Skip to main content
Top

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

10. Waste Technological Dynamics and Policy Effects: Evidence from OECD Patent Data

Author : Francesco Nicolli

Published in: The Dynamics of Environmental and Economic Systems

Publisher: Springer Netherlands

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter examines the effect of environmental policies on technological change, in the field of waste management. This study is conducted using patent data on 28 OECD countries over the period 1980–2005 and considers five different technological fields related to the waste sector. Even though the analysis confirms that policies actually played a positive, significant role in promoting the development of green innovations, this effect is highly non-linear and strongly depends on time. As previous works have highlighted, the technological maturity of the sector, especially if compared with other areas of environmental innovation such as renewables, is reflected in a decreasing effect of policies on innovation trends. If a first wave of policies, which dates back to the 1990s, was able to promote technological change, this effect is now less evident. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to conclude that if no policy efforts had been introduced, the slowdown in the trend of patenting in waste-related sectors would have been even more pronounced.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
OECDStatExtract, available at http://​stats.​oecd.​org
 
2
EIONET is a partnership agency of the EEA and its member countries; it is fundamental to the collection and organisation of data for the EEA. See www.​eionet.​net
 
3
Ambec, S., Cohen, M. K., Elgie, S., Lanoie, P., (2011). The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness. Paper presented at Montreal, 2010 EAERE conference
 
4
In the text, only negative binomial results are reported, but Poisson estimations generally confirm the presented results.
 
5
EIONET is a partnership agency of the EEA and its member countries; it is fundamental to the collection and organisation of data for the EEA.
 
6
Source EIONET, UK Fact Sheet
 
Literature
go back to reference Alpay, E., Buccola, S., & Kerkvliet, J. (2002). Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and U.S. food manufacturing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(4), 887–901.CrossRef Alpay, E., Buccola, S., & Kerkvliet, J. (2002). Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and U.S. food manufacturing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(4), 887–901.CrossRef
go back to reference Ambec, S., & Barla, P. (2002). A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis. Economics Letters, 75(3), 355–60.CrossRef Ambec, S., & Barla, P. (2002). A theoretical foundation of the Porter hypothesis. Economics Letters, 75(3), 355–60.CrossRef
go back to reference Ambec, S., & Barla, P. (2007). Quand la réglementation environnementale profite aux pollueurs. Survol des fondements théoriques de l’Hypothèse de Porter. L’Actualité économique, 83(3), 399–414.CrossRef Ambec, S., & Barla, P. (2007). Quand la réglementation environnementale profite aux pollueurs. Survol des fondements théoriques de l’Hypothèse de Porter. L’Actualité économique, 83(3), 399–414.CrossRef
go back to reference Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2011). The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? (Resources for the Future Discussion Paper No. 11–01). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1754674 Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2011). The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? (Resources for the Future Discussion Paper No. 11–01). Available at SSRN: http://​ssrn.​com/​abstract=​1754674
go back to reference Berman, E., & Bui, L. T. M. (2001). Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), 498–510.CrossRef Berman, E., & Bui, L. T. M. (2001). Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), 498–510.CrossRef
go back to reference Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 278–293.CrossRef Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 278–293.CrossRef
go back to reference Cagatay, S., Mihci, H. (2003). Industrial pollution, environmental suffering and policy measures: an index of environmental sensitivity performance. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 5, 205–45. Cagatay, S., Mihci, H. (2003). Industrial pollution, environmental suffering and policy measures: an index of environmental sensitivity performance. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 5, 205–45.
go back to reference Cagatay, S., Mihci, H. (2006). Degree of environmental stringency and the impact on trade patterns. Journal of Economic Studies, 33, 30–51. Cagatay, S., Mihci, H. (2006). Degree of environmental stringency and the impact on trade patterns. Journal of Economic Studies, 33, 30–51.
go back to reference Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Choe, C., & Fraser, I. (1998). The economics of household waste management: A review. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 42(3), 269–302.CrossRef Choe, C., & Fraser, I. (1998). The economics of household waste management: A review. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 42(3), 269–302.CrossRef
go back to reference Costantini, V., & Mazzanti, M. (2012). On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy, 41, 132–153.CrossRef Costantini, V., & Mazzanti, M. (2012). On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy, 41, 132–153.CrossRef
go back to reference De Vries, F. P., & Withagen, C. (2005). Innovation and environmental stringency: The case of sulfur dioxide abatement (CentER Discussion Paper #2005-18). Tilburg: Tilburg University. De Vries, F. P., & Withagen, C. (2005). Innovation and environmental stringency: The case of sulfur dioxide abatement (CentER Discussion Paper #2005-18). Tilburg: Tilburg University.
go back to reference Dernis, H., & Kahn, M. (2004). Triadic patent families methodology (STI Working Paper 2004/2). Paris: OECD. Dernis, H., & Kahn, M. (2004). Triadic patent families methodology (STI Working Paper 2004/2). Paris: OECD.
go back to reference Dijkgraaf, E., & Vollebergh, H. (2004). Burn or bury? A social cost comparison of final waste disposal methods. Ecological Economics, 50, 233–47.CrossRef Dijkgraaf, E., & Vollebergh, H. (2004). Burn or bury? A social cost comparison of final waste disposal methods. Ecological Economics, 50, 233–47.CrossRef
go back to reference Driesen, D. (2005). Economic instruments for sustainable development. In S. Wood & B. Richardson (Eds.), Environmental law for sustainability. Oxford: Hart Publications. Driesen, D. (2005). Economic instruments for sustainable development. In S. Wood & B. Richardson (Eds.), Environmental law for sustainability. Oxford: Hart Publications.
go back to reference EEA. (2007). The road from landfilling to recycling: Common destination, different routes. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency. EEA. (2007). The road from landfilling to recycling: Common destination, different routes. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
go back to reference EEA. (2010). The European environment, state and outlook 2010, synthesis. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency. EEA. (2010). The European environment, state and outlook 2010, synthesis. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.
go back to reference Eliste, P., & Fredriksson, P. G. (1998). Does open trade result in a race to the bottom? Cross-country evidence. Washington DC: World Bank, mimeo. Eliste, P., & Fredriksson, P. G. (1998). Does open trade result in a race to the bottom? Cross-country evidence. Washington DC: World Bank, mimeo.
go back to reference Fischer, K. M., & Amann, C. (2001). Beyond IPAT and Kuznets Curves: Globalization as a vital factor in analyzing the environmental impact of socio economic metabolism. Population and the environment, 23, 7–43.CrossRef Fischer, K. M., & Amann, C. (2001). Beyond IPAT and Kuznets Curves: Globalization as a vital factor in analyzing the environmental impact of socio economic metabolism. Population and the environment, 23, 7–43.CrossRef
go back to reference Gabel, H. L., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (1998). The firm, its routines, and the environment. In H. Folmer & T. Tietenberg (Eds.), The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics 1998/1999: A survey of current issues. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Gabel, H. L., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (1998). The firm, its routines, and the environment. In H. Folmer & T. Tietenberg (Eds.), The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics 1998/1999: A survey of current issues. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
go back to reference Goddard, H. C. (1995). The benefits and costs of alternative solid waste management policies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 13, 183–213.CrossRef Goddard, H. C. (1995). The benefits and costs of alternative solid waste management policies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 13, 183–213.CrossRef
go back to reference Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.
go back to reference Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Review Economic and Statistics, 79(4), 610–619.CrossRef Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Review Economic and Statistics, 79(4), 610–619.CrossRef
go back to reference Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R., & Stavins, R. N. (1995). Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 132–163. Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R., & Stavins, R. N. (1995). Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 132–163.
go back to reference Johnstone, N., Hašcic, I., & Popp, D. (2010a). Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environmental Resource Economics, 45, 133–155.CrossRef Johnstone, N., Hašcic, I., & Popp, D. (2010a). Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: Evidence based on patent counts. Environmental Resource Economics, 45, 133–155.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnstone, N., Hašcic, I., & Kalamova, M. (2010b). Environmental policy design characteristics and technological innovation: Evidence from patent data (OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 16). Paris: OECD Publishing. Johnstone, N., Hašcic, I., & Kalamova, M. (2010b). Environmental policy design characteristics and technological innovation: Evidence from patent data (OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 16). Paris: OECD Publishing.
go back to reference Kaurosakis, K. (2006, March 24). MSW generation, disposal and recycling: A note on OECD intercountry differences. Paper presented at ENVECON 2006: Applied Environmental Economics Conference, the Royal Society, London. Kaurosakis, K. (2006, March 24). MSW generation, disposal and recycling: A note on OECD intercountry differences. Paper presented at ENVECON 2006: Applied Environmental Economics Conference, the Royal Society, London.
go back to reference Kennedy, P. (1994). Innovation stochastique et coût de la réglementation environnementale. L’ Actualité économique, 70, 199–209.CrossRef Kennedy, P. (1994). Innovation stochastique et coût de la réglementation environnementale. L’ Actualité économique, 70, 199–209.CrossRef
go back to reference Lanoie, P., Patry, M., & Lajeunesse, R. (2008). Environmental regulation and productivity: New findings on the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30, 121–128.CrossRef Lanoie, P., Patry, M., & Lajeunesse, R. (2008). Environmental regulation and productivity: New findings on the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30, 121–128.CrossRef
go back to reference Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Mazzanti, M., & Zoboli, R. (2008). Waste generation, waste disposal and environmental policy effectiveness. Evidence from the EU. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52, 1221–34.CrossRef Mazzanti, M., & Zoboli, R. (2008). Waste generation, waste disposal and environmental policy effectiveness. Evidence from the EU. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52, 1221–34.CrossRef
go back to reference Mazzanti, M., Nicolli, F., & Zoboli, R. (2009a). Waste generation and waste disposal: Evidence on socio-economic and policy drivers in the EU. In M. Mazzanti & A. Montini (Eds.), Waste and environmental policy. London: Routledge. Mazzanti, M., Nicolli, F., & Zoboli, R. (2009a). Waste generation and waste disposal: Evidence on socio-economic and policy drivers in the EU. In M. Mazzanti & A. Montini (Eds.), Waste and environmental policy. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Mazzanti, M., Montini, M., & Nicolli, F. (2012). Waste dynamics in economic and policy transitions: Decoupling, convergence and spatial effects. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(5), 563–581. doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.616582.CrossRef Mazzanti, M., Montini, M., & Nicolli, F. (2012). Waste dynamics in economic and policy transitions: Decoupling, convergence and spatial effects. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(5), 563–581. doi:10.​1080/​09640568.​2011.​616582.CrossRef
go back to reference McGuire, M. (1982). Regulation, factor rewards, and international trade. Journal of Public Economics, 17(3), 335–54.CrossRef McGuire, M. (1982). Regulation, factor rewards, and international trade. Journal of Public Economics, 17(3), 335–54.CrossRef
go back to reference Nicolli, F., & Mazzanti, M. (2011). Diverting waste: The role of innovation. In OECD (Ed.), Invention and transfer of environmental technologies (OECD Studies on Environmental innovation). Paris: OECD, Publishing. Nicolli, F., & Mazzanti, M. (2011). Diverting waste: The role of innovation. In OECD (Ed.), Invention and transfer of environmental technologies (OECD Studies on Environmental innovation). Paris: OECD, Publishing.
go back to reference Oates, E., Palmer, K., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132.CrossRef Oates, E., Palmer, K., & Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119–132.CrossRef
go back to reference Pearce, D. W. (2004). Does European Union waste policy pass a cost – Benefit test? World Economics, 15, 115–37. Pearce, D. W. (2004). Does European Union waste policy pass a cost – Benefit test? World Economics, 15, 115–37.
go back to reference Pethig, R. (1975). Pollution, welfare, and environmental policy in the theory of comparative advantage. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2, 160–69.CrossRef Pethig, R. (1975). Pollution, welfare, and environmental policy in the theory of comparative advantage. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2, 160–69.CrossRef
go back to reference Popp, D. (2003). Pollution control innovations and the clean Air Act of 1990. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(4), 641–660.CrossRef Popp, D. (2003). Pollution control innovations and the clean Air Act of 1990. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(4), 641–660.CrossRef
go back to reference Porter, M. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 168.CrossRef Porter, M. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 168.CrossRef
go back to reference Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment - Competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(4), 97–118.CrossRef Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment - Competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(4), 97–118.CrossRef
go back to reference Seppala, T., Haukioja, T., & Kaivooja, J. (2001). The EKC hypothesis does not hold for direct material flows: Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis tests for direct material flows in five industrial countries. Population & Environment, 23(2), 217–238.CrossRef Seppala, T., Haukioja, T., & Kaivooja, J. (2001). The EKC hypothesis does not hold for direct material flows: Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis tests for direct material flows in five industrial countries. Population & Environment, 23(2), 217–238.CrossRef
go back to reference Siebert, H. (1977). Environmental quality and the gains from trade. Kyklos, 30(4), 657–73.CrossRef Siebert, H. (1977). Environmental quality and the gains from trade. Kyklos, 30(4), 657–73.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Waste Technological Dynamics and Policy Effects: Evidence from OECD Patent Data
Author
Francesco Nicolli
Copyright Year
2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5089-0_10