Top

Journal of Intelligent Information Systems

Published in:

29-07-2022

A framework for interoperability between models with hybrid tools

Authors: Germán Braun, Pablo Rubén Fillottrani, C. Maria Keet

Published in: Journal of Intelligent Information Systems | Issue 2/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Complex system development and maintenance face the challenge of dealing with different types of models due to language affordances, preferences, sizes, and so forth that involve interaction between users with different levels of proficiency. Current conceptual data modelling tools do not fully support these modes of working. It requires that the interaction between multiple models in multiple languages is clearly specified to ensure they keep their intended semantics, which is lacking in extant tools. The key objective is to devise a mechanism to support semantic interoperability in hybrid tools for multi-modal modelling in a plurality of paradigms, all within one system. We propose FaCIL, a framework for such hybrid modelling tools. We design and realise the framework FaCIL, which maps UML, ER and ORM2 into a common metamodel with rules that provide the central point for management among the models and that links to the formalisation and logic-based automated reasoning. FaCIL supports the ability to represent models in different formats while preserving their semantics, and several editing workflows are supported within the framework. It has a clear separation of concerns for typical conceptual modelling activities in an interoperable and extensible way. FaCIL structures and facilitates the interaction between visual and textual conceptual models, their formal specifications, and abstractions as well as tracking and propagating updates across all the representations. FaCIL is compared against the requirements, implemented in crowd 2.0, and assessed with a use case. The proof-of-concept implementation in the web-based modelling tool crowd 2.0 demonstrates its viability. The framework also meets the requirements and fully supports the use case.

previous article Leveraging siamese networks for one-shot intrusion detection model

next article Semantic event relationships identification and representation using HyperGraph in multimedia digital ecosystem

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Conversely, an ontology rendered visually using a CDML remains an ontology.

https://erwin.com/products/erwin-data-modeler/

https://app.diagrams.net/

crowd 2.0 is available at https://crowd-app.fi.uncoma.edu.ar/

At https://github.com/iamcrowd

At https://github.com/iamcrowd/crowd-box

https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/

https://github.com/iamcrowd/crowd-box

https://github.com/argouml-tigris-org/argouml

Atkinson, C., Gerbig, R., & Kühne, T. (2014). Comparing multi-level modeling approaches. In: 17th Int. Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages & Systems (MoDELS). CEUR-WS, vol. 1286, pp. 53–61.

Atzeni, P., Cappellari, P., Torlone, R., Bernstein, P. A., & Gianforme, G. (2008). Model-independent schema translation. The VLDB Journal, 17(6), 1347–1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-008-0105-2.CrossRef

Atzeni, P., Gianforme, G., & Cappellari, P. (2012). Data model descriptions and translation signatures in a multi-model framework. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 63, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-012-9277-y.CrossRefMATHMathSciNet

Bader, S. R., Grangel-González, I., Nanjappa, P., Vidal, M., & Maleshkova, M. (2020). A Knowledge Graph for Industry 4.0. In: 17th International Conference, ESWC, Proceedings. LNCS. Springer, vol. 12123, pp. 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49461-2_27

Berardi, D., Calvanese, D., & De Giacomo, G. (2005). Reasoning on UML class diagrams. Artificial Intelligence, 168(1–2), 70–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2005.05.003.CrossRefMATHMathSciNet

Boyd, M., & McBrien, P. (2005). Comparing and transforming between data models via an intermediate hypergraph data model. J. Data Semant. IV, 69–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/11603412_3

Braun, G. A., Gimenez, C., Cecchi, L. A., & Fillottrani, P. R. (2020). crowd: A visual tool for involving stakeholders into ontology engineering tasks. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 34(3), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00657-8CrossRef

Braun, G. A., Marinelli, G., Gavagnin, E. R., Cecchi, L. A., & Fillottrani, P. R. (2021). Web interoperability for ontology development and support with crowd 2.0. In: 30th Int. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI, p. 4980–4983. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/707

Brickley, D., & Miller, L. (2007). The friend of a friend (FOAF) vocabulary specification. http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/

Brown, A. W. (2004). Model driven architecture: Principles and practice. Software and Systems Modeling, 3(4), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-004-0061-2.CrossRef

Calvanese, D., Cogrel, B., Komla-Ebri, S., et al. (2017). Ontop: Answering SPARQL queries over relational databases. Semantic Web, 8(3), 471–487. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-160217CrossRef

Calvanese, D., Liuzzo, P., Mosca, A., et al. (2016). Ontology-based data integration in EPNet: Production and distribution of food during the roman empire. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 51, 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2016.01.005.CrossRef

Carriero, V. A., Gangemi, A., Mancinelli, M. L., Marinucci, L., Nuzzolese, A. G., Presutti, V., & Veninata, C. (2019). Arco ontology network and LOD on italian cultural heritage. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Open Data and Ontologies for Cultural Heritage Co-located with the 31st International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, ODOCH@CAiSE. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2375, pp. 97–102

Delcambre, L. M. L., Liddle, S. W., Pastor, O., & Storey, V. C. (2018). A reference framework for conceptual modeling. In: 37th Int. Conference on Conceptual Modeling, ER. LNCS. Springer, vol. 11157, pp. 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_4

Dudáš, M., Lohmann, S., Svátek, V., & Pavlov, D. (2018). Ontology visualization methods and tools: a survey of the state of the art. The Knowledge Engineering Review 33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888918000073

Farré, C., Queralt, A., Rull, G., Teniente, E., & Urpí, T. (2013). Automated reasoning on UML conceptual schemas with derived information and queries. Information and Software Technology, 55(9), 1529–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.02.010.CrossRef

Fillottrani, P. R., Franconi, E., & Tessaris, S. (2012). The ICOM 3.0 intelligent conceptual modelling tool and methodology. Semantic Web 3(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-2011-0038

Fillottrani, P. R., & Keet, C. M. (2020). An analysis of commitments in ontology language design. In: 11th Int. Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS), vol. 330, pp. 46–60. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200659

Fillottrani, P. R., & Keet, C. M. (2021). Evidence-based lean conceptual data modelling languages. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 21(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.24215/16666038.21.e10.CrossRef

Fillottrani, P. R., & Keet, C. M. (2014). Conceptual model interoperability: a metamodel-driven approach. In: 8th Int. RuleML. LNCS, vol. 8620, pp. 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09870-8_4

Fillottrani, P. R., & Keet, C. M. (2015). Evidence-based languages for conceptual data modelling profiles. In: 19th Conference on advances in databases and information systems (ADBIS). LNCS, vol. 9282, pp. 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23135-8_15

Fillottrani, P. R., & Keet, C. M. (2017). Patterns for heterogeneous tbox mappings to bridge different modelling decisions. In: 14th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC’17). LNCS, vol. 10249, pp. 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58068-5_23

Garrido, M. A. (2019). Verbalización de un Subconjunto de UML en una Herramienta Web. MSc thesis, Univ.Nac. del Comahue, Argentina

Guarino, N., Guizzardi, G., & Mylopoulos, J. (2020). On the philosophical foundations of conceptual models. Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases, 31(321), 1. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200002CrossRef

Guerson, J., Sales, T. P., Guizzardi, G., & Almeida, J. P. A. (2015). OntoUML lightweight editor: a model-based environment to build, evaluate and implement reference ontologies. In: 19th EDOC Workshops. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2015.17

Haarslev, V., Hidde, K., Möller, R., & Wessel, M. (2012). The RacerPro knowledge representation and reasoning system. Semantic Web, 3(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-2011-0032CrossRef

Halpin, T., & Morgan, T. (2008). Information Modeling and Relational Databases, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann

He, Y., Yu, H., Ong, E., et al. (2020). CIDO: the community-based coronavirus infectious disease ontology. In: 11th Int. Conference on Biomedical Ontologies (ICBO). CEUR-WS, vol. 2807

Hobbs, J. R., & Pan, F. (2004). An ontology of time for the semantic web. ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing, 3(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/1017068.1017073.CrossRef

Jeusfeld, M. A. (2021). Multilevel modeling with conceptbase. In: Lukyanenko, R., Samuel, B.M., Sturm, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the ER Demos and Posters 2021 Co-located with 40th Int. Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER 2021). CEUR-WS, vol. 2958. https://www.ceur-ws.org/Vol-2958/paper1.pdf

Jeusfeld, M., Jarke, M., & Mylopoulos, J. (2009). Metamodeling for Method Engineering (1st ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Keet, C. M., & Fillottrani, P. R. (2015). An ontology-driven unifying metamodel of UML Class Diagrams, EER, and ORM2. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 98, 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2015.07.004.CrossRef

Keet, C. M., & Fillottrani, P. R. (2015). An analysis and characterisation of publicly available conceptual models. In: 34th Int. Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER). LNCS. Springer, vol. 9381, pp. 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_45

Kelly, S., Lyytinen, K., Rossi, M., & Tolvanen, J. (2013). Metaedit at the age of 20. In: Jr., J.A.B., Krogstie, J., Pastor, O., Pernici, B., Rolland, C., Sølvberg, A. (eds.) Seminal Contributions to Information Systems Engineering, pp. 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36926-1_10

Kensche, D., Quix, C., Chatti, M. A., & Jarke, M. (2007). Gerome: A generic role based metamodel for model management. Journal on Data Semantics, 8, 82–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70664-9_4.CrossRefMATH

Khan, Z., & Keet, C. M. (2021). Structuring abstraction to achieve ontology modularisation. In: Daramola, O., Moser, T. (eds.) Advanced Concepts, Methods, and Applications in Semantic Computing. IGI Global, pp. 72–92

Koubarakis, M., Borgida, A., Constantopoulos, P., Doerr, M., Jarke, M., Jeusfeld, M. A., et al. (2021). A retrospective on Telos as a metamodeling language for requirements engineering. Requirements Engineering, 26(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-020-00329-x.CrossRef

Liebig, T., Luther, M., Noppens, O., & Wessel, M. (2011). OWLlink. Semantic Web, 2(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-2011-0027CrossRef

Lodi, G., Asprino, L., Nuzzolese, A. G., Presutti, V., Gangemi, A., Recupero, D. R., Veninata, C., & Orsini, A. (2017). Semantic Web for Cultural Heritage Valorisation, pp. 3–37. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54499-1_1

Lubyte, L., & Tessaris, S. (2009). Automated extraction of ontologies wrapping relational data sources. In: Int. Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA). Springer, pp. 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03573-9_10

Mahlaza, Z., & Keet, C. M. (2021). ToCT: A task ontology to manage complex templates. In: FOIS Ontology Showcase, The Joint Ontology Workshops (JOWO). CEUR-WS, vol. 2969. https://www.ceur-ws.org/Vol-2969/paper40-FoisShowCase.pdf

Mayr, H. C., & Thalheim, B. (2021). The triptych of conceptual modeling. Software and Systems Modeling, 20(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-020-00836-z.CrossRef

Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P. F., & Parsia, B. (2022). OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax. W3C recommendation, W3C (accessed 3 February 2022). www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/

Musen, M. A. (2015). The protégé project: a look back and a look forward. AI Matters, 1(4), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757001.2757003CrossRef

Nicolaescu, P., Rosenstengel, M., Derntl, M., Klamma, R., & Jarke, M. (2016). View-Based Near Real-Time Collaborative Modeling for Information Systems Engineering. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering - 28th Int. Conference, CAiSE, vol. 9694, pp. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39696-5_1

Object Management Group (2017). OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML). Object Management Group. www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/

Object Management Group (2022) Semantics of business vocabulary and rules (SBVR) – OMG Released Versions of SBVR. www.omg.org/spec/SBVR/1.0

Ong, D., & Jabbari, M. (2019). A review of problems and challenges of using multiple conceptual models. In: vom Brocke, J., Gregor, S., Müller, O. (eds.) 27th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2019. https://www.aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2019_rp/179

Poveda-Villalon, M., Garcia-Castro, R., Daniele, L., de Roode, M. (2019). SAREF4AGRI: an extension of SAREF for the agriculture and food domain. https://saref.etsi.org/saref4agri/v1.1.2/

QUDT.org (2011). FAIRsharing.org: QUDT; Quantities, Units, Dimensions and Types. https://doi.org/10.25504/FAIRsharing.d3pqw7

Rull, G., Farré, C., Queralt, A., Teniente, E., & Urpí, T. (2015). AuRUS: explaining the validation of UML/OCL conceptual schemas. Software and Systems Modeling, 14(2), 953–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-013-0350-8.CrossRef

Sabegh, M. A. J., & Recker, J. (2017). Combined use of conceptual models in practice: An exploratory study. Journal of Database Management, 28(2), 56–88. https://doi.org/10.4018/JDM.2017040103.CrossRef

Sportelli, F., & Franconi, E. (2016). Formalisation of ORM Derivation Rules and Their Mapping into OWL. In: OTM Conferences in Computer Science, vol. 10033, pp. 827–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23135-8_15

Steigmiller, A., Liebig, T., & Glimm, B. (2014). Konclude: System description. Journal of Web Semantics, 27–28, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2014.06.003.CrossRefMATH

Thalheim, B. (2009). Extended Entity Relationship Model. In: Liu, L., Özsu, M.T. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, vol. 1, pp. 1083–1091

Thalheim, B. (2010). Towards a theory of conceptual modelling. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 16(20), 3102–3137. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-016-20-3102.CrossRefMATH

Uhnák, P., & Pergl, R. (2016). The openponk modeling platform. In: Proceedings of the 11th Edition of the International Workshop on Smalltalk Technologies. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2991041.2991055

Venable, J. R., & Grundy, J. C. (1995). Integrating and supporting entity relationship and object role models. In: 14th Int. Conference of Object-Oriented and Entity-Relationship Modelling. LNCS, vol. 1021, pp. 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0020543

Whittle, J., Hutchinson, J., & Rouncefield, M. (2014). The state of practice in model-driven engineering. IEEE Software, 31(3), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2013.65CrossRef

Zhu, N., Grundy, J. C., & Hosking, J. G. (2004). Pounamu: a metatool for multi-view visual language environment construction. In: IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC). IEEE Computer Society, pp. 254–256. https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2004.41

Title: A framework for interoperability between models with hybrid tools
Authors: Germán Braun
Pablo Rubén Fillottrani
C. Maria Keet
Publication date: 29-07-2022
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Intelligent Information Systems / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0925-9902
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7675
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-022-00731-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Editorial: AI meets cybersecurity

AI infers DoS mitigation rules

Machine learning in industrial control system (ICS) security: current landscape, opportunities and challenges

Multi-task learning for toxic comment classification and rationale extraction

A context-aware unsupervised predictive maintenance solution for fleet management

TROMPA-MER: an open dataset for personalized music emotion recognition

Premium Partner