Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neural Computing and Applications 13/2021

19-01-2021 | Original Article

Analysis of acceptable additive consistency and consensus of group decision making with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy preference relations

Authors: Jie Tang, Yunning Zhang, Hamido Fujita, Xiaodan Zhang, Fanyong Meng

Published in: Neural Computing and Applications | Issue 13/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets are efficient to denote the hesitant and uncertain judgments of decision makers. To further research the utilization of this type of fuzzy sets, this paper limits to study group decision making (GDM) with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy preference relations (IVHFPRs). First, an additive consistency index is defined for interval fuzzy preference relations, by which we derive a new acceptable additive consistency concept for IVHFPRs. Then, new models based on acceptable additive consistency are built for ascertaining unknown values, and new models for judging the acceptable additive consistency of IVHFPRs are constructed. When the consistency of IVHFPRs is unacceptable, new models based on consistency and uncertain degree are constructed for obtaining acceptable additive consistency IVHFPRs that can ensure the smallest total adjustment and the minimum number of adjusted intervals. For GDM case, a new consensus index is defined to measure the agreement degree of individual judgments. When the consensus level does not satisfy requirement, new models for reaching the additive consistency and consensus requirements are built. Furthermore, a new acceptable additive consistency- and consensus-based algorithm for GDM with incomplete and unacceptable additive consistency IVHFPRs is provided. Finally, an example is given to indicate the utilization of the new algorithm and comparison analysis is made.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkMATH Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkMATH
2.
go back to reference Xu ZS (2007) Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Inf Sci 177(11):2363–2379MathSciNetMATH Xu ZS (2007) Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Inf Sci 177(11):2363–2379MathSciNetMATH
3.
go back to reference Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int J Approx Reason 52(3):395–407MathSciNetMATH Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int J Approx Reason 52(3):395–407MathSciNetMATH
4.
go back to reference Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25(6):529–539MATH Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25(6):529–539MATH
5.
go back to reference Zhang ZM, Wang C, Tian XD (2015) A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 86:77–101 Zhang ZM, Wang C, Tian XD (2015) A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 86:77–101
6.
go back to reference Zhang ZM, Wang C, Tian XD (2015) Multi-criteria group decision making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 36:1–23 Zhang ZM, Wang C, Tian XD (2015) Multi-criteria group decision making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 36:1–23
7.
go back to reference Xu YJ, Chen L, Rodríguez RM, Herrera F, Wang HM (2016) Deriving the priority weights from incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 99:71–78 Xu YJ, Chen L, Rodríguez RM, Herrera F, Wang HM (2016) Deriving the priority weights from incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 99:71–78
8.
go back to reference Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12(2):117–131MathSciNetMATH Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12(2):117–131MathSciNetMATH
9.
go back to reference Zhu B, Xu ZS (2011) Regression methods for hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Technol Econ Dev Eco 19:S214–S227 Zhu B, Xu ZS (2011) Regression methods for hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Technol Econ Dev Eco 19:S214–S227
10.
go back to reference Tang J, An QX, Meng FY, Chen XH (2017) A natural method for ranking objects from hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 16(6):1611–1646 Tang J, An QX, Meng FY, Chen XH (2017) A natural method for ranking objects from hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 16(6):1611–1646
11.
go back to reference Meng FY, An QX (2017) An approach for group decision making method with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 127:1–15 Meng FY, An QX (2017) An approach for group decision making method with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 127:1–15
12.
go back to reference Zhang Z, Kou XY, Yu WY, Guo CH (2018) On priority weights and consistency for incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 143:115–126 Zhang Z, Kou XY, Yu WY, Guo CH (2018) On priority weights and consistency for incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 143:115–126
13.
go back to reference Zhu B, Xu ZS, Xu JP (2014) Deriving a ranking from hesitant fuzzy preference relations under group decision making. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(8):328–1337 Zhu B, Xu ZS, Xu JP (2014) Deriving a ranking from hesitant fuzzy preference relations under group decision making. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(8):328–1337
14.
go back to reference Alcantud JCR, Giarlotta A (2019) Necessary and possible hesitant fuzzy sets: a novel model for group decision making. Inf Fusion 46(1):3–76 Alcantud JCR, Giarlotta A (2019) Necessary and possible hesitant fuzzy sets: a novel model for group decision making. Inf Fusion 46(1):3–76
15.
go back to reference Farhadinia B, Herrera-Viedma E (2019) Multiple criteria group decision making method based on extended hesitant fuzzysets with unknown weight information. Appl Soft Comput 78:310–323 Farhadinia B, Herrera-Viedma E (2019) Multiple criteria group decision making method based on extended hesitant fuzzysets with unknown weight information. Appl Soft Comput 78:310–323
16.
go back to reference Galo NR, Calache LDDR, Carpinetti LCR (2018) A group decision approach for supplier categorization based on hesitant fuzzy and ELECTRE TRI. Int J Prod Econ 202:182–186 Galo NR, Calache LDDR, Carpinetti LCR (2018) A group decision approach for supplier categorization based on hesitant fuzzy and ELECTRE TRI. Int J Prod Econ 202:182–186
17.
go back to reference Hu JH, Yang Y, Zhang XL, Chen XH (2018) Similarity and entropy measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Int Trans Oper Res 25(3):857–886MathSciNetMATH Hu JH, Yang Y, Zhang XL, Chen XH (2018) Similarity and entropy measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Int Trans Oper Res 25(3):857–886MathSciNetMATH
18.
go back to reference Sun G, Guan X, Yi X, Zhou Z (2018) Grey relational analysis between hesitant fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition. Expert Syst Appl 92:521–532 Sun G, Guan X, Yi X, Zhou Z (2018) Grey relational analysis between hesitant fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition. Expert Syst Appl 92:521–532
19.
go back to reference Zhou W, Chen J, Xu ZS, Meng S (2018) Hesitant fuzzy preference envelopment analysis and alternative improvement. Inf Sci 465:105–117 Zhou W, Chen J, Xu ZS, Meng S (2018) Hesitant fuzzy preference envelopment analysis and alternative improvement. Inf Sci 465:105–117
20.
go back to reference Zhou W, Xu Z (2018) Portfolio selection and risk investment under the hesitant fuzzy environment. Knowl Based Syst 144:1–31 Zhou W, Xu Z (2018) Portfolio selection and risk investment under the hesitant fuzzy environment. Knowl Based Syst 144:1–31
21.
go back to reference Chen N, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2013) Interval-valued hesitant preference relation relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 37:528–540 Chen N, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2013) Interval-valued hesitant preference relation relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl Based Syst 37:528–540
22.
go back to reference Wei GW, Zhao XF, Lin R (2013) Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl Based Syst 46:43–53 Wei GW, Zhao XF, Lin R (2013) Some hesitant interval-valued fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl Based Syst 46:43–53
23.
go back to reference He YD, He Z, Shi LX, Meng SS (2016) Multiple attribute group decision making based on IVHFPBMs and a new ranking method for interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information. Comput Ind Eng 99:633–677 He YD, He Z, Shi LX, Meng SS (2016) Multiple attribute group decision making based on IVHFPBMs and a new ranking method for interval-valued hesitant fuzzy information. Comput Ind Eng 99:633–677
24.
go back to reference Meng FY, Chen XH (2014) An approach to interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making with incomplete weight information based on hybrid Shapley operators. Informatica 25(4):617–642MATH Meng FY, Chen XH (2014) An approach to interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making with incomplete weight information based on hybrid Shapley operators. Informatica 25(4):617–642MATH
25.
go back to reference Chen N, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2013) Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to clustering analysis. Appl Math Modell 37:2197–2211MathSciNetMATH Chen N, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2013) Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to clustering analysis. Appl Math Modell 37:2197–2211MathSciNetMATH
26.
go back to reference Meng FY, Wang C, Chen XH, Zhang Q (2016) Correlation coefficients of interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets and their application based on Shapley function. Int J Intell Syst 31(1):17–43 Meng FY, Wang C, Chen XH, Zhang Q (2016) Correlation coefficients of interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets and their application based on Shapley function. Int J Intell Syst 31(1):17–43
27.
go back to reference Farhadinia B (2013) Information measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 240:129–144MathSciNetMATH Farhadinia B (2013) Information measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 240:129–144MathSciNetMATH
28.
go back to reference Liu Y, Liu J, Hong ZY (2018) A multiple attribute decision making approach based on new similarity measures of interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Comput Intell Syst 11:15–32 Liu Y, Liu J, Hong ZY (2018) A multiple attribute decision making approach based on new similarity measures of interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Comput Intell Syst 11:15–32
29.
go back to reference Asan U, Kadaifci C, Bozdag E, Soyer A (2018) A new approach to DEMATEL based on interval- valued hesitant fuzzy sets Appl. Soft Comput 66:34–49 Asan U, Kadaifci C, Bozdag E, Soyer A (2018) A new approach to DEMATEL based on interval- valued hesitant fuzzy sets Appl. Soft Comput 66:34–49
30.
go back to reference Liu ZW, Ming XG, Song WY (2019) A framework integrating interval-valued hesitant fuzzy DEMATEL method to capture and evaluate co-creative value propositions for smart PSS. J Clean Prod 215:611–625 Liu ZW, Ming XG, Song WY (2019) A framework integrating interval-valued hesitant fuzzy DEMATEL method to capture and evaluate co-creative value propositions for smart PSS. J Clean Prod 215:611–625
31.
go back to reference Zhang CQ, Wang C, Zhang ZM, Tian DZ (2019) A novel technique for multiple attribute group decision making in interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environments with incomplete weight information. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10(6):2429–2445 Zhang CQ, Wang C, Zhang ZM, Tian DZ (2019) A novel technique for multiple attribute group decision making in interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environments with incomplete weight information. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10(6):2429–2445
32.
go back to reference Tang J, Meng FY (2018) Ranking objects from group decision making with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy preference relations in view of additive consistency and consensus. Knowl Based Syst 162:46–61 Tang J, Meng FY (2018) Ranking objects from group decision making with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy preference relations in view of additive consistency and consensus. Knowl Based Syst 162:46–61
33.
go back to reference Zhang YN, Tang J, Meng FY (2019) Programming model-based method for ranking objects from group decision making with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Appl Intell 49(3):837–857 Zhang YN, Tang J, Meng FY (2019) Programming model-based method for ranking objects from group decision making with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Appl Intell 49(3):837–857
34.
35.
go back to reference Xu ZS (2001) A practical method for priority of interval number complementary judgment matrix. Oper Res Manag Sci 10(1):16–19 Xu ZS (2001) A practical method for priority of interval number complementary judgment matrix. Oper Res Manag Sci 10(1):16–19
36.
go back to reference Meng FY, An QX, Tan CQ, Chen XH (2017) An approach for group decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency and consensus analysis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 47(8):2069–2082 Meng FY, An QX, Tan CQ, Chen XH (2017) An approach for group decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency and consensus analysis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 47(8):2069–2082
37.
go back to reference Krejčí J (2017) On additive consistency of interval and fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 107:128–140 Krejčí J (2017) On additive consistency of interval and fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 107:128–140
38.
go back to reference Meng FY, Tang J, Fujita H (2019) Consistency-based algorithms for decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(10):2052–2066 Meng FY, Tang J, Fujita H (2019) Consistency-based algorithms for decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(10):2052–2066
39.
go back to reference Morente-Molinera JA, Kou G, Pérez IJ, Samuylov K, Selamat A, Herrera-Viedma E (2020) A group decision making support system for the Web: how to work in environments with a high number of participants and alternatives. Appl Soft Comput 68:191–201 Morente-Molinera JA, Kou G, Pérez IJ, Samuylov K, Selamat A, Herrera-Viedma E (2020) A group decision making support system for the Web: how to work in environments with a high number of participants and alternatives. Appl Soft Comput 68:191–201
40.
go back to reference Liang YY, Qin JD, Martínez L, Liu J (2020) A heterogeneous QUALIFLEX method with criteria interaction for multi-criteria group decision making. Inf Sci 512:1481–1502MathSciNetMATH Liang YY, Qin JD, Martínez L, Liu J (2020) A heterogeneous QUALIFLEX method with criteria interaction for multi-criteria group decision making. Inf Sci 512:1481–1502MathSciNetMATH
41.
go back to reference Morente-Molinera JA, Wu X, Morfeq A, Al-Hmouz R, Herrera-Viedma E (2020) A novel multi-criteria group decision-making method for heterogeneous and dynamic contexts using multi-granular fuzzy linguistic modelling and consensus measures. Inf Fusion 53:240–250 Morente-Molinera JA, Wu X, Morfeq A, Al-Hmouz R, Herrera-Viedma E (2020) A novel multi-criteria group decision-making method for heterogeneous and dynamic contexts using multi-granular fuzzy linguistic modelling and consensus measures. Inf Fusion 53:240–250
42.
go back to reference Pérez-Fernández R, Alonso P, Bustince H, Díaz I, Montes S (2016) Applications of finite interval-valued hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Inf Sci 326:89–101MathSciNetMATH Pérez-Fernández R, Alonso P, Bustince H, Díaz I, Montes S (2016) Applications of finite interval-valued hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Inf Sci 326:89–101MathSciNetMATH
43.
go back to reference Zhai YL, Xu ZS (2019) Consistency checking and improving for interval-valued hesitant preference relations. Symmetry 11(4):466MATH Zhai YL, Xu ZS (2019) Consistency checking and improving for interval-valued hesitant preference relations. Symmetry 11(4):466MATH
44.
go back to reference Chen WJ, Zou Y (2020) Group decision making under generalized fuzzy soft sets and limited cognition of decision makers. Eng Appl Artif Intell 87:103344 Chen WJ, Zou Y (2020) Group decision making under generalized fuzzy soft sets and limited cognition of decision makers. Eng Appl Artif Intell 87:103344
45.
go back to reference Deli İ (2020) A TOPSIS method by using generalized trapezoidal hesitant fuzzy numbers and application to a robot selection problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 38(2):779–793 Deli İ (2020) A TOPSIS method by using generalized trapezoidal hesitant fuzzy numbers and application to a robot selection problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 38(2):779–793
46.
go back to reference Zhang YL, Zhang XL, Li M, Liu ZM (2019) Research on heat transfer enhancement and flow characteristic of heat exchange surface in cosine style runner. Heat Mass Transfer 55:3117–3131 Zhang YL, Zhang XL, Li M, Liu ZM (2019) Research on heat transfer enhancement and flow characteristic of heat exchange surface in cosine style runner. Heat Mass Transfer 55:3117–3131
48.
go back to reference Zhang XL, Zhang YL, Liu ZM, Liu J (2020) Analysis of heat transfer and flow characteristics in typical cambered ducts. Int J Therm Sci 150:106226 Zhang XL, Zhang YL, Liu ZM, Liu J (2020) Analysis of heat transfer and flow characteristics in typical cambered ducts. Int J Therm Sci 150:106226
Metadata
Title
Analysis of acceptable additive consistency and consensus of group decision making with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy preference relations
Authors
Jie Tang
Yunning Zhang
Hamido Fujita
Xiaodan Zhang
Fanyong Meng
Publication date
19-01-2021
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Neural Computing and Applications / Issue 13/2021
Print ISSN: 0941-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05516-z

Other articles of this Issue 13/2021

Neural Computing and Applications 13/2021 Go to the issue

Premium Partner