Top

Cultural Studies of Science Education

Published in:

25-09-2015 | Original Paper

A new lens for supporting and studying science teacher reflections: situating the self in the [activity] system

Authors: Brett Criswell, Brendan Calandra, Anton Puvirajah, Laurie Brantley-Dias

Published in: Cultural Studies of Science Education | Issue 4/2015

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This paper presents a new lens for analyzing written reflections on the teaching experiences of pre-service [science] teachers. The lens, which borrows heavily from Activity Theory, allows science education researchers and teacher educators to identify tensions, disturbances, conflicts, and contradictions within teachers’ written reflections as a means to help the participants situate their successes and challenges within the activity systems in which they operate. This paper describes the process through which the lens was crafted, defines the key constructs comprising the lens, applies the lens to the analysis of two purposefully selected reflection documents, and then considers the affordances of the lens. It also discusses how the insights gained from this lens have lead to new ways of facilitating reflection in pre-service science teachers, including the use of Kenneth Snelson’s tensegrity sculptures as a metaphor for the goal of reflection. Finally, it connects the tensions identified in the individual reflections of two pre-service science teachers to broader issues being addressed in science education.

previous article Integrating Ubunifu, informal science, and community innovations in science classrooms in East Africa

next article The material co-construction of hard science fiction and physics

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Given that educational thinkers like Dewey (1997a, b) have explicitly discussed the meaning of experience in relation to reflection, we believed it necessary to address this notion as well. However, our search of the Activity Theory literature did not yield any detailed treatment of experience, particularly as it is associated with other AT constructs (e.g. activity). Thus, we will simply define experience as the comprehension and internalization of the outcomes of engaging in activity, or the accumulation of such understandings as a given activity occurs in repeated episodes over time. It is important to distinguish this general usage from our use of ‘micro-teaching experiences’ or ‘field experiences’, which are specific labels that have been historically attached to certain activities within the MAT program. Further, it should be noted that we will treat the relationship between reflection and experience later in this paper.

Yrjö Engeström and Annalisa Sannino (2011) also created a set of terms for analyzing the discourse in intervention sessions related to organizational change efforts. We have noted a couple of difficulties with their approach that made it necessary to develop our own framework. First, two of their four terms—dilemmas and double binds—had meanings that did not seem suitable for the context of our work. Second, the relationships between their terms were not clearly articulated. Finally, their use of a limited set of discourse markers to identify when an instance of a particular construct occurred did not allow for the same depth of analysis we wanted to achieve in examining our data.

We recognize that, given the complexity of the educational system and the number of thinkers who influenced its local and more national development in the U.S., the concept ‘prepared citizen’ has actually expanded into a multitude of different conceptions that are in various relationships to each other. We have limited the discussion to the two that are linked to the data under examination and can be seen to represent a genuine contradiction in this activity system.

Abell, S. K., Bryan, L. A., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Investigating preservice elementary science teacher reflective thinking using integrated media case-based instruction in elementary science teacher preparation. Science Education, 82(4), 491–509. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807.CrossRef

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Andrée, M. (2012). Altering conditions for student participation and motive development in school science: Learning from Helena’s mistake. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(2), 425–438. doi:10.1007/s11422-011-9314-x.CrossRef

Axel, E. (1997). One developmental line in European activity theories. In M. Cole, Y. Engeström, & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition (pp. 128–146). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ayers, W. C., Quinn, T., & Stovall, D. (2008). Handbook of social justice in education. New York: Routledge.

Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Squire, K., & Keating, T. (2002). Using activity theory to understand the systemic tensions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2), 76–107. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA0902_02.CrossRef

Barma, S. (2011). A sociocultural reading of reform in science teaching in a secondary biology class. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(3), 635–661. doi:10.1007/s11422-011-9315-9.CrossRef

Barton, A. C., Ermer, J. L., Burkett, T. A., & Osborne, M. D. (2003). Teaching for social justice. New York: Teachers College.

Basharina, O. K. (2007). An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 82–103.

Berding, J. W. (2012). Towards a flexible curriculum: John Dewey's theory of experience and learning. Education and Culture, 14(1), 24–31.

Berry, A. (2007). Tensions in teaching about teaching. Dordrecht: Springer.

Bloome, D., & Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(4), 304–333. doi:10.2307/747928.CrossRef

Bryan, L. A., & Atwater, M. M. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparation programs. Science Education, 86(6), 821–839. doi:10.1002/sce.10043.CrossRef

Calandra, B., & Brantley-Dias, L. (2010). Using digital video editing to shape novice teachers: A generative process for nurturing professional growth. Educational Technology, 50(1), 13–17.

Calandra, B., Brantley-Dias, L., & Dias, M. (2006). Using digital video for professional development in urban schools: A preservice teacher’s experience with reflection. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(4), 125–133.

Calandra, B., Brantley-Dias, L., Lee, J. K., & Fox, D. L. (2009). Using video editing to cultivate novice teachers’ practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(1), 73–94. doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782542.CrossRef

Calandra, B., & Puvirajah, A. (2011). A framework for facilitating transformation in novice teachers using digital video. Educational Technology, 51(2), 33–36.

Candela, A. (2010). Time and space: Undergraduate Mexican physics in motion. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(3), 701–727. doi:10.1007/s11422-010-9259-5.CrossRef

Chamoso, J. M., Caceres, M. J., & Ascarate, P. (2012). Reflection on the teaching-learning process in the initial training of teachers. Characterization of the issues on which pre-service mathematics teachers reflect. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 28(2), 154–164. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.08.003.

Chitpin, S. (2011). Can mentoring and reflection cause change in teaching practice? A professional development journey of a Canadian teacher educator. Professional Development in Education, 37(2), 225–240. doi:10.1080/19415257.2010.531625.CrossRef

Danielowich, R. (2007). Negotiating the conflicts: Reexamining the structure and function of reflection in science teacher learning. Science Education, 91(4), 629–663. doi:10.1002/sce.20207.CrossRef

Daniels, H. (2008). Vygotsky and research. New York: Routledge.

Davydov, V. V. (1999). The content and unsolved problems of activity theory. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 39–52). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Denton, D. (2011). Reflection and learning: Characteristics, obstacles, and implications. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(8), 838–852.CrossRef

Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive biography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef

Dewey, J. (1892). Syllabus: Introduction to philosophy. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey, volume 17, 1925–1953: 1885–1953, miscellaneous writings (pp. 153–160). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

Dewey, J. (1997a). Experience and education. New York: Free Press.

Dewey, J. (1997b). How we think. Mineola, NY: Dover.

Eick, C. J., & Reed, C. J. (2002). What makes an inquiry-oriented science teacher? The influence of learning histories on student teacher role identity and practice. Science Education, 86(3), 401–416. doi:10.1002/sce.10020.CrossRef

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.

Engeström, Y. (1992). Interactive expertise: Studies in distributed working intelligence. Volume 83 of Research bulletin, Helsingin yliopisto Kasvatustieteiden osasto. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Education. Retrieved June 17, 2013, from http://is2.lse.ac.uk/Events/esrcseminars/engestrom.pdf.

Engeström, Y. (1996). Developmental work research as educational research: Looking ten years back into the zone of proximal development. Nordisk Pedagogik, 16(3), 131–143.

Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. doi:10.1080/13639080020028747.CrossRef

Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368–387. doi:10.1108/09534811111132758.CrossRef

Fayez, M. (2010). Restructuring the relationship between STEM faculty and K-12: Crafting a figured world of partnership. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(3), 767–773. doi:10.1007/s11422-010-9284-4.CrossRef

Freire, P. (2007). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

García G, C. M. (2011). Science curriculum reform as a socioculturally anchored practice. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 663–670. doi:10.1007/s11422-011-9345-3.CrossRef

Griffin, M. L. (2003). Using critical incidents to promote and assess reflective thinking in preservice teachers. Reflective Practice, 4(2), 207–220. doi:10.1080/14623940308274.CrossRef

Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and practice. London: Heinemann.

Hoffman, M. H. G. (2005). The curse of the Hegelian heritage: “Dialectic,” “contradiction,” and “dialectical logic” in activity theory. Retrieved June 17, 2013 from http://www.spp.gatech.edu/faculty/workingpapers/wp9.pdf.

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. doi:10.1080/09500690601007549.CrossRef

Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectic logic: Essays on its history and theory. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

Jung, J. (2012). The focus, role, and meaning of experienced teachers’ reflection in physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(2), 157–175. doi:10.1080/17408989.2011.565471.CrossRef

Kant, I. (1999). The critique of pure reason. In P. Guyer & A. W. Wood (Eds.), Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kaptelinin, V. (2005). The object of activity: Making sense of the sense-maker. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 4–18. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1201_2.CrossRef

Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2009). Awaking the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Killion, J., & Todnem, G. (1991). A process for personal theory building. Educational Leadership, 48(7), 14–16.

Kozulin, A. (2001). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Leontiev, A. N. (1979). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.

Leontiev, A. N. (1983). The productive career of A.N. Leontiev. In A. Zaporozhets, V. Zinchenko, O. Ovchinnikova, & O. Tikhmirov (Eds.), A.N. Leontiev and contemporary psychology. Moscow: Moscow University.

Liou, P.-Y., & Lawrenz, F. (2011). Optimizing teacher preparation loan forgiveness programs: Variables related to perceived influence. Science Education, 95(1), 121–144. doi:10.1002/sce.20409.CrossRef

Mann, H. (1989). On the art of teaching. Carlisle, MA: Applewood Books.

Marcos, J. J. M., & Tillema, H. (2006). Studying studies on teacher reflection and action: An appraisal of research contributions. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 112–132. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2006.08.003.CrossRef

Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Marx, K. (1993). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 3) (D. Fernback, Trans. & E. Mandel, Intro.). New York: Penguin Classics.

Miettinen, R. (2006). Pragmatism and activity theory: Is Dewey’s philosophy a philosophy of cultural retooling? Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 8(2), 3–19.

National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. New York: Routledge.

Popova, A., & Daniels, H. (2004). Employing the concept of the object in the discussion of the links between school pedagogies and individual working lives in pre- and post-Soviet Russia. Educational Review, 56(2), 193–205. doi:10.1080/0031910410001693272.CrossRef

Procee, H. (2006). Reflection in education: A Kantian epistemology. Educational Theory, 56(3), 237–253.CrossRef

Pultorak, E. G. (1993). Facilitating reflective thought in novice teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 288–295. doi:10.1177/0022487193044004007.CrossRef

Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00181.CrossRef

Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (1999). Sparks of genius: The 13 thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Roth, W.-M. (2002). Being and becoming in the classroom. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263–291. doi:10.1002/sce.10113.CrossRef

Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232. doi:10.3102/0034654306298273.CrossRef

Roth, W. M., & Tobin, K. (2002a). Redesigning an “urban” teacher education program: An activity theory perspective. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2), 108–131. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA0902_03.CrossRef

Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2002b). At the elbow of another. Learning to teach by coteaching. New York: Peter Lang.

Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research. New York: Springer.CrossRef

Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Skerrett, A., & Sevian, H. (2010). Identity and biography as mediators of science and mathematics faculty’s involvement in K-12 service. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(3), 743–766. doi:10.1007/s11422-009-9235-0.CrossRef

Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as object-related: Resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1), 70–88. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6.CrossRef

Talisse, R. (2002). Two concepts of inquiry. Philosophical Writings, 20, 69–81.

Tripp, D. (1993). Critical incidents in teaching: Developing reflective judgment. London: Routledge.

Tuunainen, J. (2001). Constructing objects and transforming experimental systems. Perspectives on Science, 9(1), 78–105. doi:10.1162/10636140152947803.CrossRef

Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205–228. doi:10.2307/1179579.CrossRef

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Title: A new lens for supporting and studying science teacher reflections: situating the self in the [activity] system
Authors: Brett Criswell
Brendan Calandra
Anton Puvirajah
Laurie Brantley-Dias
Publication date: 25-09-2015
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Cultural Studies of Science Education / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1871-1502
Electronic ISSN: 1871-1510
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9654-4

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Reflections on the challenges and possibilities of journal publication in science education

Response to Marie Paz Morales’ “Influence of culture and language sensitive physics on science attitude achievement”

Co-planning among science and special education teachers: How do different conceptual lenses help to make sense of the process?

Urban special education policy and the lived experience of stigma in a high school science classroom

The material co-construction of hard science fiction and physics

Influence of culture and language sensitive physics on science attitude enhancement