Skip to main content
Top

2023 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. Risikoneigung und Risikoverhalten

Author : Ute Vanini

Published in: Psychologie von Risiko und Vertrauen

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel werden verschiedene Konzepte der Risikoneigung, deren Messung sowie mögliche Einflussfaktoren vorgestellt. Zudem wird der Einfluss der Risikoneigung auf das Risikoverhalten von Entscheidern untersucht. Dafür werden überblicksartig zentrale Befunde ausgewählter Studien diskutiert, wobei der Schwerpunkt auf Entscheidungen im Unternehmenskontext, z. B. Gründungs- oder Investitionsentscheidungen, gelegt wird. Risikofreudige Entscheider gründen eher Unternehmen, führen risikoreichere Investitionen durch und bauen geringere Puffer in ihre Budgetplanung oder Informationsnachfrage ein. Neben der Risikoneigung wird das Risikoverhalten von Entscheidern allerdings durch eine Vielzahl weiterer Faktoren – insbesondere ihre Risikowahrnehmung – bestimmt. Aus den Ergebnissen lassen sich Konsequenzen für die Gestaltung von Entscheidungsprozessen z. B. bei Investitionen oder im Rahmen der Planung und Budgetierung able iten.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Arrow, K. J. (1965). Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing. Yrjö Hahnsson Foundation, Helsinki. Arrow, K. J. (1965). Aspects of the theory of risk-bearing. Yrjö Hahnsson Foundation, Helsinki.
go back to reference Baldauf, A., & Rank, O. N. (2008). Ressourcen, Risikoneigung und Unternehmenserfolg – Eine Analyse von international tätigen kleinen und mittleren Schweizer Unternehmen. Die Unternehmung, 62(6), 542–572. Baldauf, A., & Rank, O. N. (2008). Ressourcen, Risikoneigung und Unternehmenserfolg – Eine Analyse von international tätigen kleinen und mittleren Schweizer Unternehmen. Die Unternehmung, 62(6), 542–572.
go back to reference Bellemare, C., & Shearer, B. S. (2006). Sorting, incentives and risk preferences: Evidence from a field experiment; IZA Discussion Papers, No. 2227, July 2006, IZA Bonn. Bellemare, C., & Shearer, B. S. (2006). Sorting, incentives and risk preferences: Evidence from a field experiment; IZA Discussion Papers, No. 2227, July 2006, IZA Bonn.
go back to reference Blais, A.-R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgement and Decision Making, 1(1), 33–47.CrossRef Blais, A.-R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgement and Decision Making, 1(1), 33–47.CrossRef
go back to reference Botella, J., Narváez, M., Martinez-Molina, A., Rubio, V. J., & Santacreu, J. (2008). A dilemmas task for eliciting risk propensity. The Psychological Record, 58, 529–546.CrossRef Botella, J., Narváez, M., Martinez-Molina, A., Rubio, V. J., & Santacreu, J. (2008). A dilemmas task for eliciting risk propensity. The Psychological Record, 58, 529–546.CrossRef
go back to reference Brachert, M., & Hyll, W. (2014). On the stability of preferences; repercussions of entrepreneurship on risk attitudes. SOEP papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research Nr. 667, DIW Berlin. Brachert, M., & Hyll, W. (2014). On the stability of preferences; repercussions of entrepreneurship on risk attitudes. SOEP papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research Nr. 667, DIW Berlin.
go back to reference Bricker, R., & DeBruine, M. (1993). The effects of information availability and cost on investment strategy selection: An experiment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 5, 30–57. Bricker, R., & DeBruine, M. (1993). The effects of information availability and cost on investment strategy selection: An experiment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 5, 30–57.
go back to reference Brink, A. G., Hobson, J. L., & Stevens, D. E. (2016). The effect of high power financial incentives on excessive risk-taking behavior: An experimental examination. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 29(1), 13–29.CrossRef Brink, A. G., Hobson, J. L., & Stevens, D. E. (2016). The effect of high power financial incentives on excessive risk-taking behavior: An experimental examination. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 29(1), 13–29.CrossRef
go back to reference Brockhaus, R. H. (1980). Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. The Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 509–520. Brockhaus, R. H. (1980). Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. The Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 509–520.
go back to reference Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383.CrossRef Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383.CrossRef
go back to reference Cooper, T., & Faseruk, A. (2011). Strategic risk, risk perception and risk behaviour: Meta-analysis. Journal of Financial Management and Analysis, 24(2), 20–29. Cooper, T., & Faseruk, A. (2011). Strategic risk, risk perception and risk behaviour: Meta-analysis. Journal of Financial Management and Analysis, 24(2), 20–29.
go back to reference Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2001). Strategic risk behaviour and its temporalities: Between risk propensity and decision context. Journal of Management Studies, 38(4), 515–534.CrossRef Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2001). Strategic risk behaviour and its temporalities: Between risk propensity and decision context. Journal of Management Studies, 38(4), 515–534.CrossRef
go back to reference Dave, C., Eckel, C. C., Johnson, C. A., & Rojas, C. (2010). Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 41(3), 219–243.CrossRef Dave, C., Eckel, C. C., Johnson, C. A., & Rojas, C. (2010). Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 41(3), 219–243.CrossRef
go back to reference De Wild, A. (2013). Unraveling risk appetite – Applications of decision theory in the evaluation of organizational risk appetite. PhD Thesis, University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam University Press, Rotterdam/The Netherlands. De Wild, A. (2013). Unraveling risk appetite – Applications of decision theory in the evaluation of organizational risk appetite. PhD Thesis, University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam University Press, Rotterdam/The Netherlands.
go back to reference Deckop, J. R., Merriman, K. K., & Blau, G. (2004). Impact of variable risk preferences on the effectiveness of control by pay. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 63–80.CrossRef Deckop, J. R., Merriman, K. K., & Blau, G. (2004). Impact of variable risk preferences on the effectiveness of control by pay. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 63–80.CrossRef
go back to reference Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants and behavorial consequences. Journal of European Economic Association, 9(3), 522–550.CrossRef Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants and behavorial consequences. Journal of European Economic Association, 9(3), 522–550.CrossRef
go back to reference Efing, M., Hau, H., Kampkötter, P., & Steinbrecher, J. (2015). Die Dosis macht das Gift – eine Analyse zum Einfluss auf die Profitabilität und das Risiko von Banken. ifo Schnelldienst, ISSN 0018-974x, 68(3), 23–31. Efing, M., Hau, H., Kampkötter, P., & Steinbrecher, J. (2015). Die Dosis macht das Gift – eine Analyse zum Einfluss auf die Profitabilität und das Risiko von Banken. ifo Schnelldienst, ISSN 0018-974x, 68(3), 23–31.
go back to reference Eisenführ, F., Weber, M., & Langer, T. (2010). Rationales Entscheiden (5. Aufl.). Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg. Eisenführ, F., Weber, M., & Langer, T. (2010). Rationales Entscheiden (5. Aufl.). Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
go back to reference Ewald, J., Maart, S. C., & Mußhoff, O. (2012). Messung der subjektiven Risikoeinstellung von Entscheidern: Existieren Methoden- und Personengruppenunterschiede? German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(3), 148–161. Ewald, J., Maart, S. C., & Mußhoff, O. (2012). Messung der subjektiven Risikoeinstellung von Entscheidern: Existieren Methoden- und Personengruppenunterschiede? German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(3), 148–161.
go back to reference Gilmore, A., Carson, D., & O’Donnell, A. (2004). Small business owner-managers and their attitude to risk. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 23(3), 349–360.CrossRef Gilmore, A., Carson, D., & O’Donnell, A. (2004). Small business owner-managers and their attitude to risk. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 23(3), 349–360.CrossRef
go back to reference Gleißner, W. (2009). Risikowahrnehmung, Risikomaße und Risikoentscheidungen: theoretische Grundlagen. In O. Everling & M. Müller (Hrsg.), Risikoprofiling von Anlegern (S. 305–343). Bank-Verlag Medien, Köln. Gleißner, W. (2009). Risikowahrnehmung, Risikomaße und Risikoentscheidungen: theoretische Grundlagen. In O. Everling & M. Müller (Hrsg.), Risikoprofiling von Anlegern (S. 305–343). Bank-Verlag Medien, Köln.
go back to reference Günther, T., & Detzner, M. (2009). Risikoverhalten von Managern – Ergebnisse empirischer Controllingforschung. CFO aktuell, 24(Juni), 124–129. Günther, T., & Detzner, M. (2009). Risikoverhalten von Managern – Ergebnisse empirischer Controllingforschung. CFO aktuell, 24(Juni), 124–129.
go back to reference Günther, T., & Detzner, M. (2012). Sind Manager und Controller risikoscheu? Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung. Controlling, 24(4/5), 247–254.CrossRef Günther, T., & Detzner, M. (2012). Sind Manager und Controller risikoscheu? Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung. Controlling, 24(4/5), 247–254.CrossRef
go back to reference Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.CrossRef Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.CrossRef
go back to reference Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRef Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRef
go back to reference Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.CrossRef Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaufmann, C., Weber, M., & Haisley, E. (2013). The role of experience sampling and graphical displays on one’s investment risk appetite. Management Science, 59(2), 323–340.CrossRef Kaufmann, C., Weber, M., & Haisley, E. (2013). The role of experience sampling and graphical displays on one’s investment risk appetite. Management Science, 59(2), 323–340.CrossRef
go back to reference Kim, D. C. (1992). Risk preferences in participative budgeting. The Accounting Review, 67(2), 303–318. Kim, D. C. (1992). Risk preferences in participative budgeting. The Accounting Review, 67(2), 303–318.
go back to reference Klos, A., Weber, E. U., & Weber, M. (2005). Investment decisions and time horizon: Risk perception and risk behavior in repeated gambles. Management Science, 51(12), 1777–1790.CrossRef Klos, A., Weber, E. U., & Weber, M. (2005). Investment decisions and time horizon: Risk perception and risk behavior in repeated gambles. Management Science, 51(12), 1777–1790.CrossRef
go back to reference Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1964). Risk-taking: A study in cognition and personality. Holt, Newyork/US. Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1964). Risk-taking: A study in cognition and personality. Holt, Newyork/US.
go back to reference Krahnen, J. P., Rieck, C., & Theissen E. (1997). Messung individueller Risikoeinstellungen, CFS Working Paper No. 1997/03, Center for Financial Studies (CFS), Goethe University Frankfurt. Krahnen, J. P., Rieck, C., & Theissen E. (1997). Messung individueller Risikoeinstellungen, CFS Working Paper No. 1997/03, Center for Financial Studies (CFS), Goethe University Frankfurt.
go back to reference Laughhunn, D. J., Payne, J. W., & Crum, R. (1980). Managerial risk preferences for below-target returns. Management Science, 26(12), 1238–1249.CrossRef Laughhunn, D. J., Payne, J. W., & Crum, R. (1980). Managerial risk preferences for below-target returns. Management Science, 26(12), 1238–1249.CrossRef
go back to reference Lohse, T., & Qari, S. (2014). Gendereffekte bei Risikoneigung und Lügen – Evidenz aus einem Compliance-Experiment. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 43(2), 91–97.CrossRef Lohse, T., & Qari, S. (2014). Gendereffekte bei Risikoneigung und Lügen – Evidenz aus einem Compliance-Experiment. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 43(2), 91–97.CrossRef
go back to reference MacCrimmon, K. R., & Wehrung, D. A. (1990). Characteristics of risk taking executives. Management Science, 36(4), 422–435.CrossRef MacCrimmon, K. R., & Wehrung, D. A. (1990). Characteristics of risk taking executives. Management Science, 36(4), 422–435.CrossRef
go back to reference Macko, A., & Tyszka, T. (2009). Entrepreneurship and risk taking. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58(3), 469–487.CrossRef Macko, A., & Tyszka, T. (2009). Entrepreneurship and risk taking. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58(3), 469–487.CrossRef
go back to reference March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33(11), 1404–1418.CrossRef March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33(11), 1404–1418.CrossRef
go back to reference Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91. Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91.
go back to reference Masclet, D., Colombier, N., Denant-Boemont, L., & Lohéac, Y. (2009). Group and individual risk preferences: A lottery-choice experiment with self-employed and salaried workers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70, 470–484.CrossRef Masclet, D., Colombier, N., Denant-Boemont, L., & Lohéac, Y. (2009). Group and individual risk preferences: A lottery-choice experiment with self-employed and salaried workers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70, 470–484.CrossRef
go back to reference Menkhoff, L., & Sakha, S. (2014). Multi-item risk measures. Kiel Institute for World Economy, Working Paper, Kiel, No. 1980. Menkhoff, L., & Sakha, S. (2014). Multi-item risk measures. Kiel Institute for World Economy, Working Paper, Kiel, No. 1980.
go back to reference Mousavi, S., & Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk, uncertainty, and heuristics. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1671–1678.CrossRef Mousavi, S., & Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk, uncertainty, and heuristics. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1671–1678.CrossRef
go back to reference Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, & Willman, P. (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 157–176.CrossRef Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, & Willman, P. (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 157–176.CrossRef
go back to reference Nosic, A., & Weber, M. (2007). Determinants of risk taking behavior: The role of risk attitudes, risk perceptions and beliefs (Working Paper, Sonderforschungsbereich 504). Universität Mannheim. Nosic, A., & Weber, M. (2007). Determinants of risk taking behavior: The role of risk attitudes, risk perceptions and beliefs (Working Paper, Sonderforschungsbereich 504). Universität Mannheim.
go back to reference Nosic, A., & Weber, M. (2010). How risky do I invest: The role of risk attitudes, risk perceptions and overconfidence. Decision Analysis, 7(3), 282–301.CrossRef Nosic, A., & Weber, M. (2010). How risky do I invest: The role of risk attitudes, risk perceptions and overconfidence. Decision Analysis, 7(3), 282–301.CrossRef
go back to reference Pavic, I., Pervan, M., & Visic, J. (2014). Personal characteristics as determinants of risk propensity of Business Economics Students – An Empirical study. Paper presented at the 8th International Days of Statistics and Economics, Prague, September 11–13, 2014. Pavic, I., Pervan, M., & Visic, J. (2014). Personal characteristics as determinants of risk propensity of Business Economics Students – An Empirical study. Paper presented at the 8th International Days of Statistics and Economics, Prague, September 11–13, 2014.
go back to reference Pratt, J. W. (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32, 122–136.CrossRef Pratt, J. W. (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32, 122–136.CrossRef
go back to reference Rohrmann, B. (2002). Risk attitude scales: Concepts and questionnaires. Project Report, University of Melbourne/Australia. Rohrmann, B. (2002). Risk attitude scales: Concepts and questionnaires. Project Report, University of Melbourne/Australia.
go back to reference Sasaki, S., Xie, S., Ohtake, F., Qin, J., & Tsutsui, Y. (2006). Experiments on risk attitude: The case of Chinese Students. Osaka University, The Institute of Social and Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 664, Osaka/Japan. Sasaki, S., Xie, S., Ohtake, F., Qin, J., & Tsutsui, Y. (2006). Experiments on risk attitude: The case of Chinese Students. Osaka University, The Institute of Social and Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 664, Osaka/Japan.
go back to reference Sauner-Leroy, J.-B. (2004). Managers and productive investment decisions: The impact of uncertainty and risk aversion. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(1), 1–18.CrossRef Sauner-Leroy, J.-B. (2004). Managers and productive investment decisions: The impact of uncertainty and risk aversion. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(1), 1–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Scharner, M., & Pöchtrager, S. (2013). Risikowahrnehmung von Führungskräften in österreichischen Molkereien. Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Agrarökonomie, 22(1), 173–182. Scharner, M., & Pöchtrager, S. (2013). Risikowahrnehmung von Führungskräften in österreichischen Molkereien. Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Agrarökonomie, 22(1), 173–182.
go back to reference Schubert, R. (2006). Analyzing and managing risk – On the importance of gender differences in risk attitudes. Managerial Finance, 32(9), 706–715.CrossRef Schubert, R. (2006). Analyzing and managing risk – On the importance of gender differences in risk attitudes. Managerial Finance, 32(9), 706–715.CrossRef
go back to reference Schwartz, A., & Hasnain, M. (2002). Risk perception and risk attitude in informed consent. Risk Decision and Policy, 7, 121–130.CrossRef Schwartz, A., & Hasnain, M. (2002). Risk perception and risk attitude in informed consent. Risk Decision and Policy, 7, 121–130.CrossRef
go back to reference Shoham, A., & Fiegenbaum, A. (2002). Competitive determinants of organizational risk-taking attitude: The role of strategic reference points. Management Decision, 40(2), 127–141.CrossRef Shoham, A., & Fiegenbaum, A. (2002). Competitive determinants of organizational risk-taking attitude: The role of strategic reference points. Management Decision, 40(2), 127–141.CrossRef
go back to reference Simon, M., Houghton, S. M., & Aquino, K. (1999). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 113–134.CrossRef Simon, M., Houghton, S. M., & Aquino, K. (1999). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 113–134.CrossRef
go back to reference Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9–38.CrossRef Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9–38.CrossRef
go back to reference Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322.PubMedCrossRef Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vanini, U. (2016). Risikoneigung und Unternehmenssteuerung – Ergebnisse empirischer Studien. In L. Nadig & U. Egle (Hrsg.), CARF Luzern 2016, Konferenzband, Schriften aus dem Institut für Finanzdienstleistungen Zug, IFZ Band 35 (S. 319–362). Verlag IFZ, Hochschule Luzern. Vanini, U. (2016). Risikoneigung und Unternehmenssteuerung – Ergebnisse empirischer Studien. In L. Nadig & U. Egle (Hrsg.), CARF Luzern 2016, Konferenzband, Schriften aus dem Institut für Finanzdienstleistungen Zug, IFZ Band 35 (S. 319–362). Verlag IFZ, Hochschule Luzern.
go back to reference Vanini, U. (2018). Manager an ihren Risiken beteiligen. Controlling & Management Review, 62(4), 50–55.CrossRef Vanini, U. (2018). Manager an ihren Risiken beteiligen. Controlling & Management Review, 62(4), 50–55.CrossRef
go back to reference Vanini, U., & Rieg, R. (2021a). Risikomanagement (2. Aufl.). Schaeffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart. Vanini, U., & Rieg, R. (2021a). Risikomanagement (2. Aufl.). Schaeffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart.
go back to reference Vanini, U., & Rieg, R. (2021b). Risk attitude, information selection, and information use in capital budgeting decisions. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 13(3/4), 253–278. Vanini, U., & Rieg, R. (2021b). Risk attitude, information selection, and information use in capital budgeting decisions. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 13(3/4), 253–278.
go back to reference Viscusi, W. K., Philipps, O. R., & Kroll, S. (2011). Risky investment decisions: How are individuals influenced by their groups? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 43(2), 81–106.CrossRef Viscusi, W. K., Philipps, O. R., & Kroll, S. (2011). Risky investment decisions: How are individuals influenced by their groups? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 43(2), 81–106.CrossRef
go back to reference Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944, 1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Pinceton/NY. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944, 1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Pinceton/NY.
go back to reference Weber, E. U. (2010). Risk attitude and preference. Advanced Review, 1(1), 79–88. Weber, E. U. (2010). Risk attitude and preference. Advanced Review, 1(1), 79–88.
go back to reference Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44(9), 1205–1217.CrossRef Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44(9), 1205–1217.CrossRef
go back to reference Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2008). Decisions under uncertainty: Psychological, economic, and neuroeconomic explanations of risk preference. In P. Glimcher, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, & P. Poldrack (Hrsg.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. Elsevier. Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2008). Decisions under uncertainty: Psychological, economic, and neuroeconomic explanations of risk preference. In P. Glimcher, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, & P. Poldrack (Hrsg.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. Elsevier.
go back to reference Weber, E. U., Siebenmorgen, N., & Weber, M. (2005). Communicating asset risk: How name recognition and the format of historic volatility information affect risk perception and investment decisions. Risk Analysis, 25(3), 598–609.CrossRef Weber, E. U., Siebenmorgen, N., & Weber, M. (2005). Communicating asset risk: How name recognition and the format of historic volatility information affect risk perception and investment decisions. Risk Analysis, 25(3), 598–609.CrossRef
go back to reference Weber, M., Weber, E. U., & Nosic, A. (2012). Who takes risks when and why: Determinants of changes in investor risk taking. Review of Finance, 17(3), 847–883.CrossRef Weber, M., Weber, E. U., & Nosic, A. (2012). Who takes risks when and why: Determinants of changes in investor risk taking. Review of Finance, 17(3), 847–883.CrossRef
go back to reference Wiswede, G. (2021). Einführung in die Wirtschaftspsychologie (6. Aufl.). Munich. Wiswede, G. (2021). Einführung in die Wirtschaftspsychologie (6. Aufl.). Munich.
go back to reference Young, S. M. (1985). Participative budgeting: The effects of risk aversion and asymmetric information on budgetary slack. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(2), 829–842.CrossRef Young, S. M. (1985). Participative budgeting: The effects of risk aversion and asymmetric information on budgetary slack. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(2), 829–842.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Risikoneigung und Risikoverhalten
Author
Ute Vanini
Copyright Year
2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65575-7_5

Premium Partner