Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
A Conceptual Frame of Nuclear Proliferation in South Africa and the British Nexus Read chapter Read first chapter

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

9. An Analysis of the Failed Technology Denial Strategy of Britain Towards South Africa

Authors : Lucky E. Asuelime, Raquel A. Adekoye

Published in: Nuclear Proliferation in South Africa

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter provides a historical examination of the special relationship between Britain and South Africa. It briefly defines the meaning of technology denial as an instrument for combating nuclear proliferation and describes diplomatic incidents and political environments that suggest that Britain adopted complacent approaches which ultimately negated the effectiveness of “technology denial” in the South African nuclear proliferation case. It traces the development of their unique, historically grounded significance and ties, in the context of interactions around nuclear weapons. If the general assumption is that technological capability is a prerequisite for a state to go nuclear, how is Britain implicated in the provision of such and how did this motivate South Africa to develop its indigenous nuclear weapons? Specifically, this chapter responds to the question: to what extent did British nuclear technology collaboration led to the development of South Africa’s technological capability?

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter A Comparative Analysis and Evaluation of “Emerging Powers” Nuclear Proliferation in the Global South
next chapter Model Explanations of a Nuclear Powered South Africa
Footnotes
1
The majority of the archival documents used for the analysis in this chapter were obtained from the Anna-Mart Van-Wyk, British Archive Collections.
 
2
A 2008 Congressional Research Service report lists 17 states with an active or defunct nuclear weapons program.
 
3
Ibid.
 
4
South Africa is not included since it has dismantled its six-and-a-half nuclear bomb stockpile.
 
5
According to Alexander Reed, for example, “the Security Council imposed sanctions on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) following the state’s nuclear test in 2006. Resolution 1718 bans transfers of “all items, materials, equipment, goods, and technology…which could contribute to DPRK’s nuclear-related, ballistic missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programs.”
 
6
Problems at the war’s end over dominion representation in international deliberations seemed a clear demonstration of this.
 
7
On December 2, 1968, the UN General Assembly requested all states and organizations “to suspend cultural, educational, sporting, and other exchanges with the racist regime and with organizations or institutions in South Africa which practice apartheid.”
 
8
It is widely believed that the uranium was used to manufacture nuclear weapons. The history of nuclear energy in South Africa dates back to 1959, when the country’s first large-scale nuclear research and development project was initiated under the auspices of the AEB. The AEB was later replaced by the Uranium Enrichment Corporation of South Africa Limited (UCOR) to enrich uranium, develop the process further, and to complete the construction of the pilot plant and put it into operation.
 
9
Letter from British embassy in Pretoria to the Joint Nuclear Section, Energy Department, Whitehall, London. “South African Uranium Enrichment,”’ FCO45-1809. 17th November 1975 (Van-Vyk, Anna-Mart Archival Collections).
 
10
The General Electric Company (GEC) was a major British-based industrial conglomerate, involved in consumer and defense electronics, communications, and engineering.
 
11
Minutes of meeting held at the British Department of Energy office, between Brown, F. (British department of Energy), Fakley, D. (British Ministry of Defence, hereafter cited as MOD), Hughes (British Nuclear Fuels Limited, hereafter cited as BNFL), and Mr. Lorin Stieff of ACDA United States. South Africa, The NPT, and Enrichment Safeguards. FCO45-1809. 4th December 1975 (Van-Vyk, Anna-Mart Archival Collections).
 
Literature
Albright, D. (2001). South Africa’s nuclear weapons program. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Asuelime, L. (2013a). Drivers of nuclear proliferation in the global south: A historical analysis of South Africa. A PhD thesis international relations, submitted to the College of Humanities, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (Unpublished).
Asuelime, L. (2013b). Uranium politics of gatekeeping: Revisiting the British government’s policy vis-à-vis South Africa, 1945–1951. Historia, 58, 1, May/Mei, 33–50.
Asuelime, L. E. (2014). Churchill’s British atomic relations with Malan’s government in South Africa, 1951–1954? New Contree, No. 71, December, 137–151.
Asuelime, L., & Francis, S. (2014). Drivers of nuclear proliferation: South Africa’s incentives and constraints. Journal for Contemporary History, 39(1), 55–68.
British Labour Party Manifesto. (1973). World peace, international order and human rights. FCO45-1809 (Van-Vyk, Anna-Mart British Archive Collections).
Cassuto, A. (1970). Can uranium enrichment enrich South Africa? The World Today, 26(10), 419–427.
Cox to Butler. (1988). Nuclear contacts with South Africa. FCO45-1924, 16 September 1976 (Anna-Mart Van-Vyk British Archive Collections).
Darwin, J. G. (1988). Britain and decolonization: The retreat from empire in the post-war world. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
Fig, D. (1999). Sanctions and the nuclear industry. In N. Crawford & A. Klotz (Eds.), How sanctions work. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Flournoy, M. A., & Campbell, K. M. (1988). South Africa’s bomb: A military option? Orbis, 32(3), 385–401.
Gallagher, J., & Robinson, R. (1953). The imperialism of free trade. Economic History Review, 1, 1–15.CrossRef
Holland, R. F. (1985). European decolonization, 1918–1981: An introductory survey. London: Palgrave.CrossRef
Kerr, P. K. (2008). Nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons and missiles: Status and trends. CRS Report for Congress, RL30699. Congressional Research Service.
Koornhof, P. G. J. (1975, November 12). Commercial uranium enrichment plant in South Africa. Being a Press release by The Honourable South African Minister of Mines (Unpublished).
Letter from British embassy in Pretoria to the Joint Nuclear Section, Energy Department, Whitehall, London. South African Uranium Enrichment. FCO45-1809, 17 November 1975 (Van-Vyk, Anna-Mart Archive Collections).
Makepeace to McMillan. (1976). Export of uranium oxide to South Africa application 2/1250/76. FCO45-1924, 14 September (Anna-Mart Van-Vyk British Archive Collections).
Mansergh, N. (1968). Survey of Britain commonwealth affairs: Problems of wartime co-operation and post-war change, 1939–1952. London: Frank Cass.
Minutes of meeting held at the British Department of Energy office, between Brown, F. (British Department of Energy), Fakley, D. (British Ministry of Defence hereafter cited as MOD), Hughes (British Nuclear Fuels Limited hereafter cited as BNFL) and Mr. Lorin Stieff of ACDA United States. South Africa, The NPT, and Enrichment Safeguards. FCO45-1809, 4 December 1975 (Van-Vyk, Anna-Mart British Archive Collections).
Moodie, T. D. (1975). The role of Afrikanerdom: Power, apartheid, and the afrikaner civil religion. London: Dent.
Reed, A. R. (2010). The role of technology denial in nuclear nonproliferation. MA thesis, submitted to Georgetown University (Unpublished).
Roberts to Lewis and Heath. (1975). Nigeria: Policy on nuclear cooperation with South African. FCO45-1809, 1 October (Van-Vyk, Anna-Mart British Archive Collections).
Roux, A. J. A., & Grant, W. L. (1975, April). The South African uranium enrichment project. Being a Conference paper presented at the European Nuclear Conference, Paris, France (Unpublished).
Sokolski, H. D. (2001). Best of intentions: America’s campaign against strategic weapons proliferation. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Stultz, N. M. (1974). Afrikaner politics in South Africa, 1934–1948. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Turpen, E. (2009). Achieving nonproliferation goals: Moving from denial to technology governance. Muscatine, IA: Stanley Foundation.
United Nations. (2005, May 2–27). The treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons (NPT). 2005 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), New York.
Metadata
Title
An Analysis of the Failed Technology Denial Strategy of Britain Towards South Africa
Authors
Lucky E. Asuelime
Raquel A. Adekoye
Copyright Year
2016
Book
Nuclear Proliferation in South Africa

Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33372-4

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-33373-1

Copyright Year: 2016

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33373-1_9