Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 3/2020

26-06-2019 | Original Article

Wireless charging and shared autonomous battery electric vehicles (W+SABEV): synergies that accelerate sustainable mobility and greenhouse gas emission reduction

Authors: Zicheng Bi, Michael A. Reiner, Gregory A. Keoleian, Yan Zhou, Michael Wang, Zhenhong Lin

Published in: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Emerging technologies play important roles in shaping future mobility systems and impacting sustainability performance of the transportation sector in major economies, such as the United States of America (USA) and China. This study applies a life cycle framework to demonstrate and evaluate the synergies of the following four emerging transportation system technologies both qualitatively and quantitatively: (1) wireless charging; (2) shared mobility services; (3) autonomous driving; and (4) battery electric vehicles (BEV). The new concept of a wireless charging and shared autonomous battery electric vehicle (W+SABEV) system is introduced and modeled. First, an analytical framework is presented to assess the pros and cons of the W+SABEV system vs. a conventional plug-in charging BEV system, adhering to the principles of sustainable mobility and highlighting the impacts and dynamics of the disruptive technologies on the key parameters that define sustainable mobility. Second, a quantitative analysis presents the synergies of the four technologies by modeling a W+SABEV system and demonstrates that the combination of the four technologies can shorten the payback time of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission burdens for infrastructure and vehicles. Compared to a plug-in charging BEV system, a W+SABEV system pays back the additional GHG emission burdens of wireless charging infrastructure deployment within 5 years if the wireless charging utility factor (ratio of en route charging time vs. trip time) is above 19%.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB (2003) Design through the 12 principles of green engineering. Environ Sci Technol 37:94A–101ACrossRef Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB (2003) Design through the 12 principles of green engineering. Environ Sci Technol 37:94A–101ACrossRef
go back to reference Anderson JM, Nidhi K, Stanley KD, Sorensen P, Samaras C, Oluwatola OA (2014) Autonomous vehicle technology: A guide for policymakers. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California Anderson JM, Nidhi K, Stanley KD, Sorensen P, Samaras C, Oluwatola OA (2014) Autonomous vehicle technology: A guide for policymakers. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California
go back to reference Bi Z, Song L, De Kleine R, Mi C, Keoleian GA (2015) Plug-in vs. wireless charging: life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions for an electric bus system. Appl Energy 146:11–19CrossRef Bi Z, Song L, De Kleine R, Mi C, Keoleian GA (2015) Plug-in vs. wireless charging: life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions for an electric bus system. Appl Energy 146:11–19CrossRef
go back to reference Bi Z, Kan T, Mi CC, Zhang Y, Zhao Z, Keoleian GA (2016) A review of wireless power transfer for electric vehicles: prospects to enhance sustainable mobility. Appl Energy 179:413–425CrossRef Bi Z, Kan T, Mi CC, Zhang Y, Zhao Z, Keoleian GA (2016) A review of wireless power transfer for electric vehicles: prospects to enhance sustainable mobility. Appl Energy 179:413–425CrossRef
go back to reference BloombergNEF (2018) Electric vehicle outlook 2018. Bloomberg New Energy Finance (NEF), London BloombergNEF (2018) Electric vehicle outlook 2018. Bloomberg New Energy Finance (NEF), London
go back to reference Chen TD, Kockelman KM, Hanna JP (2016) Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transport Res A 94:243–254 Chen TD, Kockelman KM, Hanna JP (2016) Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transport Res A 94:243–254
go back to reference Fagnant DJ, Kockelman KM (2014) The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transp Res C 40:1–13CrossRef Fagnant DJ, Kockelman KM (2014) The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transp Res C 40:1–13CrossRef
go back to reference Fulton L, Mason J, Meroux D (2017) Three revolutions in urban transportation: how to achieve the full potential of vehicle electrification, automation, and shared mobility in urban transportation systems around the world by 2050. No. STEPS-2050, Fulton L, Mason J, Meroux D (2017) Three revolutions in urban transportation: how to achieve the full potential of vehicle electrification, automation, and shared mobility in urban transportation systems around the world by 2050. No. STEPS-2050,
go back to reference Gawron JH, Keoleian GA, De Kleine RD, Wallington TJ, Kim HC (2018) Life cycle assessment of connected and automated vehicles: sensing and computing subsystem and vehicle level effects. Environ Sci Technol 52:3249–3256CrossRef Gawron JH, Keoleian GA, De Kleine RD, Wallington TJ, Kim HC (2018) Life cycle assessment of connected and automated vehicles: sensing and computing subsystem and vehicle level effects. Environ Sci Technol 52:3249–3256CrossRef
go back to reference Hao H, Wang M, Zhou Y, Wang H, Ouyang M (2015) Levelized costs of conventional and battery electric vehicles in China: Beijing experiences. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20:1229–1246CrossRef Hao H, Wang M, Zhou Y, Wang H, Ouyang M (2015) Levelized costs of conventional and battery electric vehicles in China: Beijing experiences. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20:1229–1246CrossRef
go back to reference Kan T, Nguyen T-D, White JC, Malhan RK, Mi C (2017) A new integration method for an electric vehicle wireless charging system using LCC compensation topology: analysis and design. IEEE Trans Power Electron 32:1–12 Kan T, Nguyen T-D, White JC, Malhan RK, Mi C (2017) A new integration method for an electric vehicle wireless charging system using LCC compensation topology: analysis and design. IEEE Trans Power Electron 32:1–12
go back to reference Kim HC, Wallington TJ, Arsenault R, Bae C, Ahn S, Lee J (2016) Cradle-to-gate emissions from a commercial electric vehicle Li-ion battery: a comparative analysis. Environ Sci Technol 50:7715–7722CrossRef Kim HC, Wallington TJ, Arsenault R, Bae C, Ahn S, Lee J (2016) Cradle-to-gate emissions from a commercial electric vehicle Li-ion battery: a comparative analysis. Environ Sci Technol 50:7715–7722CrossRef
go back to reference Lee S, Choi B, Rim CT (2013) Dynamics characterization of the inductive power transfer system for online electric vehicles by Laplace phasor transform. IEEE Trans Power Electron 28:5902–5909CrossRef Lee S, Choi B, Rim CT (2013) Dynamics characterization of the inductive power transfer system for online electric vehicles by Laplace phasor transform. IEEE Trans Power Electron 28:5902–5909CrossRef
go back to reference Lin Z, Li J, Dong J (2014) Dynamic wireless power transfer: potential impact on plug-in electric vehicle adoption SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1965 Lin Z, Li J, Dong J (2014) Dynamic wireless power transfer: potential impact on plug-in electric vehicle adoption SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1965
go back to reference Liu Z, Song Z (2017) Robust planning of dynamic wireless charging infrastructure for battery electric buses. Transp Res C 83:77–103CrossRef Liu Z, Song Z (2017) Robust planning of dynamic wireless charging infrastructure for battery electric buses. Transp Res C 83:77–103CrossRef
go back to reference Shoup D (2017) The high cost of free parking: Updated edition. Routledge, New York Shoup D (2017) The high cost of free parking: Updated edition. Routledge, New York
go back to reference Sperling D (2018) Three revolutions: steering automated, shared, and electric vehicles to a better future. Island Press, Washington D.C. Sperling D (2018) Three revolutions: steering automated, shared, and electric vehicles to a better future. Island Press, Washington D.C.
go back to reference U.S. EPA (2016) Avoided emissions and generation tool (AVERT). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Air and Radiation Climate Protection Partnerships Division, Washington D.C. U.S. EPA (2016) Avoided emissions and generation tool (AVERT). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Air and Radiation Climate Protection Partnerships Division, Washington D.C.
go back to reference Zhou Y, Wang M, Hao H, Johnson L, Wang H (2015) Plug-in electric vehicle market penetration and incentives: a global review. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20:777–795CrossRef Zhou Y, Wang M, Hao H, Johnson L, Wang H (2015) Plug-in electric vehicle market penetration and incentives: a global review. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20:777–795CrossRef
go back to reference Zivin JSG, Kotchen MJ, Mansur ET (2014) Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of marginal emissions: implications for electric cars and other electricity-shifting policies. J Econ Behav Organ 107:248–268CrossRef Zivin JSG, Kotchen MJ, Mansur ET (2014) Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of marginal emissions: implications for electric cars and other electricity-shifting policies. J Econ Behav Organ 107:248–268CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Wireless charging and shared autonomous battery electric vehicles (W+SABEV): synergies that accelerate sustainable mobility and greenhouse gas emission reduction
Authors
Zicheng Bi
Michael A. Reiner
Gregory A. Keoleian
Yan Zhou
Michael Wang
Zhenhong Lin
Publication date
26-06-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change / Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1381-2386
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-019-09870-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2020

Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 3/2020 Go to the issue