Skip to main content
Top

2015 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Web-Systems Remote Usability Tests and Their Participant Recruitment

Authors : Piotr Chynał, Janusz Sobecki

Published in: Human-Computer Interaction: Design and Evaluation

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this paper we present a description of a proposed hybrid, remote usability testing method and a comparison of different approaches to participant recruitment for the test conducted according to this usability evaluation method. Moreover this paper contains a description of the implemented hybrid method and its characteristic. One of the main features of this method is that it allows to perform remote online tests. These tests are an alternative to traditional laboratory tests. They don’t require a special laboratory space, gathering participants in one place, a moderator or other equipment to perform the tests. However we have to face a challenge – how to recruit participants for remote usability test, which is more complicated because we must motivate our users to participate in such test without having a direct contact with them.
This paper presents a comparison of a few selected methods that we used to encourage users of website HotelGo24.​com to take part in usability evaluation test of that site. We present how many users were ready to participate in our study depending on the applied method of encouragement and their reward for participating in the study.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Rajeshkumar, S., Omar, R., Mahmud, M.: Taxonomies of user experience (UX) evaluation methods. In: 2013 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), pp. 533–538, 27–28 Nov 2013 Rajeshkumar, S., Omar, R., Mahmud, M.: Taxonomies of user experience (UX) evaluation methods. In: 2013 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS), pp. 533–538, 27–28 Nov 2013
2.
go back to reference Rubin, J., Chisnell, D.: Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design and Conduct Effective Tests. Wiley, New York (2008) Rubin, J., Chisnell, D.: Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design and Conduct Effective Tests. Wiley, New York (2008)
3.
go back to reference Nielsen, J.: Usability inspection methods. In: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 413–414. ACM, Apr 1994 Nielsen, J.: Usability inspection methods. In: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 413–414. ACM, Apr 1994
4.
go back to reference Chynał, P.: Hybrid approach to web based systems usability evaluation. In: Nguyen, N.T., Attachoo, B., Trawiński, B., Somboonviwat, K. (eds.) ACIIDS 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8397, pp. 384–391. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRef Chynał, P.: Hybrid approach to web based systems usability evaluation. In: Nguyen, N.T., Attachoo, B., Trawiński, B., Somboonviwat, K. (eds.) ACIIDS 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8397, pp. 384–391. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., Van de Weijer, J.: Eye Tracking: a Comprehensive Guide to Methods And Measures. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011) Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., Van de Weijer, J.: Eye Tracking: a Comprehensive Guide to Methods And Measures. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)
6.
go back to reference Tullis, T., Fleischman, S., McNulty, M., Cianchette, C., Bergel, M.: An empirical comparison of lab and remote usability testing of web sites. In: Usability Professionals Association Conference, July 2002 Tullis, T., Fleischman, S., McNulty, M., Cianchette, C., Bergel, M.: An empirical comparison of lab and remote usability testing of web sites. In: Usability Professionals Association Conference, July 2002
7.
go back to reference Brush B., Ames M., Davis J.: A Comparison of Synchronous Remote and Local Usability Studies for an Expert Interface. In CHI 2004 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, USA, pp. 1179–1182 (2004) Brush B., Ames M., Davis J.: A Comparison of Synchronous Remote and Local Usability Studies for an Expert Interface. In CHI 2004 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, USA, pp. 1179–1182 (2004)
8.
go back to reference Oztoprak A., Erbug C.: Field versus Laboratory Usability Testing: a First Comparison. Technical report, Department of Industrail Design - Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Architercture, Inonu Bulvari, 06531 Ankara, Turkey (2008) Oztoprak A., Erbug C.: Field versus Laboratory Usability Testing: a First Comparison. Technical report, Department of Industrail Design - Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Architercture, Inonu Bulvari, 06531 Ankara, Turkey (2008)
9.
go back to reference Liu, D., Bias, R.G., Lease, M., Kuipers, R.: Crowdsourcing for usability testing. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 49(1), 1–10 (2012) Liu, D., Bias, R.G., Lease, M., Kuipers, R.: Crowdsourcing for usability testing. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 49(1), 1–10 (2012)
10.
go back to reference Kittur, A., Chi, E.H., Suh, B.: Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 453–456. ACM, Apr 2008 Kittur, A., Chi, E.H., Suh, B.: Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 453–456. ACM, Apr 2008
12.
go back to reference Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Consulted 1(2012), 28 (2008) Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Consulted 1(2012), 28 (2008)
Metadata
Title
Web-Systems Remote Usability Tests and Their Participant Recruitment
Authors
Piotr Chynał
Janusz Sobecki
Copyright Year
2015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20901-2_16