Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Influencing Factors on Error Reporting in Aviation - A Scenario-Based Approach Read chapter Read first chapter

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

A Review of Non-driving-related Tasks Used in Studies on Automated Driving

Authors : Frederik Naujoks, Dennis Befelein, Katharina Wiedemann, Alexandra Neukum

Published in: Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Conditionally automated driving (CAD) relieves the driver from monitoring current traffic conditions. This type of driving inherently enables the driver to execute different non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs). However, the driver still must be available as a backup option. With this in mind, the classification and evaluation of various NDRTs concerning their impact on driver performance in takeover scenarios represent an important contribution toward the creation of safe CAD functions. We reviewed various NDRTs that were used in studies on automated driving. The focus was on assigning aspects of these activities (e.g., ability to visually monitor traffic, necessity of sustained attention to NDRT, etc.) to various steps of the takeover process (e.g., noticing and interpreting takeover requests), which could be impaired by the execution of the respective NDRT. This, in turn, would increase the demands on the driver with respect to managing the takeover situation.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Cognitive Load Assessment of Tractor Driver Based on Cognitive Task Workload Model
next chapter Driverless Pods: From Technology Demonstrators to Desirable Mobility Solutions
Literature
1.
Stutts, J.C., Reinfurt, D.W., Staplin, L., Rodgman, E.A.: The Role of Driver Distraction in Traffic Crashes. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington (2001)CrossRef
2.
Gordon, C.: Driver distraction: an initial examination of the ‘attention diverted by’ contributory factor codes from crash reports and focus group research on perceived risks. 2005 IPENZ Conference, Auckland (2005)
3.
Glaze, A.L., Ellis, J.M.: Pilot Study of Distracted Drivers. Transportation and Safety Training Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (2003)
4.
Huemer, A.K., Vollrath, M.: Ablenkung durch fahrfremde Tätigkeiten - Machbarkeitsstudie. Bundesanstalt für Strassenwesen, Bergisch Gladbach (2012)
5.
Schoemig, N., Schoch, S., Neukum, A., Schumacher, M., Wandtner, B.: Simulatorstudien zur Ablenkungswirkung fahrfremder Tätigkeiten. Bundesanstalt für Strassenwesen, Bergisch Gladbach (2015)
6.
Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Neale, V.L., Sudweeks, J.D., Ramsey, D.J.: The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington (2006)
7.
Olson, R.L., Hanowski, R.J., Hickman, J.S., Bocanegra, J.L.: Driver Distraction in Commercial Vehicle Operations. Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, Blacksburg (2009)CrossRef
8.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle Electronic Devices. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC (2012)
9.
Spiessl, W., Hussmann, H.: Assessing error recognition in automated driving. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 5, 103–111 (2011)CrossRef
10.
Wickens, C.D.: The structure of attentional resources. In: Nickerson, R.S. (ed.) Attention and Performance VIII, pp. 239–257. Taylor & Francis, New York (1980)
11.
May, J.F., Baldwin, C.L.: Driver fatigue: the importance of identifying causal factors of fatigue when considering detection and countermeasure technologies. Trans. Res. F.-Traffic 12, 218–224 (2009)CrossRef
12.
Toffetti, A., Wilschut, E., Martens, M., Schieben, A., Rambaldini, A., Merat, N., Flemish, F.: CityMobil: human factor issues regarding highly automated vehicles on eLane. Transp. Res. Rec. 2110, 1–8 (2009)CrossRef
13.
Flemisch, F., Griesche, S., Heesen, M., Kaussner, A., Niemann, J., Petermann, I., Schieben, A., Schoemig, N.: Highly automated vehicles for intelligent transport: Validation of preliminary design of HAVEit systems by simulator tests. Technical report, HAVEit Consortium (2010)
14.
Carsten, O., Lai, F., Barnard, A., Merat, N., Jamson, A.: Control task substitution in semi-automated driving: does it matter what aspects are automated? Hum. Factors 54, 747–761 (2012)CrossRef
15.
Llaneras, R.E., Salinger, J., Green, C.A.: Human factors issues associated with limited ability autonomous driving systems: drivers’ allocation of visual attention to the forward roadway. In: 7th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, pp. 92–98. University of Iowa, Iowa City (2013)
16.
Jamson, A.H., Merat, N., Carsten, O.M., Lai, F.C.: Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. Trans. Res. C.-Emerg. 30, 116–125 (2013)CrossRef
17.
Helldin, T., Falkman, G., Riveiro, M., Davidsson, S.: Presenting system uncertainty in automotive UIs for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving. In: 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 210–217. ACM, New York (2013)
18.
Dogan, E., Deborne, R., Delhomme, P., Kemeny, A., Jonville, P.: Evaluating the shift of control between driver and vehicle at high automation at low speed: the role of anticipation. In: 5th Transport Research Arena (TRA) Conference, Paris (2014)
19.
Melcher, V., Rauh, S., Diederichs, F., Widlroither, H., Bauer, W.: Take-over requests for automated driving. Proced. Manuf. 3, 2867–2873 (2015)CrossRef
20.
Naujoks, F., Mai, C., Neukum, A.: The effect of urgency of take-over requests during highly automated driving under distraction conditions. In: Ahram, T., Karowski, W., Marek, T. (eds.) In: 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, vol. 7, pp. 2099–2106. AHFE Conference, Krakau (2014)
21.
Schwalk, M., Kalogerakis, N., Maier, T.: Driver support by a vibrotactile seat matrix – Recognition, adequacy and workload of tactile patterns in take-over scenarios during automated driving. Proced. Manuf. 3, 2466–2473 (2015)CrossRef
22.
Diederichs, F., Bischoff, S., Widlroither, H., Reilhac, P., Hottelart, K., Moizard, J.: Smartphone integration and SAE level 3 car automation: a new cockpit concept and its evaluation in a car simulator. In: VDI (ed.) Der Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert, pp. 63–78. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf (2015)
23.
Naujoks, F., Purucker, C., Neukum, A.: Secondary task engagement and vehicle automation–Comparing the effects of different automation levels in an on-road experiment. Trans. Res. F.-Traffic 38, 67–82 (2016)CrossRef
24.
Tijerina, L., Johnston, S., Parmer, E., Pham, H., Winterbottom, M., Barickman, F.: Preliminary Studies in Haptic Displays for Rear-End Collision Avoidance System and Adaptive Cruise Control Applications. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington (2000)
25.
Petermann-Stock, I., Hackenberg, L., Muhr, T., Mergl, C.: Wie lange braucht der Fahrer - eine Analyse zu Übernahmezeiten aus verschiedenen Nebentätigkeiten während einer hochautomatisierten Staufahrt. 6. Tagung Fahrerassistenzsysteme - der Weg zum automatischen Fahren. TU München, München (2013)
26.
Neubauer, C., Matthews, G., Saxby, D.: Fatigue in the automated vehicle - do games and conversation distract or energize the driver? Proc. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 58, 2053–2057 (2014)CrossRef
27.
Rudin-Brown, C.M., Parker, H.A.: Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): implications for preventive strategies. Trans. Res. F.-Traffic 7, 59–76 (2004)CrossRef
28.
Louw, T., Merat, N., Jamson, H.: Engaging with highly automated driving: To be or not to be in the loop? In: 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, Salt Lake City (2015)
29.
Seppelt, B.D., Lees, M.N., Lee, J.D.: Driver distraction and reliance: adaptive cruise control in the context of sensor reliability and algorithm limits. In: Third International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, Rockport (2005)
30.
van den Beukel, A.P., van der Voort, M.C.: The influence of time-criticality on situation Awareness when retrieving human control after automated driving. In: 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), The Hague (2013)
31.
Politis, I., Brewster, S., Pollick, F.: Language-based multimodal displays for the handover of control in autonomous cars. In: Burnett, G., Gabbard, J., Green, P., Osswald, S., Eren, A., Antrobus, V. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 3–10. ACM, New York (2015)
32.
Blommer, M., Curry, R., Kochhar, D., Swaminathan, R., Talamonti, W., Tijerina, L.: The effects of a scheduled driver engagement strategy in automated driving. Proc. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 59, 1681–1685 (2015)CrossRef
33.
Ma, R., Kaber, D.B.: Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 35, 939–953 (2005)CrossRef
34.
Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M.: What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 78, 212–221 (2015)CrossRef
35.
Jamson, H., Merat, N., Carsten, O., Lai, F.: Fully-automated driving: the road to future vehicles. In: Sixth International Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, Olympic Valley (2011)
36.
Mok, B., Johns, M., Lee, K. J., Miller, D., Sirkin, D., Ive, P., Ju, W.: Emergency, automation off: unstructured transition timing for distracted drivers of automated vehicles. In: 18th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Las Palmas (2015)
37.
Walch, M., Lange, K., Baumann, M., Weber, M.: Autonomous driving: investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance. In: Burnett, G., Gabbard, J., Green, P., Osswald, S., Eren, A., Antrobus, V. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 11–18. ACM, New York (2015)
38.
Omae, M., Hashimoto, N., Sugamoto, T., Shimizu, H.: Measurement of driver’s reaction time to failure of steering controller during automatic driving. SAE J.-Rev. Automot. Eng. 26, 213–215 (2005)
39.
Schaller, T., Schiehlen, J., Gradenegger, B.: Stauassistenz–Unterstützung des Fahrers in der Quer-und Längsführung: Systementwicklung und Kundenakzeptanz. 3th Conference on Driver Assistance, Munich (2008)
40.
Damböck, D., Farid, M., Tönert, L., Bengler, K.: Übernahmezeiten beim hochautomatisierten Fahren. In: 5th Conference on Driver Assistance, Munich (2012)
41.
Beggiato, M., Krems, J.F.: The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Trans. Res. F.-Traffic 18, 47–57 (2013)CrossRef
42.
Vollrath, M., Schleicher, S., Gelau, C.: The influence of cruise control and adaptive cruise control on driving behaviour–a driving simulator study. Accid. Anal. Prev. 43, 1134–1139 (2011)CrossRef
43.
Stockert, S., Richardson, N.T., Lienkamp, M.: Driving in an increasingly automated world-approaches to improve the driver-automation interaction. Proced. Manuf. 3, 2889–2896 (2015)CrossRef
44.
Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Damböck, D., Bengler, K.: Partially automated driving as a fallback level of high automation. In: 6th Conference on Driver Assistance, Munich (2013)
45.
Lorenz, L., Hergeth, S.: Einfluss der Nebenaufgabe auf die Überwachungsleistung beim teilautomatisierten Fahren. In: VDI (ed.) Der Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert, pp. 159–173. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf (2015)
46.
Lorenz, L., Kerschbaum, P., Schumann, J.: Designing take over scenarios for automated driving: how does augmented reality support the driver to get back into the loop? Proc. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 58, 1681–1685 (2014)CrossRef
47.
Kerschbaum, P., Lorenz, L., Bengler, K.: Highly automated driving with a decoupled steering wheel. Proc. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 58, 1686–1690 (2014)CrossRef
48.
Beller, J., Heesen, M., Vollrath, M.: Improving the driver–automation interaction an approach using automation uncertainty. Hum. Factors 55, 1130–1141 (2013)CrossRef
49.
Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Krems, J. F., Toenert, L.: Effects of take-over requests and cultural background on automation trust in highly automated driving. In: 8th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Salt Lake City (2015)
50.
Körber, M., Weißgerber, T., Kalb, L., Blaschke, C., Farid, M.: Prediction of take-over time in highly automated driving by two psychometric tests. DYNA 82, 195–201 (2015)CrossRef
51.
Radlmayr, J., Gold, C., Lorenz, L., Farid, M., Bengler, K.: How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving. Proc. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 58, 2063–2067 (2014)CrossRef
52.
Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.C., Carsten, O.: Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Hum. Factors 54, 762–771 (2012)CrossRef
53.
Gold, C., Körber, M., Hohenberger, C., Lechner, D., Bengler, K.: Trust in automation – before and after the experience of take-over scenarios in a highly automated vehicle. Proced. Manuf. 3, 3025–3032 (2015)CrossRef
54.
Lin, T.W., Hwang, S.L., Green, P.A.: Effects of time-gap settings of adaptive cruise control (ACC) on driving performance and subjective acceptance in a bus driving simulator. Saf. Sci. 47, 620–625 (2009)CrossRef
55.
Lee, J., McGehee, D., Brown, T., Marshall, D.: Effects of adaptive cruise control and alert modality on driver performance. Transp. Res. Rec. 1980, 49–56 (2006)CrossRef
56.
Petermeijer, S.M., Abbink, D.A., de Winter, J.C.: Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority. Hum. Factors 57, 5–20 (2015)CrossRef
57.
Stanton, N.A., Young, M., McCaulder, B.: Drive-by-wire: the case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Saf. Sci. 27, 149–159 (1997)CrossRef
58.
Ho, A.W., Cummings, M.L.: Multiple alarms and driving situational awareness (No. HAL2005-01). MIT, Cambridge (2005)
59.
Beggiato, M., Hartwich, F., Schleinitz, K., Krems, J., Othersen, I., Petermann-Stock, I.: What would drivers like to know during automated driving? Information needs at different levels of automation. In: 7th conference driver assistance, Munich (2015)
60.
Körber, M., Cingel, A., Zimmermann, M., Bengler, K.: Vigilance decrement and passive fatigue caused by monotony in automated driving. Proced. Manuf. 3, 2403–2409 (2015)CrossRef
61.
Schömig, N., Hargutt, V., Neukum, A., Petermann-Stock, I., Othersen, I.: The interaction between highly automated driving and the development of drowsiness. Proced. Manuf. 3, 6652–6659 (2015)CrossRef
62.
Barr, L.C., Yang, C.Y.D., Hanowski, R.J., Olson, R.: An Assessment of Driver Drowsiness, Distraction, and Performance in a Naturalistic Setting. Department of Transportation Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, DC (2011)
63.
Pal, N.R., Chuang, C.-Y., Ko, L.-W., Chao, C.-F., Jung, T.-P., Liang, S.-F., Lin, C.-T.: EEG-based subject-and session-independent drowsiness detection: an unsupervised approach. EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2008, 1–11 (2008)CrossRef
64.
Kroes, S.: Detecting Boredom in Meetings. University of Twente, Enschede (2005)
65.
Åkerstedt, T., Gillberg, M.: Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. Int. J. Neurosci. 52, 29–37 (1990)CrossRef
66.
Briggs, G.F., Hole, G.J., Land, M.F.: Emotionally involving telephone conversations lead to driver error and visual tunnelling. Trans. Res. F.-Traffic 14, 313–323 (2011)CrossRef
67.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V.: Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto (1977)
68.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 54, 1063–1070 (1988)CrossRef
69.
Jackson, S.A., Marsh, H.W.: Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 18, 17–35 (1996)CrossRef
70.
Mackworth, N.: The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 1, 6–21 (1948)CrossRef
71.
Robertson, I.H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B.T., Yiend, J.: Oops!: performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 35, 747–758 (1997)CrossRef
72.
Lim, J., Dinges, D.F.: Sleep deprivation and vigilant attention. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1129, 305–322 (2008)CrossRef
73.
Oken, B.S., Salinsky, M.C., Elsas, S.: Vigilance, alertness, or sustained attention: physiological basis and measurement. Clin. Neurophysiol. 117, 1885–1901 (2006)CrossRef
74.
O’Donnell, R.D., Eggemeier, F.T.: Workload assessment methodology. In: Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, pp. 1–49. Wiley, New York (1986)
75.
De Waard, D.: The Measurement of Drivers’ Mental Workload. Traffic Research Center Groningen University, Groningen (1996)
76.
Martens, M., Van Winsum, W.: Measuring Distraction: The Peripheral Detection Task. TNO, Soesterberg (2000)
77.
Boles, D.B., Adair, L.P.: The multiple resources questionnaire (MRQ). Proc. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 45, 1790–1794 (2001)CrossRef
78.
Pauzié, A.: A method to assess the driver mental workload: the driving activity load index (DALI). IET Intell. Transp. Sy. 2, 315–322 (2008)CrossRef
79.
Pauzié, A.: Evaluating driver mental workload using the driving activity load index (DALI). In: C. Brusque (ed.) Proceedings of European Conference on Human Interface Design for Intelligent Transport Systems, pp. 67–79. HUMANIST publications, Lyon (2008)
80.
81.
Kahneman, D.: Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1973)
82.
Pashler, H.: Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol. Bull. 116, 220–224 (1994)CrossRef
83.
May, J.G., Kennedy, R.S., Williams, M.C., Dunlap, W.P., Brannan, J.R.: Eye movement indices of mental workload. Acta Psychol. 75, 75–89 (1990)CrossRef
84.
Wilson, G.F., Eggemeier, F.T.: Psychophysiological assessment of workload in multi-task environments. In: Damos, D.L. (ed.) Multiple-Task Performance, pp. 329–360. Taylor & Francis, London (1991)
85.
Kramer, A.F.: Physiological metrics of mental workload: a review of recent progress. In: Damos, D.L. (ed.) Multiple-Task Performance, pp. 279–328. Taylor & Francis, London (1991)
86.
Porges, S.W., Byrne, E.A.: Research methods for measurement of heart rate and respiration. Biol. Psychol. 34, 93–130 (1992)CrossRef
87.
Zijlstra, F.R.H., Doorn, L.V.: The Construction of a Scale to Measure Subjective Effort. TU Delft, Delft (1985)
88.
Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988)CrossRef
89.
Wittmann, M., Kiss, M., Gugg, P., Steffen, A., Fink, M., Pöppel, E., Kamiya, H.: Effects of display position of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving. Appl. Ergon. 37, 187–199 (2006)CrossRef
90.
Burnett, G.: An evaluation of different positions for an in-vehicle navigation display. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Traffic and Transport Psychology, Nottingham (2004)
91.
Tretten, P., Normark, C.J., Gärling, A.: Warnings and placement positions in automobiles. In: Proceedings of the 17th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Beijing (2009)
92.
Mehler, B., Reimer, B., Dobres, J., Coughlin, J.F.: Assessing the Demands of Voice Based In-Vehicle Interfaces - Phase II Experiment 3–2015 Toyota Corolla. MIT, Cambridge (2015)
93.
Mehler, B., Reimer, B., McAnulty, H., Dobres, J., Lee, J., Coughlin, J.F.: Assessing the Demands of Voice Based In-Vehicle Interfaces - Phase II Experiment 2–2014 Mercedes CLA. MIT, Cambridge (2015)
94.
Metz, B.: Worauf achtet der Fahrer?. Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg (2009)
95.
Dingus, T.A., Hulse, M.C., Antin, J.F., Wierwille, W.W.: Attentional demand requirements of an automobile moving-map navigation system. Transp. Res. A-Pol. 23, 301–315 (1989)CrossRef
96.
Schneegaß, S., Pfleging, B., Kern, D., Schmidt, A.: Support for modeling interaction with automotive user interfaces. In: Tscheligi, M., Kranz, M., Weinberg, G., Meschtscherjakov, A., Murer, M., Wilfinger, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pp. 71–78. ACM, New York (2011)
97.
Pettitt, M., Burnett, G., Karbassioun, D.: Applying the keystroke level model in a driving context. In: Ergonomics Society Annual Conference, San Francisco (2006)
98.
Purucker, C., Naujoks, F., Prill, A., Neukum, A.: Evaluating distraction of in-vehicle information systems while driving by predicting total eyes-off-road times with keystroke level modeling. Appl. Ergon. 68, 543–554 (2017)CrossRef
99.
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 54–67 (2000)CrossRef
100.
Deci, E.L.: Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 18, 105–115 (1971)CrossRef
101.
Ryan, R.M.: Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: an extension of cognitive evaluation theory. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 43, 450–461 (1982)CrossRef
102.
Harackiewicz, J.M.: The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 37, 1352–1363 (1979)CrossRef
103.
Gold, C., Naujoks, F., Radlmayr, J., Bellem, H., Jarosch, O..: Testing-scenarios for human factors research in highly automated vehicles. In: 8th Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Los Angeles, USA (2017)
104.
Marberger, C., Mielenz, H., Naujoks, F., Radlmayr, J., Bengler, K., Wandtner, B.: Understanding and applying the concept of “driver availability” in automated driving. In: 8th Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Los Angeles, USA (2017)
Metadata
Title
A Review of Non-driving-related Tasks Used in Studies on Automated Driving
Authors
Frederik Naujoks
Dennis Befelein
Katharina Wiedemann
Alexandra Neukum
Copyright Year
2018
Book
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60440-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-60441-1

Copyright Year: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_52

Premium Partner

    Image Credits