We chose to employ a viscoelastic tissue description, given the high strain rates observed ahead of the crack tip in the symconCT test [
9]. In this regard, the free energy function defining vascular tissue is formulated as follows
$$\begin{aligned} \psi = \psi ^\infty - \sum \limits _{k=1}^{p} \textit{g}_k \left( 1- e^{-t/\tau _k}\right) \psi ^\infty \quad \text {with} \quad \psi ^\infty = c_1 (I_1 - 3) + c_2 (I_1 - 3)^2 \quad \text {and} \quad I_1=\textrm{tr} \bigg [{\varvec{F}}^T{\varvec{F}}\bigg ]. \end{aligned}$$
(1)
The Prony series parameters
\(\textit{g}_k\) and
\(\tau _k\) are given in [
33] and have been extracted from the literature [
38]. The elastic properties
\(\psi ^\infty \) of the media are captured by the isotropic Yeoh strain energy density. Hereby, the material parameters
\(c_1\) and
\(c_2\) are to be identified from the symconCT test recordings and
\({\varvec{F}}\) is the material deformation gradient tensor. For describing fracture behavior, we employed an isotropic cohesive zone model. The fracture energy (the energy to form the unit area of fracture surface in the reference configuration) then reads
$$\begin{aligned} G= \frac{1}{2}\bigg [K_0\delta _0^2 + K_{\textrm{s}}(\delta _{\textrm{max}}-\delta _0)^2\bigg ], \end{aligned}$$
(2)
with the elastic limit separation
\(\delta _0\), the stiffness
\(K_{0}\) and the opening at complete fracture
\(\delta _{\textrm{max}}\). The cohesive strength
\(T_0\) and the fracture energy
G are parameters to identify from the symconCT test recordings, while
\(K_{0}\) was fixed to a value that displayed minimal elastic gap opening in preliminary numerical simulations. For the inverse parameters identification, the scalar objective function
$$\begin{aligned} \phi ({\textbf{p}})=\beta \phi _{\textrm{force}}({\textbf{p}}) + (1-\beta ) \phi _{\textrm{defo}}({\textbf{p}}) , \end{aligned}$$
(3)
is minimized, where
\({\textbf{p}}=(c_1,c_2)\) and
\(\beta =0.5\) weights represent the normalized errors in clamp force
\(\phi _{\textrm{force}}\) and Green–Lagrange strains
\(\phi _{\textrm{defo}}\), respectively. At this stage, the identification considered experimental recording prior to any visible signs of crack propagation. Green–Lagrange strains have been compared at colocated coordinates within a region of 10 x 5 mm
\(^2\) on the specimen surface. The comparison is made at clamp displacement increments of 1 mm, and further details are reported elsewhere [
33]. Finally, at fixed
\(c_1\) and
\(c_2\) parameters, the minimization of
\(\phi _{\textrm{force}}({\textbf{p}})\), identified
\({\textbf{p}}=(T_0,G)\), where
\(T_0\) and
G denote the cohesive strength and the fracture energy of vessel wall tissue, respectively. Further details are reported in our previous work [
33].