Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Theory and Decision 2/2017

25-07-2016

A simple framework for the axiomatization of exponential and quasi-hyperbolic discounting

Author: Nina Anchugina

Published in: Theory and Decision | Issue 2/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to investigate which normative requirements, or axioms, lead to exponential and quasi-hyperbolic forms of discounting. Exponential discounting has a well-established axiomatic foundation originally developed by Koopmans (Econometrica 28(2):287–309, 1960, 1972) and Koopmans et al. (Econometrica 32(1/2):82–100, 1964) with subsequent contributions by several other authors, including Bleichrodt et al. (J Math Psychol 52(6):341–347, 2008). The papers by Hayashi (J Econ Theory 112(2):343–352, 2003) and Olea and Strzalecki (Q J Econ 129(3):1449–1499, 2014) axiomatize quasi-hyperbolic discounting. The main contribution of this paper is to provide an alternative foundation for exponential and quasi-hyperbolic discounting, with simple, transparent axioms and relatively straightforward proofs. Using techniques by Fishburn (The foundations of expected utility. Reidel Publishing Co, Dordrecht, 1982) and Harvey (Manag Sci 32(9):1123–1139, 1986), we show that Anscombe and Aumann’s (Ann Math Stat 34(1):199–205, 1963) version of Subjective Expected Utility theory can be readily adapted to axiomatize the aforementioned types of discounting, in both finite and infinite horizon settings.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Pan et al. (2015) have recently provided a generalization of quasi-hyperbolic discounting to continuous time. The proposed generalization is called two-stage exponential discounting. An axiomatic foundation for this discount function is given for single dated outcomes.
 
2
It should also be mentioned that our setting considers a discrete time space. A continuous time framework can be found, for example, in the above-mentioned paper by Fishburn and Rubinstein (1982) and in a generalized model of hyperbolic discounting introduced by Loewenstein and Prelec (1992). Harvey (1986) analyses discrete sequences of timed outcomes with a continuous time space.
 
3
It is worth mentioning that Fishburn’s motivation for the convergence axiom B6 looks somewhat contrived in the context of acts (Fishburn 1982, p. 113). However, it becomes very natural in the context where states of the world are re-interpreted as periods of time.
 
4
As pointed out above, mixture independence stated for n periods implies joint independence for n periods. Hence, this raises the obvious question of whether it is possible to use an n-period version of the subjective mixture independence axiom to obtain a time separable discounted utility representation without the need for the Debreu-type independence conditions.
 
Literature
go back to reference Anscombe, F. J., & Aumann, R. J. (1963). A definition of subjective probability. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34(1), 199–205.CrossRef Anscombe, F. J., & Aumann, R. J. (1963). A definition of subjective probability. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34(1), 199–205.CrossRef
go back to reference Bleichrodt, H., Rohde, K. I. M., & Wakker, P. P. (2008). Koopmans constant discounting for intertemporal choice: a simplification and a generalization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52(6), 341–347.CrossRef Bleichrodt, H., Rohde, K. I. M., & Wakker, P. P. (2008). Koopmans constant discounting for intertemporal choice: a simplification and a generalization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52(6), 341–347.CrossRef
go back to reference Chark, R., Chew, S. H., & Zhong, S. (2015). Extended present bias: a direct experimental test. Theory and Decision, 79(1), 151–165.CrossRef Chark, R., Chew, S. H., & Zhong, S. (2015). Extended present bias: a direct experimental test. Theory and Decision, 79(1), 151–165.CrossRef
go back to reference Debreu, G. (1960). Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. In K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical methods in the social sciences (pp. 16–26). Stanford: Stanford University Press. Debreu, G. (1960). Topological methods in cardinal utility theory. In K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin, & P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical methods in the social sciences (pp. 16–26). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
go back to reference Epstein, L. G. (1983). Stationary cardinal utility and optimal growth under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory, 31(1), 133–152.CrossRef Epstein, L. G. (1983). Stationary cardinal utility and optimal growth under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory, 31(1), 133–152.CrossRef
go back to reference Fishburn, P. C. (1970). Utility theory for decision making. New York: Wiley. Fishburn, P. C. (1970). Utility theory for decision making. New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Fishburn, P. C. (1982). The foundations of expected utility. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Co.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C. (1982). The foundations of expected utility. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Co.CrossRef
go back to reference Fishburn, P. C., & Rubinstein, A. (1982). Time preference. International Economic Review, 23(3), 677–694.CrossRef Fishburn, P. C., & Rubinstein, A. (1982). Time preference. International Economic Review, 23(3), 677–694.CrossRef
go back to reference Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1989). Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(2), 141–153.CrossRef Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1989). Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(2), 141–153.CrossRef
go back to reference Gorman, W. M. (1968). The structure of utility functions. The Review of Economic Studies, 35(4), 367–390.CrossRef Gorman, W. M. (1968). The structure of utility functions. The Review of Economic Studies, 35(4), 367–390.CrossRef
go back to reference Grandmont, J.-M. (1972). Continuity properties of a von Neumann–Morgenstern utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 4(1), 45–57.CrossRef Grandmont, J.-M. (1972). Continuity properties of a von Neumann–Morgenstern utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 4(1), 45–57.CrossRef
go back to reference Grant, S., & Van Zandt, T. (2009). Expected utility theory. In P. Anand, P. Pattanaik, & C. Puppe (Eds.), The handbook of rational and social choice (pp. 21–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Grant, S., & Van Zandt, T. (2009). Expected utility theory. In P. Anand, P. Pattanaik, & C. Puppe (Eds.), The handbook of rational and social choice (pp. 21–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Gul, F. (1992). Savage’s theorem with a finite number of states. Journal of Economic Theory, 57(1), 99–110.CrossRef Gul, F. (1992). Savage’s theorem with a finite number of states. Journal of Economic Theory, 57(1), 99–110.CrossRef
go back to reference Harvey, C. M. (1986). Value functions for infinite-period planning. Management Science, 32(9), 1123–1139.CrossRef Harvey, C. M. (1986). Value functions for infinite-period planning. Management Science, 32(9), 1123–1139.CrossRef
go back to reference Hayashi, T. (2003). Quasi-stationary cardinal utility and present bias. Journal of Economic Theory, 112(2), 343–352.CrossRef Hayashi, T. (2003). Quasi-stationary cardinal utility and present bias. Journal of Economic Theory, 112(2), 343–352.CrossRef
go back to reference Koopmans, T. C. (1960). Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica, 28(2), 287–309.CrossRef Koopmans, T. C. (1960). Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica, 28(2), 287–309.CrossRef
go back to reference Koopmans, T. C. (1972). Representations of preference orderings over time. In C. B. McGuire & R. Radner (Eds.), Decision and organization (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam: North Holland. Koopmans, T. C. (1972). Representations of preference orderings over time. In C. B. McGuire & R. Radner (Eds.), Decision and organization (pp. 79–100). Amsterdam: North Holland.
go back to reference Koopmans, T. C., Diamond, P. A., & Williamson, R. E. (1964). Stationary utility and time perspective. Econometrica, 32(1/2), 82–100.CrossRef Koopmans, T. C., Diamond, P. A., & Williamson, R. E. (1964). Stationary utility and time perspective. Econometrica, 32(1/2), 82–100.CrossRef
go back to reference Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443–477.CrossRef Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443–477.CrossRef
go back to reference Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 573–597.CrossRef Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 573–597.CrossRef
go back to reference Olea, J. L. M., & Strzalecki, T. (2014). Axiomatization and measurement of quasi-hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(3), 1449–1499.CrossRef Olea, J. L. M., & Strzalecki, T. (2014). Axiomatization and measurement of quasi-hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(3), 1449–1499.CrossRef
go back to reference Pan, J., Webb, C. S., & Zank, H. (2015). An extension of quasi-hyperbolic discounting to continuous time. Games and Economic Behavior, 89, 43–55.CrossRef Pan, J., Webb, C. S., & Zank, H. (2015). An extension of quasi-hyperbolic discounting to continuous time. Games and Economic Behavior, 89, 43–55.CrossRef
go back to reference Phelps, E. S., & Pollak, R. A. (1968). On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 35(2), 185–199.CrossRef Phelps, E. S., & Pollak, R. A. (1968). On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 35(2), 185–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Ryan, M. J. (2009). Generalizations of SEU: A geometric tour of some non-standard models. Oxford Economic Papers, 61(2), 327–354.CrossRef Ryan, M. J. (2009). Generalizations of SEU: A geometric tour of some non-standard models. Oxford Economic Papers, 61(2), 327–354.CrossRef
go back to reference Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 155–161.CrossRef Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 155–161.CrossRef
go back to reference Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
go back to reference von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Wakai, K. (2009). A model of utility smoothing. Econometrica, 76(1), 137–153.CrossRef Wakai, K. (2009). A model of utility smoothing. Econometrica, 76(1), 137–153.CrossRef
go back to reference Young, E. R. (2007). Generalized quasi-geometric discounting. Economics Letters, 96(3), 343–350.CrossRef Young, E. R. (2007). Generalized quasi-geometric discounting. Economics Letters, 96(3), 343–350.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A simple framework for the axiomatization of exponential and quasi-hyperbolic discounting
Author
Nina Anchugina
Publication date
25-07-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Theory and Decision / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0040-5833
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7187
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-016-9566-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Theory and Decision 2/2017 Go to the issue