Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Environmental Management 3/2011

01-09-2011

What’s Wrong with the Tap? Examining Perceptions of Tap Water and Bottled Water at Purdue University

Authors: Amber Saylor, Linda Stalker Prokopy, Shannon Amberg

Published in: Environmental Management | Issue 3/2011

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The environmental impacts of bottled water prompted us to explore drinking water choices at Purdue University, located in West Lafayette, IN. A random sample of 2,045 Purdue University students, staff, and faculty was invited to participate in an online survey. The survey assessed current behaviors as well as perceived barriers and benefits to drinking tap water versus bottled water. 677 surveys were completed for a response rate of 33.1%. We then conducted qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of university undergraduates (n = 21) to obtain contextual insights into the survey results and the beliefs of individuals with a variety of drinking water preferences. This study revealed that women drink disproportionately more bottled water then men while undergraduate students drink more than graduate students, staff and faculty. The study also uncovered a widespread belief that recycling eliminates the environmental impacts of bottled water. Important barriers to drinking tap water at Purdue include: perceived risks from tap water and the perceived safety of bottled water, preferring the taste of bottled water, and the convenience of drinking bottled water. The qualitative interviews revealed that drinking water choices can be influenced by several factors—especially whether individuals trust tap water to be clean—but involve varying levels of complexity. The implications of these results for social marketing strategies to promote tap water are discussed.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Anadu EC, Harding A (2000) Risk perception and bottled water use. Journal AWWA 92(11):82–92 Anadu EC, Harding A (2000) Risk perception and bottled water use. Journal AWWA 92(11):82–92
go back to reference Andreasen AR (1995) Marketing social change: changing behavior to promote health, social development, and the environment. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Andreasen AR (1995) Marketing social change: changing behavior to promote health, social development, and the environment. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
go back to reference Bratt C (1999) The impacts of norms and assumed consequences on recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior 31(5):630–656CrossRef Bratt C (1999) The impacts of norms and assumed consequences on recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior 31(5):630–656CrossRef
go back to reference De Franca Doria M, Pidgeon N, Hunter P (2005) Perception of tap water risks and quality: a structural equation model approach. Water Science and Technology 52(8):143–149 De Franca Doria M, Pidgeon N, Hunter P (2005) Perception of tap water risks and quality: a structural equation model approach. Water Science and Technology 52(8):143–149
go back to reference Doria MF (2006) Bottled water versus tap water: understanding consumers’ preferences. Journal of Water and Health 4(2):271–276 Doria MF (2006) Bottled water versus tap water: understanding consumers’ preferences. Journal of Water and Health 4(2):271–276
go back to reference Finucane ML, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Flynn J, Satterfield TA (2000) Gender, race and perceived risk: the ‘white male’ effect. Health, Risk & Society 2(2):159–172CrossRef Finucane ML, Slovic P, Mertz CK, Flynn J, Satterfield TA (2000) Gender, race and perceived risk: the ‘white male’ effect. Health, Risk & Society 2(2):159–172CrossRef
go back to reference Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK (1994) Gender, race and perception of environmental risks. Risk Analysis 14(6):1101–1108CrossRef Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK (1994) Gender, race and perception of environmental risks. Risk Analysis 14(6):1101–1108CrossRef
go back to reference Foltz F (1999) Science, pollution, and clean drinking water: choosing between tap water, bottled water and home purification. Bulletin of Science. Technology and Society 19(4):300–309 Foltz F (1999) Science, pollution, and clean drinking water: choosing between tap water, bottled water and home purification. Bulletin of Science. Technology and Society 19(4):300–309
go back to reference Gleick PH (2010) Bottled & sold: the story behind our obsession with bottled water. Island Press, Washington Gleick PH (2010) Bottled & sold: the story behind our obsession with bottled water. Island Press, Washington
go back to reference Gleick PH, Cooley HS (2009) Energy implications of bottled water. Environmental Research Letters 4:1–6CrossRef Gleick PH, Cooley HS (2009) Energy implications of bottled water. Environmental Research Letters 4:1–6CrossRef
go back to reference Hurd RE, AWWA-RF (American Water Works Association Research Foundation) (1993) Consumer attitude survey on water quality issues. AWWA, Denver Hurd RE, AWWA-RF (American Water Works Association Research Foundation) (1993) Consumer attitude survey on water quality issues. AWWA, Denver
go back to reference Jardine CG (2006) Improving communication of drinking water risks through a better understanding of public perspectives. Special Publication-Royal Society of Chemistry 302:172–183 Jardine CG (2006) Improving communication of drinking water risks through a better understanding of public perspectives. Special Publication-Royal Society of Chemistry 302:172–183
go back to reference Jardine CG, Gibson N, Hrudey SE (1999) Detection of odour and health risk perception of drinking water. Water Science and Technology 40(6):91–98CrossRef Jardine CG, Gibson N, Hrudey SE (1999) Detection of odour and health risk perception of drinking water. Water Science and Technology 40(6):91–98CrossRef
go back to reference Kotler P, Lee NR (2008) Social marketing: influencing behaviors for good. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks Kotler P, Lee NR (2008) Social marketing: influencing behaviors for good. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks
go back to reference Lazo JK, Kinnell J, Bussa T, Fisher A, Collamer N (1999) Expert and lay mental models of ecosystems: inferences for risk communication. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment 10(1):45–64 Lazo JK, Kinnell J, Bussa T, Fisher A, Collamer N (1999) Expert and lay mental models of ecosystems: inferences for risk communication. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment 10(1):45–64
go back to reference McKenzie-Mohr D, Smith W (1999) Fostering sustainable behavior: an introduction to community-based social marketing. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island McKenzie-Mohr D, Smith W (1999) Fostering sustainable behavior: an introduction to community-based social marketing. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island
go back to reference McSpirit S, Reid C (2011) Residents’ perceptions of tap water and decisions to purchase bottled water: a survey analysis from the appalachian, big sandy coal mining region of west Virginia. Society and Natural Resources 24:511–520CrossRef McSpirit S, Reid C (2011) Residents’ perceptions of tap water and decisions to purchase bottled water: a survey analysis from the appalachian, big sandy coal mining region of west Virginia. Society and Natural Resources 24:511–520CrossRef
go back to reference Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman CJ (2002) Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, Atman CJ (2002) Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
go back to reference Parag Y, Roberts JT (2009) A battle against the bottles: building, claiming, and regaining tap-water trustworthiness. Society and Natural Resources 22:625–636CrossRef Parag Y, Roberts JT (2009) A battle against the bottles: building, claiming, and regaining tap-water trustworthiness. Society and Natural Resources 22:625–636CrossRef
go back to reference Rogers RW, Prentice-Dunn S, Gochman D (1997) Handbook of health behavior research 1: personal and social determinants. Plenum Press, New York, pp 113–132 Rogers RW, Prentice-Dunn S, Gochman D (1997) Handbook of health behavior research 1: personal and social determinants. Plenum Press, New York, pp 113–132
go back to reference Royte E (2008) Bottlemania: how water went on sale and why we bought it. Bloomsbury USA, New York Royte E (2008) Bottlemania: how water went on sale and why we bought it. Bloomsbury USA, New York
go back to reference Schutt RK (2009) Investigating the social world: the process and practice of research. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks Schutt RK (2009) Investigating the social world: the process and practice of research. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks
Metadata
Title
What’s Wrong with the Tap? Examining Perceptions of Tap Water and Bottled Water at Purdue University
Authors
Amber Saylor
Linda Stalker Prokopy
Shannon Amberg
Publication date
01-09-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Environmental Management / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9692-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Environmental Management 3/2011 Go to the issue