Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Soft Computing 20/2019

01-02-2019 | Foundations

A new rule to combine dependent bodies of evidence

Authors: Xiaoyan Su, Lusu Li, Hong Qian, Sankaran Mahadevan, Yong Deng

Published in: Soft Computing | Issue 20/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Dempster’s rule of combination can only be applied to independent bodies of evidence. This paper proposes a new rule to combine dependent bodies of evidence. The rule is based on the concept of joint belief distribution, and can be seen as a generalization of Dempster’s rule. When the bodies of evidence are independent, the new combination rule will be reduced into Dempster’s rule. Two examples are illustrated to show the use and effectiveness of the proposed method.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Antoine V, Quost B, Masson MH, Denoeux T (2014) Cevclus: evidential clustering with instance-level constraints for relational data. Soft Comput 18(7):1321–1335CrossRef Antoine V, Quost B, Masson MH, Denoeux T (2014) Cevclus: evidential clustering with instance-level constraints for relational data. Soft Comput 18(7):1321–1335CrossRef
go back to reference Cattaneo ME (2003) Combining belief functions issued from dependent sources. Seminar für Statistik, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH), Zürich Cattaneo ME (2003) Combining belief functions issued from dependent sources. Seminar für Statistik, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH), Zürich
go back to reference Cattaneo ME (2011) Belief functions combination without the assumption of independence of the information sources. Int J Approx Reason 52(3):299–315MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Cattaneo ME (2011) Belief functions combination without the assumption of independence of the information sources. Int J Approx Reason 52(3):299–315MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
go back to reference Chen S, Deng Y, Wu J (2013) Fuzzy sensor fusion based on evidence theory and its application. Appl Artif Intell 27(3):235–248CrossRef Chen S, Deng Y, Wu J (2013) Fuzzy sensor fusion based on evidence theory and its application. Appl Artif Intell 27(3):235–248CrossRef
go back to reference Choenni S, Blok HE, Leertouwer E (2006) Handling uncertainty and ignorance in databases: a rule to combine dependent data. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on database systems for advanced applications (DASFAA’06). Springer, Singapore, pp 310–324 Choenni S, Blok HE, Leertouwer E (2006) Handling uncertainty and ignorance in databases: a rule to combine dependent data. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on database systems for advanced applications (DASFAA’06). Springer, Singapore, pp 310–324
go back to reference Coletti G, Scozzafava R (2006) Toward a general theory of conditional beliefs. Int J Intell Syst 21(3):229–259CrossRefMATH Coletti G, Scozzafava R (2006) Toward a general theory of conditional beliefs. Int J Intell Syst 21(3):229–259CrossRefMATH
go back to reference Cuzzolin F, Gong W (2013) Belief modeling regression for pose estimation. In: Proceedings of the 16th conference on information fusion (FUSION). Istanbul, pp 1398–1405 Cuzzolin F, Gong W (2013) Belief modeling regression for pose estimation. In: Proceedings of the 16th conference on information fusion (FUSION). Istanbul, pp 1398–1405
go back to reference Deng Y, Su X, Wang D, Li Q (2010) Target recognition based on fuzzy dempster data fusion method. Def Sci J 60:525–530CrossRef Deng Y, Su X, Wang D, Li Q (2010) Target recognition based on fuzzy dempster data fusion method. Def Sci J 60:525–530CrossRef
go back to reference Denœux T (2008) Conjunctive and disjunctive combination of belief functions induced by nondistinct bodies of evidence. Artif Intell 172(2):234–264MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Denœux T (2008) Conjunctive and disjunctive combination of belief functions induced by nondistinct bodies of evidence. Artif Intell 172(2):234–264MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
go back to reference Destercke S, Dubois D (2011) Idempotent conjunctive combination of belief functions: extending the minimum rule of possibility theory. Inf Sci 181(18):3925–3945MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Destercke S, Dubois D (2011) Idempotent conjunctive combination of belief functions: extending the minimum rule of possibility theory. Inf Sci 181(18):3925–3945MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
go back to reference Destercke S, Dubois D, Chojnacki E (2007) Cautious conjunctive merging of belief functions. In: Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty. Springer, Berlin, pp 332–343 Destercke S, Dubois D, Chojnacki E (2007) Cautious conjunctive merging of belief functions. In: Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty. Springer, Berlin, pp 332–343
go back to reference Fung R, Chong C (1985) Metaprobability and Dempster–Shafer in evidential reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 1st conference annual conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI-85). AUAI Press, Corvallis, Oregon, pp 76–83 Fung R, Chong C (1985) Metaprobability and Dempster–Shafer in evidential reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 1st conference annual conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI-85). AUAI Press, Corvallis, Oregon, pp 76–83
go back to reference Guralnik V, Mylaraswamy D, Voges H (2006) On handling dependent evidence and multiple faults in knowledge fusion for engine health management. In: Aerospace conference. IEEE, pp 9–17 Guralnik V, Mylaraswamy D, Voges H (2006) On handling dependent evidence and multiple faults in knowledge fusion for engine health management. In: Aerospace conference. IEEE, pp 9–17
go back to reference Hua Z, Gong B, Xu X (2008) A DS-AHP approach for multi-attribute decision making problem with incomplete information. Expert Syst Appl 34(3):2221–2227CrossRef Hua Z, Gong B, Xu X (2008) A DS-AHP approach for multi-attribute decision making problem with incomplete information. Expert Syst Appl 34(3):2221–2227CrossRef
go back to reference Huang S, Su X, Hu Y, Mahadevan S, Deng Y (2014) A new decision-making method by incomplete preferences based on evidence distance. Knowl Based Syst 56:264–272CrossRef Huang S, Su X, Hu Y, Mahadevan S, Deng Y (2014) A new decision-making method by incomplete preferences based on evidence distance. Knowl Based Syst 56:264–272CrossRef
go back to reference Liu Z, Pan Q, Dezert J (2014) Credal classification rule for uncertain data based on belief functions. Pattern Recognit 47(7):2532–2541CrossRef Liu Z, Pan Q, Dezert J (2014) Credal classification rule for uncertain data based on belief functions. Pattern Recognit 47(7):2532–2541CrossRef
go back to reference Masson MH, Destercke S, Denoeux T (2016) Modelling and predicting partial orders from pairwise belief functions. Soft Comput 20(3):939–950CrossRef Masson MH, Destercke S, Denoeux T (2016) Modelling and predicting partial orders from pairwise belief functions. Soft Comput 20(3):939–950CrossRef
go back to reference Monney PA, Chan M (2007) Modelling dependence in Dempster–Shafer theory. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 15(1):93–114MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Monney PA, Chan M (2007) Modelling dependence in Dempster–Shafer theory. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl Based Syst 15(1):93–114MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
go back to reference Mouna C, Arnaud M, Boutheina Y (2015) Combining partially independent belief functions. Decis Support Syst 73:37–46CrossRef Mouna C, Arnaud M, Boutheina Y (2015) Combining partially independent belief functions. Decis Support Syst 73:37–46CrossRef
go back to reference Nakama T, Ruspini E (2014) Combining dependent evidential bodies that share common knowledge. Int J Approx Reason 55(9):2109–2125MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Nakama T, Ruspini E (2014) Combining dependent evidential bodies that share common knowledge. Int J Approx Reason 55(9):2109–2125MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
go back to reference Reformat M, Yager RR (2008) Building ensemble classifiers using belief functions and OWA operators. Soft Comput 12(6):543–558CrossRefMATH Reformat M, Yager RR (2008) Building ensemble classifiers using belief functions and OWA operators. Soft Comput 12(6):543–558CrossRefMATH
go back to reference Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, PrincetonMATH Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, PrincetonMATH
go back to reference Shi F, Su X, Qian H, Yang N, Han W (2017) Research on the fusion of dependent evidence based on rank correlation coefficient. Sensors 17:2362–2377CrossRef Shi F, Su X, Qian H, Yang N, Han W (2017) Research on the fusion of dependent evidence based on rank correlation coefficient. Sensors 17:2362–2377CrossRef
go back to reference Smets P (1992) The concept of distinct evidence. In: Proceedings of the 4th conference on information processing and management of uncertainty in knowledge-based systems (IPMU). Palma de Mayorca, pp 789–794 Smets P (1992) The concept of distinct evidence. In: Proceedings of the 4th conference on information processing and management of uncertainty in knowledge-based systems (IPMU). Palma de Mayorca, pp 789–794
go back to reference Su X, Deng Y, Mahadevan S, Bao Q (2012) An improved method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft engine rotor blades. Eng Fail Anal 26:164–174CrossRef Su X, Deng Y, Mahadevan S, Bao Q (2012) An improved method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft engine rotor blades. Eng Fail Anal 26:164–174CrossRef
go back to reference Su X, Mahadevan S, Xu P, Deng Y (2015a) Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis using evidence theory and AHP. Risk Anal 35(7):1296–1316CrossRef Su X, Mahadevan S, Xu P, Deng Y (2015a) Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis using evidence theory and AHP. Risk Anal 35(7):1296–1316CrossRef
go back to reference Su X, Mahadevan S, Xu P, Deng Y (2015b) Handling of dependence in Dempster–Shafer theory. Int J Intell Syst 30(4):441–467CrossRef Su X, Mahadevan S, Xu P, Deng Y (2015b) Handling of dependence in Dempster–Shafer theory. Int J Intell Syst 30(4):441–467CrossRef
go back to reference Su X, Mahadevan S, Han W, Deng Y (2016) Combining dependent bodies of evidence. Appl Intell 44:634–644CrossRef Su X, Mahadevan S, Han W, Deng Y (2016) Combining dependent bodies of evidence. Appl Intell 44:634–644CrossRef
go back to reference Su X, Li L, Shi F, Qian H (2018) Research on the fusion of dependent evidence based on mutual information. IEEE Access 6:71839CrossRef Su X, Li L, Shi F, Qian H (2018) Research on the fusion of dependent evidence based on mutual information. IEEE Access 6:71839CrossRef
go back to reference Xiao W, Wang Z, Wang Y (2011) Combination rule for dependent evidences. Control Decis 26(5):773–776MathSciNet Xiao W, Wang Z, Wang Y (2011) Combination rule for dependent evidences. Control Decis 26(5):773–776MathSciNet
go back to reference Xu H, Deng Y (2018) Dependent evidence combination based on shearman coefficient and pearson coefficient. IEEE Access 6(1):11,634–11,640CrossRef Xu H, Deng Y (2018) Dependent evidence combination based on shearman coefficient and pearson coefficient. IEEE Access 6(1):11,634–11,640CrossRef
go back to reference Xu H, Smets P (1994) Evidential reasoning with conditional belief functions. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, Washington, USA, pp 598–605 Xu H, Smets P (1994) Evidential reasoning with conditional belief functions. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, Washington, USA, pp 598–605
go back to reference Yager RR, Alajlan N (2015) Dempster-shafer belief structures for decision making under uncertainty. Knowl Based Syst 80:58–66CrossRef Yager RR, Alajlan N (2015) Dempster-shafer belief structures for decision making under uncertainty. Knowl Based Syst 80:58–66CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A new rule to combine dependent bodies of evidence
Authors
Xiaoyan Su
Lusu Li
Hong Qian
Sankaran Mahadevan
Yong Deng
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Soft Computing / Issue 20/2019
Print ISSN: 1432-7643
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7479
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03804-y

Other articles of this Issue 20/2019

Soft Computing 20/2019 Go to the issue

Premium Partner