Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Meccanica
Published in: Meccanica 1-2/2019

17-12-2018

A computational framework for fluid–porous structure interaction with large structural deformation

Authors: Rana Zakerzadeh, Paolo Zunino

Published in: Meccanica | Issue 1-2/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We study the effect of poroelasticity on fluid–structure interaction. More precisely, we analyze the role of fluid flow through a deformable porous matrix in the energy dissipation behavior of a poroelastic structure. For this purpose, we develop and use a nonlinear poroelastic computational model and apply it to the fluid–structure interaction simulations. We discretize the problem by means of the finite element method for the spatial approximation and using finite differences in time. The numerical discretization leads to a system of non-linear equations that are solved by Newton’s method. We adopt a moving mesh algorithm, based on the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian method to handle large deformations of the structure. To reduce the computational cost, the coupled problem of free fluid, porous media flow and solid mechanics is split among its components and solved using a partitioned approach. Numerical results show that the flow through the porous matrix is responsible for generating a hysteresis loop in the stress versus displacement diagrams of the poroelastic structure. The sensitivity of this effect with respect to the parameters of the problem is also analyzed.
previous article Boundary-layer development beyond a critical value
next article Viscous flow induced by plates moving in opposite directions: a finite-breadth case

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
Chapelle D et al (2009) A poroelastic model valid in large strains with applications to perfusion in cardiac modeling. Comput Mech 46(1):91–101MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
2.
Chabiniok R et al (2016) Multiphysics and multiscale modelling, data-model fusion and integration of organ physiology in the clinic: ventricular cardiac mechanics. Interface Focus 6(2):1–24CrossRef
3.
Calo VM et al (2008) Multiphysics model for blood flow and drug transport with application to patient-specific coronary artery flow. Comput Mech 43(1):161–177MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
4.
Feenstra PH et al (2009) Drug transport in artery walls: a sequential porohyperelastic-transport approach. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 12(3):263–276CrossRef
5.
Badia S et al (2009) Coupling Biot and Navier–Stokes equations for modelling fluid–poroelastic media interaction. J Comput Phys 228(21):7986–8014ADSMathSciNetMATHCrossRef
6.
Koshiba N et al (2007) Multiphysics simulation of blood flow and LDL transport in a porohyperelastic arterial wall model. J Biomech Eng 129(3):374–385
7.
McCutchen CW (1982) Cartilage is poroelastic, not viscoelastic (including and exact theorem about strain energy and viscous loss, and an order of magnitude relation for equilibration time). J Biomech 15(4):325–327CrossRef
8.
Yang Z et al (2006) Dynamic finite element modeling of poroviscoelastic soft tissue. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 9(1):7–16MathSciNetCrossRef
9.
Armstrong MH et al (2016) A finite element model for mixed porohyperelasticity with transport, swelling, and growth. PLoS ONE 11(4):e0152806CrossRef
10.
Goriely A et al (2015) Mechanics of the brain: perspectives, challenges, and opportunities. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 14(5):931–965CrossRef
11.
Bukac M et al (2015) Effects of poroelasticity on fluid–structure interaction in arteries: a computational sensitivity study. In: Modeling the heart and the circulatory system. Springer, New York, pp 197–220
12.
Bazilevs Y et al (2006) Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Comput Mech 38(4–5):310–322MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
13.
Bazilevs Y et al (2009) Patient-specific isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(45–46):3534–3550ADSMathSciNetMATHCrossRef
14.
15.
Chepelenko GV (2015) Atherosclerosis regulation via media lipid-driven VSMC cholesterol efflux switch. Med Hypotheses 84(2):141–144CrossRef
16.
Smith E (1990) Transport, interactions and retention of plasma proteins in the intima: the barrier function of the internal elastic lamina. Eur Heart J 11(suppl E):72–81CrossRef
17.
Zakerzadeh R, Bukac M, Zunino P (2015) Computational analysis of energy distribution of coupled blood flow and arterial deformation. Int J Adv Eng Sci Appl Math 8(1):70–85MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
18.
Burtschell B et al (2017) Effective and energy-preserving time discretization for a general nonlinear poromechanical formulation. Comput Struct 182:313–324CrossRef
19.
Vuong AT et al (2015) A general approach for modeling interacting flow through porous media under finite deformations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 283:1240–1259ADSMathSciNetMATHCrossRef
20.
Chapelle D et al (2014) General coupling of porous flows and hyperelastic formulations—from thermodynamics principles to energy balance and compatible time schemes. Eur J Mech B Fluids 46:82–96MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
21.
Balzani D, Deparis S, Fausten S, Forti D, Heinlein A, Klawonn A, Quarteroni A, Rheinbach O, Schröder J (2015) Numerical modeling of fluid–structure interaction in arteries with anisotropic polyconvex hyperelastic and anisotropic viscoelastic material models at finite strains. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cnm.​2756 CrossRef
22.
Tricerri P et al (2015) Fluid–structure interaction simulations of cerebral arteries modeled by isotropic and anisotropic constitutive laws. Comput Mech 55(3):479–498MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
23.
Bukač M et al (2015) Partitioning strategies for the interaction of a fluid with a poroelastic material based on a Nitsche’s coupling approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 292:138–170ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATH
24.
Zakerzadeh R et al (2014) Fluid–structure interaction in arteries with a poroelastic wall model. In: 21st Iranian conference of biomedical engineering (ICBME) IEEE, pp 35–39
25.
Dunne T et al (2010) Numerical simulation of fluid–structure interaction based on monolithic variational formulations. In: Fundamental trends in fluid–structure interaction (contemporary challenges in mathematical fluid dynamics and its applications) vol 1, pp 1–75
26.
Burman E et al (2014) Explicit strategies for incompressible fluid–structure interaction problems: Nitsche type mortaring versus Robin–Robin coupling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 97(10):739–758MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
27.
28.
Yang M et al (1991) The possible role of poroelasticity in the apparent viscoelastic behavior of passive cardiac muscle. J Biomech 24(7):587–597CrossRef
29.
Taber LA et al (1996) Poroelastic plate and shell theories. In: Mechanics of poroelastic media. Springer, New York, pp 323–337
30.
31.
32.
Biot MA (1956) General solutions of the equations of elasticity and consolidation for a porous material. J Appl Mech 23(1):91–96MathSciNetMATH
33.
Biot MA (1956) Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid–saturated porous solid. I. Low–frequency range. J Acoust Soc Am 28(2):168–178ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
34.
Discacciati M et al (2009) Navier–Stokes/Darcy coupling: modeling, analysis, and numerical approximation. Revista Matemática Complutense 22(2):315–426MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
35.
Quaini A et al (2007) A semi-implicit approach for fluid–structure interaction based on an algebraic fractional step method. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 17(6):957–983MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
36.
Uzuoka R et al (2012) Dynamics of unsaturated poroelastic solids at finite strain. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 36(13):1535–1573CrossRef
37.
38.
39.
40.
Holzapfel GA (2002) Nonlinear solid mechanics: a continuum approach for engineering science. Meccanica 37(4):489–490CrossRef
41.
Burman E et al (2009) Stabilization of explicit coupling in fluid–structure interaction involving fluid incompressibility. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(5–8):766–784ADSMathSciNetMATHCrossRef
42.
Quarteroni A et al (2010) Numerical mathematics, vol 37. Springer, New YorkMATH
43.
Razzaq M et al (2009) Numerical simulation and benchmarking of fluid structure interaction with application to hemodynamics. Techn Univ, Fak für Mathematik
44.
Jendoubi A et al (2016) A simple mesh-update procedure for fluid–structure interaction problems. Comput Struct 169:13–23CrossRef
45.
46.
Brooks AN et al (1982) Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 32(1):199–259ADSMathSciNetMATHCrossRef
47.
Ijiri T et al (2012) A kinematic approach for efficient and robust simulation of the cardiac beating motion. PLoS ONE 7(5):e36706ADSCrossRef
48.
Bukač M et al (2013) Fluid–structure interaction in blood flow capturing non-zero longitudinal structure displacement. J Comput Phys 235:515–541ADSMathSciNetCrossRef
49.
Ren H et al (2009) Poroelastic analysis of permeability effects in thinly layered porous media. Geophysics 74(6):N49–N54CrossRef
50.
Costi JJ et al (2008) Frequency-dependent behavior of the intervertebral disc in response to each of six degree of freedom dynamic loading: solid phase and fluid phase contributions. Spine 33(16):1731CrossRef
51.
Cederbaum G et al (2000) Poroelastic structures. Elsevier, AmsterdamMATH
52.
Yeh F-H et al (1998) Dynamic behavior of a poroelastic slab subjected to uniformly distributed impulsive loading. Comput Struct 67(4):267–277MATHCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A computational framework for fluid–porous structure interaction with large structural deformation
Authors
Rana Zakerzadeh
Paolo Zunino
Publication date
17-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Meccanica / Issue 1-2/2019
Print ISSN: 0025-6455
Electronic ISSN: 1572-9648
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-018-00932-x

Other articles of this Issue 1-2/2019

Meccanica 1-2/2019 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Boundary-layer development beyond a critical value

OriginalPaper

Generalized Rayleigh surface waves in a piezoelectric semiconductor half space

OriginalPaper

Wave equation in fractional Zener-type viscoelastic media involving Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivatives

OriginalPaper

A magneto-rheological elastomer vibration isolator for lightweight structures

OriginalPaper

Application of modal analysis methods to the design of wireless power transfer systems

OriginalPaper

Wave isogeometric analysis method for calculating dispersive properties of guided waves in rotating damped cylinders

Premium Partners

    Image Credits