Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cultural Studies of Science Education 4/2015

01-05-2014

A qualitative analysis of the determinants in the choice of a French journal reviewing procedures

Author: Ludovic Morge

Published in: Cultural Studies of Science Education | Issue 4/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Between 1993 and 2010, two French journals (Aster and Didaskalia) coming from different backgrounds but belonging to the same institution used to publish papers on research in science and technology education. The merging of these journals made it necessary for them to compare the different reviewing procedures used by each. This merging occurred at a time when research is becoming increasingly international which partly determines some of the reviewing procedure choices. In order for a francophone international journal to survive, it needs to take this internationalization into account in a reasoned manner. The author of this article, as a chief editor of RDST (Recherches en Didactique des Sciences et des Technologies)—the journal resulting from the merging- taking part in this merger, analyses the social, cultural and pragmatic determinants which impacted the choices made in reviewing procedures. This paper describes how these diversity of factors leads us to drop the idea of a standard reviewing procedure which would be valid for all journals.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Aronson, E. (1990). Applying social psychology to desegregation and energy conservation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 118–132.CrossRef Aronson, E. (1990). Applying social psychology to desegregation and energy conservation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 118–132.CrossRef
go back to reference Astolfi, J. P. (1985). Le nouvel Aster. Aster, 1, 1–5. Astolfi, J. P. (1985). Le nouvel Aster. Aster, 1, 1–5.
go back to reference Baker, D. (2002). The peer review process in science education journals. Research in Science Education, 32, 171–180.CrossRef Baker, D. (2002). The peer review process in science education journals. Research in Science Education, 32, 171–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Besançon, J., & Tiberghien, A. (1993). Editorial. Didaskalia, 1, 9–11. Besançon, J., & Tiberghien, A. (1993). Editorial. Didaskalia, 1, 9–11.
go back to reference Bingham, C. (1998). Peer review on the internet: A better class of conversation. The Lancet, 351(Suppl. I), 10–14.CrossRef Bingham, C. (1998). Peer review on the internet: A better class of conversation. The Lancet, 351(Suppl. I), 10–14.CrossRef
go back to reference Castro, D., Blanchet, A., Santiago-Delefosse, M., & Haas, V. (2003). Le processus d’expertise scientifique et les priorités des experts. Pratiques Psychologiques, 4(1), 49–63. Castro, D., Blanchet, A., Santiago-Delefosse, M., & Haas, V. (2003). Le processus d’expertise scientifique et les priorités des experts. Pratiques Psychologiques, 4(1), 49–63.
go back to reference Cottrell, N. (1972). Social facilitation. In C. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 185–236). New York: Holt, Rinehart Winston. Cottrell, N. (1972). Social facilitation. In C. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 185–236). New York: Holt, Rinehart Winston.
go back to reference Debray, R. (2000). Introduction à la médiologie. Paris: PUF. Debray, R. (2000). Introduction à la médiologie. Paris: PUF.
go back to reference Drapeau, M. (2004). Les critères de scientificité en recherche qualitative. Pratiques Psychologiques, 10(1), 79–86.CrossRef Drapeau, M. (2004). Les critères de scientificité en recherche qualitative. Pratiques Psychologiques, 10(1), 79–86.CrossRef
go back to reference Espinet, M., Izquierdo M., & Garcia, C. (accepted). Can a Castilian science education journal become international? The case of Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Cultural Studies of Science Education. Espinet, M., Izquierdo M., & Garcia, C. (accepted). Can a Castilian science education journal become international? The case of Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Cultural Studies of Science Education.
go back to reference Foucault, M. (1988/2001). La gouvernementalité. Paris: Gallimard Foucault, M. (1988/2001). La gouvernementalité. Paris: Gallimard
go back to reference Garfunkel, J. M., Ulshen, M. H., Hamrick, H. J., & Lawson, E. E. (1994). Effect of Institutional Prestige on referees’ recommendations and editorial decisions. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 137–138.CrossRef Garfunkel, J. M., Ulshen, M. H., Hamrick, H. J., & Lawson, E. E. (1994). Effect of Institutional Prestige on referees’ recommendations and editorial decisions. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 137–138.CrossRef
go back to reference Gosling, P. (1996). Psychologie sociale. Paris: Bréal. Gosling, P. (1996). Psychologie sociale. Paris: Bréal.
go back to reference Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706.CrossRef Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaufmann, J. C. (2007). L’entretien compréhensif. Paris: Armand Colin. Kaufmann, J. C. (2007). L’entretien compréhensif. Paris: Armand Colin.
go back to reference Lapassade, G. (2002b). Observation participante. In J. Barus-Michel, E. Enriquez, A. et Lévy (Eds.), Vocabulaire de psychologie. Références et position. Paris: Erès. Lapassade, G. (2002b). Observation participante. In J. Barus-Michel, E. Enriquez, A. et Lévy (Eds.), Vocabulaire de psychologie. Références et position. Paris: Erès.
go back to reference Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832.CrossRef Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832.CrossRef
go back to reference Maillet, E. (2012). Réfléchir la culture des écrans à l’école. Thèse de doctorat: Lyon 2. Maillet, E. (2012). Réfléchir la culture des écrans à l’école. Thèse de doctorat: Lyon 2.
go back to reference Martin, S. N., & Siry, C. (2011). Networks of practice in science education research: A global contexte. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 592–623.CrossRef Martin, S. N., & Siry, C. (2011). Networks of practice in science education research: A global contexte. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 592–623.CrossRef
go back to reference Martins, I., & Barros, S. (accepted). The role of journals in building up communities and in promoting mutual appreciation of contributions made by different profile science educators: the experience of Ciência em Tela. Cultural Studies of Science Education. Martins, I., & Barros, S. (accepted). The role of journals in building up communities and in promoting mutual appreciation of contributions made by different profile science educators: the experience of Ciência em Tela. Cultural Studies of Science Education.
go back to reference Perkins, D. V., & Saris, R. N. (2001). A “Jigsaw Classroom” technique for undergraduate statistics courses. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 111–113.CrossRef Perkins, D. V., & Saris, R. N. (2001). A “Jigsaw Classroom” technique for undergraduate statistics courses. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 111–113.CrossRef
go back to reference Piolat, A., & Vauclair, J. (2004). Le processus d’expertise éditorial avant et après internet. Pratiques Psychologiques, 10(3), 255–272.CrossRef Piolat, A., & Vauclair, J. (2004). Le processus d’expertise éditorial avant et après internet. Pratiques Psychologiques, 10(3), 255–272.CrossRef
go back to reference Santiago-Delefosse, M. (2004). Évaluer la qualité des publications : Quelles spécificités pour la recherche qualitative ? Pratiques Psychologiques, 10(3), 243–254.CrossRef Santiago-Delefosse, M. (2004). Évaluer la qualité des publications : Quelles spécificités pour la recherche qualitative ? Pratiques Psychologiques, 10(3), 243–254.CrossRef
go back to reference Stiegler, B. (2009). Pour une nouvelle critique de l’économie politique. Paris: Galilée, coll. « Débats » . Stiegler, B. (2009). Pour une nouvelle critique de l’économie politique. Paris: Galilée, coll. « Débats » .
go back to reference Street, M. D., Bozeman, D. P., & Whitfield, J. M. (1998). Author perceptions of positive and negative behaviors in the manuscript review process. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 1–22. Street, M. D., Bozeman, D. P., & Whitfield, J. M. (1998). Author perceptions of positive and negative behaviors in the manuscript review process. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 1–22.
go back to reference Sumner, T., Buckingham Shum, S., Wright, M., Bonnardel, N., Piolat, A., & Chevalier, A. (2000). Redesigning the peer review process: A developmental theory-in-action. In R. Dieng, A. Giboin, G. De Michelis, & L. Karsenty (Eds.), Designing cooperative systems: The use of theories and models (pp. 19–34). Amsterdam: I.O.S Press. Sumner, T., Buckingham Shum, S., Wright, M., Bonnardel, N., Piolat, A., & Chevalier, A. (2000). Redesigning the peer review process: A developmental theory-in-action. In R. Dieng, A. Giboin, G. De Michelis, & L. Karsenty (Eds.), Designing cooperative systems: The use of theories and models (pp. 19–34). Amsterdam: I.O.S Press.
go back to reference Tregenza, T. (2002). Gender bias in the refereeing process. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17(8), 349–350.CrossRef Tregenza, T. (2002). Gender bias in the refereeing process. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17(8), 349–350.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Rooyen, S., Godlee, F., Evans, S., Smith, R., & Black, N. (1998). Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial. JAMA, 280, 234–237.CrossRef Van Rooyen, S., Godlee, F., Evans, S., Smith, R., & Black, N. (1998). Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial. JAMA, 280, 234–237.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Rooyen, S., Godlee, F., Evans, S., Black, N., & Smith, R. (1999). Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers’ recommendations: A randomised trial. British Medical Journal, 318, 23–27. Van Rooyen, S., Godlee, F., Evans, S., Black, N., & Smith, R. (1999). Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers’ recommendations: A randomised trial. British Medical Journal, 318, 23–27.
go back to reference Vauclair, J., & Piolat, A. (2004). Qualité et visibilité des revues francophones dans les bases de données internationales. Pratiques Psychologiques, 10, 211–229.CrossRef Vauclair, J., & Piolat, A. (2004). Qualité et visibilité des revues francophones dans les bases de données internationales. Pratiques Psychologiques, 10, 211–229.CrossRef
go back to reference Walsh, E., Rooney, M., Appleby, L., & Wilkinson, G. (2000). Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 47–51.CrossRef Walsh, E., Rooney, M., Appleby, L., & Wilkinson, G. (2000). Open peer review: A randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 47–51.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A qualitative analysis of the determinants in the choice of a French journal reviewing procedures
Author
Ludovic Morge
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Cultural Studies of Science Education / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1871-1502
Electronic ISSN: 1871-1510
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9549-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Cultural Studies of Science Education 4/2015 Go to the issue