Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Business Ethics
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics 2/2021

18-01-2020 | Original Paper

Virtue Beyond Contract: A MacIntyrean Approach to Employee Rights

Author: Caleb Bernacchio

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 2/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Rights claims are ubiquitous in modernity. Often expressed when relatively weaker agents assert claims against more powerful actors, especially against states and corporations, the prominence of rights claims in organizational contexts creates a challenge for virtue-based approaches to business ethics, especially perspectives employing MacIntyre’s practices–institutions schema since MacIntyre has long been a vocal critic of the notion of human rights. In this article, I argue that employee rights can be understood at a basic level as rights conferred by the rules constitutive of practices. As such, employee rights correspond to the obligations of practitioners to treat fellow practitioners according to the standards of excellence and requirements of justice. Thus, one way that managers can ensure that their core practice is well-functioning is to recognize employee rights. One implication of this argument is that managers should adopt a more positive stance toward labor unions, insofar as they are a key way for employees to ensure that their voice is heard, and their rights respected.
previous article Popular Culture, Moral Narratives and Organizational Portrayals: A Multimodal Reflexive Analysis of a Reality Television Show
next article Organizational Spirituality: Concept and Perspectives

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
Research suggests that many criminal organizations, such as the mafia, where any notion of a good purpose seems to be lacking, are actually ethically ambivalent, often fulfilling important social functions, contributing in a distorted manner to the common good, while also unjustly exploiting others (Hagedorn 2008; Kilcullen 2010, 2015). This is not to say that criminal organizations are practices but it does suggest that most organizations, especially lawful corporations, present a rather mixed picture, contributing to the common good, while also engaging in forms of injustice. Though clearly some organizations, such as concentration camps lack any sort of direction to the common good. As Moore (2017, p. 146) says, “The conclusion we have reached, therefore, is a rather nuanced one. Not everything is a practice; some activities are excluded because they do not have internal goods which serve the common good (concentration camps, for example). Some activities clearly are practices even if, sometimes, they stand in need of moral criticism (chess, medicine, architecture, for example). And some activities may have been practices in the past, or could have the potential to be practices in the future, but institutional corruption and acquisitiveness is such that there is barely any evidence of practice-like features (banking, for example). But in the latter case, it may yet be possible to redeem these activities so that they, at least, begin to exhibit practice-like features.”
 
Literature
Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61–89.
Anderson, E. (2017). Private government: How employers rule our lives (and why we don't talk about it). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Aquinas, T. (1981). Summa theologiae. New York: Christian Classics.
Aristotle. (1999). The Nichomachean ethics. In T. Irwin (Ed.), Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company Inc.
Arnold, D. G., & Bowie, N. E. (2003). Sweatshops and respect for persons. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 221–242.
Arnold, D. G., & Bowie, N. E. (2007). Respect for workers in global supply chains: Advancing the debate over sweatshops. Business Ethics Quarterly, 17(1), 135–145.
Barnard, C. (1971). The functions of the executive: 30th (anniversary ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Beabout, G. (2012). Management as a domain-relative practice that requires and develops practical wisdom. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 405–432.
Beadle, R. (2008). Why business cannot be a practice. Analyse & Kritik, 30(1), 229–241.
Beadle, R. (2013). Managerial work in a practice-embodying institution: The role of calling, the virtue of constancy. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 679–690.
Beadle, R. (2017). MacIntyre's influence on business ethics. In A. Sison, G. Beabout, & I. Ferrero (Eds.), Handbook of virtue ethics in business and management (pp. 1–9). New York: Springer.
Beadle, R., & Moore, G. (2006). MacIntyre on virtue and organization. Organization Studies, 27(3), 323–340.
Beadle, R., & Knight, K. (2012). Virtue and meaningful work. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 433–450.
Bernacchio, C. (2015). Rival versions of corporate governance as rival theories of agency. Philosophy of Management, 14(1), 67–76.
Bernacchio, C. (2018a). Networks of giving and receiving in an organizational context: Dependent Rational Animals and MacIntyrean business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 28(4), 377–400.
Bernacchio, C. (2018b). Agency, desires, and changing organizational routines. Philosophy of Management, 17(3), 279–301.
Blackledge, P. (2012). Marxism and ethics: Freedom, desire, and revolution. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Bowie, N. (2015). Richard De George and the use of ethical theory in applied ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(4), 699–706.
Burton, B. K., & Dunn, C. P. (1996). Collaborative control and the commons: Safeguarding employee rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6, 277–288.
Cyert, R., & March, J. (2013). A behavioral theory of the firm. Eastford, CT: Martino Fine Books.
Des Jardins, J. R., & McCall, J. J. (1985). A defense of employee rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(5), 367–376.
Donaldson, T. (2015). Where the facts end: Richard De George and the rise of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics., 127(4), 783–787.
Duarte d'Almeida, L. (2016). Fundamental legal concepts: the Hohfeldian framework. Philosophy Compass, 11(10), 554–569.
Dworkin, G. (1978). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ferrero, I., & Sison, A. J. G. (2014). A quantitative analysis of authors, schools and themes in virtue ethics articles in business ethics and management journals (1980–2011). Business Ethics European Review, 23, 375–400.
Fontrodona, J., & Sison, A. (2006). The nature of the firm, agency theory and shareholder theory: A critique from philosophical anthropology. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 33–42.
Foss, N., & Lindenberg, S. (2013). Microfoundations for strategy: A goal-framing perspective on the drivers of value creation. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 85–102.
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.
Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47.
Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for mortals: How people cope with uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greenhouse, S. (2019). The autoworkers strike is bigger than G.M. The New York Times, September 17.
Gregory, B. (2012). The unintended reformation how a religious revolution secularized society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Haase, M. (2014). Am i you? Philosophical Explorations, 17(3), 358–371.
Hagedorn, J. (2008). A world of gangs: Armed young men and gangsta culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Hartman, E. M. (1996). Organizational ethics and the good life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hartman, E. M. (2013). Virtue in business: Conversations with Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herzog, L. (2018). Reclaiming the system: Moral responsibility, divided labour, and the role of organizations in society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hohfeld, W. N. (1913). Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. The Yale Law Journal, 23(1), 16–59.
Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Kilcullen, D. (2010). Counterinsurgency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kilcullen, D. (2015). Out of the mountains: The coming age of the urban guerrilla. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knight, K. (2008). Goods. Philosophy of Management, 7(1), 107–122.
Knight, K. (2018). A radical’s critique of rights. Politics & Poetics., 4, 1–24.
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518.
Kolodny, N., & Wallace, R. J. (2003). Promises and practices revisited. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31(2), 119–154.
Laitien, A. 2015. Practices as actual sources of goodness of action. Philosophy and Public Issues (New Series), Supplementary Volume: 57–70.
Lindenberg, S., & Foss, N. J. (2011). Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal framing and governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 500–525.
MacIntyre, A. (1983). Are there any natural rights?. Brunswick: Bowdoin College.
MacIntyre, A. (1994a). How can we learn what Veritatis Splendor has to teach? The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 58(2), 171–195.
MacIntyre, A. (1994b). A partial response to my critics. In J. Horton & S. Mendus (Eds.), After MacIntyre (pp. 283–304). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. (2000). The recovery of moral agency. In J. Wilson (Ed.), The best christian writing 2000 (pp. 111–136). London: HarperCollins.
MacIntyre, A. (2004). Questions for Confucians: Reflections on the essays in comparative study of self, autonomy, and community. In K. Shun & D. B. Wong (Eds.), Confucian ethics: A comparative study of self, autonomy, and community (pp. 203–218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
MacIntyre, A. (2016). Ethics in the conflicts of modernity: An essay on desire, practical reasoning, and narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacIntyre, A., & Dunne, J. (2002). Alasdair MacIntyre on education: In dialogue with Joseph Dunne. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36(1), 1–19.
March, J., & Simon, H. (1997). Organizations (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Marchington, M., & Wilkinson, A. (2005). Direct participation and involvement. In S. Bach (Ed.), Managing human resources: Personnel management in transition (pp. 398–423). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Mayer, C. (2013). Firm commitment: Why the corporation is failing us and how to restore trust in it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCall, J. J. (2001). Employee voice in corporate governance: A defense of strong participation rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11, 195–213.
Melé, D. (2012). The firm as a “community of persons”: A pillar of humanistic business ethos. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 89–101.
Moore, G. (2005a). Humanizing business: A modern virtues ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(2), 237–255.
Moore, G. (2005b). Corporate character: Modern virtue ethics and the virtuous corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4), 659–685.
Moore, G. (2008). Re-imagining the morality of management: A modern virtue ethics approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 483–511.
Moore, G. (2012a). Virtue in business: Alliance Boots and an empirical exploration of MacIntyre’s conceptual framework. Organization Studies, 33(3), 363–387.
Moore, G. (2012b). The virtue of governance, the governance of virtue. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 293–318.
Moore, G. (2017). Virtue at work: Ethics for individuals, managers, and organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moore, G., & Beadle, R. (2006). In search of organizational virtue in business: Agents, goods, practices, and environments. Organization Studies, 27(3), 369–389.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York, NY: Basic Books Inc.
Otteson, J. (2019). Honorable business: A framework for business in a just and humane society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paár, T. (2018). Whose Aristotelianism? MacIntyre, neoaristotelianism, and morality. Politics & Poetics, 4, 1–21.
Radin, T. J., & Werhane, P. H. (2003). Employment-at-will, employee rights, and future directions for employment. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 113–130.
Rawls, J. (1955). Two concepts of rules. The Philosophical Review, 64(1), 3–32.
Robson, A. (2015). Constancy and integrity:(un) measurable virtues? Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(S2), S115–S129.
Rosanas, J. M., & Velilla, M. (2003). Loyalty and trust in the ethical bases of organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 49–59.
Sanz, P., & Fontrodona, J. (2019). Moderation as a moral competence: Integrating perspectives for a better understanding of temperance in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(4), 981–994.
Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Selznick, P. (2011). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. New Orleans, LA: Quid Pro Books.
Simon, H. (1997). Administrative behavior (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
Sinnicks, M. (2014). Practices, governance, and politics: Applying MacIntyre's ethics to business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(2), 229–249.
Sinnicks, M. (2018). The just world fallacy as a challenge to the business-as-community Thesis. Business & Society, 0007650318759486.
Sinnicks, M. (2019). Moral education at work: On the scope of MacIntyre’s concept of a practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(1), 105–118.
Sison, A. J. G. (2018). Virtue ethics and natural law responses to human rights quandaries in business. Business and Human Rights Journal, 3(2), 211–232.
Sison, A. J. G., Ferrero, I., & Guitián, G. (2016). Human dignity and the dignity of work: Insights from Catholic social teaching. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(4), 503–528.
Sison, A. J. G., & Fontrodona, J. (2012). The common good of the firm in the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 211–246.
Solomon, R. C. (1992). Corporate roles, personal virtues: An Aristotelian approach to business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(3), 317–339.
Solomon, R. C. (1993). Ethics and excellence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, C. (1994). Justice after virtue. In J. Horton & S. Mendus (Eds.), After MacIntyre (pp. 16–43). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Thompson, M. (2004). What is it to wrong someone? A puzzle about justice. In R. J. Wallace, P. Pettit, S. Scheffler & M. Smith (Eds.), Reason and value: Themes from the moral philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, M. (2008). Life and action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tsoukas, H. (2018a). Strategy and virtue: Developing strategy-as-practice through virtue ethics. Strategic Organization, 16(3), 323–351.
Tsoukas, H. (2018b). Praxis, character, and competence: From a behavioral to a communitarian view of the firm. In M. Augier, C. Fang, & V. P. Rindova (Eds.), Behavioral strategy in perspective (pp. 181–194). Bingley, West Yorkshire, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Tsoukas, H., & Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is organizational knowledge? Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 973–993.
Upton, H. (2000). Right-based morality and Hohfeld's relations. The Journal of Ethics, 4(3), 237–256.
Weber, M., 1947. The theory of economic and social organization. (A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.. New York: Oxford University Press.
Werhane, P., Radin, T. J., & Bowie, N. E. (2004). Employment and employee rights. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
West, A. (2018). After virtue and accounting ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(1), 21–36.
Wilkinson, A., Gollan, P. J., Marchington, M., & Lewin, D. (2010). Conceptualizing employee participation in organizations. In A. Wilkinson, P. J. Gollan, M. Marchington, & D. Lewin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of participation in organizations (pp. 3–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1973). Markets and hierarchies: Some elementary considerations. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 316–325.
Yeoman, R. (2014). Conceptualising meaningful work as a fundamental human need. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2), 235–251.
Metadata
Title
Virtue Beyond Contract: A MacIntyrean Approach to Employee Rights
Author
Caleb Bernacchio
Publication date
18-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04435-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Journal of Business Ethics 2/2021 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Pay Secrecy, Discrimination, and Autonomy

Original Paper

Religious But Not Ethical: The Effects of Extrinsic Religiosity, Ethnocentrism and Self-righteousness on Consumers’ Ethical Judgments

Original Paper

Unexpected Lives: The Intersection of Islam and Arab Women’s Entrepreneurship

Original Paper

How Pro-social Framing Affects the Success of Crowdfunding Projects: The Role of Emphasis and Information Crowdedness

Original Paper

Punishment by Securities Regulators, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Cost of Debt

Original Paper

How Do Companies Respond to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy