Top

Transportation

Published in:

12-11-2019

Validation of a unidimensional and probabilistic measurement scale for pro-environmental behaviour by travellers

Authors: Jean-Baptiste Gaborieau, Cristina Pronello

Published in: Transportation | Issue 2/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

In the current debate, ecological themes have become a key element that can influence public policy, as recent events involving green activist groups have shown. Public policies targeted to education, along with focused advertising, can strongly influence people’s beliefs and their emotional reactions. Understanding individual behavioural responses is therefore of the utmost importance for policy makers wishing to encourage more sustainable mobility. They could be greatly assisted by an effective measure of ecological behaviour giving them a better understanding of the determinants of travel behaviour, enabling them to analyse the impact of adopted policies. Ideally, such a measure should be simple to use, and it should be usable across different cultural and geographical contexts so as to allow comparisons between different countries. This paper seeks to determine whether the General Ecological Behaviour (GEB) questionnaire—as a dichotomous multi-items Rasch scale for ecological behaviour measurement—is valid for use in a different cultural context. We refer to the relevant literature, and we describe our approach in detail so that it may easily be adopted by interested practitioners. The research was done in the metropolitan area of Torino (Italy), where a multimodal real-time smartphone application to assist travellers and encourage them towards more sustainable mobility was being developed and trialled. Within this framework, an investigation was done into the pro-environmental behaviour of the participants in the app trial. Our aim was to determine whether a general pro-environmental attitude can legitimately be assessed using Item Response Theory and, notably, the Rasch model. Results suggest that, using an Item Response Theory model, GEB is a questionnaire that is able to effectively measure pro-environmental behaviour by travellers. There are no discrepancies between pro-social behaviour (a trait that is known to correlate with environmentally friendly attitudes and that the GEB questionnaire seeks to measure) and actual environmentally friendly behaviour; one-dimensionality, item reliability, and the absence of simple differential item functioning are all good indicators of a model that functions well. GEB has shown its potential in providing an understanding of people’s attitudes towards environmental issues and of how this information might be used to better tailor public policies in a number of sectors, in particular transport.

previous article Cascading failure analysis and robustness optimization of metro networks based on coupled map lattices: a case study of Nanjing, China

next article Opening out and closing down: the treatment of uncertainty in transport planning’s forecasting paradigm

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

http://www.winsteps.com.

A Guttman scale (Guttman 1950) is a deterministic version of the Rasch scale. In a Guttman scale, if the items are ranked by difficulty, the following will be true: (1) if a given answer is correct, then all easier answers are also correct and (2) if a given answer is incorrect, then all more difficult answers are also incorrect. Thus, knowing the last correct answer provides all information needed to know the answers to other items and the ability of the respondent in relation to the trait measured by the scale.

http://dati.istat.it.

Ajzen, I.: Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Dorsey Press, Chicago (1988)

Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)

Andersen, E.B.: A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika 38(1), 123–140 (1973)

Andrich, D.: Controversy and the Rasch model: a characteristic of incompatible paradigms? Med. Care 42, I7–I16 (2004)

Arnold, O., Kibbe, A., Hartig, T., Kaiser, F.G.: Capturing the environmental impact of individual lifestyles: evidence of the criterion validity of the general ecological behavior scale. Environ. Behav. 50(3), 350–372 (2018)

Axelrod, L.J., Lehman, D.R.: Responding to environmental concerns: what factors guide individual action? J. Environ. Psychol. 13(2), 149–159 (1993)

Bamberg, S., Möser, G.: Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol. 27(1), 14–25 (2007)

Bond, T.G., Fox, C.M.: Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. Psychology Press, London (2013)

Borsboom, D., Scholten, A.: The Rasch model and conjoint measurement theory from the perspective of psychometrics. Theory Psychol. 18, 111–117 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354307086925CrossRef

Campbell, D.T.: Social attitudes and other acquired behavioral dispositions. In: Koch, S. (ed.) Psychology: A Study of a Science. Investigations of Man as Socius: Their Place in Psychology and the Social Sciences, vol. 6, pp. 94–172. McGraw-Hill, New York (1963)

Christensen, K.B., Bjorner, J.B., Kreiner, S., Petersen, J.H.: Testing unidimensionality in polytomous Rasch models. Psychometrika 67(4), 563–574 (2002)

Corral-Verdugo, V.: Dual ‘realities’ of conservation behaviour: self-reports vs observations of re-use and recycling behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 17(2), 135–145 (1997)

Embretson, S.E.: Item response theory models and inferential bias in multiple group comparisons. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 20, 201–212 (1996)

European Commission: The Attitudes of European Citizens Towards Environment. Special Eurobarometer 217/Wave 62.1 TNS Opinion & Social (2005)

Fejer, S: Aspekte zur Änderbarkeit von Verbraucherver-halten durch Social-Marketing-Eine empirische Analyse eines konkreten Beispiels [Some Aspects of Consumerism Modification by Social-Marketing—An Empirical Analysis of a Real Life Example]. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany (1989)

Fejer, S., Stroschein, F.R.: “Die Ableitung einer Guttman-Skala für sozial-und ökologiebewußtes Verhalten”, planung und analyse. Heft 1, 5–12 (1991)

Fisher, W.P.: Physical disability construct convergence across instruments: towards a universal mentric. J. Outcome Meas. 1(2), 87–113 (1997)

Fuj, E.T., Hennessy, M., Mak, J.: An evaluation of the validity and reliability of survey response data on household electricity conservation. Eval. Rev. 9(1), 93–104 (1985)

Gaborieau, J.B.: Evaluation of the potential modal shift induced by the use of a real time multimodal navigator: psycho-social study of travel behaviour and attitude. Doctoral dissertation, Politecnico di Torino (2016). https://iris.polito.it/. Accessed June 2019

Gamba, R.J., Oskamp, S.: Factors influencing community residents’ participation in commingled curbside recycling programs. Environ. Behav. 26(5), 587–612 (1994)

Gärling, T., Fujii, S., Gärling, A., Jakobsson, C.: Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of proenvironmental behaviour intention. J. Environ. Psychol. 23(1), 1–9 (2003)

Green-Demers, I., Pelletier, L.G., Menard, S.: The impact of behavioural difficulty on the saliency of the association between self-determined motivation and environmental behaviours. Can. J. Behav. Sci./Rev. Can. Sci. Comport. 29(3), 157 (1997)

Guttman, L.A.: The basis for scalogram analysis. In: Stouffer, S. (ed.) Measurement and Prediction, vol. 4, pp. 60–90. Wiley, New York (1950)

Harland, P., Staats, H., Wilke, H.A.: Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 29(12), 2505–2528 (1999)

Haustein, S., Nielsen, T.A.S.: European mobility cultures: a survey-based cluster analysis across 28 European countries. J. Transp. Geogr. 54, 173–180 (2016)

Heimlich, J.E., Ardoin, N.M.: Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: a literature review. Environ. Educ. Res. 14(3), 215–237 (2008)

Hirst, E., Goeltz, R.: Evaluation of residential energy conservation programs in Minnesota. Eval. Rev. 9(3), 329–347 (1985)

Hunecke, M., Haustein, S., Grischkat, S., Böhler, S.: Psychological, sociodemographic, and infrastructural factors as determinants of ecological impact caused by mobility behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 27, 277–292 (2007)

Hunecke, M., Haustein, S., Böhler, S., Grischkat, S.: Attitude-based target groups to reduce the ecological impact of daily mobility behavior. Environ. Behav. 42(1), 3–43 (2010)

Jaspen, N.: Serial correlation. Psychometrika 11(1), 23–30 (1946)

Kaiser, F.G.: A general measure of ecological behavior 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28(5), 395–422 (1998)

Kaiser, F.G., Biel, A.: Assessing general ecological behaviour: a cross-cultural comparison between Switzerland and Sweden. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 16(1), 44 (2000)

Kaiser, F.G., Byrka, K.: The Campbell paradigm as a conceptual alternative to the expectation of hypocrisy in contemporary attitude research. J. Soc. Psychol. 155(1), 12–29 (2015)

Kaiser, F.G., Wilson, M.: Assessing people’s general ecological behavior: a cross-cultural measure 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 30(5), 952–978 (2000)

Kaiser, F.G., Doka, G., Hofstetter, P., Ranney, M.A.: Ecological behavior and its environmental consequences: a life cycle assessment of a self-report measure. J. Environ. Psychol. 23(1), 11–20 (2003)

Kaiser, F.G., Oerke, B., Bogner, F.X.: Behavior-based environmental attitude: development of an instrument for adolescents. J. Environ. Psychol. 27(3), 242–251 (2007)

Kaiser, F.G., Byrka, K., Hartig, T.: Reviving Campbell’s paradigm for attitude research. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 14(4), 351–367 (2010)

Kaiser, F.G., Brügger, A., Hartig, T., Bogner, F.X., Gutscher, H.: Appreciation of nature and appreciation of environmental protection: how stable are these attitudes and which comes first? Eur. Rev. Appl. Psychol./Rev. Eur. Psychol. Appl. 64, 269–277 (2014)

Karabatsos, G.: A critique of Rasch residual fit statistics. J. Appl. Meas. 1(2), 152–176 (2000)

Karabatsos, G.: The Rasch model, additive conjoint measurement, and new models of probabilistic measurement theory. J. Appl. Meas. 2(4), 389–423 (2001)

Koller, I., Hatzinger, R.: Nonparametric tests for the Rasch model: explanation, development, and application of quasi-exact tests for small samples. Interstat 11, 1–16 (2013)

Korfiatis, K.J., Hovardas, T., Pantis, J.D.: Determinants of environmental behavior in societies in transition: evidence from five European countries. Popul. Environ. 25(6), 563–584 (2004)

Kroesen, M., Chorus, C.: The role of general and specific attitudes in predicting travel behavior—a fatal dilemma? Travel Behav. Soc. 10, 33–41 (2018)

Kuder, G.F., Richardson, M.W.: The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika 2(3), 151–160 (1937)

Leonard-Barton, D.: Voluntary simplicity lifestyles and energy conservation. J. Consum. Res. 8(3), 243–252 (1981)

Linacre, J.M.: PROX with missing data, or known item or person measures. Rasch Meas Trans 8(3), 378 (1994a)

Linacre, J.: Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Meas. Trans. 7, 328 (1994b)

Linacre, J.M.:WINSTEPS Rasch measurement [Computer software]. winsteps.com, Chicago (2005)

Linacre, J.M.: Misfit diagnosis: Infit outfit mean-square standardized. Help for Winsteps Rasch Measurement Software (2006)

Linacre, J.M.: The expected value of a point-biserial (or similar) correlation. Rasch Meas. Trans. 22(1), 1154 (2008)

Lord, F.M.: Small N justifies Rasch model. In: Weiss, D.J. (ed.) New Horizons in Testing, pp. 51–61. Academic Press, Cambridge (1983)

Magno, C.: Demonstrating the difference between classical test theory and item response theory using derived test data. Int. J. Educ. Psychol. Assess. 1, 1–11 (2009)

Mair, P., Hatzinger, R.: Extended Rasch modeling: the eRm package for the application of IRT models in R. J. Stat. Softw. 20(9), 1–20 (2007a)

Mair, P., Hatzinger, R.: CML based estimation of extended Rasch model with the eRm packahe in R. Psychol. Sci. 49(1), 26–43 (2007b)

Mair, P., Hatzinger, R., and Maier M.J.: eRm: Extended Rasch Modeling 0.16-2 (2018). http://erm.r-forge.r-project.org/. Accessed June 2019

Maloney, M.P., Ward, M.P.: Ecology: let’s hear from the people: an objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. Am. Psychol. 28(7), 583 (1973)

Martin-Löf, P.: Statistiska Modeller, Anteckningar från Seminarier läsåret 1969–70, utarbetade av R. Sundberg. Institutionen för matematisk statistik, Stockholms universitet, Stockholm (1970)

Olsson, U., Drasgow, F., Dorans, N.J.: The polyserial correlation coefficient. Psychometrika 47(3), 337–347 (1982)

Otto, S., Neaman, A., Richards, B., Marió, A.: Explaining the ambiguous relations between income, environmental knowledge, and environmentally significant behavior. Soc. Nat. Resour. 29, 628–632 (2016)

Otto, S., Kröhne, U., Richter, D.: The dominance of introspective measures and what this implies: the example of environmental attitude. PLoS ONE 13(2), e0192907 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192907CrossRef

Peter, J.P.: Reliability: a review of psychometric basics and recent marketing practices. J. Mark. Res. 16, 6–17 (1979)

Ponocny, I.: Nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests for the Rasch model. Psychometrika 66(3), 437–459 (2001)

Pronello, C., Camusso, C.: Travellers’ profiles definition using statistical multivariate analysis of attitudinal variables. J. Transp. Geogr. 19(6), 1294–1308 (2011)

Pronello, C., Gaborieau, J.B.: Engaging in pro-environment travel behaviour research from a psycho-social perspective: a review of behavioural variables and theories (2071–1050). Sustainability 10(7), 2412 (2018)

Ramsey, J.M.: The effects of issue investigation and action training on eighth-grade students’ environmental behavior. J. Environ. Educ. 24(3), 31–36 (1993)

Rasch, G.: Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Danish Institute for Educational Research, Copenhagen (1960)

Rasch, G.: A mathematical theory of objectivity and its consequences for model construction. In: Report from European Meeting on Statistics, Econometrics and Management Sciences, Amsterdam (1968)

Revelle, W.: An Introduction to Psychometric Theory with Applications in R (2011). http://personality-project.org/r/book/. Accessed June 2019

Schwartz, S.H.: Moral decision making and behaviour. In: Macauley, M., Berkowitz, L. (eds.) Altruism and Helping Behavior, pp. 127–141. Academic Press, New York (1970)

Seong, T.-J.: Sensitivity of marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item and ability parameters to the characteristics of the prior ability distributions. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 14(3), 299–311 (1990)

Smith, R.M., Suh, K.K.: Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates. J. Appl. Meas. 4(2), 153–163 (2003)

Smith, R.M., Schumacker, R.E., Bush, M.J.: Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the rasch model. J. Outcome Meas. 2(1), 66–78 (1998)

Smith, A.B., Rush, R., Fallowfield, L.J., Velikova, G., Sharpe, M.: Rasch fit statistics and sample size considerations for polytomous data. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 8(1), 33 (2008)

Soysal, S., Akın A.Ç. and İnal, H.: Impact of missing data on Rasch model estimations. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 1166–1177 (2016)

Steg, L., Gifford, R.: Sustainable transportation and quality of life. J. Transp. Geogr. 13(1), 59–69 (2005)

Steg, L., Sievers, I.: Cultural theory and individual perceptions of environmental risks. Environ. Behav. 32(2), 250–269 (2000)

Stern, P.C.: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues 56, 407–424 (2000)

Stone, C.A.: Recovery of marginal maximum likelihood estimates in the two-parameter logistic response model: an evaluation of MULTILOG. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 16(1), 1–16 (1992)

Triandis, H.C.: Interpersonal behavior. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Monterey (1977)

Van Liere, K.D., Dunlap, R.E.: Moral norms and environmental behavior: an application of Schwartz’s norm-activation model to yard burning 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 8(2), 174–188 (1978)

Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R.M., Van Lange, P.A.: Car versus public transportation? The role of social value orientations in a real-life social dilemma. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 25(3), 258–278 (1995)

Verhelst, N.D.: An efficient MCMC algorithm to sample binary matrices with fixed marginals. Psychometrika 73(4), 705–728 (2008)

Vining, J., Ebreo, A.: Predicting recycling behavior from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities 1. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22(20), 1580–1607 (1992)

Wang, W.C., Chen, C.T.: Item parameter recovery, standard error estimates, and fit statistics of the WINSTEPS program for the family of Rasch models. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 65(3), 376–404 (2005)

Wilson, E.B., Hilferty, M.M.: The distribution of Chi square. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 17(12), 684–688 (1931)

Wright, B.D., Douglas, G.A.: Best procedures for sample-free item analysis. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 1(2), 281–295 (1977)

Wright, M., Klÿn, B.: Environmental attitude—behaviour correlations in 21 countries. J. Empir. Gener. Market. Sci. 3, 42–60 (1998)

Wright, B., Panchapakesan, N.: A procedure for sample-free item analysis. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 29(1), 23–48 (1969)

Wright, B.D., Linacre, J.M., Gustafson, J.E., Martin-Lof, P.: Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas. Trans. 8(3), 370 (1994)

Title: Validation of a unidimensional and probabilistic measurement scale for pro-environmental behaviour by travellers
Authors: Jean-Baptiste Gaborieau
Cristina Pronello
Publication date: 12-11-2019
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Transportation / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0049-4488
Electronic ISSN: 1572-9435
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10068-w

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Accessibility in the regional CGE framework: the effects of major transport infrastructure investments in Poland

Examining the effect of life course events on modality type and the moderating influence of life stage

How does commute duration affect subjective well-being? A case study of Chinese cities

Gender differences in commuting travel in the U.S.: interactive effects of race/ethnicity and household structure

Development of alternative stochastic frontier models for estimating time-space prism vertices

Shopping trip mode choice of older adults: an application of activity space and hybrid choice models in understanding the effects of built environment and personal goals

Premium Partner