Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. What’s New? Temporality in Practice Theory and Pragmatism

Authors : Anders Buch, Iben Sandal Stjerne

Published in: How Organizations Manage the Future

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter discusses two temporal approaches to social order that accentuate the role of novelty, change and temporality in accounts of social organization, activity and human action, namely, the pragmatist approach of George Herbert Mead and the practice theoretical approach of Theodore R. Schatzki. The chapter investigates how they conceive of novelty in their theoretical accounts. With this in mind, an empirical case from an organizational setting in the creative industry is introduced: the production of the film Antboy. To illustrate the points about novelty, the case is discussed with the conceptual resources put at our disposal by the two approaches to better understand how organizing for the future can in fact accommodate the processes of creativity that bring about novelty.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
This does not mean that normativity is absent in practice theoretical accounts—only that so-called regulist accounts of normativity are problematic. Joseph Rouse (2017) argues that practice theory must adopt a temporal conception of normativity: ‘What unifies a temporally extended social practice is not some feature that its individual performances have in common, but the mutual responsiveness of those performances over time.’
 
Literature
go back to reference Amabile, Teresa M. 1996. Creativity in Context. Boulder: Westview Press. Amabile, Teresa M. 1996. Creativity in Context. Boulder: Westview Press.
go back to reference Baert, Patrick. 1992. Time, Self, and Social Being. Temporality Within the Sociological Context. Aldershot: Avebury. Baert, Patrick. 1992. Time, Self, and Social Being. Temporality Within the Sociological Context. Aldershot: Avebury.
go back to reference Becker, Howard S. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press. Becker, Howard S. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
go back to reference Buch, Anders, and Bente Elkjær. 2015. Pragmatism and Practice Theory. Convergences or Collisions. Paper Presented at the Conference of Organizational Learning, Knowledge, and Capabilities (OLKC2015), Milan, April 2015. Buch, Anders, and Bente Elkjær. 2015. Pragmatism and Practice Theory. Convergences or Collisions. Paper Presented at the Conference of Organizational Learning, Knowledge, and Capabilities (OLKC2015), Milan, April 2015.
go back to reference Buch, Anders, and Theodore Schatzki. forthcoming. Questions of Practice in Philosophy and the Social Sciences. New York: Routledge. Buch, Anders, and Theodore Schatzki. forthcoming. Questions of Practice in Philosophy and the Social Sciences. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Caniëls, M.C.J., and E.F. Rietzschel. 2015. Organizing Creativity: Creativity and Innovation Under Constraints. Creativity and Innovation Management 24: 184–196.CrossRef Caniëls, M.C.J., and E.F. Rietzschel. 2015. Organizing Creativity: Creativity and Innovation Under Constraints. Creativity and Innovation Management 24: 184–196.CrossRef
go back to reference Chia, Robert. 2017. A Process-Philosophical Understanding of Organizational Learning as ‘Wayfinding’: Process, Practices, and Sensitivity to Environmental Affordances. The Learning Organization 24 (2): 107–118.CrossRef Chia, Robert. 2017. A Process-Philosophical Understanding of Organizational Learning as ‘Wayfinding’: Process, Practices, and Sensitivity to Environmental Affordances. The Learning Organization 24 (2): 107–118.CrossRef
go back to reference Dawson, Patrick, and Christopher Sykes. 2016. Organizational Change and Temporality. Bending the Arrow of Time. London: Routledge. Dawson, Patrick, and Christopher Sykes. 2016. Organizational Change and Temporality. Bending the Arrow of Time. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Dewey, John. 1920/2008. In Reconstruction in Philosophy, The Middle Works, ed. Jo Ann Boydston, vol. 12. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.CrossRef Dewey, John. 1920/2008. In Reconstruction in Philosophy, The Middle Works, ed. Jo Ann Boydston, vol. 12. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference ———. 1938. Logic. The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company. ———. 1938. Logic. The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
go back to reference Garud, Raghu, Barbara Simpson, Ann Langley, and Haridimos Tsoukas, eds. 2016. The Emergence of Novelty in Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Garud, Raghu, Barbara Simpson, Ann Langley, and Haridimos Tsoukas, eds. 2016. The Emergence of Novelty in Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Cambridge: Polity. Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Cambridge: Polity.
go back to reference ———. 1997. G. H. Mead. A Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ———. 1997. G. H. Mead. A Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Jones, C., M. Maoret, F. Massa, and S. Svejenova. 2012. Rebels with a Cause: Formation of the De Novo Category ‘Modern Architecture’. Organization Science 23: 1523–1545.CrossRef Jones, C., M. Maoret, F. Massa, and S. Svejenova. 2012. Rebels with a Cause: Formation of the De Novo Category ‘Modern Architecture’. Organization Science 23: 1523–1545.CrossRef
go back to reference Lampel, J., T. Lant, and J. Shamsie. 2000. Balancing Act: Learning from Organizing Practices in Cultural Industries. Organization Science 11: 263–269.CrossRef Lampel, J., T. Lant, and J. Shamsie. 2000. Balancing Act: Learning from Organizing Practices in Cultural Industries. Organization Science 11: 263–269.CrossRef
go back to reference Langley, Ann, and Haridimos Tsoukas, eds. 2017. The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. Langley, Ann, and Haridimos Tsoukas, eds. 2017. The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
go back to reference Mead, George Herbert. 1932/2002. The Philosophy of the Present. New York: Prometheus Books. Mead, George Herbert. 1932/2002. The Philosophy of the Present. New York: Prometheus Books.
go back to reference ———. 1934/1962. In Mind, Self, and Society. From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, ed. C.W. Morris. Chicago: Chicago University Press. ———. 1934/1962. In Mind, Self, and Society. From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, ed. C.W. Morris. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
go back to reference ———. 1938/1972. The Philosophy of the Act, ed. C.W. Morris et al. Chicago: Chicago University Press. ———. 1938/1972. The Philosophy of the Act, ed. C.W. Morris et al. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
go back to reference Okrent, Mark. 1991. Heidegger’s Pragmatism. Understanding, Being, and the Critique of Metaphysics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Okrent, Mark. 1991. Heidegger’s Pragmatism. Understanding, Being, and the Critique of Metaphysics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
go back to reference Ortmann, Günter, and Jörg Sydow. 2017. Dancing in Chains: Creative Practices in/of Organizations. Organization Studies. Online First, August 2017.CrossRef Ortmann, Günter, and Jörg Sydow. 2017. Dancing in Chains: Creative Practices in/of Organizations. Organization Studies. Online First, August 2017.CrossRef
go back to reference Rosso, Brent D. 2014. Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams. Organization Studies 35: 551–585.CrossRef Rosso, Brent D. 2014. Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams. Organization Studies 35: 551–585.CrossRef
go back to reference Rouse, Joseph. 2017. Normativity. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of the Social Mind, ed. Julian Kieverstein, 545–562. New York: Routledge. Rouse, Joseph. 2017. Normativity. In The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of the Social Mind, ed. Julian Kieverstein, 545–562. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Sawyer, R. Keith. 2005. Social Emergence. Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Sawyer, R. Keith. 2005. Social Emergence. Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Schatzki, Theodore. 2002. The Site of the Social. A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. Schatzki, Theodore. 2002. The Site of the Social. A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
go back to reference ———. 2010. The Timespace of Human Activity. On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events. Lanham: Lexington Books. ———. 2010. The Timespace of Human Activity. On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events. Lanham: Lexington Books.
go back to reference ———. 2016. Practice Theory as Flat Ontology. In Practice Theory and Research. Exploring the Dynamics of Social Life, ed. Gert Spaargaren, Don Weenink, and Machiel Larmers, 28–42. New York: Routledge. ———. 2016. Practice Theory as Flat Ontology. In Practice Theory and Research. Exploring the Dynamics of Social Life, ed. Gert Spaargaren, Don Weenink, and Machiel Larmers, 28–42. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference ———. forthcoming. On Plural Actions. In Practice, Practices, and Pragmatism. Perspectives from Philosophy and the Social Sciences, ed. Anders Buch and Theodore Schatzki. New York: Routledge. ———. forthcoming. On Plural Actions. In Practice, Practices, and Pragmatism. Perspectives from Philosophy and the Social Sciences, ed. Anders Buch and Theodore Schatzki. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Stjerne, Iben. 2016. Transcending Organization in Temporary Systems. Aesthetics’ Organizing Work and Employment in Creative Industries. PhD Series 50.2016, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School. Stjerne, Iben. 2016. Transcending Organization in Temporary Systems. Aesthetics’ Organizing Work and Employment in Creative Industries. PhD Series 50.2016, Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
go back to reference Stjerne, Iben, and Silviya Svejenova. 2016. Connecting Temporary and Permanent Organizing. Tensions and Boundary Work in a Series of Film Projects. Organization Studies 37 (12): 1771–1792.CrossRef Stjerne, Iben, and Silviya Svejenova. 2016. Connecting Temporary and Permanent Organizing. Tensions and Boundary Work in a Series of Film Projects. Organization Studies 37 (12): 1771–1792.CrossRef
go back to reference Svec, Ondrej, and Jakub Capek. 2017. Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology. London: Routledge. Svec, Ondrej, and Jakub Capek. 2017. Pragmatic Perspectives in Phenomenology. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Urry, John. 2016. What Is the Future? Cambridge: Polity Press. Urry, John. 2016. What Is the Future? Cambridge: Polity Press.
go back to reference Wijnberg, N., and G. Gemser. 2000. Adding Value to Innovation: Impressionism and the Transformation of the Selection System in Visual Arts. Organization Science 11: 323–329.CrossRef Wijnberg, N., and G. Gemser. 2000. Adding Value to Innovation: Impressionism and the Transformation of the Selection System in Visual Arts. Organization Science 11: 323–329.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
What’s New? Temporality in Practice Theory and Pragmatism
Authors
Anders Buch
Iben Sandal Stjerne
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74506-0_3