Top

Published in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

6. Are Some Genres More Profitable than Others?

Author : Barrie Gunter

Published in: Predicting Movie Success at the Box Office

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Movies are classified by genre. Evidence has emerged over time that some genres tend to be consistently more successful than others. The popularity of specific genres, however, can often be subject to changes in public tastes and cultural fashions. It is important that a movie can be clearly placed in terms of its genre to enable audiences to determine what kind of movie it is and also how good it is of its type. Movies must stay true to their genres and not contain elements that for audiences seem to make a bad fit given the type of story they are expecting.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

previous chapter Does Marketing and Promotion Create Box Office Success?

next chapter Do Sex, Horror and Violence Sell Movies?

Balio, T. (2002). Hollywood production trends in the era of globalization, 1990–1999. In S. Neale (Ed.), Genre and contemporary Hollywood (pp. 165–184). London, UK: British Film Institute.

Boone, C., Carroll, G. R., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2002). Resource distributions and market partitioning: Dutch daily newspapers, 1968 to 1994. American Sociological Review, 67, 408–431.CrossRef

Boone, C., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2004). A united theory of market partitioning: An integration of resource partitioning and sunk cost theories. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13, 701–725.CrossRef

Box Office Mojo. (2012). Worldwide grosses. Available at: http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/world/ Accessed 8th July 2016.

De Silva, I. (1998). Consumer selection of motion pictures. In B. R. Litman (Ed.), The motion picture mega industry (pp. 144–171). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn Bacon.

Deane, M. (2010, April 9). Movie genres that make the most money. Investopedia. Available at: http://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0410/. Accessed 18th October 2017.

Deniz, B., & Hasbrouck, R. B. (2010). What determines box office success of a movie in the United States? Available at: http://www.nedsi.org/proc/2012/proc/p111015009.pdf. Accessed 23rd August 2016.

Desai, K. K., & Basuroy, S. (2005). Interactive influence of genre familiarity, star power and critics’ reviews in the cultural goods industry: The case of motion pictures. Psychology and Marketing Journal, 22(3), 203–223.CrossRef

Dobrev, S. D., Kim, T.-Y., & Hanna, M. T. (2001). Dynamics of niche width and resource partitioning. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1299–1337.CrossRef

Fu, W. W., & Govindaraju, A. (2010). Explaining global box-office tastes in Hollywood films: Homogenization of national audiences’ movie selections. Communication Research, 37(2), 215–238.CrossRef

Guback, T. H. (1969). The international film industry: Western Europe and American since 1945. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population of ecology or organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.CrossRef

Hannan, M. T., Polos, L., & Carroll, G. R. (2007). Logics of organizational theory: Audiences, codes and ecologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hirschberg, P. (2004, November 14). Is the face of America that of a green ogre? New York Times Magazine, p. 91.

Hsu, G. (2006). Jacks of all trades and masters of none: Audiences’ reactions to spanning genres in feature film production. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 420–450.CrossRef

Jedidi, K., Krider, R. E., & Weinberg, C. B. (1998). Clustering at the movies. Marketing Letters, 9(4), 393–405.CrossRef

Ji, S. W., & Waterman, D. (2010). Production technology and trends in movie content: An empirical study. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.362.9800&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Kaimann, D., & Pannicke, J. (2015). Movie success in a genre-specific contest: Evidence from the UD film industry (Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers, No.98). Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/142323/1/84418649X.pdf

Kakutani, M. (1997, June 8). Taking out the trash. New York Times Sunday Magazine, p. 30.

Litman, B. (1983). Predicting success of theatrical movies; An empirical study. Journal of Popular Culture, 16, 159–175.CrossRef

Mirrlees, T. (2013). Global entertainment media: Between cultural imperialism and cultural globalisation. New York, NY: Routledge.

Olson, S. R. (1999). Hollywood planet: Global media and the competitive advantage of narrative transparency. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pangarker, N. A., & Smit, E. M. (2013). The determinants of box office performance in the film industry revisited. South African Journal of Business Management, 44(3), 47–58.

Peli, G. (1997). The niche hiker’s guide to population ecology: A logical reconstruction of organizational ecology’s niche theory. Sociological Methodology, 27, 1–46.CrossRef

Prell, S. (2016, January 15). Every Marvel movie is a different genre, and that is why the MCU works. Gamesradar. Available at: http://www.gamesradar.com/every-marvel-movie-different-genre-and-s-why-mcu-works/. Accessed 18th October 2017.

Sawhney, M. S., & Eliashberg, J. (1996). A parsimonious model for forecasting gross box-office revenues of motion pictures. Marketing Science, 15, 113–131.CrossRef

Simonton, D. K. (2005). Film as art versus film as business: Differential correlates of screenplay characteristics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 93–117.CrossRef

The Numbers. (2016a). Domestic movie theatrical market summary 1995 to 2016. Available at: http://www.the-numbers.com/market/. Accessed 17th August 2016.

The Numbers. (2016b). Box office history for super hero movies. Available at: http://www.the-numbers.com/market/creative-type/Super-Hero. Accessed 17th August 2016.

Vogel, H. L. (2007). Entertainment industry economics: A guide for financial analysis (7th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Waterman, D. (2005). Hollywood’s road to riches. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef

Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the legitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1398–1438.CrossRef

Zuckerman, E. W., & Kim, T.-Y. (2003). The critical trade-off: Identity assignment and box-office success in the feature film industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 27–67.CrossRef

Zuckerman, E. W., Kim, T.-Y., Ukanwa, K., & Von Rittman, J. J. (2003). Robust identities or non-entities? Typecasting in the feature film labour market. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 1018–1074.CrossRef

Title: Are Some Genres More Profitable than Others?
Author: Barrie Gunter
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Predicting Movie Success at the Box Office
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71802-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-71803-3

Copyright Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71803-3_6