Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Review of Derivatives Research 3/2019

22-01-2019

Valuation of an option using non-parametric methods

Authors: Shu Ling Chiang, Ming Shann Tsai

Published in: Review of Derivatives Research | Issue 3/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper provides a general valuation model to fairly price a European option using parametric and non-parametric methods. In particular, we show how to use the historical simulation (HS) method, a well-known non-parametric statistical method applied in the financial area, to price an option. The advantage of the HS method is that one can directly obtain the distribution of stock returns from historical market data. Thus, it not only does a good job in capturing any characteristics of the return distribution, such as clustering and fat tails, but it also eliminates the model errors created by mis-specifying the distribution of underlying assets. To solve the problem of measuring transformation in valuing options, we use the Esscher’s transform to convert the physical probability measure to the forward probability measure. Taiwanese put and call options are used to illustrate the application of this method. To clearly show which model prices stock options most accurately, we compare the pricing errors from the HS method with those from the Black–Scholes (BS) model. The results show that the HS model is more accurate than the BS model, regardless for call or put options. More importantly, because there is no complex mathematical theory underlying the HS method, it can easily be applied in practice and help market participants manage complicated portfolios effectively.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The forward measure is also a risk-neutral one.
 
2
Every distribution that has a moment-generating function is a member of a natural exponential family. Using such distributions simplifies the theory and computation of generalized linear models. Retrieved from https://​en.​wikipedia.​org/​wiki/​Natural_​exponential_​family.
 
3
When the option is valued under the forward measure, we use the \( B(t,T) \) as the numeraire asset. In this case, the stock volatility can be expressed as \( v(t,T) \). The formula of \( v(t,T) \) is shown in Eq. (11).
 
4
TEJ is a well-known databank containing financial information on Taiwan.
 
5
We removed options with price less than 3 because such options are illiquid and quoting them would be unlikely to provide any useful information. Doing so also reduces the effect of price discreteness on options valuation.
 
6
Many traditional studies show that close to the maturity date, options may induce biases in valuation due to their low-time premiums and bid-ask spreads (Guidolina and Timmermann 2003; Nan et al. 2006; Kim and Lee 2013; Chena and Xu 2014). These studies generally excluded options that are 6–8 days from maturity. We also deleted the data for options less than 7 days from maturity.
 
7
The DF (Dickey–Fuller) and ADF (Augmented Dickey–Fuller) values for the stock returns in the random walk model are − 2.788 and − 3.046, respectively. They are all significant at the 1% level. These results show that the returns data are stationary.
 
8
We have (107.608 − 172.584)/172.584 = − 37.65% and (78.680 − 126.015)/126.015 = − 37.56%.
 
Literature
go back to reference Amin, K. I. (1993). Jump diffusion option valuation in discrete time. Journal of Finance, 48, 1833–1863.CrossRef Amin, K. I. (1993). Jump diffusion option valuation in discrete time. Journal of Finance, 48, 1833–1863.CrossRef
go back to reference Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E. (1999). Superposition of Ornstein–Uhlenbexk type processes. Theory Probability Application, 45, 175–194.CrossRef Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E. (1999). Superposition of Ornstein–Uhlenbexk type processes. Theory Probability Application, 45, 175–194.CrossRef
go back to reference Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., Nicolato, E., & Shephard, N. (2002). Some recent developments in stochastic volatility modelling. Quantitative Finance, 2, 11–23.CrossRef Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., Nicolato, E., & Shephard, N. (2002). Some recent developments in stochastic volatility modelling. Quantitative Finance, 2, 11–23.CrossRef
go back to reference Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., & Shephard, N. (2001). Non-Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck-based models and some of their uses in financial economics. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 63, 167–241.CrossRef Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E., & Shephard, N. (2001). Non-Gaussian Ornstein–Uhlenbeck-based models and some of their uses in financial economics. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 63, 167–241.CrossRef
go back to reference Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637–659.CrossRef Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637–659.CrossRef
go back to reference Cao, M., & Wei, J. (1999). Pricing weather derivative: An equilibrium approach. Working paper. Cao, M., & Wei, J. (1999). Pricing weather derivative: An equilibrium approach. Working paper.
go back to reference Carr, P., Geman, H., Madan, D. B., & Yor, M. (2003). Stochastic volatility for Lévy processes. Mathematical Finance, 13(3), 345–382.CrossRef Carr, P., Geman, H., Madan, D. B., & Yor, M. (2003). Stochastic volatility for Lévy processes. Mathematical Finance, 13(3), 345–382.CrossRef
go back to reference Chan, T. (1999). Pricing contingent claims on stocks driven by Lévy processes. The Annals of Applied Probability, 9(2), 504–528.CrossRef Chan, T. (1999). Pricing contingent claims on stocks driven by Lévy processes. The Annals of Applied Probability, 9(2), 504–528.CrossRef
go back to reference Chena, S. X., & Xu, Z. (2014). On implied volatility for options—Some reasons to smile and more to correct. Journal of Econometrics, 179, 1–15.CrossRef Chena, S. X., & Xu, Z. (2014). On implied volatility for options—Some reasons to smile and more to correct. Journal of Econometrics, 179, 1–15.CrossRef
go back to reference Choi, P., & Nam, K. (2008). Asymmetric and leptokurtic distribution for heteroscedastic asset returns: The S U-normal distribution. Journal of Empirical Finance, 15(1), 41–63.CrossRef Choi, P., & Nam, K. (2008). Asymmetric and leptokurtic distribution for heteroscedastic asset returns: The S U-normal distribution. Journal of Empirical Finance, 15(1), 41–63.CrossRef
go back to reference Christensen, B. J., & Prabhala, N. R. (1998). The relation between implied and realized volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 50, 125–150.CrossRef Christensen, B. J., & Prabhala, N. R. (1998). The relation between implied and realized volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 50, 125–150.CrossRef
go back to reference Cont, R. (2001). Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues. Quantitive Finance, 1, 223–236.CrossRef Cont, R. (2001). Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues. Quantitive Finance, 1, 223–236.CrossRef
go back to reference Davis, M. H. A. (1998). A note on the forward measure. Finance Stochastic, 2(1), 19–28.CrossRef Davis, M. H. A. (1998). A note on the forward measure. Finance Stochastic, 2(1), 19–28.CrossRef
go back to reference Eberlein, E., & Papapantoleon, A. (2005). Symmetries and pricing of exotic options in Lévy models. In A. Kyprianou, W. Schoutens, & P. Wilmott (Eds.), Exotic option pricing and advanced Lévy models (pp. 99–128). New York: Wiley. Eberlein, E., & Papapantoleon, A. (2005). Symmetries and pricing of exotic options in Lévy models. In A. Kyprianou, W. Schoutens, & P. Wilmott (Eds.), Exotic option pricing and advanced Lévy models (pp. 99–128). New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Fama, H. (1965). The behavior of stock market prices. Journal of Business, 38, 34–105.CrossRef Fama, H. (1965). The behavior of stock market prices. Journal of Business, 38, 34–105.CrossRef
go back to reference Gerber, H. U., & Shiu, E. S. W. (1994). Option pricing by Esscher transforms. Transactions of Society of Actuaries, 46, 99–191. Gerber, H. U., & Shiu, E. S. W. (1994). Option pricing by Esscher transforms. Transactions of Society of Actuaries, 46, 99–191.
go back to reference Gerber, H. U., & Shiu, E. S. W. (1996). Actuarial bridges to dynamic hedging and option pricing. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 18, 183–218. Gerber, H. U., & Shiu, E. S. W. (1996). Actuarial bridges to dynamic hedging and option pricing. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 18, 183–218.
go back to reference Guidolina, M., & Timmermann, A. (2003). Option prices under Bayesian learning: Implied volatility dynamics and predictive densities. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 27, 717–769.CrossRef Guidolina, M., & Timmermann, A. (2003). Option prices under Bayesian learning: Implied volatility dynamics and predictive densities. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 27, 717–769.CrossRef
go back to reference Hunter, R. (1999). Managing mother nature. Derivatives Strategy, 4(2), 15–19. Hunter, R. (1999). Managing mother nature. Derivatives Strategy, 4(2), 15–19.
go back to reference Jorion, P. (1988). On jump processes in the foreign exchange and stock markets. The Review of Financial Studies, 1, 427–445.CrossRef Jorion, P. (1988). On jump processes in the foreign exchange and stock markets. The Review of Financial Studies, 1, 427–445.CrossRef
go back to reference Jorion, P. (2000). Value at risk, the new benchmark for managing financial risk. New York: McGraw-Hill. Jorion, P. (2000). Value at risk, the new benchmark for managing financial risk. New York: McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Kim, N., & Lee, J. (2013). No-arbitrage implied volatility functions: Empirical evidence from KOSPI 200 index options. Journal of Empirical Finance, 21, 36–53.CrossRef Kim, N., & Lee, J. (2013). No-arbitrage implied volatility functions: Empirical evidence from KOSPI 200 index options. Journal of Empirical Finance, 21, 36–53.CrossRef
go back to reference Kou, S. G. (2002). A jump-diffusion model for option pricing. Management Science, 48, 1086–1101.CrossRef Kou, S. G. (2002). A jump-diffusion model for option pricing. Management Science, 48, 1086–1101.CrossRef
go back to reference Merton, R. C. (1976). Option pricing when the underlying stock returns are discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 125–144.CrossRef Merton, R. C. (1976). Option pricing when the underlying stock returns are discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 125–144.CrossRef
go back to reference Musiela, M., & Rutkowski, M. (2002). Martingale methods in financial modelling. Berlin: Springer. Musiela, M., & Rutkowski, M. (2002). Martingale methods in financial modelling. Berlin: Springer.
go back to reference Nan, S. O., Oh, S. Y., Kim, H. K., & Kim, B. C. (2006). An empirical analysis of the price discovery and the pricing bias in the KOSPI 200 stock index derivatives markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 15, 398–414.CrossRef Nan, S. O., Oh, S. Y., Kim, H. K., & Kim, B. C. (2006). An empirical analysis of the price discovery and the pricing bias in the KOSPI 200 stock index derivatives markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 15, 398–414.CrossRef
go back to reference Rubinstein, M. (1998). Edgeworth binomial trees. Journal of Derivatives, 5, 20–27.CrossRef Rubinstein, M. (1998). Edgeworth binomial trees. Journal of Derivatives, 5, 20–27.CrossRef
go back to reference Schoutens, W. (2003). Lévy processes in finance—Pricing financial derivatives. New York: Wiley.CrossRef Schoutens, W. (2003). Lévy processes in finance—Pricing financial derivatives. New York: Wiley.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Valuation of an option using non-parametric methods
Authors
Shu Ling Chiang
Ming Shann Tsai
Publication date
22-01-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Review of Derivatives Research / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1380-6645
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7144
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-018-09153-6