Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

A Framework for Quality Measurement of BPMN Process Models

Authors : Anacleto Correia, António Gonçalves, Mário Simões-Marques

Published in: Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2018

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Nowadays organizations are collaborative and process-intensive. Measurement of process models have a variety of applications including process models’ quality evaluation, process improvement and task planning. The objective of this work is to propose a framework for quantifying and linking different quality characteristics of process models built with a standard process modeling language: BPMN. The framework supports the derivation of measures regarding internal quality characteristics of process models, to enable measurement of the quality perceived by process models’ users, at the end of the modeling process. To this aim, a measurement terminology for process modeling was set up in order to support process models’ measures instantiation. This was done through the specification of a set of activities to be developed in order to derive the base measures and indirect measures for prediction of process models’ quality. This work follows a product-oriented approach, by which, quality is assumed as being multi-dimensional concept, with several interrelated characteristics.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
2.
go back to reference Rolón, E., Cardoso, J., García, F., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M.: Analysis and validation of control-flow complexity measures with BPMN process models. In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Ukor, R. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD -2009. LNBIP, vol. 29, pp. 58–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01862-6_6CrossRef Rolón, E., Cardoso, J., García, F., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M.: Analysis and validation of control-flow complexity measures with BPMN process models. In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Ukor, R. (eds.) BPMDS/EMMSAD -2009. LNBIP, vol. 29, pp. 58–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-642-01862-6_​6CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Aguilar, E.R., et al.: Evaluation measures for business process models, pp. 1567–1568 (2006) Aguilar, E.R., et al.: Evaluation measures for business process models, pp. 1567–1568 (2006)
4.
go back to reference OMG, BPMN: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) (2011) OMG, BPMN: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) (2011)
5.
go back to reference Recker, J.C., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Do process modelling techniques get better? A comparative ontological analysis of BPMN. In: Campbell, B., Underwood, J., Bunker, D. (eds.) 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, Australia, 30 November– 2 December 2005 (2005) Recker, J.C., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Do process modelling techniques get better? A comparative ontological analysis of BPMN. In: Campbell, B., Underwood, J., Bunker, D. (eds.) 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, Australia, 30 November– 2 December 2005 (2005)
6.
go back to reference Recker, J., Rosemann, M.: Business process modeling: a comparative analysis. J. Assoc. 10(4), 333–363 (2009) Recker, J., Rosemann, M.: Business process modeling: a comparative analysis. J. Assoc. 10(4), 333–363 (2009)
7.
go back to reference Harmon, P., Wolf, C.: Business process modeling survey, December 2011 Harmon, P., Wolf, C.: Business process modeling survey, December 2011
8.
go back to reference I.O.f.S. ISO, ISO/IEC 25000:2005 – Software Engineering – Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – Guide to SQuaRE (2005) I.O.f.S. ISO, ISO/IEC 25000:2005 – Software Engineering – Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – Guide to SQuaRE (2005)
10.
go back to reference Moody, D.L.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data Knowl. Eng. 55(3), 243–276 (2005)CrossRef Moody, D.L.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data Knowl. Eng. 55(3), 243–276 (2005)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kueng, P., Kawalek, P.: Goal-based business process models: creation and evaluation. Bus. Process Manage. J. 3(1), 17–38 (1997)CrossRef Kueng, P., Kawalek, P.: Goal-based business process models: creation and evaluation. Bus. Process Manage. J. 3(1), 17–38 (1997)CrossRef
13.
15.
go back to reference Korherr, B., List, B.: Extending the EPC and the BPMN with business process goals and performance measures. In: Book Extending the EPC and the BPMN with Business Process Goals and Performance Measures, Series Extending the EPC and the BPMN with Business Process Goals and Performance Measures, pp. 287–294 (2007) Korherr, B., List, B.: Extending the EPC and the BPMN with business process goals and performance measures. In: Book Extending the EPC and the BPMN with Business Process Goals and Performance Measures, Series Extending the EPC and the BPMN with Business Process Goals and Performance Measures, pp. 287–294 (2007)
16.
go back to reference Korherr, B.: Business Process Modelling: Languages, Goals, and Variabilities. VDM Publishing, Saarbrücken (2008) Korherr, B.: Business Process Modelling: Languages, Goals, and Variabilities. VDM Publishing, Saarbrücken (2008)
17.
go back to reference Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Jander, K., Lamersdorf, W., Burmeister, B.: Go4Flex: goal-oriented process modelling. In: Essaaidi, M., Malgeri, M., Badica, C. (eds.) Intelligent Distributed Computing IV. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 315, pp. 77–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15211-5_9CrossRef Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Jander, K., Lamersdorf, W., Burmeister, B.: Go4Flex: goal-oriented process modelling. In: Essaaidi, M., Malgeri, M., Badica, C. (eds.) Intelligent Distributed Computing IV. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 315, pp. 77–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​978-3-642-15211-5_​9CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Popova, V., Sharpanskykh, A.: Formal modelling of organisational goals based on performance indicators. Data Knowl. Eng. 70(4), 335–364 (2011)CrossRef Popova, V., Sharpanskykh, A.: Formal modelling of organisational goals based on performance indicators. Data Knowl. Eng. 70(4), 335–364 (2011)CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Johannes, J.: ATL Use Case - Model Driven Performance Engineering: From UML/SPT to AnyLogic. Book ATL, TU Dresden (2008) Johannes, J.: ATL Use Case - Model Driven Performance Engineering: From UML/SPT to AnyLogic. Book ATL, TU Dresden (2008)
20.
go back to reference Bocciarelli, P., Ambrogio, A.D.: Automated performance analysis of business processes. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on Theory of Modeling and Simulation-DEVS Integrative M&S Symposium. Society for Computer Simulation International (2012) Bocciarelli, P., Ambrogio, A.D.: Automated performance analysis of business processes. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on Theory of Modeling and Simulation-DEVS Integrative M&S Symposium. Society for Computer Simulation International (2012)
21.
go back to reference Pavlovski, C.J., Zou, J.: Non-functional requirements in business process modeling, vol. 79 (2008) Pavlovski, C.J., Zou, J.: Non-functional requirements in business process modeling, vol. 79 (2008)
22.
go back to reference Heinrich, R., et al.: Modeling quality information within business process models. In: Proceedings of the 4th SQMB Workshop, TUM-I1104 (2011) Heinrich, R., et al.: Modeling quality information within business process models. In: Proceedings of the 4th SQMB Workshop, TUM-I1104 (2011)
23.
go back to reference Meneely, A.: Software metrics validation criteria: a systematic literature review. North Carolina State University. Department of Computer Science (2010) Meneely, A.: Software metrics validation criteria: a systematic literature review. North Carolina State University. Department of Computer Science (2010)
24.
go back to reference Briand, L., et al.: Theoretical and empirical validation of software product measures. In: International Software Engineering Research Network, Technical report ISERN-95–03 (1995) Briand, L., et al.: Theoretical and empirical validation of software product measures. In: International Software Engineering Research Network, Technical report ISERN-95–03 (1995)
25.
go back to reference Briand, L.C., et al.: An operational process for goal-driven definition of measures. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(12), 1106–1125 (2002)CrossRef Briand, L.C., et al.: An operational process for goal-driven definition of measures. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(12), 1106–1125 (2002)CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Basili, V.R., et al.: The goal question metric approach. In: Marciniak, J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 578–583 (2000) Basili, V.R., et al.: The goal question metric approach. In: Marciniak, J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 578–583 (2000)
27.
go back to reference García, F., et al.: Towards a consistent terminology for software measurement information and software technology. Inf. Softw. Technol. 48(8), 631–644 (2006)CrossRef García, F., et al.: Towards a consistent terminology for software measurement information and software technology. Inf. Softw. Technol. 48(8), 631–644 (2006)CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Fenton, N.E., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach. Brooks, Baltimore (1998) Fenton, N.E., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach. Brooks, Baltimore (1998)
29.
go back to reference Meneely, A.: Validating software metrics : a spectrum of philosophies. ACM Trans. Software Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM) 21(4), 24 (2012)CrossRef Meneely, A.: Validating software metrics : a spectrum of philosophies. ACM Trans. Software Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM) 21(4), 24 (2012)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Framework for Quality Measurement of BPMN Process Models
Authors
Anacleto Correia
António Gonçalves
Mário Simões-Marques
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95174-4_34

Premium Partner