Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Progress in Artificial Intelligence 3/2023

07-03-2023 | Regular Paper

A novel multi-criteria decision analysis technique incorporating demanding essential characteristics of existing MCDA techniques

Author: Susmita Bandyopadhyay

Published in: Progress in Artificial Intelligence | Issue 3/2023

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper has proposed a novel multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) technique that considers relationships among the criteria, relationships among the alternatives, relationships among the criteria and the alternatives, the uncertainty or dilemma that the decision makers face in their decision-making, the entropy among the criteria. These characteristics are the essential characteristics of various MCDA techniques as evident from the existing literature. Incorporating all these characteristics in a single algorithm is the novelty and unique contribution of the proposed technique in this paper. The existing MCDA techniques are based on individual characteristics such as distance measurement from the best solution, utility measurement, measuring kind of average values, pair-wise comparison and considerations of relationships among criteria. However, no single research study has considered the prime characteristics of these techniques through a single algorithm. This is the motivation behind the proposed technique. The dilemma of the decision makers has been captured by the use of hesitant fuzzy elements; the information content among the criteria has been captured by applying the concept of entropy through the application of a technique called IDOCRIW. Relationships have been determined by calculating covariances among the criteria and among the alternatives. A kind of sensitivity analysis, rank reversal method has been performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed technique. The proposed method has also been compared with four different types of already existing MCDA techniques, AHP, MAUT, MACBETH and MOORA. Both the sensitivity analysis and the comparison with other methods establish the effectiveness of the proposed technique. The results of the comparison by these methods establish the superiority of the proposed MCDA technique over the existing techniques.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Saaty, T.: The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)MATH Saaty, T.: The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)MATH
2.
go back to reference Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B.: PROMETHEE methods. Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys, pp. 163–186. Springer, New York (2005) Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B.: PROMETHEE methods. Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys, pp. 163–186. Springer, New York (2005)
4.
go back to reference Saaty, T.L.: Fundamentals of the analytic network process-multiple networks with benefits, costs, opportunities and risks. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 13(3), 348–379 (2004)CrossRef Saaty, T.L.: Fundamentals of the analytic network process-multiple networks with benefits, costs, opportunities and risks. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 13(3), 348–379 (2004)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Figueira, J.R., Greco, S., Roy, B., Slowinski, R.: ELECTRE methods: main features and recent developments. In: Handbook of multicriteria analysis, Vol. 103, pp. 51–89 (2010) Figueira, J.R., Greco, S., Roy, B., Slowinski, R.: ELECTRE methods: main features and recent developments. In: Handbook of multicriteria analysis, Vol. 103, pp. 51–89 (2010)
6.
go back to reference Nixon, J.D., Dey, P.K., Davies, P.A.: Design of a novel solar thermal collector using a multi-criteria decision-making methodology. J. Clean. Prod. 59, 150–159 (2013)CrossRef Nixon, J.D., Dey, P.K., Davies, P.A.: Design of a novel solar thermal collector using a multi-criteria decision-making methodology. J. Clean. Prod. 59, 150–159 (2013)CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Oztaysi, B.: A decision model for information technology selection using AHP integrated TOPSIS-Grey: the case of content management systems. Knowl. Based Syst. 70, 44–54 (2014)CrossRef Oztaysi, B.: A decision model for information technology selection using AHP integrated TOPSIS-Grey: the case of content management systems. Knowl. Based Syst. 70, 44–54 (2014)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bandyopadhyay, S.: Comparison among multi-criteria decision analysis techniques: a novel method. Prog. Artif. Intell. 10, 195–216 (2021)CrossRef Bandyopadhyay, S.: Comparison among multi-criteria decision analysis techniques: a novel method. Prog. Artif. Intell. 10, 195–216 (2021)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Emovon, I., Norman, R.A., Murphy, A.J.: Methodology of using an integrated averaging technique and MAUT method for failure mode and effects analysis. J. Eng. Technol. (JET) 7(1), 140–155 (2016) Emovon, I., Norman, R.A., Murphy, A.J.: Methodology of using an integrated averaging technique and MAUT method for failure mode and effects analysis. J. Eng. Technol. (JET) 7(1), 140–155 (2016)
10.
go back to reference BanaeCosta, C.A., Chagas, M.P.: A career choice problem: An example of how to use MACBETH to build a quantitative value model based on qualitative value judgments. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 153(2), 323–331 (2004)MATHCrossRef BanaeCosta, C.A., Chagas, M.P.: A career choice problem: An example of how to use MACBETH to build a quantitative value model based on qualitative value judgments. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 153(2), 323–331 (2004)MATHCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Brauers, W.K., Ginevicius, R., Zavadskas, E.K., Antucheviciene, J.: The future of sustainable development in some Baltic states by application of the MOORA method. In Citizens and governance for sustainable development, pp. 156–161 (2006). Brauers, W.K., Ginevicius, R., Zavadskas, E.K., Antucheviciene, J.: The future of sustainable development in some Baltic states by application of the MOORA method. In Citizens and governance for sustainable development, pp. 156–161 (2006).
12.
go back to reference Alinezhad, A.., Khalili, J.: New methods and applications in multiple attribute decision-making (MADM). In: International series in operations research & management science, Vol. 277. Springer, Switzerland (2019). Alinezhad, A.., Khalili, J.: New methods and applications in multiple attribute decision-making (MADM). In: International series in operations research & management science, Vol. 277. Springer, Switzerland (2019).
13.
go back to reference Gomes, L.F.A.M., Machado, M.A.S., Rangel, L.A.D.: Behavioral multi-criteria decision analysis: the TODIM method with criteria interactions. Ann. Oper. Res. 211(1), 531–548 (2013)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Gomes, L.F.A.M., Machado, M.A.S., Rangel, L.A.D.: Behavioral multi-criteria decision analysis: the TODIM method with criteria interactions. Ann. Oper. Res. 211(1), 531–548 (2013)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P.: Multi-criteria decision analysis: methods and software. Wiley, UK (2013)CrossRef Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P.: Multi-criteria decision analysis: methods and software. Wiley, UK (2013)CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sheskin, D.J.: Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, (3rd ed). Chapman & Hall/CRC, Florida (2004). Sheskin, D.J.: Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, (3rd ed). Chapman & Hall/CRC, Florida (2004).
16.
go back to reference Tzeng, G.-H., Huang, J.-J.: Multiple attribute decision-making: methods and applications. CRC Press, US (2011)MATHCrossRef Tzeng, G.-H., Huang, J.-J.: Multiple attribute decision-making: methods and applications. CRC Press, US (2011)MATHCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Edwards, W., Barron, F.H.: SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multi-attribute utility measurement. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 60(3), 306–325 (1994)CrossRef Edwards, W., Barron, F.H.: SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multi-attribute utility measurement. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 60(3), 306–325 (1994)CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P.: REGIME methode voor ordinal multi-criteria analyse. Kwant. Methoden 7(22), 61–78 (1986) Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P.: REGIME methode voor ordinal multi-criteria analyse. Kwant. Methoden 7(22), 61–78 (1986)
19.
go back to reference Roubens, M.: Preference relations on actions and criteria in multicriteria decision-making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 10(1), 51–55 (1982)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Roubens, M.: Preference relations on actions and criteria in multicriteria decision-making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 10(1), 51–55 (1982)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H.: Multicriteria planning of post earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Compu. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 17(3), 211–220 (2002)CrossRef Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H.: Multicriteria planning of post earthquake sustainable reconstruction. Compu. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 17(3), 211–220 (2002)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Voogd, H.: Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. Pion Ltd., London (1983) Voogd, H.: Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. Pion Ltd., London (1983)
22.
go back to reference Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Vilutiene, T.: Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 10(3), 123–141 (2010)CrossRef Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Vilutiene, T.: Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 10(3), 123–141 (2010)CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zavadskas, E.K., Kaklauskas, A., Peldschus, F., Turskis, Z.: Multi-attribute assessment of road design solutions by using the COPRAS method. Baltic J. Road Bridge Eng. 2(4), 193–203 (2007) Zavadskas, E.K., Kaklauskas, A., Peldschus, F., Turskis, Z.: Multi-attribute assessment of road design solutions by using the COPRAS method. Baltic J. Road Bridge Eng. 2(4), 193–203 (2007)
24.
go back to reference Zavadskas, E.K., Antucheviciene, J., Saparauskas, J., Turskis, Z.: MCDM methods WASPAS and MULTIMOORA: Verification of robustness of methods when assessing alternative solutions. Econom. Comput. Econom. Cybernet. Stud. Res. 47(2), 5–20 (2013) Zavadskas, E.K., Antucheviciene, J., Saparauskas, J., Turskis, Z.: MCDM methods WASPAS and MULTIMOORA: Verification of robustness of methods when assessing alternative solutions. Econom. Comput. Econom. Cybernet. Stud. Res. 47(2), 5–20 (2013)
25.
go back to reference Gomes, L.F.A.M.: An application of the TODIM method to the multicriteria rental evaluation of residential properties. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 193(1), 204–211 (2009)MATHCrossRef Gomes, L.F.A.M.: An application of the TODIM method to the multicriteria rental evaluation of residential properties. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 193(1), 204–211 (2009)MATHCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.: Stochastic EDAS method for multi-criteria decision-making with normally distributed data. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 33(3), 1627–1638 (2017)MATHCrossRef Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.: Stochastic EDAS method for multi-criteria decision-making with normally distributed data. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 33(3), 1627–1638 (2017)MATHCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bozanic, D.I., Pamucar, D.S., Karovic, S.M.: Application the MABAC method in support of decision-making on the use of force in a defensive operation. Tehnika 71(1), 129–136 (2016)CrossRef Bozanic, D.I., Pamucar, D.S., Karovic, S.M.: Application the MABAC method in support of decision-making on the use of force in a defensive operation. Tehnika 71(1), 129–136 (2016)CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Liu, C.-H., Tzeng, G.-H., Lee, M.-H., Lee, P.-Y.: Improving metro–airport connection service for tourism development: Using hybrid MCDM models. Tour. Manage. Perspect. 6, 95–107 (2013) Liu, C.-H., Tzeng, G.-H., Lee, M.-H., Lee, P.-Y.: Improving metro–airport connection service for tourism development: Using hybrid MCDM models. Tour. Manage. Perspect. 6, 95–107 (2013)
29.
go back to reference Collan, M., Fedrizzi, M., Luukka, P.: A multi-expert system for ranking patents: An approach based on fuzzy pay-off distributions and a TOPSIS–AHP framework. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 4749–4759 (2013)CrossRef Collan, M., Fedrizzi, M., Luukka, P.: A multi-expert system for ranking patents: An approach based on fuzzy pay-off distributions and a TOPSIS–AHP framework. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 4749–4759 (2013)CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Tavana, M., Zandi, F., Katehakis, M.N.: A hybrid fuzzy group ANP–TOPSIS framework for assessment of e-government readiness from a CiRM perspective. Inf. Manage. 50, 383–397 (2013)CrossRef Tavana, M., Zandi, F., Katehakis, M.N.: A hybrid fuzzy group ANP–TOPSIS framework for assessment of e-government readiness from a CiRM perspective. Inf. Manage. 50, 383–397 (2013)CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Golpîra, H.: A novel multiple attribute decision making approach based on interval data using U2P-miner algorithm. Data Knowl. Eng. 115, 116–128 (2018)CrossRef Golpîra, H.: A novel multiple attribute decision making approach based on interval data using U2P-miner algorithm. Data Knowl. Eng. 115, 116–128 (2018)CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Zakeri, S.: Ranking based on optimal points multi-criteria decision-making method. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. 9(1), 45–69 (2018)CrossRef Zakeri, S.: Ranking based on optimal points multi-criteria decision-making method. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. 9(1), 45–69 (2018)CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Shen, K.-w, Xiao-kang, W., Jian-qiang, W.: Multi-criteria decision-making method based on smallest enclosing circle in incompletely reliable information environment. Comput. Ind. Eng. 130, 1–13 (2019)CrossRef Shen, K.-w, Xiao-kang, W., Jian-qiang, W.: Multi-criteria decision-making method based on smallest enclosing circle in incompletely reliable information environment. Comput. Ind. Eng. 130, 1–13 (2019)CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Zakeri, S., Ecer, F., Konstantas, D., Cheikhrouhou, N.: The vital-immaterial-mediocre multi-criteria decision-making method. Article in Press, Kybernetes (2021) Zakeri, S., Ecer, F., Konstantas, D., Cheikhrouhou, N.: The vital-immaterial-mediocre multi-criteria decision-making method. Article in Press, Kybernetes (2021)
35.
go back to reference Fei, L., Yong, D., Yong, H.: DS-VIKOR: a new multi-criteria decision-making method for supplier selection. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21(1), 157–175 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRef Fei, L., Yong, D., Yong, H.: DS-VIKOR: a new multi-criteria decision-making method for supplier selection. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 21(1), 157–175 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.: A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Econom. Comput. Econom. Cybernet. Stud. Res. 50(3), 25–44 (2016) Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.: A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Econom. Comput. Econom. Cybernet. Stud. Res. 50(3), 25–44 (2016)
37.
go back to reference Huchang, L., Xunjie, G., Zeshui, X., Xiao-Jun, Z., Herrera, F.: Hesitancy degree-based correlation measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their applications in multiple criteria decision-making. Inf. Sci. 508, 275–292 (2020)MathSciNetCrossRef Huchang, L., Xunjie, G., Zeshui, X., Xiao-Jun, Z., Herrera, F.: Hesitancy degree-based correlation measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their applications in multiple criteria decision-making. Inf. Sci. 508, 275–292 (2020)MathSciNetCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Sellak, H., Ouhbi, B., Frikh, B.: A knowledge based outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 67, 625–640 (2018)CrossRef Sellak, H., Ouhbi, B., Frikh, B.: A knowledge based outranking approach for multi-criteria decision-making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 67, 625–640 (2018)CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Gou, X., Xu, Z., Liao, H.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic entropy and cross-entropy measures and alternative queing method for multiple criteria decision-making. Inf. Sci. 388–389, 225–246 (2017)CrossRef Gou, X., Xu, Z., Liao, H.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic entropy and cross-entropy measures and alternative queing method for multiple criteria decision-making. Inf. Sci. 388–389, 225–246 (2017)CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Jibin Lan, R.J.: Priority degrees for hesitant fuzzy sets: application to multiple attribute decision-making. Oper. Res. Prespect. 4, 67–73 (2017)MathSciNet Jibin Lan, R.J.: Priority degrees for hesitant fuzzy sets: application to multiple attribute decision-making. Oper. Res. Prespect. 4, 67–73 (2017)MathSciNet
41.
go back to reference Wang, J., Wang, J.-X., Zhang, H.-y, Chen, X.-H.: Multi criteria decision-making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: an outranking approach. Knowl. Based Syst. 86, 224–236 (2015)CrossRef Wang, J., Wang, J.-X., Zhang, H.-y, Chen, X.-H.: Multi criteria decision-making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: an outranking approach. Knowl. Based Syst. 86, 224–236 (2015)CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Wang, F., Li, X., Chen, X.: Hesitant fuzzy soft set and its applications in multicriteria decision-making. J. Appl. Math. 2014, 1–11 (2014)MATH Wang, F., Li, X., Chen, X.: Hesitant fuzzy soft set and its applications in multicriteria decision-making. J. Appl. Math. 2014, 1–11 (2014)MATH
43.
go back to reference Chen, S.-M., Hong, J.-A.: Multicriteria linguistic decision-making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and the aggregation of fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 286, 63–74 (2014)CrossRef Chen, S.-M., Hong, J.-A.: Multicriteria linguistic decision-making based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and the aggregation of fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 286, 63–74 (2014)CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Eghbali-Zarch, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Dehghan-Sanej, K., Kaboli, A.: Prioritizing the effective strategies for construction and demolition waste management using fuzzy IDOCRIW and WASPAS methods. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management (2014). Eghbali-Zarch, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Dehghan-Sanej, K., Kaboli, A.: Prioritizing the effective strategies for construction and demolition waste management using fuzzy IDOCRIW and WASPAS methods. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management (2014).
45.
go back to reference Čereška, A., Podviezko, A., Zavadskas, E.K.: Assessment of different metal screw joint parameters by using multiple criteria analysis methods. Metals 8(5), 318 (2018)CrossRef Čereška, A., Podviezko, A., Zavadskas, E.K.: Assessment of different metal screw joint parameters by using multiple criteria analysis methods. Metals 8(5), 318 (2018)CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Podvezko, V., Zavadskas, E.K., Podviezko, A.: An extension of the new objective weight assessment methods CILOS and IDOCRIW to fuzzy MCDM. Econom. Comput. Econom. Cybernet. Stud. Res. 54(2), 59–75 (2020) Podvezko, V., Zavadskas, E.K., Podviezko, A.: An extension of the new objective weight assessment methods CILOS and IDOCRIW to fuzzy MCDM. Econom. Comput. Econom. Cybernet. Stud. Res. 54(2), 59–75 (2020)
47.
go back to reference Zavadskas, E.K., Podvezko, V.: Integrated determination of objective criteria weights in MCDM. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 15(02), 267–283 (2016)CrossRef Zavadskas, E.K., Podvezko, V.: Integrated determination of objective criteria weights in MCDM. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 15(02), 267–283 (2016)CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Čereška, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Bucinskas, V., Podvezko, V., Sutinys, E.: Analysis of steel wire rope diagnostic data applying multi-criteria methods. Appl. Sci. 8(2), 260 (2018)CrossRef Čereška, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Bucinskas, V., Podvezko, V., Sutinys, E.: Analysis of steel wire rope diagnostic data applying multi-criteria methods. Appl. Sci. 8(2), 260 (2018)CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Vavrek, R., Bečica, J.: Capital city as a factor of multi-criteria decision analysis: application on transport companies in the Czech Republic. Mathematics 8(10), 1765 (2020)CrossRef Vavrek, R., Bečica, J.: Capital city as a factor of multi-criteria decision analysis: application on transport companies in the Czech Republic. Mathematics 8(10), 1765 (2020)CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Zavadskas, E.K., Cavallaro, F., Podvezko, V., Ubarte, I., Kaklauskas, A.: MCDM assessment of a healthy and safe built environment according to sustainable development principles: a practical neighborhood approach in Vilnius. Sustainability 9(5), 702 (2021)CrossRef Zavadskas, E.K., Cavallaro, F., Podvezko, V., Ubarte, I., Kaklauskas, A.: MCDM assessment of a healthy and safe built environment according to sustainable development principles: a practical neighborhood approach in Vilnius. Sustainability 9(5), 702 (2021)CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Dayyani, L., Pourtaheri, M., Ahmadi, H.: Evaluation of texture deterioration stages of rural settlements on the Tehran metropolitan fringe using the decision-making method of OW and CODAS. J. Hous. Built Environ. 37(1), 1–49 (2021) Dayyani, L., Pourtaheri, M., Ahmadi, H.: Evaluation of texture deterioration stages of rural settlements on the Tehran metropolitan fringe using the decision-making method of OW and CODAS. J. Hous. Built Environ. 37(1), 1–49 (2021)
52.
go back to reference Triantaphyllou, E., Mann, S.H.: An examination of the effectiveness of multi-dimensional decision-making methods: a decision-making paradox. Decis. Support Syst. 5, 303–312 (1989)CrossRef Triantaphyllou, E., Mann, S.H.: An examination of the effectiveness of multi-dimensional decision-making methods: a decision-making paradox. Decis. Support Syst. 5, 303–312 (1989)CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Ishizaka, A., Siraj, S.: Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? an experimental comparative study of three methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 264(2), 462–471 (2013)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Ishizaka, A., Siraj, S.: Are multi-criteria decision-making tools useful? an experimental comparative study of three methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 264(2), 462–471 (2013)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Moradian, M., Modanloo, V., Aghaiee, S.: Comparative analysis of multi criteria decision-making techniques for material selection of brake booster valve body. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 6(5), 526–534 (2019) Moradian, M., Modanloo, V., Aghaiee, S.: Comparative analysis of multi criteria decision-making techniques for material selection of brake booster valve body. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 6(5), 526–534 (2019)
55.
go back to reference Zamani-Sabzi, H., Phillip King, J., Gard, C.C., Abudu, S.: Statistical and analytical comparison of multi-criteria decision-making techniques under fuzzy environment. Op. Res. Perspect. 3, 92–117 (2016)MathSciNet Zamani-Sabzi, H., Phillip King, J., Gard, C.C., Abudu, S.: Statistical and analytical comparison of multi-criteria decision-making techniques under fuzzy environment. Op. Res. Perspect. 3, 92–117 (2016)MathSciNet
56.
go back to reference Moghassem, A.R.: Comparison among two analytical methods of multi-criteria decision-making for appropriate spinning condition selection. World Appl. Sci. J. 21(5), 784–794 (2013) Moghassem, A.R.: Comparison among two analytical methods of multi-criteria decision-making for appropriate spinning condition selection. World Appl. Sci. J. 21(5), 784–794 (2013)
57.
go back to reference Javaid, B., Arshad, M.W., Ahmad, S., Abas Kazmi, S.A.: Comparison of Different Multi Criteria Decision Analysis Techniques for Performance Evaluation of Loop Configured Micro Grid. 2nd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies, iCoMET 2019, IEEE, 30–31, Pakistan. (2019) Javaid, B., Arshad, M.W., Ahmad, S., Abas Kazmi, S.A.: Comparison of Different Multi Criteria Decision Analysis Techniques for Performance Evaluation of Loop Configured Micro Grid. 2nd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies, iCoMET 2019, IEEE, 30–31, Pakistan. (2019)
58.
go back to reference Ceballos, B., Lamata, M.T., Pelta, D.A.: A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods. Prog. Artif. Intell. 5(4), 315–322 (2016)CrossRef Ceballos, B., Lamata, M.T., Pelta, D.A.: A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods. Prog. Artif. Intell. 5(4), 315–322 (2016)CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Ӧzcan, T., Çelebi, N., Esnaf, Ş: Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(8), 9773–9779 (2011)CrossRef Ӧzcan, T., Çelebi, N., Esnaf, Ş: Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(8), 9773–9779 (2011)CrossRef
60.
go back to reference Hodgett, R.E.: Comparison of Multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 85(5–8), 1145–1157 (2016)CrossRef Hodgett, R.E.: Comparison of Multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 85(5–8), 1145–1157 (2016)CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Hajkowicz, S., Higgins, A.: A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 184(1), 255–265 (2008)MATHCrossRef Hajkowicz, S., Higgins, A.: A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 184(1), 255–265 (2008)MATHCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Selmi, M., Kormi, T., Ali, N.B.H.: Comparing multi-criteria decision aid methods through a ranking stability index. In: 2013 5th International conference on modeling, simulation and applied optimization (ICMSAO) pp. 1–5. IEEE. Selmi, M., Kormi, T., Ali, N.B.H.: Comparing multi-criteria decision aid methods through a ranking stability index. In: 2013 5th International conference on modeling, simulation and applied optimization (ICMSAO) pp. 1–5. IEEE.
63.
go back to reference Athawale, V.M., Chakraborty, S.: A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput. 2(4), 831–850 (2011) Athawale, V.M., Chakraborty, S.: A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput. 2(4), 831–850 (2011)
64.
go back to reference Chitsaz, N., Banihabib, M.E.: Comparison of different multi criteria decision-making models in prioritizing flood management alternatives. Water Resour. Manage. 29(8), 2503–2525 (2015)CrossRef Chitsaz, N., Banihabib, M.E.: Comparison of different multi criteria decision-making models in prioritizing flood management alternatives. Water Resour. Manage. 29(8), 2503–2525 (2015)CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Mathew, M., Sahu, S.: Comparison of new multi-criteria decision-making methods for material handling equipment selection. Manage. Sci. Lett. 8(3), 139–150 (2018)CrossRef Mathew, M., Sahu, S.: Comparison of new multi-criteria decision-making methods for material handling equipment selection. Manage. Sci. Lett. 8(3), 139–150 (2018)CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Sarraf, R., McGuire, M.P.: Integration and comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods in safe route planner. Expert Syst. Appl. 154, 113399 (2020)CrossRef Sarraf, R., McGuire, M.P.: Integration and comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods in safe route planner. Expert Syst. Appl. 154, 113399 (2020)CrossRef
67.
go back to reference Pelegrina, G.D., Duarte, L.T., Grabisch, M., Romano, J.M.T.: Dealing with redundancies among criteria in multicriteria decision making through independent component analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 169, 108171 (2022)CrossRef Pelegrina, G.D., Duarte, L.T., Grabisch, M., Romano, J.M.T.: Dealing with redundancies among criteria in multicriteria decision making through independent component analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 169, 108171 (2022)CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Juanpera, M., Domenech, B., Ferrer-Martí, L., García-Villoria, A., Pastor, R.: Methodology for integrated multicriteria decision-making with uncertainty: extending the compromise ranking method for uncertain evaluation of alternatives. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 434, 135–158 (2022)MathSciNetCrossRef Juanpera, M., Domenech, B., Ferrer-Martí, L., García-Villoria, A., Pastor, R.: Methodology for integrated multicriteria decision-making with uncertainty: extending the compromise ranking method for uncertain evaluation of alternatives. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 434, 135–158 (2022)MathSciNetCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Şahin, M.: A comprehensive analysis of weighting and multicriteria methods in the context of sustainable energy. Int J Environ Sci Technol 18(6), 1591–1616 (2021) Şahin, M.: A comprehensive analysis of weighting and multicriteria methods in the context of sustainable energy. Int J Environ Sci Technol 18(6), 1591–1616 (2021)
70.
go back to reference Zhang, X., Xia, Q., Yang, F., Song, S., Ang, S.: Interval cross-efficiency for ranking decision making units using the stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis-evidential reasoning approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 156, 107222 (2021)CrossRef Zhang, X., Xia, Q., Yang, F., Song, S., Ang, S.: Interval cross-efficiency for ranking decision making units using the stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis-evidential reasoning approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 156, 107222 (2021)CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Li, H., Wu, P., Zhou, L., Chen, H.: A new approach for multicriteria group decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Measurement 172, 108818 (2021)CrossRef Li, H., Wu, P., Zhou, L., Chen, H.: A new approach for multicriteria group decision making under interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Measurement 172, 108818 (2021)CrossRef
72.
go back to reference García-Cáceres, R.G.: Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis–matching (SMAA-M). Op. Res. Perspect. 7, 100145 (2020)MathSciNet García-Cáceres, R.G.: Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis–matching (SMAA-M). Op. Res. Perspect. 7, 100145 (2020)MathSciNet
73.
go back to reference Jia, Q., Hu, J., He, Q., Zhang, W., Safwat, E.: A multicriteria group decision-making method based on AIVIFSs, Z-numbers, and trapezium clouds. Inf. Sci. 566, 38–56 (2021)MathSciNetCrossRef Jia, Q., Hu, J., He, Q., Zhang, W., Safwat, E.: A multicriteria group decision-making method based on AIVIFSs, Z-numbers, and trapezium clouds. Inf. Sci. 566, 38–56 (2021)MathSciNetCrossRef
74.
go back to reference Tavares, L.V., Arruda, P.: A multicriteria model to select candidates for public contracting using the OPTIONCARDS method. Autom. Constr. 136, 104162 (2022)CrossRef Tavares, L.V., Arruda, P.: A multicriteria model to select candidates for public contracting using the OPTIONCARDS method. Autom. Constr. 136, 104162 (2022)CrossRef
75.
go back to reference Hussain, A., Chun, J., Khan, M.: A novel multicriteria decision making (MCDM) approach for precise decision making under a fuzzy environment. Soft. Comput. 25(7), 5645–5661 (2021)MATHCrossRef Hussain, A., Chun, J., Khan, M.: A novel multicriteria decision making (MCDM) approach for precise decision making under a fuzzy environment. Soft. Comput. 25(7), 5645–5661 (2021)MATHCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Stoilova, S., Munier, N.: A novel fuzzy SIMUS multicriteria decision-making method. An application in railway passenger transport planning. Symmetry 13(3), 483 (2021)CrossRef Stoilova, S., Munier, N.: A novel fuzzy SIMUS multicriteria decision-making method. An application in railway passenger transport planning. Symmetry 13(3), 483 (2021)CrossRef
77.
go back to reference Harju, M., Liesiö, J., Virtanen, K.: Spatial multi-attribute decision analysis: axiomatic foundations and incomplete preference information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 275(1), 167–181 (2019)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef Harju, M., Liesiö, J., Virtanen, K.: Spatial multi-attribute decision analysis: axiomatic foundations and incomplete preference information. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 275(1), 167–181 (2019)MathSciNetMATHCrossRef
78.
go back to reference Wang, J.-Q., Wang, J., Chen, Q.-H., ZhangChen, H.-Y.X.-H.: An outranking approach for multi-criteria decison-making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Inf. Sci. 280, 338–351 (2014)MATHCrossRef Wang, J.-Q., Wang, J., Chen, Q.-H., ZhangChen, H.-Y.X.-H.: An outranking approach for multi-criteria decison-making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Inf. Sci. 280, 338–351 (2014)MATHCrossRef
79.
go back to reference Mukhametzyanov, I., Pamučar, D.: A Sensitivity Analysis in MCDM Problems: A Statistical Approach. Decis. mak. Appl. Manage. Eng. 1(2), 51–80 (2018)CrossRef Mukhametzyanov, I., Pamučar, D.: A Sensitivity Analysis in MCDM Problems: A Statistical Approach. Decis. mak. Appl. Manage. Eng. 1(2), 51–80 (2018)CrossRef
80.
go back to reference Triantaphyllou, E.: Multi-criteria decision-making methods: a comparative study. In: Applied optimization, Vol. 44. Springer, USA (2000). Triantaphyllou, E.: Multi-criteria decision-making methods: a comparative study. In: Applied optimization, Vol. 44. Springer, USA (2000).
81.
go back to reference Pamučar, D.B., Ranđelović, A.: Multi-criteria decision-making: an example of sensitivity analysis. SJM 12(1), 1–27 (2017) Pamučar, D.B., Ranđelović, A.: Multi-criteria decision-making: an example of sensitivity analysis. SJM 12(1), 1–27 (2017)
82.
go back to reference Yu, O.-Y., Guikema, S.D., Briaud, J.-L., Burnett, D.: Sensitivity analysis for multi-attribute system selection problems in onshore environmentally friendly drilling (EFD). Syst. Eng. 15(2), 153–171 (2012)CrossRef Yu, O.-Y., Guikema, S.D., Briaud, J.-L., Burnett, D.: Sensitivity analysis for multi-attribute system selection problems in onshore environmentally friendly drilling (EFD). Syst. Eng. 15(2), 153–171 (2012)CrossRef
83.
go back to reference Li, P., Qian, H., Wu, J., Chen, J.: Sensitivity analysis of TOPSIS method in water quality assessment: I. Sensitivity to the parameter weights. Environ. Monit. Assess 185, 2453–2461 (2013)CrossRef Li, P., Qian, H., Wu, J., Chen, J.: Sensitivity analysis of TOPSIS method in water quality assessment: I. Sensitivity to the parameter weights. Environ. Monit. Assess 185, 2453–2461 (2013)CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A novel multi-criteria decision analysis technique incorporating demanding essential characteristics of existing MCDA techniques
Author
Susmita Bandyopadhyay
Publication date
07-03-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Progress in Artificial Intelligence / Issue 3/2023
Print ISSN: 2192-6352
Electronic ISSN: 2192-6360
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13748-023-00299-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2023

Progress in Artificial Intelligence 3/2023 Go to the issue

Premium Partner