Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 3/2016

14-03-2016 | Original paper

Assessment and Prediction of Liquefaction Potential Using Different Artificial Neural Network Models: A Case Study

Author: Abbas Abbaszadeh Shahri

Published in: Geotechnical and Geological Engineering | Issue 3/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Soil liquefaction as a transformation of granular material from solid to liquid state is a type of ground failure commonly associated with moderate to large earthquakes and refers to the loss of strength in saturated, cohesionless soils due to the build-up of pore water pressures and reduction of the effective stress during dynamic loading. In this paper, assessment and prediction of liquefaction potential of soils subjected to earthquake using two different artificial neural network models based on mechanical and geotechnical related parameters (model A) and earthquake related parameters (model B) have been proposed. In model A the depth, unit weight, SPT-N value, shear wave velocity, soil type and fine contents and in model B the depth, stress reduction factor, cyclic stress ratio, cyclic resistance ratio, pore pressure, total and effective vertical stress were considered as network inputs. Among the numerous tested models, the 6-4-4-2-1 structure correspond to model A and 7-5-4-6-1 for model B due to minimum network root mean square errors were selected as optimized network architecture models in this study. The performance of the network models were controlled approved and evaluated using several statistical criteria, regression analysis as well as detailed comparison with known accepted procedures. The results represented that the model A satisfied almost all the employed criteria and showed better performance than model B. The sensitivity analysis in this study showed that depth, shear wave velocity and SPT-N value for model A and cyclic resistance ratio, cyclic stress ratio and effective vertical stress for model B are the three most effective parameters on liquefaction potential analysis. Moreover, the calculated absolute error for model A represented better performance than model B. The reasonable agreement of network output in comparison with the results from previously accepted methods indicate satisfactory network performance for prediction of liquefaction potential analysis.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Agrawal G, Chameau JA, Bourdeau PL (1997) Assessing the liquefaction susceptibility at a site based on information from penetration testing. In: Kartam N, Flood I, Garrett JH (eds) Artificial neural networks for civil engineers: fundamentals and applications. Amer Society of Civil Engineers, 216 p Agrawal G, Chameau JA, Bourdeau PL (1997) Assessing the liquefaction susceptibility at a site based on information from penetration testing. In: Kartam N, Flood I, Garrett JH (eds) Artificial neural networks for civil engineers: fundamentals and applications. Amer Society of Civil Engineers, 216 p
go back to reference Andrus RD, Stokoe KH II (2000) Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 126:1015–1102CrossRef Andrus RD, Stokoe KH II (2000) Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 126:1015–1102CrossRef
go back to reference Bagheripour MH, Shooshpasha I, Afzalirad M (2012) A genetic algorithm approach for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on reliability method. J Earth Syst Sci 121:45–62CrossRef Bagheripour MH, Shooshpasha I, Afzalirad M (2012) A genetic algorithm approach for assessing soil liquefaction potential based on reliability method. J Earth Syst Sci 121:45–62CrossRef
go back to reference Basheer IA, Hajmeer M (2000) Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. J Microbiol Method 43:3–31CrossRef Basheer IA, Hajmeer M (2000) Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. J Microbiol Method 43:3–31CrossRef
go back to reference Berrill JB, Davis RO (1985) Energy dissipation and seismic liquefaction of sands: revised model. Soils Found 25(2):106–118CrossRef Berrill JB, Davis RO (1985) Energy dissipation and seismic liquefaction of sands: revised model. Soils Found 25(2):106–118CrossRef
go back to reference Fausett L (1994) Fundamentals of neural networks: architectures, and applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs Fausett L (1994) Fundamentals of neural networks: architectures, and applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
go back to reference Finn WD (2002) State of the art for the evaluation of seismic liquefaction potential. Comput Geotech 29:328–341CrossRef Finn WD (2002) State of the art for the evaluation of seismic liquefaction potential. Comput Geotech 29:328–341CrossRef
go back to reference Goh AT (2002) Probabilistic neural network for evaluating seismic liquefaction potential. Can Geotech J 39(1):219–232CrossRef Goh AT (2002) Probabilistic neural network for evaluating seismic liquefaction potential. Can Geotech J 39(1):219–232CrossRef
go back to reference Hanna AM, Ural D, Saygili G (2007) Neural network model for liquefaction potential in soil deposits using Turkey and Taiwan earthquake data. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:521–540CrossRef Hanna AM, Ural D, Saygili G (2007) Neural network model for liquefaction potential in soil deposits using Turkey and Taiwan earthquake data. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:521–540CrossRef
go back to reference Hurtado JE, Londono JM, Meza MA (2002) On the applicability of neural networks for soil dynamic amplification analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21:579–591CrossRef Hurtado JE, Londono JM, Meza MA (2002) On the applicability of neural networks for soil dynamic amplification analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21:579–591CrossRef
go back to reference Jong YH, Lee CI (2004) Influence of geological conditions on the powder factor for tunnel blasting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(Supplement 1):533–538CrossRef Jong YH, Lee CI (2004) Influence of geological conditions on the powder factor for tunnel blasting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(Supplement 1):533–538CrossRef
go back to reference Juang CH, Chen CJ (1999) CPT-based liquefaction evaluation using artificial neural networks. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 14(3):221–229CrossRef Juang CH, Chen CJ (1999) CPT-based liquefaction evaluation using artificial neural networks. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng 14(3):221–229CrossRef
go back to reference Kayen RE, Mitchell JK (1997) Assessment of liquefaction potential during earthquakes by arias intensity. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng ASCE 123:1162–1174CrossRef Kayen RE, Mitchell JK (1997) Assessment of liquefaction potential during earthquakes by arias intensity. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng ASCE 123:1162–1174CrossRef
go back to reference Kim Y, Kim B (2006) Use of artificial neural networks in the prediction of liquefaction resistance of sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(11):1502–1504CrossRef Kim Y, Kim B (2006) Use of artificial neural networks in the prediction of liquefaction resistance of sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(11):1502–1504CrossRef
go back to reference Levenberg K (1944) A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Q Appl Math 2:164–168 Levenberg K (1944) A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Q Appl Math 2:164–168
go back to reference Liao SSC, Whitman RV (1986) Catalogue of liquefaction and non-liquefaction occurrences during earthquakes. In: Resources Report, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA Liao SSC, Whitman RV (1986) Catalogue of liquefaction and non-liquefaction occurrences during earthquakes. In: Resources Report, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
go back to reference Liao SSC, Veneziano D, Whitman RV (1988) Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability. J Geotech Eng ASCE 114(4):389–411CrossRef Liao SSC, Veneziano D, Whitman RV (1988) Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability. J Geotech Eng ASCE 114(4):389–411CrossRef
go back to reference Marquardt D (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 11(2):431–441CrossRef Marquardt D (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 11(2):431–441CrossRef
go back to reference Oommen T, Baise LG, Vogel R (2010) Validation and application of empirical liquefaction model. J Geotechnol Geoenviron Eng 136(12):1618–1633CrossRef Oommen T, Baise LG, Vogel R (2010) Validation and application of empirical liquefaction model. J Geotechnol Geoenviron Eng 136(12):1618–1633CrossRef
go back to reference Orense RP (2005) Assessment of liquefaction potential based on peak ground motion parameters. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:225–240CrossRef Orense RP (2005) Assessment of liquefaction potential based on peak ground motion parameters. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:225–240CrossRef
go back to reference Rahman MS, Wang J (2002) Fuzzy neural network models for liquefaction prediction. J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22:685–694CrossRef Rahman MS, Wang J (2002) Fuzzy neural network models for liquefaction prediction. J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22:685–694CrossRef
go back to reference Rezaei M, Monjezi M, Ghorbani Moghaddam S, Farzaneh F (2011) Burden prediction in blasting operation using rock geomechanical properties. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-010-0269-0 Rezaei M, Monjezi M, Ghorbani Moghaddam S, Farzaneh F (2011) Burden prediction in blasting operation using rock geomechanical properties. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.​1007/​s12517-010-0269-0
go back to reference Robertson PK, Wride CE (1998) Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 35(3):442–459CrossRef Robertson PK, Wride CE (1998) Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test. Can Geotech J 35(3):442–459CrossRef
go back to reference Roy D (2008) Coupled use of Cone tip resistance and small strain shear modulus to assess liquefaction potential. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 134:519–530CrossRef Roy D (2008) Coupled use of Cone tip resistance and small strain shear modulus to assess liquefaction potential. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 134:519–530CrossRef
go back to reference Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 97(9):1249–1273 Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 97(9):1249–1273
go back to reference Seed HB, Idriss IM (1982) Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, Monograph Series, p 134 Seed HB, Idriss IM (1982) Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, Monograph Series, p 134
go back to reference Seed HB, Idriss IM, Arango I (1983) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 109(3):458–482CrossRef Seed HB, Idriss IM, Arango I (1983) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 109(3):458–482CrossRef
go back to reference Tokimatsu K, Yoshimi Y (1983) Empirical correlation of soil liquefaction based on SPT N-value and fines content. Soils Found 23(4):56–74CrossRef Tokimatsu K, Yoshimi Y (1983) Empirical correlation of soil liquefaction based on SPT N-value and fines content. Soils Found 23(4):56–74CrossRef
go back to reference Transtrum MK, Sethna JP (2012) Improvements to the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm for nonlinear least-squares minimization. Preprint submitted to Journal of Computational Physics, January 30, 2012 Transtrum MK, Sethna JP (2012) Improvements to the Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm for nonlinear least-squares minimization. Preprint submitted to Journal of Computational Physics, January 30, 2012
go back to reference Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD, Arango I, Castro I, Christian JT, Dorby R, Finn WDLL, Harder F, Hynes ME, Ishihara K, Koester JP, Laio SC, Marcuson WF, Martin GR, Mitchell JK, MoriwakiY Power MS, Robertson PK, Seed RB, Stokoe KH (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summery report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(10):817–833CrossRef Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD, Arango I, Castro I, Christian JT, Dorby R, Finn WDLL, Harder F, Hynes ME, Ishihara K, Koester JP, Laio SC, Marcuson WF, Martin GR, Mitchell JK, MoriwakiY Power MS, Robertson PK, Seed RB, Stokoe KH (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summery report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(10):817–833CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessment and Prediction of Liquefaction Potential Using Different Artificial Neural Network Models: A Case Study
Author
Abbas Abbaszadeh Shahri
Publication date
14-03-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0960-3182
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1529
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-016-0004-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 3/2016 Go to the issue