Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Transportation
Published in: Transportation 6/2020

11-03-2019

Why (not) abolish fares? Exploring the global geography of fare-free public transport

Author: Wojciech Kębłowski

Published in: Transportation | Issue 6/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Although the policy of abolishing fares in public transport—here referred to as “fare-free public transport” (FFPT)—exists in nearly 100 localities worldwide, it has not been thoroughly researched. To start filling this gap, I enhance the conceptual clarity about fare abolition. I start by providing a definition of FFPT, discussing its different forms, and introducing a distinction between “partial” FFPT and—the main focus of the paper—“full” FFPT. Next, I distinguish three perspectives on full FFPT—first, approaches that assess fare abolition primarily against its economic impact; second, analyses that look at its contribution to “sustainable” development; third, more critical arguments highlighting its politically transformative and socially just potential. Against the background of this debate I offer the most comprehensive inventory of full FFPT programmes to date, and begin to chart and examine their global geography. As a result, FFPT emerges as a policy that takes diverse forms and exists in diverse locations. Supported and contested by diverse rationales, it cannot be analysed as transport instrument alone.
previous article How commuting affects subjective wellbeing
next article How do they get by without cars? An analysis of travel characteristics of carless households in California

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
I applied the following keywords (and their translations into respective languages listed above): ‘free transit’, ‘free public transport’, ‘zero-fare public transport’ and ‘fare-free public transport’. In English, the ‘transport*’ string was applied to capture both ‘transport’ and ‘transportation’, thus embracing European as well as North American contributions.
 
3
Analysing FFPT programmes in the US, Volinski (2012) further notes that with the exception of discontinued programmes in Austin (TX), Denver (CO), and Mercer County (NJ), “most managers of fare-free transit systems did not regard disruptive passengers as a significant problem [and] bus operators prefer to deal with a few more disruptive passengers if it means that they do not have to deal with fare collection and fare disputes”.
 
4
Philipson and Willis (1990) have nonetheless questioned to what extent fares constitute a veritable barrier to mobility. They have argued that FFPT could discriminate against citizens who do not use PT, and provide a free service not to users who need it the most, but to all citizens including the highly-mobile and rich. However, there is strong evidence that across urban contexts the use of PT is related to social class, as the rich use PT much less than the poor. PT could  therefore be argued to act as a policy of wealth distribution (Grengs 2005).
 
5
While this review builds on a variety of sources cited in the section on “Conceptualising and defining different forms of FFPT”, it is nonetheless likely that some cases of full FFPT have not been detected by the author. Herein presented review should therefore be considered as a first step towards a comprehensive long-term mapping of all cases of fare abolition. Furthermore, in the course of writing and reviewing the article, several new full FFPT programmes have been reported. In France, municipalities that have zeroed fares include Dunkirk (a weekend-only programme expanded in September 2017 to a full FFPT system) and Villeneuve-sur-Lot (since 2018). In Sweden, fare-free PT was implemented in April 2018 in Fagersta and Sala. As many as 12 cases of full FFPT have been reported in Poland throughout 2017 (Ostrołęka) and 2018 (Bolesławiec, Chocianów, Czernica, Działdowo, Giżycko, Kostrzyn, Kórnik, Nowy Dwór Mazowiecki, Pobiedziska, Wągrowiec, Wieluń). Although the news about these newly-emergent FFPT cases requires careful verification—notably regarding the form of fare abolition—it is likely that the overall count of full FFPT cases worldwide has increased by January 2019 to 115 (of which 73 are located in Europe, 27 in North America, 11 in South America, 3 in Asia, and 1 in Australia).
 
6
This increase is nonetheless significant when compared to figures presented by PT networks in nearby communities. PT operator in the Lane County (Oregon) (population of 351.715 in 2010) reported a + 0,28% increase of the number of passengers between 2011/12 and 2013/14 years, reaching 11.19 m trips per year (Lane Transit District 2018). In the same period of time, the PT network in Oregon’s capital, Salem (population of 154.637 in 2010), observed a − 1.21% decline, down to 3.32 m trips per year (Salem Area Mass Transit District 2012, 2014a, b).
 
7
To put these figures into perspective, in the neighbouring city of Marseille (population of 869.815 in 2015) the increase of passengers at that time (2009–2014) amounted to + 9%, reaching 165,58 m trips per year (Observatoire des mobilités 2015). In Aix-en-Provence (population of 142.149 in 2014), the increase between 2009 and 2018 amounted to approximately + 8%, reaching 15 m trips annually (https://​www.​aixenbus.​fr/​lentreprise/​).
 
8
This increase is all the more significant in the context of a decrease of the number of bus passengers in the state of Rio de Janeiro (− 7.06%) and the city of Rio de Janeiro proper (− 7.43%) between 2014 and 2017 (https://​www.​fetranspor.​com.​br/​mobilidade-urbana-setor-em-numeros).
 
Literature
Aftimus, P., Santini, D.: Brazil: from dream to nightmare. In: Dellheim, J., Prince, J. (eds.) Free Public Transit, pp. 183–196. Black Rose Books, Montreal (2018)
Aleshire, R.A.: The case of free transit. Current 135, 19–22 (1971)
Antov, D.: Preconditions for the introduction of free public transport in Tallinn. Free Public Transport—A Brave Step Towards the Green Capital, Tallinn (2012)
Ariès, P.: Liberté, égalité, gratuité : pour la gratuité des services publics !. Golias, Villeurbanne (2011)
Banister, D.: The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp. Policy 15, 73–80 (2008)CrossRef
Baum, H.J.: Free public transport. J. Transp. Econ. Policy 7, 3–19 (1973)
Briche, H.: Dunkerque, «laboiratoire» de la gratuité des transports en commun. Retour sur les effets de la gratuité partielle. Vigs, Agence d’Urbanisme Flandre-Dunkerque (2017a)
Brie, M.: Private E-Car vs. Public Transport for free —Real Dystopia versus Concrete Utopia. Presented at the Denver (2012)
Brown, J., Hess, D.B., Shoup, D.: Unlimited access. Transportation 28, 233–267 (2001)CrossRef
Brown, J., Hess, D.B., Shoup, D.: Fare-free public transport at universities. An evaluation. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 23, 69–82 (2003)CrossRef
CAPAE: Les actes de la première rencontre des collectivités pionnières dans la gratuité des transports publics (2012)
CAPAE: Liberté, égalité, gratuité. Lignes de l’agglo, Aubagne (2013)
Cats, O., Reimal, T., Susilo, Y.: Public transport pricing policy—empirical evidence from a fare-free scheme in Tallinn, Estonia. Presented at the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January (2014)
Cats, O., Susilo, Y.O., Reimal, T.: The prospects of fare-free public transport: evidence from Tallinn. Transportation 44, 1083–1104 (2017)CrossRef
CERTU: Le débat : la gratuité des Transports Collectifs Urbains? (2010)
City of Corvallis: Climate Action Plan for Corvallis, Oregon. City of Corvallis, Corvallis (2015)
Claux, M.: La ville mobile gouvernée : intercommunalités, politiques de déplacements et trajectoires de développement dans la Région Urbaine Marseillaise (2014)
Comune di Bologna: Bologna non deve soffocare: : proposte per il riodino del traffico cittadino, Bologna (1972)
Cordier, B.: La gratuité totale des transports collectifs urbains : effets sur la fréquentation et intérêts. Bureau d’études en transports en déplacements (ADETEC), Agence de l’environnement et de la maîtrise de l’énergie (ADEME) (2007)
Danish Board of Technology: Perspektiver ved indførelse af gratis offentlig transport: vurderinger og anbefalinger fra en arbejdsgruppe under Teknologirådet. Teknologirådet, København (2006)
Dellheim, J.: “Free Public Transport by Decree” Versus Transformation. Presented at the Berlin, March (2016)
Domencich, T.A., Kraft, G.: Free Transit. D. C. Heath & Co., Lexington (1970)
Donin, D.: Fare-Less Public Transit, Impact on Ridership: Policy Review of Corvallis, Oregon’s Recently Implemented Fare-less Transit System (2013)
Doumayrou, V.: Gratuité : le rôle pilote des villes moyennes. Le Monde Diplomatique 10, I–II (2012)
Duhamel, Y.: Gratuité des transports publics urbains et répartition modale. Retour sur rapport final. Axiales/Programme de recherche et d’innovation dans les transports terrestres (PREDIT), Agence de l’environnement et de la maîtrise de l’énergie (ADEME) (2004)
Fearnley, N.: Public transport subsidies in the UK: evidence of distributional effects. World Transp. Policy Pract. 12, 30–39 (2006)
Fearnley, N.: Free fares policies: impact on public transport mode share and other transport policy goals. Int. J. Transp. 1, 75–90 (2013)CrossRef
Fix, M., Ribeiro, G.E., Prado, A.D.: Mobilidade urbana e direito à cidade: uma entrevista com Lúcio Gregori sobre transporte coletivo e Tarifa Zero. Rev. Bras. Estud. Urbanos Reg. 17, 175 (2015)CrossRef
FNAUT: La FNAUT : bilan et perspectives d’avenir. Conférence de presse. Fédération Nationale des Associations d’Usagers des Transports, Paris (2015)
Giovanangelli, M., Sagot-Duvauroux, J.-L.: Voyageurs sans ticket - Liberté, égalité, gratuité: une expérience sociale à Aubagne. Au Diable Vauvert, Vauvert (2012)
Gomes, D.: Quem paga a conta? CNT Transp. Atual. 246, 17–23 (2016)
Greenspan, H.P.: The case for prepaid transit. Transit J. 1, 57–63 (1976)
Grengs, J.: The abandoned social goals of public transit in the neoliberal city of the USA. City 9, 51–66 (2005)CrossRef
Hodge, D.C., Orrell, J.D., Strauss, T.R.: Fare-free Policy: Costs, Impacts on Transit Service and Attainment of Transit System Goals. Washington State Department of Transportation, Seattle, Washington (1994)
van Hulten, M.: Gratis openbaar vervoer. Kluwer, Deventer (1972)
Isacsson, L.: Equality and growth. Fare free public transport in Avesta municipality. Fare free public transport as a growth factor, Avesta (2015)
Kębłowski, W.: Moving past sustainable mobility towards a critical perspective on urban transport. A right to the city-inspired analysis of fare-free public transport, PhD thesis (2018)
Kębłowski, W., Bassens, D.: “All transport problems are essentially mathematical”: the uneven resonance of academic transport and mobility knowledge in Brussels. Urban Geogr. 3, 413–437 (2018)CrossRef
Kębłowski, W., Tuvikene, T., Pikner, T., Jauhiainen, J.: Towards an urban political geography of transport: unpacking the political and scalar dynamics of fare-free public transport in Tallinn, Estonia. Environ. Plan. C Polit. Space (2019)
Kitchin, R.: The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79, 1–14 (2014)CrossRef
Kleiner, Y.S.: Racial profiling in the name of national security: protecting minority travlers’ civil liberties in the age of terrorism. Boston Coll. Third World Law J. 30, 103–144 (2010)
Larrabure, M.: The struggle for the new commons in the Brazilian free transit movement. Stud. Polit. Econ. 97, 175–194 (2016)
Lane Transit District: Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 2016–2017. Lane Transit District, Eugene, Oregon (2018)
Ługowski, Ł.: Renesans komunikacji zbiorowej (2017)
Maricato, E. (ed.): Cidades Rebeldes: Passe Livre e as Manifestações que Tomaram as Ruas do Brasil. Boitempo, São Paulo (2013)
Observatoire des mobilités: Les résultats de 2014 en chiffres. Tableaux de bord détaillé de l’Observatoire. Observatoire des mobilités, Marseille (2015)
O’Reilly, D.M.: An Analysis of Concessionary Bus Fare Schemes for OAPs Using the 1985/86 National Travel Survey. Department of Transport, London (1990)
Perkowski, R.: Three Years of Free Public Transport in Ząbki. International Free Public Transport conference, Żory (2014)
Perone, J.S.: Advantages and Disadvantages of Fare-Free Transport Policy. National Center for Transportation Research, Tampa (2002)CrossRef
Philipson, M., Willis, D.: Free public transport for all? In: Australasian Transport Research Forum, pp. 623–640 (1990)
Planka.nu: The Traffic Power Structure (2016)
Prince, J., Dellheim, J. (eds.): Free Public Transport and Why We Don’t Pay to Ride Elevators. Black Rose Books, Montréal (2018)
Ramböll: Trafikanalys. Litteraturstudie avgiftsfri kollektivtrafik. Ramböll Sverige AB, Malmö (2015)
Rice, S.K., Parkin, W.S.: New avenues for profiling and bias research. The question of Muslim Americans. Presented at the New York and London (2010)
Robert, M.: Transports publics urbains: Textes sur la gratuité, Carfree France Editions (2015)
Salem Area Mass Transit District: Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012, Salem, Oregon (2012)
Salem Area Mass Transit District: Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, Salem, Oregon (2014a)
Salem Area Mass Transit District: Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, Salem, Oregon (2014b)
Santana, B., Silva, D.B.: Brasil: «No es por 0, 20. Es por los derechos»: Las demandas en las calles y la política en red. Nueva Sociedad 247, 4–15 (2013)
Schein, R.: Free transit and social movement infrastructure: assessing the political potential of Toronto’s nascent free transit campaign. Altern. Routes J. Crit. Soc. Res. 22, 115–122 (2011)
Scheiner, J.I.: Exploding the myths of prepaid transit. Transit J. 2, 57–64 (1976)
Scheiner, J.I., Starling, G.: The political economy of free-fare transit. Urban Aff. Rev. 10, 170–184 (1974)
Shen, J.X., Zheng, S.K.: Fare-free public transit service: experience from Gaoping city of China. Adv. Transp. Stud. 1, 10 (2015)
Storchmann, K.: Externalities by automobiles and fare-free transit in Germany—a paradigm shift? J. Public Transp. 6, 5 (2003)CrossRef
Studenmund, A.H., Connor, D.: The free-fare transit experiments. Transp. Res. Part A Gen. 16, 261–269 (1982)CrossRef
Thøgersen, J., Møller, B.: Breaking car use habits: the effectiveness of a free one-month travelcard. Transportation 35, 329–345 (2008)CrossRef
UTP: La gratuité dans les transports publics urbains : une fausse bonne idée. Union des Transports Publics et ferroviaries, Paris (2011)
van Goeverden, C., Rietveld, P., Koelemeijer, J., Peeters, P.: Subsidies in public transport. Eur. Transp 32, 5–25 (2006)
Verlinghieri, E., Venturini, F.: Exploring the right to mobility through the 2013 mobilizations in Rio de Janeiro. J. Transp. Geogr. (2017)
Volinski, J.: Implementation and Outcomes of Fare-Free Transit Systems. A Synthesis of Transit Practice. Transport Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC (2012)
Yaden, D.: Fareless transit in the portland metropolitan region. Fareless Transit System Research Workgroup. Parsons, Brinkeroff, Quade, and Douglas, Inc. (1998)
Metadata
Title
Why (not) abolish fares? Exploring the global geography of fare-free public transport
Author
Wojciech Kębłowski
Publication date
11-03-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Transportation / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0049-4488
Electronic ISSN: 1572-9435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-09986-6

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Transportation 6/2020 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Assessment of the transit ridership prediction errors using AVL/APC data

OriginalPaper

The evaluation of large cycling infrastructure investments in Glasgow using crowdsourced cycle data

OriginalPaper

Can passenger flow distribution be estimated solely based on network properties in public transport systems?

OriginalPaper

How do they get by without cars? An analysis of travel characteristics of carless households in California

OriginalPaper

How commuting affects subjective wellbeing

OriginalPaper

Do preferences for BRT and LRT change as a voter, citizen, tax payer, or self-interested resident?

Premium Partner

    Image Credits