Introduction
Physical Modeling Experiments
Mixing and Homogenization in the Ladle
Author | Experimental Apparatus | Gas Injection Pattern | Gas Injection Position | Scale | Liquid Metal | Gas | Colored Reagent and Injection Position | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joo and Guthrie[8] | cylindrical vessel (UD1000 mm × BD864 mm × H787 mm) | porous plug | central and off-centered bottom blowing | 1/3 | water | air | KCl above the plume | mixing mechanisms as function of porous plug location, tracer injection point, and ladle monitoring point |
Krishnapisharody et al.[12] | cylindrical vessel (D500 mm × H270 mm) | nozzle | central top blowing and off-centered bottom blowing | 1/5 | water | air | KCl above the plume | mixing time for different bottom blowing positions with top blowing |
González-Bernal et al.[13] | cylindrical vessel (D371 mm × H456 mm) | tuyere | off-centered bottom blowing | 1/7 | water | air | vegetal red colorant at the central bottom | effects of locations of single tuyere and dual tuyeres on the mixing time |
Fan et al.[21] | cylindrical vessel (D614 mm × H800 mm) | nozzle | central and off-centered top blowing | 0.25 | water | air | dye NaCl above the water and submerged | optimal position of Ca-Si injection |
Mazumdar et al.[24] | cylindrical vessel (D1120 mm × H930 mm) (D600 mm × H490 mm) (D495 mm × H410 mm) (D300 mm × H250 mm) | submerged lance | central top vertical blowing | 1, 0.53, 0.44, 0.27 | water | air | sulfuric acid above the plume | criteria of mixing time and gas flow rate for dynamic similarity |
Mandal et al.[14] | cylindrical vessel (D600 mm, D450 mm, D300 mm) (0.7 ≤ H/D mm ≤ 1.2) | tuyere/nozzle | ± 0.5R bottom blowing | 0.2 | water | air/N2 | NaCl or H2SO4 axis of symmetry | mixing time and correlation of liquid depth, vessel radius, and gas flow rate with dual porous plugs stirring |
Mazumdar et al.[15] | cylindrical vessel (D585 mm × H600 mm) | nozzle | central, ± 0.5R, and 0.64R bottom blowing | 0.17 | water | air/N2 | NaCl or H2SO4 axis of symmetry | mixing time and correlation of flat bottom, tapered cylindrical, step bottom, and funnel- shaped bottom |
Patil et al.[16] | cylindrical vessel (D300 mm, D600 mm) | nozzle | ± 0.5R bottom blowing | water | air | NaCl or KCl or H2SO4 above the exposed eye | effects of slag layer thickness and upper phase physical properties on the mixing time | |
Amaro-Villeda et al.[17] | cylindrical vessel (D537 mm × H410 mm) | nozzle | central and off-centered bottom blowing | 1/6 | water | air | NaOH or HCl | effects of slag properties on mixing time and energy dissipation |
Tang et al.[18] | cylindrical vessel (UD963 mm × BD920 mm × H933 mm) | porous plug | off-centered bottom blowing | 1/3 | water | N2 | KCl above the exposed eye | effects of dual-plug separation angles and radial locations on mixing time |
Liu et al.[19] | cylindrical vessel (UD676 mm × BD617 mm × H700 mm) | porous plug | central and off-centered bottom blowing | 1/3 | water | N2 | NaCl above the exposed eye | effects of radial locations and separation angles of single and dual plugs on the mixing time |
Gómez et al.[20] | cylindrical vessel (D335 mm × H391 mm) | nozzle | off-centered bottom blowing | 1/8 | water | air | KCl above the exposed eye | effects of separation angles, radial locations, and slag layer thickness on mixing time |
Gas Bubble Formation, Transformation, and Interactions in the Plume Zone
Author | Experimental Apparatus | Gas Injection Pattern | Liquid Metal | Gas | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sahai and Guthrie[9] | cylindrical vessel (D500 mm × H450 mm) | 2.16-mm nozzle | water | air | velocity pattern and plume structure |
cylindrical vessel (D500 mm × H400 mm) | 4.1-mm, 6.35-mm nozzles | water | air | gas fraction, bubble velocity, bubble frequency, and bubble pierced length in the plume | |
cylindrical vessel (D500 mm × H600 mm) | 6.35-mm nozzle | ||||
Johansen et al.[27] | cylindrical vessel (UD1100 mm × BD930 mm × H1237 mm) | 50-mm porous plug | water | air | radial mean and turbulent velocities |
Taniguchi et al.[28] | cylindrical vessel (D290 mm × H200 mm) | 6-mm nozzle | water | nitrogen | fluid flow, bubble dispersion, and gas-liquid mass transfer |
Anagbo et al.[29] | cylindrical vessel (D500 mm × H400 mm) | 60-mm porous plug | water | air | spatial distributions of properties of the plume above the plug |
cylindrical vessel (D500 mm × H420 mm) | 4-mm nozzle | water | air | variety of bubble size during the floating, velocity pattern, and void fraction of gas along the plume | |
Kishimoto et al.[32] | cylindrical vessel (D500 mm × H420 mm) (D500 mm × H500 mm) | 3-mm nozzle | water | air | location of the interface, propagation velocity, and energy dissipation |
Iguchi et al.[33] | cylindrical vessel (D126 mm × H233 mm) | 2-mm nozzle | water | air | comparison of four regions in the plume zone |
Iguchi et al.[34] | cylindrical vessel (D90 mm × H120mm) | 1-mm nozzle | 1600 °C molten iron | argon | bubble characteristics in a metallurgical reactor |
cylindrical vessel (D400 mm × H370 mm) | 2-mm, 3-mm, 5-mm nozzles | Wood’s metal | nitrogen, argon or helium | gas fraction and bubble frequency, bubble size distribution, mean rising velocity, and physical properties of gas | |
cylindrical vessel (D420 mm × H500 mm) | 1-mm nozzle,10-mm to 50-mm porous plugs | NaOH solution (0.02 mol/L) | CO2 | diffusion-controlled decarburization in molten steel | |
Li et al.[39] | cylindrical vessel with 2.44 deg slope angle (D617 mm × H700 mm) | 43.4-mm porous plug | water | N2 | bubble size distribution in the plume zone |
Xu et al.[40] | cylindrical vessel (D150 mm × H75 mm) | 0.5-mm, 1-mm, 2-mm nozzles | water | air | effect of the wettability on the bubble formation |
Wang et al.[41] | cylindrical vessel (D120 mm × H80 mm) | 1.5-mm, 2-mm, 2.5-mm nozzles | water | air | motion of single bubble and interactions between two bubbles |
cylindrical vessel (D100 mm × H400 mm) | 2-mm orifice | silicon oil | nitrogen | expansion of single bubble rising and its volumetric mass transfer under vacuum degassing condition |
Inclusion Behavior at the Steel-Slag Interface and in the Molten Steel
Author | Experimental Apparatus | Gas Injection | Liquid Metal | Slag | Inclusion | Gas | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kang et al.[44] | rectangular container (L430 mm × W210 mm × H590 mm) | 10-mm nozzle | water | silicon oil (5 × 10−5, 1 × 10−4, 2 × 10−4 m2 s−1) | charcoal powder | air | inclusion removal around open eye and comparison of inclusion removal contribution by gas plume and buoyancy |
cylindrical vessel (D250 mm × H400 mm) | |||||||
Huang et al.[49] | cylindrical vessel (D1225 mm × H1252 mm) | purging plug | water | mixed oil | alumina hollow balls (0.5, 1, 2 mm) | nitrogen | slag entrapment around open eye |
Thunman et al.[50] | rectangular container (L150 mm × W250 mm × H350 mm) | 5-mm nozzle | Ga-In-Sn alloy (0.34 mm2/s) | MnCl2-glycerol (42.11 mm2 s−1) | argon | slag entrainment around open eye | |
HCl solution (1.02 mm2 s−1) | |||||||
Yang et al.[52] | rectangular container (L200 mm × W50 mm × H400 mm) | water | polystyrene particle (15 to 589 μm) | air | inclusion removal by wake flow | ||
Dayal et al.[51] | rectangular container (L950 mm × W150 mm × H400 mm) | 10-mm nozzle | water | oil | air | effect of the shear force on the particle droplet behaviors at the steel-slag interface | |
Liu et al.[53] | water | silicon oil (5 × 10−5, 7.5 × 10−5 m2 s−1) | hollow aluminum (4 mm) | forces of nonmetallic inclusion at the steel-slag interface and inclusion behavior separated from molten steel to slag | |||
Zhou et al.[54] | water | bean oil kerosene pump oil | paraffin wax (sphere, plate, octahedron) | effects of inclusion geometry and slag properties on the separation process of nonmetallic inclusion at the steel-slag interface |
Open Eye Formation
Author | Experimental Apparatus | Gas Injection | Scale | Bulk Phase | Slag Layer | Gas | Colored Reagent | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yonezawa and Schwerdtfeger[10] | cylindrical vessel (D290 mm × H225 mm) | 0.5, 1, 1.5 mm | mercury | silicon oil | high-purity nitrogen | sudan blue | open eye, time average of the free surface area, and time fraction of complete coverage | |
Krishnapisharody and Irons[55] | cylindrical vessel (D420 mm × H500 mm) | 3-mm nozzle | 0.1 | water-paraffin oil, CaCl2 solution-paraffin oil, water-heavy motor oil | air | dimensionless eye size as a function of density ratio and Froude number | ||
Guo and Irons[56] | square vessel (L500 mm × W500 mm × H400 mm) | 1.5-mm nozzle 25-mm porous plug | water | air | spout height | |||
Iguchi et al.[57] | cylindrical vessel (D200 mm × H300 mm) (D500 mm × H750 mm) | 0.5-, 1-, 1.5-mm nozzles | water | silicon oil | air | expression to describe open eye | ||
Peranandhanthan and Mazumdar[58] | cylindrical vessel (D300 mm × H300 mm) | 8-mm nozzle | 0.1 | water | petroleum ether mustard oil soybean oil tetrachloro ethelene perfumed coconut oil | air | modified expression of dimensionless slag eye | |
Wu et al.[59] | cylindrical vessel (D600 mm × H500 mm) | 6-mm nozzle | 0.2 | water-silicon oil (0.050, 0.100, 0.200, 0.515 Pa s) | air | sudan blue | open eye formation | |
cylindrical vessel (D240 mm × H145 mm) | 6-mm nozzle | 1/13 | Ga-In-Sn alloy-hydrochloric acid ((12 pct) (0.006 Pa s) (0.001 Pa s) | argon | sudan yellow | |||
Liu et al.[19] | cylindrical vessel (D617 mm × H700 mm) | 43.4-mm porous plug | 0.33 | water | bean oil | nitrogen | effects of gas flow rate, slag layer thickness, and plug separation angles on slag eye formation | |
Lv et al.[60] | cylindrical vessel (D600 mm, D290 mm) | 6-mm nozzle | water | silicon oil (97 Pa s) | air | sudan blue | size of slag eye | |
cylindrical vessel (D188 mm × H172 mm) | 6-mm nozzle | sodium tungstate (10 Pa s) | ||||||
Amaro-Villeda et al.[17] | cylindrical vessel (D537 mm × H410 mm) | nozzle | 1/6 | water | oil | air | effects of flow rate and slag properties on open eye formation | |
Mazumdar et al.[61] | cylindrical vessel (D600 mm × H705 mm) | 0.28 | water | petroleum ether mustard oil coconut oil | air | optimization of gas bubbling for mixing time and slag eye area | ||
cylindrical vessel (D300 mm × H359 mm) | 0.14 | |||||||
Pérez et al.[62] | cylindrical vessel (D500 mm × H410 mm) | nozzle | 1/6 | water | air | flow pattern measured by PIV and its effect on open eye formation |
Industrial Trials
Company | Steel Grade | Experimental Apparatus | Stirring Condition | Capacity | Alloy Component | Slag Layer Thickness | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSAB AB[131] | cylindrical vessel (D2.6 m × H2.9 m) | 107t | thermal stratification during holding | ||||
Yawata steelworks of Nippon Steel Corporation[10] | cylindrical vessel (D4.4 m × H3.5 m) | 100 to 500 NL/min | 350t | 0.02 pct C, 0.01 pct Si, 0.20 pct Mn, 0.015 pct P, 0.010 pct S | 50 mm | open eye | |
Uddeholm AB[45] | AISI H13 tool steel | 700 A + 10 L/min Ar 900 A + 100 L/min Ar | 65t | 0.39 pct C, 1.0 pct Si, 0.4 pct Mn, 5.3 pct Cr, 1.3 pct Mo, 0.9 pct V, N, S | optimization of gas stirring for decreasing inclusion content | ||
tool steel | cylindrical vessel (D2.95 m × H1.36 m) | 300, 600, 750, 900 A | 65t | Cr, Mo, Mn, Si, V, Ni, S | 100 mm | slag droplets generated at the steel-slag interface | |
special steels | cylindrical vessel (D2.97 m × H3.18 m) | 20, 30 STP m3/h | 170t | Al, C, Mn, Si | mixing phenomena and open eye formation | ||
cylindrical vessel (D3.59 m × H4.75 m) | 215t | analysis on the ladle lining during the preheating process and teeming process | |||||
SFIL Steelworks[67] | cylindrical vessel (D2.8 m × H2.79 m) | 10.8 Nm3/h | 100t | hydrogen degassing |
Criteria for Scaling Between Physical Modeling Experiments and Industrial Trials
Author | Froude Number | Gas Flow Rate (Model and Prototype) | Gas Flow Rate (Prototype and Industrial Scale) | Void Fraction | Plume Radius | Plume Velocity | Mixing Time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\( \frac{{\rho_{\text{g}} }}{{\rho_{\text{l}} }}\frac{{Q^{2} }}{{gd^{5} }} \)
|
\( \frac{{{\text{Q}}_{\text{model}} }}{{Q_{\text{prototype}} }} = \lambda^{5/2} \)
|
\( \frac{{\alpha_{\text{model}} }}{{\alpha_{\text{prototype}} }} = \lambda^{0} \)
|
\( \frac{{R_{{{\text{av}}_{\text{model}} }} }}{{R_{{{\text{av}}_{\text{prototype}} }} }} = \lambda \)
|
\( \frac{{U_{{p_{\text{model}} }} }}{{U_{{p_{\text{prototype}} }} }} = \lambda^{1/2} \)
| |||
Yu et al.[4] |
\( \frac{{Q_{\text{model}} }}{{{\text{Q}}_{\text{prototype}} }} = \left( {\frac{{\lambda_{\sigma } }}{{\lambda_{{\rho_{\text{l}} }} }}} \right)^{1/4} \lambda^{2} \)
| ||||||
Fan and Hwang[21] |
\( \frac{{Q_{\text{model}} }}{{Q_{\text{prototype}} }} = \frac{{\lambda_{\sigma } }}{{\lambda_{{\mu_{\text{l}} }} }}\lambda^{2} \)
|
\( \frac{{Q_{\text{prototype}} }}{{Q_{\text{industrial scale}} }} = \frac{1873}{293}\frac{{P_{\text{atm}} }}{{P_{\text{atm}} + \rho_{\text{steel}} gH_{\text{real}} }} \)
| |||||
Mazumdar et al.[24] |
\( \frac{{Q_{\text{model}} }}{{Q_{\text{industrial scale}} }} = \lambda^{5/2} \)
|
\( \frac{{\tau_{\text{model}} }}{{\tau_{\text{full scale}} }} = \lambda^{1/2} \)
| |||||
Mazumdar[69] |
\( \frac{{U^{2} }}{gH} \)
|
\( \frac{{Q_{\text{model}} }}{{Q_{\text{industrial scale}} }} = \lambda^{3/2} \)
|
\( \frac{{U_{{p_{\text{model}} }} }}{{U_{{p_{\text{full scale}} }} }} = \lambda^{1/6} \)
|
\( \frac{{\tau_{\text{model}} }}{{\tau_{\text{full scale}} }} = \lambda^{5/6} \)
| |||
Pan et al.[70] |
\( \frac{{Q_{\text{model}} }}{{Q_{\text{prototype}} }} = \frac{{\lambda_{\sigma } }}{{\lambda_{{\mu_{\text{l}} }} }}\lambda^{2} \)
|
\( \frac{{Q_{\text{prototype}} }}{{Q_{\text{industrial scale}} }} = \frac{1873}{293}\frac{{P_{\text{atm}} }}{{P_{\text{atm}} + \rho_{\text{steel}} gH_{\text{real}} }} \)
|
Numerical Models to Study the Gas–Liquid Zone in Ladle Refining
Multiphase Models Applied to Study Ladle Refining
Quasi-single-phase model
Author | Dimension | Position of Gas Injection | Volume Fraction | Plume Velocity | Slip Velocity | Plume Shape | Bubble Diameter | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joo and Guthrie[8] | 2 | one off-centered two off-centered |
\( \frac{Q}{{\pi R_{\text{av}}^{2} U_{\text{p}} }} \)
|
\( 4.17Q^{0.333} H^{0.25} R^{ - 0.33} \)
| mixing mechanisms with single or dual bubbling of different positions | |||
Goldschmit and Owen[82] | 3 | one central two off-centered |
\( \frac{{Q_{1} - \pi R_{\text{av}}^{2} \alpha (1 - \alpha )U_{\text{s}} }}{{2\pi \mathop \smallint \nolimits_{0}^{{R_{av} }} U_{\text{p}} r{\text{d}}r}} \)
|
\( 4.5Q^{0.333} H^{0.25} R^{ - 0.25} \)
|
\( 1.08*\left( {\frac{{gd_{\text{b}} }}{2}} \right)^{0.5} \)
|
\( 0.291\left( {\frac{{Q_{1}^{2} }}{g}} \right)^{0.2} {\text{Fr}}_{\text{m}}^{ - 0.129} \left( {\frac{z}{{d_{\text{o}} }}} \right)^{0.43} \)
|
\( 0.35*(Q_{\text{g}}^{2} /g)^{0.2} \)
| position of Ar injection |
2 | central vertical submerged lance |
\( \frac{{Q\frac{{T_{\text{l}} }}{{T_{\text{g}} }}\frac{{P_{0} }}{P}}}{{2\pi R_{\text{av}}^{2} U_{p} }} \)
|
\( 4.17Q^{0.333} H^{0.25} R^{ - 0.33} \)
|
\( 1.08*\left( {\frac{{gd_{\text{b}} }}{2}} \right)^{0.5} \)
|
\( k\left( {\frac{\sigma }{{\rho_{\text{l}} }}} \right)^{1/2} \)
| flow pattern | ||
Mazumdar and Guthrie[80] | 2 | central vertical submerged lance |
\( \frac{Q}{{\pi R_{\text{av}}^{2} U_{\text{p}} }} \)
|
\( 4.19\beta^{0.333} Q^{0.333} H^{0.25} R^{ - 0.33} \)
| with or without tapered side walls and surface baffles | |||
Mazumdar et al.[81] | 2 | one bottom center |
\( \frac{Q}{{\pi R_{\text{av}}^{2} U_{\text{p}} }} \)
|
\( 4.5Q^{0.333} H^{0.25} R^{ - 0.25} \)
| average rise velocity in the plume zone | |||
Ganguly and Chakraborty[83] | 2 | one center |
\( \frac{Q}{{\pi R_{\text{av}}^{2} U_{\text{p}} }} \)
|
\( 4.17Q^{0.333} H^{0.25} R^{ - 0.333} \)
|
\( \left( {\frac{1}{\sqrt 3 }} \right){\text{radius at surface}} \)
\( \frac{Q}{{\pi R_{\text{av}}^{2} U_{\text{p}} }}\left( {\text{no slip}} \right) \)
\( \frac{{Q - \pi R_{\text{av}}^{2} \alpha \left( {1 - \alpha } \right)u_{\text{rel}} }}{{2\pi \mathop \smallint \nolimits_{0}^{{R_{\text{av}} }} rU_{\text{p}} {\text{d}}r}}(slip) \)
| thermal stratification | ||
Ganguly and Chakraborty[84] | 3 | one center |
\( \frac{Q}{{\pi R_{\text{av}}^{2} U_{\text{p}} }} \)
|
\( 4.17Q^{0.333} H^{0.25} R^{ - 0.333} \)
|
\( 1.08*\left( {\frac{{gd_{\text{b}} }}{2}} \right)^{0.5} \)
|
\( \left( {\frac{1}{\sqrt 3 }} \right){\text{radius at surface}} \)
| effect of gas flow rate, bottom nozzle configurations, and tracer addition locations on mixing time |
VOF model
Author | Model | Turbulence | Dimension | Gas Injection | Inclusion | Slag | Code | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Llanos et al.[11] | VOF | k–ε model | 3 | one off-centered two off-centered | no | yes | fluent | mixing time, wall skin friction coefficient, open eye of various gas injection arrangements |
VOF | laminar | 3 | one center | no | no | fluent | single bubble rising and bursting, effect of the wettability on bubble formation | |
Xu et al.[93] | VOF (interface) DPM (inclusion) | laminar | 3 | one center | yes | no | fluent | effect of wake flow on inclusion removal |
Wang et al.[41] | VOF | laminar | 3 | one center two off-centered | no | no | fluent | coaxial bubbles coalescence and parallel bubbles bounce with one and two nozzles |
Huang et al.[49] | VOF | LES model | 3 | one off-centered | no | yes | fluent | slag droplet entrainment at the open eye area |
Li et al.[86] | VOF | k–ε model | 3 | one off-centered two symmetric | yes | no | fluent | flow and interface behavior of steel and slag |
Ramasetti et al.[87] | VOF | k–ε model | 3 | one off-centered | no | yes | Fluent | open eye formation |
VOF | LES model | 3 | one center | no | yes | Fluent | effect of interfacial velocity on droplet distributions and slag emulsification at the steel-slag interface | |
VOF | LES model | 3 | one center | no | yes | entrainment of slag into molten metal, vice versa, and slag-metal interfacial mass transfer rates | ||
Ersson et al.[94] | VOF + Thermo-Calc | k–ε model | 3 | top blowing | no | yes | Fluent + Thermo-Calc | interfacial reactions and decarburization |
Singh et al.[95] | VOF + Thermo-Calc | k–ε model | 3 | one off-centered two off-centered | no | yes | Fluent + Thermo-Calc | steel-slag interfacial reaction and desulfurization |
E–E model
Author | Model | Dimension | Inclusion | Code | Virtual Mass Coefficient | Drag Coefficient | Lift Coefficient | Turbulence Dissipation Coefficient | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Xia et al.[109] | E–E | 2 | no | CFX | 0.44, 4/3, \( \frac{2}{3}E_{\text{o}}^{1/2} \) | 0.1, 0.15, 0.3 | 0.1 | drag coefficient and lift force coefficient for different bubble shapes | |
Mendez et al.[110] | E–E | 2 | no | CFX | 0 to 0.06 |
\( \frac{24}{\text{Re}}(1 + 0.15{\text{Re}}^{0.687} ) \)
| 0.05 | 0 to 1 | drag force and nondrag force |
Lou and Zhu[96] | E–E | 3 | no | FLUENT | universal drag | − 0.05, 0, 0.5 | Simonin | interaction forces between gas-liquid two-phase | |
E–E + PBM (inclusion) | 3 | yes | FLUENT | inclusion behavior and mixing phenomena with different arrangements of tuyeres | |||||
E–E + PBM (inclusion) | 3 | yes | FLUENT | 0.5 | 8/3 | Tomiyama | Simonin | transport, aggregation, and surface entrapment of inclusions | |
E–E | 3 | yes | CFX |
\( \frac{24}{\text{Re}}\left( {1 + 0.15{\text{Re}}^{0.687} } \right) + \frac{0.42}{{1 + \frac{{4.25 \times 10^{ - 4} }}{{{\text{Re}}^{1.16} }}}} \)
| mechanisms of inclusion growth and inclusion removal | ||||
Geng et al.[113] | E–E | 3 | no | CFX |
\( { \hbox{max} }\left( {\frac{24}{\text{Re}}\left( {1 + 0.15{\text{Re}}^{0.687} } \right), 0.44} \right) \)
| effects of dual-plug separation angle and axial distance on mixing time | |||
Maldonado-Parra et al.[114] | E–E | 3 | no | PHOENICS | effects of radial position of single plug and dual plugs on mixing time | ||||
Huang et al.[115] | E–E + DPM (inclusion) | 3 | yes | CFX |
\( \frac{24}{\text{Re}}(1 + 0.15{\text{Re}}^{0.687} ) \)
| influences of purging plug arrangement and gas flow rate on the erosion of the ladle lining | |||
E–E | 2 | yes | PHOENICS |
\( \frac{24}{\text{Re}}\left( {1 + 0.15{\text{Re}}^{0.687} } \right) + \frac{0.42}{{1 + \frac{{4.25 \times 10^{ - 4} }}{{{\text{Re}}^{1.16} }}}} \)
| microinclusion growth and separation and removal | ||||
E-E | 2 | no | PHOENICS | flow pattern and chemical reaction around the steel-slag interface | |||||
E–E + SRM | 3 | no | FLUENT | universal drag | Simonin | thermodynamics and fluid dynamics of desulfurization, dealumination, desilication, and demanganization | |||
E–E | 3 | no | FLUENT | universal drag | 0.1 | dehydrogenation and denitrogenation in industrial vacuum tank degassers | |||
Li et al.[39] | E–E + PBM (bubble) | 3 | no | FLUENT | 0.5 | Schiller–Naumann | Tomiyama | Sato | bubble size distribution affected by the coalescence and the breakage in the plume |
E–L model
Author | Model | Turbulence | Dimension | Position of Porous Plug | Slag | Virtual Mass Coefficient | Drag Coefficient | Buoyancy Force | Lift Coefficient | Pressure Gradient force | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aoki et al.[123] | E–E + DPM (bubble) | k–ε model | 3 | off-centered | no | 0.5 | Kuo and Wallis[132] | yes | \( 0.00165 \alpha_{\text{g}}^{ - 0.78} \)[133] | yes | inclusion removal |
Singh et al.[124] | E–E + DPM (bubble) | k–ε model | 3 | one center | no | Morsi and Alexander[134] | wall shear stress distribution in gas agitated vessels | ||||
Cloete et al.[71] | VOF + DPM (bubble) | k–ε model | 3 | one center | no | Xia[109] | yes | bubble growth and period of swirl motion | |||
Liu et al.[72] | VOF (interface) + DPM (bubble) | k–ε model | 3 | one-off-centered two symmetric two off-centered (90 deg) | yes | 0.5 | nonspherical drag law | yes | yes | interface behavior and mixing time of one plug with dual-plug system | |
Li et al.[73] | VOF (interface) + DPM (bubble) | k–ε model | 3 | one off-centered | yes | 0.5 | Kuo and Wallis[132] | yes | 0.1 | alloy dispersion | |
VOF (interface) + DPM (bubble) | k–ε model | 3 | one off- center | yes | 0.5 | Ishii–Zuber | yes | yes | unsteady state of open eye |
Turbulence Models Applied in Ladle Refining
Comparison of Calculation Systems
Model | Momentum Equation | Main Turbulence Model Used |
---|---|---|
Quasi-single-phase model |
\( \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\left( {\rho \vec{u}} \right) + \rho \vec{u} \cdot \nabla \vec{u} = - \nabla p + \nabla \cdot \left[ {\left( {\mu + \mu_{\text{t}} } \right)\left( {\nabla \vec{u} + \nabla \vec{u}^{T} } \right)} \right] +\varvec{\rho}_{{\mathbf{L}}} \varvec{\vec{g}\alpha }_{{\mathbf{g}}} \)
| standard k–ε model |
VOF model |
\( \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\left( {\rho \vec{u}} \right) + \nabla \cdot \left( {\rho \vec{u}\vec{u}} \right) = - \nabla p + \nabla \cdot \left[ {\left( {\mu + \mu_{\text{t}} } \right)\left( {\nabla \vec{u} + \nabla \vec{u}^{T} } \right)} \right] + \varvec{\rho \vec{g}} + \varvec{F}_{{\mathbf{s}}} \)
| standard k–ε model, LES model |
E–E model |
\( \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\left( {\alpha_{q} \rho_{q} \vec{u}_{q} } \right) + \nabla \cdot \left( {\alpha_{q} \rho_{q} \vec{u}_{q} \vec{u}_{q} } \right) = - \alpha_{q} \nabla p + \nabla \cdot \left[ {\alpha_{q} \left( {\mu + \mu_{\text{t}} } \right)\left( {\nabla \vec{u} + \nabla \vec{u}^{T} } \right)} \right] +\varvec{\alpha}_{\varvec{q}}\varvec{\rho}_{\varvec{q}} \vec{\varvec{g}} + \vec{\varvec{F}}_{{{\mathbf{drag}},\;\varvec{q}}} + \vec{\varvec{F}}_{{{\mathbf{lift}},\;\varvec{q}}} + \vec{\varvec{F}}_{{{\mathbf{VM}},\;\varvec{q}}} + \vec{\varvec{F}}_{{{\mathbf{TD}},\;\varvec{q}}} \)
| standard k–ε model, RNG k–ε model |
Eulerian–Lagrangian model |
\( \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\left( {\rho \vec{u}} \right) + \nabla \cdot \left( {\rho \vec{u}\vec{u}} \right) = - \nabla p + \nabla \cdot \left[ {\left( {\mu + \mu_{\text{t}} } \right)\left( {\nabla \vec{u} + \nabla \vec{u}^{T} } \right)} \right] + \varvec{\rho \vec{g}} + \varvec{F}_{{\mathbf{s}}} + \varvec{F}_{{{\mathbf{bi}}}} \)
\( \varvec{F}_{{{\mathbf{bi}}}} = \mathop \sum \limits_{1}^{{\varvec{N}_{{\mathbf{b}}} }} \left( {\vec{\varvec{F}}_{{{\mathbf{drag}},\varvec{ }{\mathbf{b}}}} + \vec{\varvec{F}}_{{{\mathbf{buoyancy}},\varvec{ }{\mathbf{b}}}} + \vec{\varvec{F}}_{{{\mathbf{VM}},\varvec{ }{\mathbf{b}}}} + \vec{\varvec{F}}_{{{\mathbf{pressure gradient}},\varvec{ }{\mathbf{b}}}} } \right)\varvec{\rho}_{{\mathbf{b}}} \varvec{Q}_{{{\mathbf{bi}}}} \Delta \varvec{t} \)
| standard k–ε model |