Top

Journal of Business Ethics

Published in:

29-09-2021 | Original Paper

When Aspirational Talk Backfires: The Role of Moral Judgements in Employees’ Hypocrisy Interpretation

Authors: Lucas Amaral Lauriano, Juliane Reinecke, Michael Etter

Published in: Journal of Business Ethics | Issue 4/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) aspirations by companies have been identified as a motivating factor for active employee participation in CSR implementation. However, a failure to practise what one preaches can backfire and lead to attribution of hypocrisy. Drawing on a qualitative study of an award-winning sustainability pioneer in the cosmetics sector, we explore the role of moral judgement in how and when employees interpret word–deed misalignment in CSR implementation as hypocritical. First, our case reveals that high CSR aspirations by companies raise employees’ moral expectations. Second, we develop a framework that explains variations in employees’ hypocrisy interpretations based on consequentialist and deontological forms of moral judgement. Our research advances a contextual view of hypocrisy, not as an objective characteristic of an organisation, but as an outcome of interpretative processes of perceived motives and results in CSR implementation. Our framework thereby explains why even highly committed organisations may face accusations of hypocrisy.

previous article Artistic Freedom or the Hamper of Equality? Exploring Ethical Dilemmas in the Use of Artistic Freedom in a Cultural Organization in Sweden

next article Harnessing the Power Within: The Consequences of Salesperson Moral Identity and the Moderating Role of Internal Competitive Climate

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

All names are fictional.

Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079CrossRef

Aguinis, H., Villamor, I., & Gabriel, K. P. (2020). Understanding employee responses to COVID-19: A behavioral corporate social responsibility perspective. Management Research: THe Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-06-2020-1053CrossRef

Ahmed, M. M., Chung, K. Y., & Eichenseher, J. W. (2003). Business students’ perception of ethics and moral judgment: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1–2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022915316112CrossRef

Alzola, M. (2015). Virtuous persons and virtuous actions in business ethics and organizational research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 25, 287–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2015.24CrossRef

Antoni, A., Reinecke, J., & Fotaki, M. (2020). Caring or not caring for coworkers? An empirical exploration of the dilemma of care allocation in the workplace. Business Ethics Quarterly, 30, 447–485.CrossRef

Babu, N., De Roeck, K., & Raineri, N. (2020). Hypocritical organizations: Implications for employee social responsibility. Journal of Business Research, 114(July), 376–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.034CrossRef

Barden, J., Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2005). “Saying One Thing and Doing Another”: Examining the impact of event order on hypocrisy judgments of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(11), 1463–1474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205276430CrossRef

Barnett, M. L. (2014). Why stakeholders ignore firm misconduct: A cognitive view. Journal of Management, 40(3), 676–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311433854CrossRef

Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods and Research, 10(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418101000205CrossRef

Bowen, F., & Aragon-Correa, J. A. (2014). Greenwashing in corporate environmentalism research and practice: The importance of what we say and do. Organization and Environment, 27(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614537078CrossRef

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846CrossRef

Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.684462CrossRef

Brunsson, N. (1993). Ideas and actions: Justification and hypocrisy as alternatives to control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(6), 489–506.CrossRef

Carlos, W. C., & Lewis, B. W. (2018). Strategic silence: Withholding certification status as a hypocrisy avoidance tactic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 130–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217695089CrossRef

Chang, E. (2005). Employees’ overall perception of HRM effectiveness. Human Relations, 58(4), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726705055037CrossRef

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. SAGE Publications.

Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003CrossRef

Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 20(3), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413478310CrossRef

Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2019a). Talk–action dynamics: Modalities of aspirational talk. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619896267CrossRef

Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2019b). Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication. Journal of Business Research, 114(July), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.020CrossRef

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153.

Crilly, D., Zollo, M., & Hansen, M. T. (2012). Faking it or muddling through? Understanding decoupling in response to stakeholder pressures. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1429–1448. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0697CrossRef

Eby, L., Adams, D., Russell, J., & Gaby, S. (2000). Perception of organizational readiness for change. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700533006.CrossRef

Effron, D. A., Connor, K. O., Leroy, H., & Lucas, B. J. (2018). From inconsistency to hypocrisy: When does “saying one thing but doing another” invite condemnation? Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.10.003CrossRef

El Akremi, A., Gond, J.-P., Swaen, V., Roeck, K. D., & Igalens, J. (2018). How do employees perceive corporate responsibility? Development and validation of a multidimensional corporate stakeholder responsibility scale. Journal of Management, 44(2), 619–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315569311CrossRef

Frankena, W. K. (1973). Ethics. Prentice-Hall. Retrieved June 29, 2020, from https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Ethics.html?id=ZftGAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y.

Girschik, V. (2020). Shared responsibility for societal problems: The role of internal activists in reframing corporate responsibility. Business and Society, 59(1), 34–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318789867CrossRef

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.2307/588533CrossRef

Gond, J.-P., El Akremi, A., Swaen, V., & Babu, N. (2017). The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 246(January), 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2170CrossRef

Greenbaum, R. L., Mawritz, M. B., & Piccolo, R. F. (2015). When leaders fail to “walk the talk”: Supervisor undermining and perceptions of leader hypocrisy. Journal of Management, 41(3), 929–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312442386CrossRef

Haack, P., Schoeneborn, D., & Wickert, C. (2012). Talking the talk, moral entrapment, creeping commitment? Exploring narrative dynamics in corporate responsibility standardization. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 815–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612443630CrossRef

Hahn, T., Figge, F., Pinkse, J., & Preuss, L. (2018). A paradox perspective on corporate sustainability: Descriptive, instrumental, and normative aspects. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3587-2CrossRef

Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5CrossRef

Hejjas, K., Miller, G., & Scarles, C. (2019). “It’s Like Hating Puppies!” Employee disengagement and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3791-8CrossRef

Hengst, I.-A.A., Jarzabkowski, P., Hoegl, M., & Muethel, M. (2020). Toward a process theory of making sustainability strategies legitimate in action. Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), 246–271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0960CrossRef

Higgins, C., Tang, S., & Stubbs, W. (2020). On managing hypocrisy: The transparency of sustainability reports. Journal of Business Research, 114(June), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.041CrossRef

Janney, J. J., & Gove, S. (2011). Reputation and corporate social responsibility aberrations, trends, and hypocrisy: Reactions to firm choices in the stock option backdating scandal. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7), 1562–1585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00984.xCrossRef

Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.375.

Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325CrossRef

Lamm, E., Tosti-Kharas, J., & King, C. E. (2015). Empowering employee sustainability: Perceived organizational support toward the environment. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2093-zCrossRef

Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 20(1), 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00282.xCrossRef

MacLean, T., Litzky, B. E., & Holderness, D. K. (2015). When organizations don’t walk their talk: A cross-level examination of how decoupling formal ethics programs affects organizational members. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2103-1CrossRef

Maon, F., Vanhamme, J., De Roeck, K., Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., Roeck, K., et al. (2019). The dark side of stakeholder reactions to corporate social responsibility: Tensions and micro-level undesirable outcomes. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12198CrossRef

Mccarthy, L. (2017). Empowering women through corporate social responsibility: A feminist Foucauldian critique. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27, 603–631. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2017.28CrossRef

Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., Fein, S., Savitsky, K. K., Tuller, D. M., & Monin, B. (2012). The strategic pursuit of moral credentials. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 774–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.017CrossRef

Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.xCrossRef

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef

Monin, B., & Merritt, A. (2011). Moral hypocrisy, moral inconsistency, and the struggle for moral integrity. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (Vol. 1, pp. 167–184). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13091-009.

Noy, C. (2017). Ethnography of communication. In The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–11). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0089.

Ormiston, M. E., & Wong, E. M. (2013). License to Ill: The effects of corporate social responsibility and CEO moral identity on corporate social irresponsibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(4), 861–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12029CrossRef

Paillé, P., & Raineri, N. (2015). Linking perceived corporate environmental policies and employees eco-initiatives: The influence of perceived organizational support and psychological contract breach. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2404–2411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.02.021CrossRef

Pelletier, K. L., & Bligh, M. C. (2008). The aftermath of organizational corruption: Employee attributions and emotional reactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 823–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9471-8CrossRef

Philippe, T. W., & Koehler, J. W. (2005). A Factor analytical study of perceived organizational hypocrisy. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 70(2), 13.

Pinkse, J., Hahn, T., & Figge, F. (2019). Supersized tensions and slim responses? The discursive construction of strategic tensions around social issues. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(3), 314–340. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0150CrossRef

Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S. (2015). What is a “fair” price? Ethics as sensemaking. Organization Science, 26(3), 867–888. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0968CrossRef

Rotundo, M. (2019). Corporate social irresponsibility in spite of efforts to act responsibly. In A. McWilliams, D. E. Rupp, D. S. Siegel, G. K. Stahl & D. A. Waldman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility: Psychological and organizational perspectives (pp. 176–206). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198802280.001.0001.

Roulet, T. J., & Touboul, S. (2015). The intentions with which the road is paved: Attitudes to liberalism as determinants of greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2097-8CrossRef

Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.380CrossRef

Rupp, D. E., & Mallory, D. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: Psychological, person-centric, and progressing. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111505CrossRef

Scheidler, S., Marie, L., Schons, E., Spanjol, J., & Wieseke, J. (2019). Scrooge posing as Mother Teresa: How hypocritical social responsibility strategies hurt employees and firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 1(2), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3788-3CrossRef

Sikka, P. (2010). Smoke and mirrors: Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance. Accounting Forum, 34(3–4), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2010.05.002CrossRef

Smith, N. C., Read, D., & López-Rodríguez, S. (2012). Consumer perceptions of corporate social responsibility: The CSR Halo effect. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1577000CrossRef

Snelson-Powell, A. C., Grosvold, J., & Millington, A. I. (2019). Organizational hypocrisy in business schools with sustainability commitments: The drivers of talk–action inconsistency. Journal of Business Research, 114(August), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.021CrossRef

Tashman, P., Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2018). Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0171-7CrossRef

Vaara, E., Sonenshein, S., & Boje, D. M. (2016). Narratives as sources of stability and change in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 495–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1120963CrossRef

Wagner, T., Korschun, D., & Troebs, C. (2019). Deconstructing corporate hypocrisy: A delineation of its behavioral, moral, and attributional facets. Journal of Business Research, 114, 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.041CrossRef

Wagner, T., Lutz, R. J., & Weitz, B. A. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.77CrossRef

Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions: Thematic issue on corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 534–544.CrossRef

Washburn, N. T., Lange, D., Washburn, N. T., & Lange, D. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 300–326. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0522CrossRef

Wijen, F. (2014). Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: Trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0218CrossRef

Winkler, P., Etter, M., & Castelló, I. (2019). Vicious and virtuous circles of aspirational talk: From self-persuasive to agonistic CSR rhetoric. Business and Society, 59(1), 000765031982575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650319825758CrossRef

Winkler, P., Etter, M., & Wehmeier, S. (2017). Forms of talk–action-inconsistency: Introducing reverse coupling. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(3), 479–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917699523CrossRef

Xu, Z. X., & Ma, H. K. (2016). How can a deontological decision lead to moral behavior? The moderating role of moral identity. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2576-6CrossRef

Yang, L., Athanasopoulou, A., Manika, D., & Athanasopoulou, A. (2019). Are they sinners or saints? A multi-level investigation of hypocrisy in organisational and employee pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Business Research, 114(August), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.042CrossRef

Title: When Aspirational Talk Backfires: The Role of Moral Judgements in Employees’ Hypocrisy Interpretation
Authors: Lucas Amaral Lauriano
Juliane Reinecke
Michael Etter
Publication date: 29-09-2021
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 0167-4544
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0697
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04954-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Twitter-Based Social Accountability Processes: The Roles for Financial Inscriptions-Based and Values-Based Messaging

The Impact of Islamic Spirituality on Job Satisfaction and Organisational Commitment: Exploring Mediation and Moderation Impact

Predatory Monetisation? A Categorisation of Unfair, Misleading and Aggressive Monetisation Techniques in Digital Games from the Player Perspective

Winning the Battle but Losing the War: Ironic Effects of Training Consumers to Detect Deceptive Advertising Tactics

Making Behavioral Ethics Research More Useful for Ethics Management Practice: Embracing Complexity Using a Design Science Approach

Harnessing the Power Within: The Consequences of Salesperson Moral Identity and the Moderating Role of Internal Competitive Climate