Skip to main content
Top

2020 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Are Construction Professionals Equipped with the Knowledge and Tools to Address the Sustainability Dilemma?

Authors : Paul Mundy, Colin A. Booth

Published in: Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study attempts to explore the depth of knowledge and understanding of sustainability issues across a range of construction professions and utilise this evidence to reveal if Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) is being delivered with due diligence across the industry. A range of construction professionals, key actors in achieving sustainability across the built environment through their advisory roles in design and specification, were interviewed (n = 7). It became apparent that knowledge and understanding of sustainability was certainly below an expected level of competence suitable to deliver solutions across the multifaceted sustainability crisis, with many professionals failing to see beyond energy efficiency and carbon reduction. Furthermore, it revealed that planning policy changes incorporating BREEAM as a condition has had negative effects, leading clients and professionals to engage only when required. It was also evident that BREEAM schemes are being used with the goal to obtain development consents and cost was determining actions taken rather than best sustainability outcomes. This results in both BREEAM and Sustainability being perceived as an add-ons rather than core elements or drivers of a project and, in doing so, reduces the effectiveness of the design. Based on this evidence, it is proposed that there is a timely need to change construction professionals’ perceptions to achieve a truly sustainable built environment. With BREEAM being one of many similar certification schemes it is worrying that these findings may the same elsewhere around the world.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Ameen, R., Mourshed, M., & Li, H. (2015). A critical review of environmental assessment tools for sustainable urban design. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 55, 110–125.CrossRef Ameen, R., Mourshed, M., & Li, H. (2015). A critical review of environmental assessment tools for sustainable urban design. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 55, 110–125.CrossRef
go back to reference Barlow, S. (2011). Guide to BREEAM. London: RIBA Publishing. Barlow, S. (2011). Guide to BREEAM. London: RIBA Publishing.
go back to reference Berardi, U. (2013). Clarifying the new interpretations of the concept of sustainable building. Sustainable Cities and Society, 8, 72–78.CrossRef Berardi, U. (2013). Clarifying the new interpretations of the concept of sustainable building. Sustainable Cities and Society, 8, 72–78.CrossRef
go back to reference Brundtland, G. (1987). Our common future—Call for action. Environmental Conservation, 14(4), 291.CrossRef Brundtland, G. (1987). Our common future—Call for action. Environmental Conservation, 14(4), 291.CrossRef
go back to reference Cinquemani, V., & Prior, J. (2011). Integrating BREEAM throughout the design process: A guide to achieving higher BREEAM and code for sustainable homes ratings (FB 28). Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. Cinquemani, V., & Prior, J. (2011). Integrating BREEAM throughout the design process: A guide to achieving higher BREEAM and code for sustainable homes ratings (FB 28). Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
go back to reference Cole, R. (2010). Building environmental assessment methods: Redefining intentions and roles. Building Research & Information, 33(5), 455–467.CrossRef Cole, R. (2010). Building environmental assessment methods: Redefining intentions and roles. Building Research & Information, 33(5), 455–467.CrossRef
go back to reference Dixon, T., Colantonio, A., Shiers, D., Reed, R., Wilkinson, S., & Gallimore, P. (2008). A green profession? A global survey of RICS members and their engagement with the sustainability agenda. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 26(6), 460–481.CrossRef Dixon, T., Colantonio, A., Shiers, D., Reed, R., Wilkinson, S., & Gallimore, P. (2008). A green profession? A global survey of RICS members and their engagement with the sustainability agenda. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 26(6), 460–481.CrossRef
go back to reference Elkington, J. (1998). Accounting for the triple bottom line. Measuring Business Excellence, 2(3), 18–22.CrossRef Elkington, J. (1998). Accounting for the triple bottom line. Measuring Business Excellence, 2(3), 18–22.CrossRef
go back to reference Gil, J., & Duarte, J. (2013). Tools for evaluating the sustainability of urban design: A review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Urban Design and Planning, 166(6), 311–325.CrossRef Gil, J., & Duarte, J. (2013). Tools for evaluating the sustainability of urban design: A review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Urban Design and Planning, 166(6), 311–325.CrossRef
go back to reference Jones, R., Pykett, J., & Whitehead, M. (2010). Governing temptation: Changing behaviour in an age of libertarian paternalism. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4), 483–501.CrossRef Jones, R., Pykett, J., & Whitehead, M. (2010). Governing temptation: Changing behaviour in an age of libertarian paternalism. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4), 483–501.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaatz, E., Root, D., Bowen, P., & Hill, R. (2006). Advancing key outcomes of sustainability building assessment. Building Research & Information, 34(4), 308–320.CrossRef Kaatz, E., Root, D., Bowen, P., & Hill, R. (2006). Advancing key outcomes of sustainability building assessment. Building Research & Information, 34(4), 308–320.CrossRef
go back to reference Michl, P., Lorenz, D., Lützkendorf, T. & Sayce, S. (2016). Reflecting sustainability in property valuation – a progress report. Journal of Property Investment & Finance. 34(6), 552–577. [Accessed 25 February 2018]. Michl, P., Lorenz, D., Lützkendorf, T. & Sayce, S. (2016). Reflecting sustainability in property valuation – a progress report. Journal of Property Investment & Finance. 34(6), 552–577. [Accessed 25 February 2018].
go back to reference Newport, D., Chesnes, T., & Lindner, A. (2003). The “environmental sustainability” problem. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(4), 357–363.CrossRef Newport, D., Chesnes, T., & Lindner, A. (2003). The “environmental sustainability” problem. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(4), 357–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Parker, J. (2012). The value of BREEAM. Bracknell: BSRIA. Parker, J. (2012). The value of BREEAM. Bracknell: BSRIA.
go back to reference Parkin, S., Sommer, F., & Uren, S. (2003). Sustainable development: Understanding the concept and practical challenge. Engineering Sustainability, 156(1), 19–26.CrossRef Parkin, S., Sommer, F., & Uren, S. (2003). Sustainable development: Understanding the concept and practical challenge. Engineering Sustainability, 156(1), 19–26.CrossRef
go back to reference Pitt, M., Tucker, M., Riley, M., & Longden, J. (2009). Towards sustainable construction: Promotion and best practices. Construction Innovation, 9(2), 201–224.CrossRef Pitt, M., Tucker, M., Riley, M., & Longden, J. (2009). Towards sustainable construction: Promotion and best practices. Construction Innovation, 9(2), 201–224.CrossRef
go back to reference Reed, W., & Gordon, E. (2000). Integrated design and building process: What research and methodologies are needed? Building Research & Information, 28(5–6), 325–337.CrossRef Reed, W., & Gordon, E. (2000). Integrated design and building process: What research and methodologies are needed? Building Research & Information, 28(5–6), 325–337.CrossRef
go back to reference Santillo, D. (2007). Reclaiming the definition of sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research—International, 14(1), 60–66.CrossRef Santillo, D. (2007). Reclaiming the definition of sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research—International, 14(1), 60–66.CrossRef
go back to reference Shove, E. (2002). Converging conventions of comfort, cleanliness and convenience. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(4), 395–418.CrossRef Shove, E. (2002). Converging conventions of comfort, cleanliness and convenience. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(4), 395–418.CrossRef
go back to reference Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 1273–1285.CrossRef Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 1273–1285.CrossRef
go back to reference Taylor, T. (2015). Assessing carbon emissions in BREEAM. Watford: BRE Global. Taylor, T. (2015). Assessing carbon emissions in BREEAM. Watford: BRE Global.
go back to reference Vallance, S., Perkins, H., & Dixon, J. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum, 42(3), 342–348.CrossRef Vallance, S., Perkins, H., & Dixon, J. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum, 42(3), 342–348.CrossRef
go back to reference Williams, K., & Dair, C. (2007). A framework of sustainable behaviours that can be enabled through the design of neighbourhood-scale developments. Sustainable Development, 15(3), 160–173.CrossRef Williams, K., & Dair, C. (2007). A framework of sustainable behaviours that can be enabled through the design of neighbourhood-scale developments. Sustainable Development, 15(3), 160–173.CrossRef
go back to reference Zuo, J., & Zhao, Z. (2014). Green building research—Current status and future agenda: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 271–281.CrossRef Zuo, J., & Zhao, Z. (2014). Green building research—Current status and future agenda: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 271–281.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Are Construction Professionals Equipped with the Knowledge and Tools to Address the Sustainability Dilemma?
Authors
Paul Mundy
Colin A. Booth
Copyright Year
2020
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44381-8_10