Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Focusing on When Do People Obey Laws and Why It Matters Read chapter Read first chapter

2024 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

3. When Law Changes Attitudes Within the Integrated Approach

Author : Shubhangi Roy

Published in: When Do People Obey Laws?

Publisher: Springer Nature Switzerland

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter considers when and under what conditions will laws lead to attitudinal and behavioral change in the long run. First, it considers the conditions necessary for continued compliance through acquiescence, identification, and internalization. Second, it considers the conditions under which individuals who may have complied with the law through acquiescence (fear of legal sanction) or weak identification (fear of social sanctions) can be motivated to comply with laws voluntarily (through strong identification and/or internalization). In the process, it identifies the social and institutional conditions that societies and policymakers can focus on to create a general culture in favor of legal compliance. As importantly, it highlights the limits of using only laws and formal enforcement mechanisms for creating lasting attitudinal change. In fact, as the chapter discusses in the last sections, over-emphasizing the role of law and legal enforcement can have the perverse effect of undermining conditions necessary for future compliance with the law.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter The Integrated Framework of Compliance with Law as Social Influence: When Law Changes Behaviors
next chapter Understanding the Powers and Limits of Legal Expression to Create Change Through the Integrated Approach to Compliance
Footnotes
1
Roy (2022a, b) explains how initial compliance decisions can create cascades in favor of compliance.
 
2
As explained in Hogg (2003), some social identities such as ethnic groups or nationality are referred to as “ascribed” social identities since they are not chosen by the individual while others such as one’s political leanings and professional membership are considered as “achieved” social identities. However, the prominence of these identities, including ascribed social identities, can evolve.
 
3
Supra Chap. 2, 49–50.
 
4
Supra Chap. 2, Sect. 3.​2.
 
5
To this extent, continued compliance through identification can resemble compliance to social norms since both are contingent on social expectations about others’ behaviors and attitudes.
 
6
Similarly, if we were complying with a law presuming it will help us better coordinate or cooperate with other people then continued compliance will require that compliance with the law help achieve these instrumental goals.
 
7
The precise discussion on how we react to two contradictory influences, i.e., the state prohibiting the behavior and our social group prescribing it is considered more in detail in Chap. 4 where the book considers the interaction between law and social norms in shaping behaviors.
 
8
Leon Festinger is considered as one of the most influential psychologists of his time for developing this concept of cognitive dissonance. Since, his initial concept has been developed well beyond the original idea introduced by him. Harmon-Jones (2019) provides the directions in which this idea has developed since then.
 
9
Leippe and Eisenstadt (1994) observed how white American students being compelled to write articles favoring a policy favoring black minorities favorably impacted their attitudes on the policy; Cooper and Feldman (2019) studied how dissonance was induced for older individuals through induced compliance paradigm and observed that dissonance could be created even at older ages.
 
10
Harmon-Jones and Mills (2019) at p. 8—”When there is no choice about engaging in the behavior, dissonance is minimal, because there is sufficient justification for the behavior.”
 
11
Supra Chap. 3, 74–75.
 
12
This is, of course, presuming that if given a choice they would rather not be paying dowry.
 
13
In this case, it is also important to note that even if we expect that we could bribe the traffic police and get away from the legally imposed fine, there is still a cost associated with non-compliance, i.e., the cost of the bribe. The least-cost behavioral response is still to wear the seatbelt. Therefore, compliance through acquiescence is more likely to create and maintain initial compliance than in other more complex social situations like dowry and FGM practice (in which there are greater benefits from non-compliance like securing the future of one’s daughter).
 
Literature
Akers, R. L., & Jennings, W. G. (2019). The social learning theory of crime and deviance. In M. Krohn, N. Hendrix, G. Hall, & A. Lizotte (Eds.), The Handbook on Crime and Deviance (2nd ed., pp. 103-116).
Akers, R. L., & Jensen, G. (2008). The empirical status of social learning theory of crime and deviance: The past, present, and future. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 37-76).
Alfano, M. (2017). Daughters, Dowries, Deliveries: The Effect of Marital Payments on Fertility Choices in India. Journal of Development Economics, 125, 89.
Anderson, C., Mendes, S., & Tverdova, Y. (2004). Endogenous economic voting: Evidence from the 1997 British Election. Electoral Studies, 23(4), 683–708.CrossRef
Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, M. (1963). Effect of the severity of threat on the devaluation of forbidden behavior. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 66(6), 584-588.CrossRef
Barreto, N., & Hogg, M. (2017). Evaluation of and support for group prototypical leaders: A meta-analysis of twenty years of empirical research. Social Influence, 12, 41–55.CrossRef
Beasley, R., & Joslyn, M. (2001). Cognitive dissonance and post-decision attitude change in six presidential elections. Political Psychology, 22(3), 521–540.CrossRef
Bicchieri, C., & McNally, P. (2018). Shrieking sirens: Schemata, scripts, and social norms. How change occurs. Social Philosophy & Policy, 35(1), 23-53.CrossRef
Bilgrei, O. R., Buvik, K., et al. (2021). Cannabis, youth, and social identity: The evolving meaning of cannabis use in adolescence. Journal of Youth Studies, 25, 1199-214.CrossRef
Brewer, M. (2017). Intergroup discrimination: Ingroup love, or outgroup hate? In C. Sibley & F. Barlow (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice (pp. 90-110).
Burke, P., & Cerven, C. (2019). Identity accumulation, verification and well-being. In J. Stets & R. Serpe (Eds.), Identities in Everyday Life (pp. 17-33).
Cohn, A., Fehr, E., et al. (2014). Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry. Nature, 516, 86–89.CrossRef
Cohn, A., Maréchal, M. A., & Noll, T. (2015). Bad boys: How criminal identity salience affects rule violation. Review of Economic Studies, 82(4), 1289–1308.CrossRef
Cooper, J., & Feldman, L. (2019). Does cognitive dissonance occur in older age? A study of induced compliance in a healthy elderly population. Psychology and Aging, 34(5), 709–713.CrossRef
Diamond, E. (2020). The influence of identity salience on framing effectiveness: An experiment. Political Psychology, 41(6), 1133-1150.CrossRef
Dong, B., Dulleck, U., & Torgler, B. (2012). Conditional corruption. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(3), 609-627.CrossRef
Dowsett, E., Semmler, C., et al. (2018). Neutralizing the meat paradox: Cognitive dissonance, gender, and eating animals. Appetite, 123, 280-288.CrossRef
Engel, C. (2008). Learning the law. Journal of Institutional Economics, 4(2), 275–297.CrossRef
Epitropaki, O., Kark, R., et al. (2017). Leadership and followership identity processes: A multilevel review. The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 104–129.CrossRef
Frey, B., & Torgler, B. (2007). Tax morale and conditional cooperation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 136-159.CrossRef
Glaeser, E., Sacerdote, B., & Scheinkman, J. (1996). Crime and social interactions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(2), 507-548.CrossRef
Grusec, J. (2011). Socialization processes in the family: Social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 243-269.CrossRef
Harmon-Jones, E., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2007). Cognitive Dissonance Theory After 50 years of Development. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38, 7-16.CrossRef
Harmon-Jones, E., Amodio, D. M., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2009). Action-Based Model of Dissonance: A Review, Integration, and Expansion of Conceptions of Cognitive Conflict. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 119-166.
Harmon-Jones, E., Gerjikodov, T., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2008). The effect of induced compliance on relative left frontal cortical activity: a test of the action-based model of dissonance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(1), 35-45.CrossRef
Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (Eds.). (2019). Cognitive dissonance: Re-examining a pivotal theory in psychology. Routledge.
Hayek, F. (1948). The Use of Knowledge in Society. In Individualism and Economic Order (pp. 77–91).
Hogg, M. (2003). Social Identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of Self and Identity (pp. 462–479).
Kagan, R. A., Gunningham, N., & Thornton, D. (2011). Fear, Duty, and Regulatory Compliance: Lessons from Three Research Projects. In V. Nielsen & C. Parker (Eds.), Explaining Compliance (pp. 37-58).
Kahane, L. (2021). Politicizing the Mask: Political, Economic and Demographic Factors Affecting Mask Wearing Behavior in the USA. East Economic Journal, 47(2), 163-183.CrossRef
Kamel, I., Wahab, S., et al. (2021). Public Attitude as a Determinant of Petty Corruption in Egypt: A Survey Study. Journal of Humanities & Applied Sciences, 4(5), 481-96.CrossRef
Kelman, H. (2006). Interests, Relationships, Identities: Three Central Issues for Individuals and Groups in Negotiating Their Social Environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 1-26.CrossRef
Kimemia, D. (2018). Multinational corporations as supplier of corruption in Africa. Africa Insight, 49(2), 24-40.
Klar, S. (2013). The Influence of Competing Identity Primes on Political Preferences. Journal of Politics, 75, 1108–1124.CrossRef
Kobi, N. C. (2018). A social psychological view on social norms of corruption. In I. Kubbe & A. Engelbert (Eds.), Corruption and Norms: Why Informal Rules Matter (pp. 31-52).
Leippe, M., & Eisenstadt, D. (1994). Generalization of dissonance reduction: Decreasing prejudice through induced compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 395–413.CrossRef
Mackie, G. (1996). Ending Foot-binding and Infibulation: A Convention Account. American Sociological Review, 61(6), 999-1017.CrossRef
Martiny, S., & Rubin, M. (2016). Towards a clearer understanding of social identity theory’s self-esteem hypothesis. In S. McKeown, R. Haji, & N. Ferguson (Eds.), Understanding Peace and Conflict Through Social Identity Theory: Contemporary Global Perspectives (pp. 19-32).
McAdams, R. (1997). The Origin, Development and Regulations of Norms. Michigan Law Review, 96(2), 338-433.CrossRef
McCaffrey, D., & Keys, J. (2000). Competitive Framing Processes in the Abortion Debate: Polarization-Vilification, Frame Saving, and Frame Debunking. Sociological Quarterly, 41(1), 41-61.CrossRef
McKimmie, B., Hogg, M., et al. (2003). I'm a hypocrite, but so is everyone else: Group support and the reduction of cognitive dissonance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(3), 214–224.CrossRef
Mohan, D. (2010). Seat Belt Law Road Traffic Injuries in Delhi, India. Journal of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 8, 2140-46.
Mullainathan, S., & Washington, E. (2009). Sticking with Your Vote: Cognitive Dissonance and Political Attitudes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(1), 86–111.
Nakayachi, K., Ozaki, T., et al. (2020). Why Do Japanese People Use Masks Against COVID-19, Even Though Masks Are Unlikely to Offer Protection From Infection? Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1918-1920.CrossRef
Netter, B. (2006). Avoiding the Shameful Backlash: Social Repercussions for the Increased Use of Alternative Sanctions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 96(1), 187-216.
Powdthavee, N., Wong, E., et al. (2021). When face masks signal social identity: Explaining the deep face-mask divide during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE, 16(6), e0253195.CrossRef
Pressman, L. (2017). How Evolution was used to Support Scientific Racism. The Trinity Papers.
Regan, D., & Kilduff, M. (1988). Optimism about Elections: Dissonance Reduction at the Ballot Box. Political Psychology, 9(1), 101-107.CrossRef
Reimer, N., Schmid, K., et al. (2020). Self-categorization and social identification: Making sense of us and them. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in Social Psychology (pp. 1-30).
Rotherberger, M. (2020). Meat-related cognitive dissonance: A conceptual framework for understanding how meat eaters reduce negative arousal from eating animals. Appetite, 146.
Roy, S. (2022a). Theory of Social Proof and Legal Compliance: A Socio-Cognitive Explanation for Regulatory (Non) Compliance. German Law Journal, 22(2), 238-255.CrossRef
Roy, S. (2022b). When law defeats its purpose: How anti-dowry legislations (fail to) address the norms that motivate dowry payments in India. Journal of Indian Law and Society, 13(1), 51-66.
Rutledge, D. (1995). Social Darwinism, scientific racism, and the metaphysics of race. Journal of Negro Education, 64(3), 243–252.CrossRef
Schwarz, D. (2003). Shame, stigma, and crime: Evaluating the efficacy of shaming sanctions in criminal law. Harvard Law Review, 116(7), 2186-2207.CrossRef
Steele, C., Spencer, S., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379-440.CrossRef
Stone, J., Wiegand, A., et al. (1997). When exemplification fails: Hypocrisy and the motive for self-integrity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 54–65.CrossRef
Swee Jin-Ong, A., Frewer, L., & Chan, M-Y. (2017). Cognitive dissonance in food and nutrition: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57(11), 2330–2342.CrossRef
Tay, R. (2005). General and Specific Deterrent Effects of Traffic Enforcement: Do We Have to Catch Offenders to Reduce Crashes? Journal of Transport Economics & Policy, 39(2), 209-223.
Thornton, D., Kagan, R. A., & Gunningham, N. (2005). General Deterrence and Corporate Environmental Behavior. Law & Policy, 27, 262-288.CrossRef
Wojcieszak, M., & Garett, K. (2018). Social Identity, Selective Exposure, and Affective Polarization: How Priming National Identity Shapes Attitudes Toward Immigrants Via News Selection. Human Communication Research, 44(3), 247–273.CrossRef
Zakeri, M. (2016). Multinational Corporations and Corruption in Africa. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 5(2), 81–96.
Zhu, B., (2017). MNCs, Rents, and Corruption: Evidence from China. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 84–99.CrossRef
Akers, R. L. (2017). Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and Deviance. New York: Routledge.CrossRef
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRef
Friedman, L. (2016). Impact: How Law Affects Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Harmon-Jones, E. (2019). Cognitive dissonance: Re-examining a pivotal theory in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Harrington, A. (2019). Mind Fixers: Psychiatry’s Troubled Search for the Biology of Mental Illness. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Kelling, G., & Coles, C. (1996). Fixing Broken Windows: Restoring Order and Reducing Crime in Our Communities. New York: Free Press.
Kuran, T. (1997). Private Truth, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Morvon, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017). An Analysis of Leon Festinger’s A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. London: Macat.
Sutherland, E. (1947). Principles of Criminology. Lanham: General Hall.
Trinker, R., & Tyler, T. (2018). Why Children Follow Rules: Legal Socialization and the Development of Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tyson, A., Kennedy, B., et al. (2021, May 26). Gen Z, Millennials Stand Out for Climate Change Activism, Social Media Engagement with Issue. Pew Research Centre.
UNICEF. (2007). Technical Note: Coordinated Strategy to Abandon Female Genital Mutilation in One Generation.
Metadata
Title
When Law Changes Attitudes Within the Integrated Approach
Author
Shubhangi Roy
Copyright Year
2024
Book
When Do People Obey Laws?

Print ISBN: 978-3-031-53054-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-031-53055-5

Copyright Year: 2024

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53055-5_3