Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Decisions in Economics and Finance 1/2019

20-03-2019

A market-consistent framework for the fair evaluation of insurance contracts under Solvency II

Authors: Anna Maria Gambaro, Riccardo Casalini, Gianluca Fusai, Alessandro Ghilarducci

Published in: Decisions in Economics and Finance | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The entry into force of the Solvency II regulatory regime is pushing insurance companies in engaging into market consistence evaluation of their balance sheet, mainly with reference to financial options and guarantees embedded in life with-profit funds. The robustness of these valuations is crucial for insurance companies in order to produce sound estimates and good risk management strategies, in particular, for liability-driven products such as with-profit saving and pension funds. This paper introduces a Monte Carlo simulation approach for evaluation of insurance assets and liabilities, which is more suitable for risk management of liability-driven products than common approaches generally adopted by insurance companies, in particular, with respect to the assessment of valuation risk.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
IFRS 17 is effective from 1 January 2021. A company can choose to apply IFRS 17 before that date, but only if it also applies IFRS 9 Financial Instruments and IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The board will support the implementation of IFRS 17 over the next three and half years.
 
2
See definition (7) (Commission 2015), insurance and reinsurance undertakings’ valuation of the assets and liabilities using the market-consistent valuation methods prescribed in international accounting standards adopted by the Commission in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1606/2002, should follow a valuation hierarchy with quoted market prices in active markets for the same assets or liabilities being the default valuation method in order to ensure that assets and liabilities are valued at the amount for which they could be exchanged in the case of assets or transferred or settled in the case of liabilities between knowledgeable and willing parties in an arm’s length transaction. This approach should be applied by undertakings regardless of whether international or other valuation methods follow a different valuation hierarchy.
 
3
The estimates of future cash flows shall be current, explicit, unbiased and reflect all the information available to the entity without undue cost and effort about the amount, timing and uncertainty of those future cash flows. They should reflect the perspective of the entity, provided that the estimates of any relevant market variables are consistent with observable market prices [IFRS 17:33, Measurement].
 
4
See data on life insurance market at https://​www.​insuranceeurope.​eu/​insurancedata.
 
5
For a comprehensive introduction to ESGs and their applications to insurance and pension funds, see SOA (2016).
 
6
By and large, liability-driven investments are saving or pension products, like segregated fund, where the way assets performance affects liabilities is critical for the sustainability and success of the investment strategy.
 
7
For the definition of equivalent martingale measure and the fundamental theorem of asset pricing, see for example Bjork (2009).
 
8
In market-consistent evaluations, liability cash flows are discounted using a risk-free curve derived from six months Euribor, which is constructed as prescribed by EIOPA. After the financial crisis in 2008, some European sovereign bond issuers (as Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain) began to trade with a material spread over Euribor. Therefore, the assets of many insurance companies began to deteriorate while liabilities did not due to the basis or liquidity effect between market prices and discounting factors used to assess the economic value of technical provisions.
 
9
At the heart of the prudential Solvency II directive, the own risk and solvency assessment (ORSA) is defined as a set of processes constituting a tool for decision-making and strategic analysis. It aims to assess, in a continuous and prospective way, the overall solvency needs related to the specific risk profile of the insurance company.
 
10
With valuation risk, we mean correlation, basis, liquidity and model risks in accordance with the prudent person principle as stated in the article 132 of Solvency II Directive.
 
11
For an overview of insurance participating contracts, see Pitacco (2012).
 
12
See, for example, the hedging requirement under IFRS 9 financial instruments.
 
13
A stochastic time is a real positive and increasing right continuous process with left limits, for every \(t \ge 0\), \(\tau (t)\) is a stopping time, \(\tau (t)\) is finite almost surely, \(\tau (0) = 0\) and \(\lim \nolimits _{t \rightarrow \infty } \tau (t) = \infty \) (see Barndorff-Nielsen and Shiryaev 2010 for a complete discussion).
 
14
The relevance of the Italian traditional with-profit business as an example is explained in Gambaro et al. (2018). The same paper includes more information on the certainty equivalent and the market-consistent approach to insurance valuations.
 
15
A consequence of an higher turnover on the assets portfolio is the reduction of unrealised gains (or losses), which are used by insurance companies to steer the performance credited to and shared with the policyholder.
 
Literature
go back to reference Bacinello, A.: Fair pricing of life insurance partcipating policies with a minimum interest rate guaranteed. Astin Bull. 31, 275–297 (2001)CrossRef Bacinello, A.: Fair pricing of life insurance partcipating policies with a minimum interest rate guaranteed. Astin Bull. 31, 275–297 (2001)CrossRef
go back to reference Bacinello, A.: Fair valuation of the surrender option embedded in a guaranteed life insurance participating policy. J. Risk Insur. 70(3), 461–487 (2003)CrossRef Bacinello, A.: Fair valuation of the surrender option embedded in a guaranteed life insurance participating policy. J. Risk Insur. 70(3), 461–487 (2003)CrossRef
go back to reference Barndorff-Nielsen, O., Shiryaev, A.: Change of Time and Change of Measure. World Scientific, Singapore (2010)CrossRef Barndorff-Nielsen, O., Shiryaev, A.: Change of Time and Change of Measure. World Scientific, Singapore (2010)CrossRef
go back to reference Baucells, M., Borgonovo, E.: Invariant probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Manag. Sci. 59(11), 2536–2549 (2013)CrossRef Baucells, M., Borgonovo, E.: Invariant probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Manag. Sci. 59(11), 2536–2549 (2013)CrossRef
go back to reference Bauer, D., Kiesel, R., Kling, A., Russ, J.: Risk-neutral valuation of participating life insurance contracts. Insur. Math. Econ. 39, 171–183 (2006)CrossRef Bauer, D., Kiesel, R., Kling, A., Russ, J.: Risk-neutral valuation of participating life insurance contracts. Insur. Math. Econ. 39, 171–183 (2006)CrossRef
go back to reference Bianchetti, M.: Two curves, one price: pricing and hedging interest rate derivatives using different yield curves for discounting and forwarding (2012). arXiv:0905.2770 Bianchetti, M.: Two curves, one price: pricing and hedging interest rate derivatives using different yield curves for discounting and forwarding (2012). arXiv:​0905.​2770
go back to reference Bjork, T.: Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009) Bjork, T.: Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)
go back to reference Bremaud, P.: Point Processes and Queues: Martingale Dynamics. Springer, Berlin (1981)CrossRef Bremaud, P.: Point Processes and Queues: Martingale Dynamics. Springer, Berlin (1981)CrossRef
go back to reference Brigo, D., Mercurio, F.: Interest Rate Models: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2006) Brigo, D., Mercurio, F.: Interest Rate Models: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2006)
go back to reference Briys, E., De-Varenne, F.: On the risk of life insurance liabilities: debunking some common pitfalls. J. Risk Insur. 64, 673–694 (1997)CrossRef Briys, E., De-Varenne, F.: On the risk of life insurance liabilities: debunking some common pitfalls. J. Risk Insur. 64, 673–694 (1997)CrossRef
go back to reference Cox, J., Ingersoll, J., Ross, S.: A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica 53(2), 385–407 (1985)CrossRef Cox, J., Ingersoll, J., Ross, S.: A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica 53(2), 385–407 (1985)CrossRef
go back to reference Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.: Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat. Sci. 1, 54–75 (1986)CrossRef Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.: Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat. Sci. 1, 54–75 (1986)CrossRef
go back to reference Feller, W.: An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, vol. II, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1971) Feller, W.: An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, vol. II, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1971)
go back to reference Gambaro, A., Casalini, R., Fusai, G., Ghilarducci, A.: Quantitative assessment of common practice procedures in the fair evaluation of embedded options in insurance contracts. Insur. Math. Econ. 81, 117–129 (2018)CrossRef Gambaro, A., Casalini, R., Fusai, G., Ghilarducci, A.: Quantitative assessment of common practice procedures in the fair evaluation of embedded options in insurance contracts. Insur. Math. Econ. 81, 117–129 (2018)CrossRef
go back to reference Hull, J., White, A.: Pricing interest-rate derivative securities. Rev. Financ. Stud. 3(4), 573–592 (1990)CrossRef Hull, J., White, A.: Pricing interest-rate derivative securities. Rev. Financ. Stud. 3(4), 573–592 (1990)CrossRef
go back to reference Jarrow, R., Turnbull, S.: Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk. J. Finance 50(1), 53–85 (1995)CrossRef Jarrow, R., Turnbull, S.: Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk. J. Finance 50(1), 53–85 (1995)CrossRef
go back to reference Jørgensen, P.: On accounting standards and fair valuation of life insurance and pension liabilities. Scand. Actuar. J. 5, 372–394 (2004)CrossRef Jørgensen, P.: On accounting standards and fair valuation of life insurance and pension liabilities. Scand. Actuar. J. 5, 372–394 (2004)CrossRef
go back to reference Kemp, M.: Market Consistency: Model Calibration in Imperfect Markets, 1st edn. Wiley, New York (2015) Kemp, M.: Market Consistency: Model Calibration in Imperfect Markets, 1st edn. Wiley, New York (2015)
go back to reference Lando, D.: On Cox processes and credit risky securities. Rev. Deriv. Res. 2, 99–120 (1998) Lando, D.: On Cox processes and credit risky securities. Rev. Deriv. Res. 2, 99–120 (1998)
go back to reference Longstaff, F., Mithal, S., Neis, E.: Corporate yield spreads: default risk or liquidity? New evidence from the credit default swap market. J. Finance 60, 2213–2253 (2005)CrossRef Longstaff, F., Mithal, S., Neis, E.: Corporate yield spreads: default risk or liquidity? New evidence from the credit default swap market. J. Finance 60, 2213–2253 (2005)CrossRef
go back to reference Marena, M., Fusai, G., Materazzi, M.: Analysis of calibration risk for exotic options through a resampling technique. Working paper (2018) Marena, M., Fusai, G., Materazzi, M.: Analysis of calibration risk for exotic options through a resampling technique. Working paper (2018)
go back to reference Monfort, A., Renne, J.: Decomposing euro-area sovereign spreads: credit and liquidity risks. Rev. Finance 18(6), 2103–2151 (2014)CrossRef Monfort, A., Renne, J.: Decomposing euro-area sovereign spreads: credit and liquidity risks. Rev. Finance 18(6), 2103–2151 (2014)CrossRef
go back to reference Moreni, N., Pallavicini, A.: Parsimonious HJM modelling for multiple yield-curve dynamics. Quant. Finance 14(2), 199–210 (2014)CrossRef Moreni, N., Pallavicini, A.: Parsimonious HJM modelling for multiple yield-curve dynamics. Quant. Finance 14(2), 199–210 (2014)CrossRef
go back to reference Morini, M.: Solving the Puzzle in the Interest Rate Market. Interest Rate Modelling After the Financial Crisis, pp. 61–105. Risk Books, London (2013) Morini, M.: Solving the Puzzle in the Interest Rate Market. Interest Rate Modelling After the Financial Crisis, pp. 61–105. Risk Books, London (2013)
go back to reference O’Kane, D., Turnbull, S.: Valuation of credit default swaps. Lehman Brothers, Fixed Income Quantitative Credit Research (2003) O’Kane, D., Turnbull, S.: Valuation of credit default swaps. Lehman Brothers, Fixed Income Quantitative Credit Research (2003)
go back to reference Pearson, N., Sun, T.: Exploiting the conditional density in estimating the term structure: an application to the Cox, Ingersoll, and Ross Model. J. Finance 49(4), 1279–1304 (1994)CrossRef Pearson, N., Sun, T.: Exploiting the conditional density in estimating the term structure: an application to the Cox, Ingersoll, and Ross Model. J. Finance 49(4), 1279–1304 (1994)CrossRef
go back to reference Schrager, D.: Affine stochastic mortality. Insur. Math. Econ. 38(1), 81–97 (2006)CrossRef Schrager, D.: Affine stochastic mortality. Insur. Math. Econ. 38(1), 81–97 (2006)CrossRef
go back to reference Vedani, J., El Karoui, N., Loisel, S., Prigent, J.: Market inconsistencies of the market-consistent European life insurance economic valuation: pitfalls and practical solutions. Eur. Actuar. J. 7(1), 1–28 (2017)CrossRef Vedani, J., El Karoui, N., Loisel, S., Prigent, J.: Market inconsistencies of the market-consistent European life insurance economic valuation: pitfalls and practical solutions. Eur. Actuar. J. 7(1), 1–28 (2017)CrossRef
go back to reference Vigna, E., Luciano, E.: Mortality risk via affine stochastic intensities: calibration and empirical relevance. Belg. Actuar. Bull. 8, 5–16 (2008) Vigna, E., Luciano, E.: Mortality risk via affine stochastic intensities: calibration and empirical relevance. Belg. Actuar. Bull. 8, 5–16 (2008)
Metadata
Title
A market-consistent framework for the fair evaluation of insurance contracts under Solvency II
Authors
Anna Maria Gambaro
Riccardo Casalini
Gianluca Fusai
Alessandro Ghilarducci
Publication date
20-03-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Decisions in Economics and Finance / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1593-8883
Electronic ISSN: 1129-6569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-019-00242-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Decisions in Economics and Finance 1/2019 Go to the issue