Skip to main content
Top
Published in: e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik 2/2021

Open Access 25-02-2021 | Originalarbeit

Bearingless PM-synchronous machine with axial active magnetic bearing fed by zero-sequence current

Authors: Daniel Dietz, Andreas Binder

Published in: e+i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik | Issue 2/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A novel inverter supply for bearingless PM-synchronous motors with magnetic suspension allows the reduction of the number of power electronic switches. Hence, all six motional degrees of freedom of bearingless AC machines may be controlled via 3-phase inverter topologies. In this paper, instead of a bearingless motor consisting of two half motors, one bearingless motor with an additional radial active magnetic bearing is treated. Bearingless machines with cylindrical rotors in contrast to double cone rotors generate – apart from the electromagnetic torque – only radial magnetic forces. Hence, an axial magnetic bearing is used.
For this bearing, there is no need for a feeding converter bridge as the bearing coil is fed by the zero-sequence current of the feeding 3-phase inverters. The bearing coil is placed between the two star points of the motor winding. The zero-sequence current amplitude is adjusted by the 3-phase inverters via pulse width modulation. The feasibility of this kind of axial position control is proven by simulation as well as with an experiment with a 1 kW prototype motor up to 60000 min−1.
Notes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

1 Introduction

Bearingless Motors (BM) have gained rising attractiveness in the past decade. However, the increased manufacturing effort and the necessary complex position control have limited bearingless motor solutions for industrial use up to now [8]. Especially the motor topologies with special, e.g. conical rotor shapes [7, 15, 21] suffer from that drawback. The most promising topologies for industrial high-speed applications such as pumps or compressors is the bearingless PM synchronous machine. Several prototypes of this topology have reached high speed values up to \({100000\ \mathrm{min}^{-1}}\) [12] and \({60\ \mathrm{kW}}\) [16].
Here, a novel feeding concept of the axial bearing is presented, avoiding the double-cone rotor, but also the extra DC-chopper feeding circuit for the axial bearing coil. This solution reduces the costs, making it a feasible alternative to the use of an extra active magnetic bearing (AMB) circuit or of expensive mechanical high-speed ball-bearings, which require additional maintenance due to lubrification. The concept is based on the reduction of power switches and enables the use of standard 3-phase inverter modules. Thus, the concept can also be applied to higher power classes of several \({100\ \mathrm{kW}}\). Here, a \({1\ \mathrm{kW}/60000\ \mathrm{min}^{-1}}\)-prototype machine was built to evaluate the novel concept.
For power classes \(>1\ \mathrm{kW}\) a slotted 3-phase stator with six actively controlled degrees of freedom is the topology of choice in order to compensate for the rotor forces efficiently. For the use as high-speed drive, small rotor diameters are necessary to keep the mechanical stress in the rotor at a suitable level. For these cylindrical rotors a separate AMB for axial position control, a so-called thrust AMB, is required. This AMB is usually fed by a 4-quadrant chopper which requires four power switches, thus, increasing the system costs.
The novel feeding technique avoids this additional DC supply. The BM is already equipped with two 3-phase stator windings with two star-points, either as one combined torque and suspension winding, like in [17], or as two separated torque and suspension windings, as described in [6]. With the new concept, all six stator winding terminals are used to generate torque, radial and axial force at the same time. This is realized by feeding the axial bearing with a star-point current as superposition of the three zero-sequence phase currents in both 3-phase systems. The principle of feeding an AMB with a zero-sequence current was investigated in a different form already by two research groups.
The Institute for Electric Drives and Power Electronics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria, presented a PM-biased combined radial-axial magnetic bearing, one for each shaft side, where the radial force is generated by a 3-phase winding in [20]. Axial force is generated if a zero-sequence current is injected in the two bearings, weakening or enhancing the PM bias flux in the axial air-gaps on each shaft end. Further, in [4, 5] a so called axial force / torque motor is described, which generates axial force by the interaction of a zero-sequence current in the winding overhangs with a radially magnetized homopolar PM.
The second research group from Shizuoka University and Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan, presented a technique in [1] where they feed a PM synchronous machine with a 3-phase current system, applying field-oriented control. In addition they inject a zero-sequence current and put an arbitrary AMB between the star point of the motor winding system and the neutral clamp of the pulse width modulated voltage source inverter (compare Fig. 1a). Hence, the zero-sequence current is used to control the force in the additional AMB by superimposing the zero-sequence current with the phase currents of the machine. In [2, 3] they expand this principle to an outer-rotor 6-pole/6-slot bearingless slice motor with three actively controlled degrees of freedom (\(x\), \(y\), \(\varphi _{\mathrm{z}}\)): A 3-phase 4-pole winding yields the air gap magnetic field for radial force generation. A single-phase 6-pole winding yields the torque generating stator field. This single-phase winding is fed by the star-point current of the suspension winding system, consisting of the zero-sequence currents.
In contrast to that, the here presented technique is applied to a six degrees of freedom rotor position control. The zero-sequence current is not generated between one star point and the neutral inverter terminal, but between two star points \(\mathrm{Z}_{\mathrm{A}}\) and \(\mathrm{Z}_{\mathrm{B}}\) (see Fig. 1b). This is realized by using the electric scalar potential of the two star points \(\mathrm{Z}_{\mathrm{A}}\) and \(\mathrm{Z}_{\mathrm{B}}\) [9, 18]. This way, the full DC-link voltage can be applied to the axial magnetic bearing. If two bearingless half-motors are used it is also possible to use the difference of four star-point potentials in order to control the axial current \(i_{\mathrm{ax}}\) (Fig. 1c)). This case is not considered here, since the axial voltage requirement for AMB systems is low (compare Fig. 12). Generally, the zero-sequence current feeding can also be used in higher power classes if insulated-gate bipolar transistors (IGBT) instead of the here applied metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFET) are used as power switches.

2 Prototype bearingless PM synchronous machine

The BM is located on the drive end side (DE), whereas the axial thrust bearing is combined with a radial AMB as “combined” AMB [22] at the non-drive end side (NDE) of the shaft, to allow for a short axial length (Fig. 2). The bearingless permanent magnet (PM) synchronous machine prototype (Table 1) is fed by a two-level \({1.2\ \mathrm{kVA}}\)-inverter at \(150\ \mathrm{V}\)-DC-link voltage with seven current sensors and twelve MOSFET-half-bridges, operated at a switching frequency of \({f_{\mathrm{sw}}=33\ \mathrm{kHz}}\). Eddy current sensors are used for measuring the rotor radial and axial position. The rotor angle \(\gamma _{\mathrm{R}}\) is determined by an analogue Hall-sensor for speed values \({n<10000\ \mathrm{min}^{-1}}\) and by two \(90^{\circ }\)-shifted simple digital Hall-sensors for speed values \({n>10000\ \mathrm{min}^{-1}}\) to reduce the sensor time delay.
Table 1.
Data of the prototype bearingless PM machine and of the axial AMB
\(P_{\mathrm{N}} / \mathrm{kW} ; \ n_{\mathrm{N}} / \mathrm{min}^{-1} \)
1; 60000
Bearingless PM synchronous machine
 
Outer diameter \(2\cdot r_{\mathrm{s,o}} / \mathrm{mm} \)
75
Active length \(l_{\mathrm{Fe}} / \mathrm{mm} \)
40
Air gap width δ/mm
1
Rotor mass \(m_{\mathrm{R}} / \mathrm{kg} \)
0.9
DC-link voltage \(U_{\mathrm{DC}} / \mathrm{V} \)
150
Slot count Q
12
Coil pitch \(W/\tau _{\mathrm{p}} \)
2/3
Winding factors \(k_{\mathrm{w,D}}; \ k_{\mathrm{w,L}} \)
0.835; 0.75
Phase resistance \(R_{\mathrm{s}} / {\Omega } \)
0.09
Phase inductance \(L_{\mathrm{s}} / \mathrm{mH} \)
0.25
Axial AMB
 
Force-current coefficient \(k_{\mathrm{F,z}} /\frac{\mathrm{N}}{\mathrm{A}} \)
33.9
Force-distance coefficient \(k_{\mathrm{s,z}} /\frac{\mathrm{N}}{\mathrm{mm}} \)
−154.7
Coil resistance \(R_{\mathrm{ax}} / {\Omega } \)
0.9
Coil inductance \(L_{\mathrm{ax}} / \mathrm{mH} \)
3.5
The pole pair count \(p_{\mathrm{L}}\) of the suspension winding and \(p\) of the rotor PM fulfill the condition \({p_{\mathrm{L}}=p\pm 1}\) [23] for generating a radial bearing force. With the combination \(p/p_{\mathrm{L}}=1/2\) the PM rotor is composed of a solid magnetic stainless steel shaft, on which a solid \(\mathrm{Sm_{2}Co_{17}}\) PM ring is mounted, magnetized with \({2p=2}\) poles. It is protected against centrifugal forces by a shrink-fit carbon fiber sleeve. The twelve-slot stator is equipped with a distributed integer slot winding with \(q=2\) slots per pole and phase. This so-called “double 3-phase” winding, consisting of the systems A and B (Fig. 1b) serves as a combined drive and suspension winding. It generates two different field waves with \({2p=2}\) for the torque and \({2p_{\mathrm{L}}=4}\) for the radial bearing force. Due to the coil pitching of \(2/3\) the winding factor of the third harmonic field wave component is \({k_{\mathrm{w,3}}=0}\), so that no air gap field results from the zero-sequence current system. The required stator air gap field for the torque and the suspension force generation is excited by the superposition of the phase currents in the two 3-phase systems A and B (Fig. 1b), as explained in [11]. The 4-pole (suspension) field wave with fundamental winding factor \(k_{\mathrm{w,L}}\) occurs if the two 3-phase systems A and B are fed with two “in-phase” current systems (“common-mode feeding”). The 2-pole (drive) field with fundamental winding factor \(k_{\mathrm{w,D}}\) occurs if the two 3-phase systems are fed with two current systems A and B in “phase opposition” (“differential-mode feeding”).
The combined radial-axial AMB at the NDE with PM-biased magnetization is commercially available at KEBA Industrial Automation Germany GmbH. It is composed of a 4-pole radial magnetic bearing and an axial magnetic bearing. The radial magnetic bearing will not be considered hereafter, since it is fed by two standard 4-quadrant choppers in combination with a classical Proportional-Integral-Differential (PID) position controller. It may be omitted if a second BM is used instead [6]. The axial AMB with the resistance \(R_{\mathrm{ax}}\), the inductance \(L_{\mathrm{ax}}\), the force-current coefficient \(k_{\mathrm{F,z}}\) and the stiffness coefficient \(k_{\mathrm{s,z}}\) (Table 1) is also fed by the 3-phase inverters. We use the gravitational rotor force \({m_{\mathrm{R}}\cdot g=8.8\ \mathrm{N}}\) as nominal axial force. For that, we need a stationary Ohmic voltage demand of \({u_{\mathrm{ax}}=0.23\ \mathrm{V}}\), which is a very small value when compared with the speed-dependent induced voltage which can take values up to \({\hat{U}_{\mathrm{p}}=60\ \mathrm{V}}\).
A standard field-oriented, decentralized position control according to [23] is used in the BM for the radial force and the torque, applying controller tuning according the principle of natural stiffness and damping. With this control, the magnetically levitated BM was operated with a turbo-charger fan as load up to its rated speed \(n_{\mathrm{N}}=60000\ \mathrm{min}^{-1}\) [10]. A detailed discussion of the radial and axial position control is given in [10]. The schematic control circuit is shown in Fig. 3 for the axial position control, the speed control and the radial position control at the drive end for the bearingless motor.

3 Applied modulation technique

A carrier-based pulse width modulation (PWM) is used for the feeding of the stator winding of the prototype machine. The modulation of the reference voltage is part of the cascaded current control loop (Fig. 3). Coordinate transformations are required to control the system in the rotor-fixed \(d\)-\(q\)-coordinate frame. In addition to the transformations for simple 3-phase stator windings, here for the double winding systems A and B (Fig. 1b), the transformation (1) is needed due to the combined winding.
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{pmatrix} u_{\mathrm{\alpha ,A}} \\ u_{\mathrm{\beta ,A}} \\ u_{\mathrm{\alpha ,B}} \\ u_{\mathrm{\beta ,B}} \\ \end{pmatrix}&= \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\ -1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 1 \\ \end{bmatrix} \cdot \begin{pmatrix} u_{\mathrm{\alpha ,D}} \\ u_{\mathrm{\beta ,D}} \\ u_{\mathrm{\alpha ,L}} \\ u_{\mathrm{\beta ,L}} \\ \end{pmatrix} \end{aligned}$$
(1)
The symmetrical drive (subscript: D) and suspension (subscript: L) voltage systems are composed of the voltages in the 3-phase systems A and B. The “common mode feeding” of the systems A and B yields the 3-phase suspension current, whereas a “differential mode feeding” generates the 3-phase drive current system. The natural PWM adapts the mean value of a single-phase voltage over one switching period \(T_{\mathrm{sw}}\). Usually a triangular carrier voltage \(u_{\mathrm{tri}}\) is compared to a reference voltage in order to determine the switching instants (Fig. 4) [13]. For this, the voltage space vector \(\underline{u}_{\mathrm{\alpha ,\beta }}\) for the 3-phase systems A and B must be decomposed into three reference voltage signals \(u_{\mathrm{U,ref}}\), \(u_{\mathrm{V,ref}}\) and \(u_{\mathrm{W,ref}}\) for each of the two 3-phase systems as \(u_{\mathrm{U,A,ref}}\), \(u_{\mathrm{V,A,ref}}\) and \(u_{\mathrm{W,A,ref}}\) and \(u_{\mathrm{U,B,ref}}\), \(u_{\mathrm{V,B,ref}}\) and \(u_{\mathrm{W,B,ref}}\) (Fig. 3, 4). Often the zero-sequence voltage with \(3\cdot f_{\mathrm{s}}\) is added to the sinusoidal reference signal at synchronous frequency \(f_{\mathrm{s}}\) for a higher linear modulation degree \(m_{\mathrm{a}}\) [13]. This is not possible here, because an artificial DC offset \(\pm u_{\mathrm{ax,ref}}/2\) is added to the above noted reference phase voltages, where \(u_{\mathrm{ax,ref}}\approx u_{\mathrm{ax}}\) is the voltage drop over the axial AMB (Fig. 5). This DC offset is of opposite polarity in the two 3-phase systems A and B, so that a DC voltage drop of \(u_{\mathrm{ax}}\) occurs between the two star points \(\mathrm{Z}_{\mathrm{A}}\) and \(\mathrm{Z}_{\mathrm{B}}\). The block diagram of this method is given in Fig. 4. The required voltage transformation (2) shows the integration of the artificial zero-sequence current feeding. It is simple to implement with a carrier-based PWM since it only results in an offset of the reference voltages.
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{pmatrix} u_{\mathrm{U,A}} \\ u_{\mathrm{V,A}} \\ u_{\mathrm{W,A}} \\ u_{\mathrm{U,B}} \\ u_{\mathrm{U,B}} \\ u_{\mathrm{U,B}} \\ \end{pmatrix}&= \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} \\ -\frac{1}{2} & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} \\ -\frac{1}{2} & -\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & -\frac{1}{2} \\ 0 & 0 & -\frac{1}{2} & \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} \\ 0 & 0 & -\frac{1}{2} & -\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} \\ \end{bmatrix} \cdot \begin{pmatrix} u_{\mathrm{\alpha ,A}} \\ u_{\mathrm{\beta ,A}} \\ u_{\mathrm{\alpha ,B}} \\ u_{\mathrm{\beta ,B}} \\ u_{\mathrm{ax}} \\ \end{pmatrix} \end{aligned}$$
(2)

4 Evaluation by measurement and simulation

The proposed method was evaluated at the test bench according to Fig. 6. Time-domain simulations in Simulink, employing the Simscape-Toolbox were used with the settings according to Table 2. The necessary off-time of the high-side MOSFET due to the bootstrap driver circuit is represented by a reduced value of \({U_{\mathrm{DC}}=48\ \mathrm{V}\cdot 0.89}\) according to the measured dead time.
Table 2.
Settings for the numerical simulation in time-domain (power electronic properties at \(100\,\mathrm{C^{\circ }}\) from [14])
Solver type (Simulink/Simscape)
\(2^{\mathrm{nd}}\) order Heun /   \(1^{\mathrm{st}}\) order Backward Euler
DC-link voltage \(U_{\mathrm{DC}}\)
150 V
Inverter switching frequency \(f_{\mathrm{sw}}\) (MOSFET)
33 kHz
Step time \(T_{\mathrm{st}}\)
\(303\ \mathrm{ns}=T_{\mathrm{sw}}/100\)
Threshold voltage \(U_{\mathrm{th}}\)
4 V
Drain-source resistance (on) \(R_{\mathrm{DS,on}}\)
11 mΩ
Drain-source resistance (off) \(R_{\mathrm{DS,off}}\)
600 kΩ

4.1 Operation at over-modulation

Generally a safe motor operation with the zero-sequence current operation is ensured if the inverter is not driven at its voltage limit, i.e. for modulation degrees \({m_{\mathrm{a}}<1}\). Operation at over-modulation (\({m_{\mathrm{a}}>1}\)) is crucial, since not enough voltage reserve for axial current dynamics may be available. The DC axial current \(i_{\mathrm{ax}}\) in stationary operation exhibits an additional \(3\cdot f_{\mathrm{s}}\)-frequent harmonic component for \({m_{\mathrm{a}}>1}\), since the desired change in star-point potential during the “passive” time sections of the PWM cannot balance the unwanted change in star-point potential during the “active” time sections. This has already been explained in [9].
The rated speed \({n_{\mathrm{N}}=60000 \ \mathrm{min}^{-1}}\) at \({U_{\mathrm{DC}}=150\ \mathrm{V}}\) is also the maximum mechanically allowed speed and is reached with a modulation degree of \(m_{\mathrm{a}}=0.85\) [10].
In order to investigate if a safe operation of the axial bearing even at over-modulation is possible, a reduced DC-link voltage of \({U_{\mathrm{DC}}=48\ \mathrm{V}}\) is applied to enforce over-modulation at reduced speed \(n\). Figure 7 shows the measured third harmonic component of the axial voltage \(\hat{u}_{\mathrm{ax,3}}\) which increases linearly with the modulation degree for \(m_{\mathrm{a}}>1\). The resulting third harmonic of the axial current \(\hat{i}_{\mathrm{ax,3}}\) is given in Fig. 8a, which compares this current oscillation with \(3\cdot f_{\mathrm{s}}\) at \(m_{\mathrm{a}}=1.55\) between measurement and simulation for one electrical period \(1/f_{\mathrm{s}}\). The measured current exhibits an additional current ripple of \({f_{\mathrm{sw}}=33\ \mathrm{kHz}}\). The eddy currents in the axial AMB rotor disk decrease the inductance \(L_{\mathrm{ax}}\) for such high switching frequencies so an increased switching current ripple occurs. The according Fourier voltage harmonic spectrum (Fig. 8b, 8c) shows the amplitude of the \(3\cdot f_{\mathrm{s}}\)-frequent component, which is approximately \({\hat{u}_{\mathrm{ax,3}}\approx 10\ \mathrm{V}}\). Side-bands close to \(2\cdot f_{\mathrm{sw}}\) exhibit rather small values (\({< U_{\mathrm{DC}}/8}\)), when compared to the classical 4-quadrant chopper operation [19]. The increase of the \(3\cdot f_{\mathrm{s}}\)-frequent current component \(\hat{i}_{\mathrm{ax,3}}\) with increasing modulation degree is shown in Fig. 9, proving a good fit between measurement and simulation.
This \(3\cdot f_{\mathrm{s}}\)-current component is not crucial for the axial position control since the time constant of the mechanical system is much bigger than the current oscillation period \(1/\left (3\cdot f_{\mathrm{s}}\right )\). This is shown by (3): For the given configuration the ripple in \(z\)-position is \({<1~\upmu \text{m}}\) even for \({\hat{i}_{\mathrm{ax,3}}=1\ \mathrm{A}}\) at \({n=25200\ \mathrm{min}^{-1}}\). Besides that also the eddy currents in the solid rotor part of the axial AMB help to damp such unwanted \(z\left (t\right )\)-oscillations.
$$\begin{aligned} \ddot{z}(t) &= \frac{F_{\mathrm{z}}(t)}{m_{\mathrm{R}}} = \frac{k_{\mathrm{F,z}} \cdot \hat{i}_{\mathrm{ax,3}}}{m_{\mathrm{R}}} \cdot \cos (3 \cdot \omega _{\mathrm{s}} \cdot t) \\ z(t) &= - \frac{k_{\mathrm{F,z}} \cdot \hat{i}_{\mathrm{ax,3}}}{m_{\mathrm{R}}} \cdot \frac{1}{(3 \cdot \omega _{\mathrm{s}})^{2}} \cdot \cos (3 \cdot \omega _{\mathrm{s}} \cdot t) \end{aligned}$$
(3)

4.2 Position control dynamics

The benchmark for the here presented novel axial position control performance is the classical and commercially available 4-quadrant chopper operation. In Fig. 10 a position step responses to a change in reference position of \({\varDelta z=20\ \mathrm{~\upmu \text{m}}}\) at different speed, i.e. at three different modulation degrees \({m_{\mathrm{a}}= 0,\ 0.84, 1.55}\) is shown for the 4-quadrant chopper and the zero-sequence axial current operation in comparison. No significant difference between 4-quadrant chopper operation and zero-sequence current feeding in the settling behavior of the position signal can be recognized. The zero-sequence current based position control dynamics do not depend on the inverter modulation degree \(m_{\mathrm{a}}\). Only a slight oscillation in \(z\) is visible in Fig. 10f for \({m_{\mathrm{a}}=1.55}\).
The Figures 11a, 11b show the axial current response and the torque generating \(q\)-current \(i_{\mathrm{q,D}}\) at the moment of the reference signal step \(z_{\mathrm{ref}}\). In contrast to the 4-quadrant chopper operation, the zero-sequence current feeding (Fig. 11b) shows a coupling between the drive current \(i_{\mathrm{q,D}}\) and the axial current \(i_{\mathrm{ax}}\) as an oscillation of \(i_{\mathrm{q,D}}\) at the moment of the step in \(i_{\mathrm{ax}}\). This is not a magnetic coupling. It only occurs at over-modulation. This is because the high value of \(u_{\mathrm{s,ref}}\) together with the superimposed half axial voltage demand \(u_{\mathrm{ax,ref}}/2\) increase the maximum value of one half-wave of voltage reference signal to values \(>U_{\mathrm{DC}}/2\). The maximum value of the other half-wave is smaller by \(u_{\mathrm{ax,ref}}/2\). This influences the harmonic content of the phase voltages and currents. Low-frequent (\({f<10\cdot f_{\mathrm{s}}}\)) current harmonics occur from voltage harmonics which are in phase opposition in the winding systems A and B, since the axial bearing voltage is given by the difference between the star point potentials in ZA and ZB. This “coupling” does only affect the drive current, but not the suspension current for the radial force because the latter is only influenced by voltage harmonics of A and B in “common mode operation”. Even at stationary operation, these additional ripples of \(i_{\mathrm{q,D}}\) are visible in Fig. 11b when compared to Fig. 11a.
Generally, the required axial current \(i_{\mathrm{ax}}\) takes very low values due to the big force-current coefficient \(k_{\mathrm{F,z}}\) together with the low axial thrust due to the turbo-charger rotor (Table 1). Even in transient situations, there is only a low axial voltage needed (\({u_{\mathrm{ax,ref}}< U_{\mathrm{DC}}/4}\)), which is depicted in Fig. 12. It also shows that the reference voltage ripple in \(u_{\mathrm{ax,ref}}\) as well as in \(u_{\mathrm{q,D,ref}}\) increases at over-modulation in order to compensate for the vanishing voltage reserve.

5 Conclusion

A novel technique for feeding the axial active magnetic bearing in a bearingless PM synchronous machine is presented, so that no 4-quadrant chopper is needed. Instead, the magnetic bearing coil is connected to the two star points of the double 3-phase stator winding in the machine. Simulations and measurements show that this technique is excellently applicable to magnetic bearing applications due to a small voltage demand in the axial active magnetic bearing. The position control dynamics are equal to those of the classical 4-quadrant chopper operation. They do not depend on the inverter modulation degree. At over-modulation an axial current ripple with three-times fundamental frequency occurs which is not harmful since this frequency is much higher than the inverse of the mechanical time constant of the rotor.

Acknowledgement

Funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – 437667923, BI 701/22-1 (Gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) – 437667923, BI 701/22-1). Supported by KEBA Industrial Automation Germany GmbH.
Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​deed.​de.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Asama, J., Fujii, Y., Oiwa, T., Chiba, A. (2015): Novel control method for magnetic suspension and motor drive with one three-phase voltage source inverter using zero-phase current. Mech. Eng. J., 2(4), 15–25. CrossRef Asama, J., Fujii, Y., Oiwa, T., Chiba, A. (2015): Novel control method for magnetic suspension and motor drive with one three-phase voltage source inverter using zero-phase current. Mech. Eng. J., 2(4), 15–25. CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Asama, J., Oi, T., Oiwa, T., Chiba, A. (2017): Investigation of integrated winding configuration for a two-DOF controlled bearingless PM motor using one three-phase inverter. In IEEE international electric machines and drives conference (IEMDC) (pp. 1–6). Miami, FL, USA: IEEE. Asama, J., Oi, T., Oiwa, T., Chiba, A. (2017): Investigation of integrated winding configuration for a two-DOF controlled bearingless PM motor using one three-phase inverter. In IEEE international electric machines and drives conference (IEMDC) (pp. 1–6). Miami, FL, USA: IEEE.
3.
go back to reference Asama, J., Oi, T., Oiwa, T., Chiba, A. (2018): Simple driving method for a 2-DOF controlled bearingless motor using one three-phase inverter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 54(5), 4365–4376. CrossRef Asama, J., Oi, T., Oiwa, T., Chiba, A. (2018): Simple driving method for a 2-DOF controlled bearingless motor using one three-phase inverter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 54(5), 4365–4376. CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bauer, W. (2018): The bearingless axial force-torque motor (Der lagerlose Axialkraft-Momentenmotor). Ph.D. Thesis, Johannes Kepler University (JKU) Linz, Institute for Electric Drives and Power Electronics, Linz. Bauer, W. (2018): The bearingless axial force-torque motor (Der lagerlose Axialkraft-Momentenmotor). Ph.D. Thesis, Johannes Kepler University (JKU) Linz, Institute for Electric Drives and Power Electronics, Linz.
5.
go back to reference Bauer, W., Amrhein, W. (2014): Electrical design considerations for a bearingless axial-force/torque motor. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 50(4), 2512–2522. CrossRef Bauer, W., Amrhein, W. (2014): Electrical design considerations for a bearingless axial-force/torque motor. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 50(4), 2512–2522. CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bergmann, G. (2013): Five-axis rotor magnetic suspension with bearingless PM motor levitation systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Darmstadt, Institute for Electrical Energy Conversion, Darmstadt. Bergmann, G. (2013): Five-axis rotor magnetic suspension with bearingless PM motor levitation systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Darmstadt, Institute for Electrical Energy Conversion, Darmstadt.
7.
go back to reference Bergmann, G., Binder, A., Dewenter, S. (2012): Five-axis magnetic suspension with two conical air gap bearingless PM synchronous half-motors. In International symposium on power electronics power electronics, electrical drives, automation and motion (SPEEDAM) (pp. 1246–1251). Sorrento, Italy: IEEE. Bergmann, G., Binder, A., Dewenter, S. (2012): Five-axis magnetic suspension with two conical air gap bearingless PM synchronous half-motors. In International symposium on power electronics power electronics, electrical drives, automation and motion (SPEEDAM) (pp. 1246–1251). Sorrento, Italy: IEEE.
8.
go back to reference Chen, J., Zhu, J., Severson, E. L. (2020): Review of bearingless motor technology for significant power applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 56(2), 1377–1388. CrossRef Chen, J., Zhu, J., Severson, E. L. (2020): Review of bearingless motor technology for significant power applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 56(2), 1377–1388. CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dietz, D., Binder, A. (2018): Bearingless PM synchronous machine with zero-sequence current driven star point-connected active magnetic thrust bearing. Trans. Syst. Technol., 4(3), 5–25. CrossRef Dietz, D., Binder, A. (2018): Bearingless PM synchronous machine with zero-sequence current driven star point-connected active magnetic thrust bearing. Trans. Syst. Technol., 4(3), 5–25. CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dietz, D., Binder, A. (2021): Eddy current influence on the control behavior of bearingless PM synchronous machines. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 57(6). To be published. Dietz, D., Binder, A. (2021): Eddy current influence on the control behavior of bearingless PM synchronous machines. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 57(6). To be published.
11.
go back to reference Dietz, D., Messager, G., Binder, A. (2018): 1 kW/ 60000 min−1 bearingless PM motor with combined winding for torque and rotor suspension. IET Electr. Power Appl., 12(8), 1090–1097. CrossRef Dietz, D., Messager, G., Binder, A. (2018): 1 kW/ 60000 min−1 bearingless PM motor with combined winding for torque and rotor suspension. IET Electr. Power Appl., 12(8), 1090–1097. CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fu, Y., Takemoto, M., Ogasawara, S., Orikawa, K. (2020): Investigation of operational characteristics and efficiency enhancement of an ultra-high-speed bearingless motor at 100,000 R/min. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 56(4), 3571–3583. Fu, Y., Takemoto, M., Ogasawara, S., Orikawa, K. (2020): Investigation of operational characteristics and efficiency enhancement of an ultra-high-speed bearingless motor at 100,000 R/min. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 56(4), 3571–3583.
13.
go back to reference Holmes, D. G., Lipo, T. A. (2003): Pulse width modulation for power converters: principles and practice. Hoboken: John Wiley. CrossRef Holmes, D. G., Lipo, T. A. (2003): Pulse width modulation for power converters: principles and practice. Hoboken: John Wiley. CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kascak, P., Jansen, R., Dever, T., Nagorny, A., Loparo, K. (2011): Levitation performance of two opposed permanent magnet pole-pair separated conical bearingless motors. In IEEE energy conversion congress and exposition (ECCE) (pp. 1649–1656). Phoenix, AZ, USA: IEEE. Kascak, P., Jansen, R., Dever, T., Nagorny, A., Loparo, K. (2011): Levitation performance of two opposed permanent magnet pole-pair separated conical bearingless motors. In IEEE energy conversion congress and exposition (ECCE) (pp. 1649–1656). Phoenix, AZ, USA: IEEE.
16.
go back to reference Liu, Z., Chiba, A., Irino, Y., Nakazawa, Y. (2020): Optimum pole number combination of a buried permanent magnet bearingless motor and test results at an output of 60 kW with a speed of 37000 r/min. IEEE Open J. Ind. Appl., 1, 33–41. CrossRef Liu, Z., Chiba, A., Irino, Y., Nakazawa, Y. (2020): Optimum pole number combination of a buried permanent magnet bearingless motor and test results at an output of 60 kW with a speed of 37000 r/min. IEEE Open J. Ind. Appl., 1, 33–41. CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Messager, G., Binder, A. (2014): Analytical comparison of conventional and modified winding for high speed bearingless permanent magnet synchronous motor applications. In International conference on optimization of electrical and electronic equipment (OPTIM) (pp. 330–337). Bran, Romania: IEEE. CrossRef Messager, G., Binder, A. (2014): Analytical comparison of conventional and modified winding for high speed bearingless permanent magnet synchronous motor applications. In International conference on optimization of electrical and electronic equipment (OPTIM) (pp. 330–337). Bran, Romania: IEEE. CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Messager, G., Binder, A. (2017): Six-axis rotor magnetic suspension principle for permanent magnet synchronous motor with control of the positive, negative and zero-sequence current components. Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. J., 32(8), 657–662. Messager, G., Binder, A. (2017): Six-axis rotor magnetic suspension principle for permanent magnet synchronous motor with control of the positive, negative and zero-sequence current components. Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. J., 32(8), 657–662.
19.
go back to reference Mohan, N., Undeland, T. M., Robbins, W. P. (1995): Power electronics: converters, applications, and design. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley. Mohan, N., Undeland, T. M., Robbins, W. P. (1995): Power electronics: converters, applications, and design. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
20.
go back to reference Reisinger, M., Grabner, H., Silber, S., Amrhein, W., Redemann, C., Jenckel, P. (2010): A novel design of a five axes active magnetic bearing system. In International symposium on magnetic bearings (ISMB), Wuhan, China (pp. 561–566). Reisinger, M., Grabner, H., Silber, S., Amrhein, W., Redemann, C., Jenckel, P. (2010): A novel design of a five axes active magnetic bearing system. In International symposium on magnetic bearings (ISMB), Wuhan, China (pp. 561–566).
21.
go back to reference Schleicher, A., Werner, R. (2018): Theoretical and experimental analysis of controllability of a novel bearingless rotary-linear reluctance motor with optimal chessboard toothing. In IEEE international conference on industrial technology (ICIT) (pp. 540–545). Lyon: IEEE. CrossRef Schleicher, A., Werner, R. (2018): Theoretical and experimental analysis of controllability of a novel bearingless rotary-linear reluctance motor with optimal chessboard toothing. In IEEE international conference on industrial technology (ICIT) (pp. 540–545). Lyon: IEEE. CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schneider, T., Binder, A. (2007): Design and evaluation of a 60 000 rpm permanent magnet bearingless high speed motor. In International conference on power electronics and drive systems (PEDS) (pp. 1–8). Bangkok, Thailand: IEEE. Schneider, T., Binder, A. (2007): Design and evaluation of a 60 000 rpm permanent magnet bearingless high speed motor. In International conference on power electronics and drive systems (PEDS) (pp. 1–8). Bangkok, Thailand: IEEE.
23.
go back to reference Schweitzer, G., Maslen, E. H. (Eds.) (2009): Magnetic bearings: theory, design, and application to rotating machinery. Berlin, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York: Springer. Schweitzer, G., Maslen, E. H. (Eds.) (2009): Magnetic bearings: theory, design, and application to rotating machinery. Berlin, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Metadata
Title
Bearingless PM-synchronous machine with axial active magnetic bearing fed by zero-sequence current
Authors
Daniel Dietz
Andreas Binder
Publication date
25-02-2021
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
e+i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0932-383X
Electronic ISSN: 1613-7620
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00502-021-00867-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik 2/2021 Go to the issue