Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Beating the (White) House: How a “Rogue” Iran Broke Free from the “Axis of Evil” and Became an Antifragile State

Author : Bruno Reynaud de Sousa

Published in: The Geopolitics of Iran

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

For the past decade, the globalized world has been struggling to adapt to an abnormal degree of uncertainty. Amidst a global pandemic, contemporary international relations are increasingly resembling trying to play roulette at a casino in the middle of an earthquake—all bets are off. For many years, different authors have consistently predicted the collapse of the post-revolutionary Iranian regime—and have consistently failed. One could say that the demise of the Iranian regime has become the most unexpected event that can be expected in the Middle East. By applying the concept of antifragility first developed by Nassim Taleb, the present chapter proposes that this event, although repeatedly forecast, has not occurred because Iran has become an antifragile State: a country with the ability to positively leverage a complex set of circumstances amidst excruciating uncertainty. Recalling that Iran was designated a State sponsoring international terrorism, later described as a “rogue State” bent on developing nuclear weapons and part of an “axis of evil”, the present chapter discusses how the regime devised a whole-of-society strategy leveraging the Iranian armed forces whereby three elements—ideology, ingenuity and asymmetry—are deployed in a variable geometry. Firstly, the issue will be framed in the context of recent events, followed by an assessment of U.S. foreign policy and the “rogue State” discourse. Secondly, the chapter elaborates further on the idea of a whole-of-society strategy focusing on the three elements of Iran’s antifragility toolbox with special consideration given to the role played by Iranian armed forces. Finally, a set of conclusions is proposed in view of the most recent geopolitical developments.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
JCPOA (2015) and European Union (2015).
 
2
See International Atomic Energy Agency (2016a, b, c, d, e, f, a, b, c, d, 2018), International Atomic Energy Agency (2016), and Agency (2016).
 
3
Nonetheless, there are references to “fragile” States—see, op. cit., pp. 1, 4, 10, 11.
 
4
See, pp. 8, 25, 26, 45, 48.
 
5
See, pp. 25.
 
6
See, pp. 13.
 
7
See France (2013), Italy (2015), United Kingdom (2015), Germany (2016), Spain (2017), France (2017), and Poland (2017).
 
8
The settled criteria for statehood under current International Law are a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and the capacity to enter into relations with other States—see, Article 1 of the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1934) 165 LNTS 19, 28 AJIL Supp. 75.
 
9
On “pariah” States see Courmont (2007).
 
10
“North Korea is a regime arming with missiles and weapons of mass destruction, while starving its citizens (…) Iran aggressively pursues these weapons and exports terror, while an unelected few repress the Iranian people’s hope for freedom (…) Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility toward America and to support terror (…) States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger” (United States of America, 2002b).
 
11
“While the United States will constantly strive to enlist the support of the international community, we will not hesitate to act alone, if necessary, to exercise our right of self-defence by acting pre-emptively […] We must adapt the concept of imminent threat to the capabilities and objectives of today’s adversaries (…) even if uncertainty remains as to the time and place of the enemy’s attack” (United States of America, 2002a, pp. 6, 15).
 
12
Percentages close to 20% qualify as high-assay low-enriched uranium, useful for certain special power reactors. For comparison, weapons-grade uranium has a content of at least 90% Uranium-235. See Hippel et al. (2019).
 
Literature
go back to reference Abedin, M. (2019). Iran Resurgent: The Rise and Rise of the Shia State. London: Hurst & Co. Abedin, M. (2019). Iran Resurgent: The Rise and Rise of the Shia State. London: Hurst & Co.
go back to reference Agency, I. A. E. (2016). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015). Agency, I. A. E. (2016). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
go back to reference Akbarzadeh, S., & Conduit, D. (2016). Iran in the World: President Rouhani’s Foreign Policy. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Akbarzadeh, S., & Conduit, D. (2016). Iran in the World: President Rouhani’s Foreign Policy. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Alfoneh, A. (2019). Iran Unveiled: How the Revolutionary Guards Is Turning Theocracy into Military Dictatorship. Washington, DC: The AEI Press. Alfoneh, A. (2019). Iran Unveiled: How the Revolutionary Guards Is Turning Theocracy into Military Dictatorship. Washington, DC: The AEI Press.
go back to reference Azizi, A. (2020). The Shadow Commander: Soleimani, the US, and Iran’s Global Ambitions. London: Oneworld Publications. Azizi, A. (2020). The Shadow Commander: Soleimani, the US, and Iran’s Global Ambitions. London: Oneworld Publications.
go back to reference Bajoghli, N. (2019). Iran Reframed: Anxieties of Power in the Islamic Republic. Santford: Stanford University Press.CrossRef Bajoghli, N. (2019). Iran Reframed: Anxieties of Power in the Islamic Republic. Santford: Stanford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Bederman, D. J. (2002). Collective Security, Demilitarization and “Pariah” States. European Journal of International Law, 13(1), 121–138.CrossRef Bederman, D. J. (2002). Collective Security, Demilitarization and “Pariah” States. European Journal of International Law, 13(1), 121–138.CrossRef
go back to reference Benvenisti, E. (2004). The US and the Use of Force: Double-Edged Hegemony and the Management of Global Emergencies. European Journal of International Law, 15(4), 677–700.CrossRef Benvenisti, E. (2004). The US and the Use of Force: Double-Edged Hegemony and the Management of Global Emergencies. European Journal of International Law, 15(4), 677–700.CrossRef
go back to reference Bruijn, S. d. (2019). Kish Delights. Combat Aircraft, 20(2), 24–27. Bruijn, S. d. (2019). Kish Delights. Combat Aircraft, 20(2), 24–27.
go back to reference Brzezinski, Z., Ignatius, D., & Scowcroft, B. (2008). America and the World: Conversations on the Future of American Foreign Policy. New York: Basic Books. Brzezinski, Z., Ignatius, D., & Scowcroft, B. (2008). America and the World: Conversations on the Future of American Foreign Policy. New York: Basic Books.
go back to reference Buchanan, B. (2020). The Hacker and the State: Cyber Attacks and the New Normal of Geopolitics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Buchanan, B. (2020). The Hacker and the State: Cyber Attacks and the New Normal of Geopolitics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Courmont, B. (2007). Washington Et Les États Voyous: Une Stratégie Plurielle? Paris: Dalloz-Sirey. Courmont, B. (2007). Washington Et Les États Voyous: Une Stratégie Plurielle? Paris: Dalloz-Sirey.
go back to reference European Union. (2015). Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1336 of 31 July 2015 Amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP Concerning Restrictive Measures Against Iran. European Union. (2015). Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1336 of 31 July 2015 Amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP Concerning Restrictive Measures Against Iran.
go back to reference European Union. (2016). Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe—A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. European Union. (2016). Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe—A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy.
go back to reference European Union. (2020). State of Play of EU-Iran Relations and the Future of the JCPOA. European Union. (2020). State of Play of EU-Iran Relations and the Future of the JCPOA.
go back to reference France. (2013). Livre Blanc: Défense et Securité Nationale. France. (2013). Livre Blanc: Défense et Securité Nationale.
go back to reference France. (2017). Revue Stratégique de Défense et de Sécurité Nationale. France. (2017). Revue Stratégique de Défense et de Sécurité Nationale.
go back to reference Franck, T. M. (2003). What Happens Now? The United Nations After Iraq—Agora: Future Implications of the Iraq Conflict. American Journal of International Law, 97, 607 e ss. Franck, T. M. (2003). What Happens Now? The United Nations After Iraq—Agora: Future Implications of the Iraq Conflict. American Journal of International Law, 97, 607 e ss.
go back to reference Germany. (2016). White Paper on German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr. Germany. (2016). White Paper on German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr.
go back to reference Ghazvinian, J. H. (2020). America and Iran: A History 1720 to the Present. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Ghazvinian, J. H. (2020). America and Iran: A History 1720 to the Present. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
go back to reference Golkar, S. (2015). Captive Society: The Basij Militia and Social Control in Iran. Washington, DC and New York: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Columbia University Press.CrossRef Golkar, S. (2015). Captive Society: The Basij Militia and Social Control in Iran. Washington, DC and New York: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Columbia University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Grunert, J. J. (2020). Grounding the Huma: The Legality of Space Denial and (Potential) American Interference in the Iranina Space Program. The Air Force Law Review, 81, 75–132. Grunert, J. J. (2020). Grounding the Huma: The Legality of Space Denial and (Potential) American Interference in the Iranina Space Program. The Air Force Law Review, 81, 75–132.
go back to reference Hippel, F. v., Takubo, M., & Kang, J. (2019). Plutonium: How Nuclear Power’s Dream Fuel Became a Nightmare. Hippel, F. v., Takubo, M., & Kang, J. (2019). Plutonium: How Nuclear Power’s Dream Fuel Became a Nightmare.
go back to reference Hourcade, B. (2016). Géopolitique de l’Iran: Les défis d’une renaissance (2 ed.). Paris: Armand Colin. Hourcade, B. (2016). Géopolitique de l’Iran: Les défis d’une renaissance (2 ed.). Paris: Armand Colin.
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. (2016a, January 16). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015). International Atomic Energy Agency. (2016a, January 16). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. (2016b, February 26). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015). International Atomic Energy Agency. (2016b, February 26). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. (2016c, May 27). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015) 2016. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2016c, May 27). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015) 2016.
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. (2016d, September 8). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015). International Atomic Energy Agency. (2016d, September 8). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. (2016e, November 9). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015). International Atomic Energy Agency. (2016e, November 9). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. (2016f, December 6). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015). International Atomic Energy Agency. (2016f, December 6). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. (2017a, February 24). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015). International Atomic Energy Agency. (2017a, February 24). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. (2017b, June 2). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015). International Atomic Energy Agency. (2017b, June 2). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. (2017c, August 31). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015). International Atomic Energy Agency. (2017c, August 31). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. (2017d, November 13). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015). International Atomic Energy Agency. (2017d, November 13). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. (2018, February 22). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015). International Atomic Energy Agency. (2018, February 22). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. (2019a, July 1). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015). International Atomic Energy Agency. (2019a, July 1). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency. (2019a, July 8). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015). International Atomic Energy Agency. (2019a, July 8). IAEA Board Report: Verification and Monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in Light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231 (2015).
go back to reference Iraq Study Group, Baker, J. A., Hamilton, L., & Eagleburger, L. S. (2006). The Iraq Study Group Report: The Way Forward—A New Approach. New York: Vintage Books. Iraq Study Group, Baker, J. A., Hamilton, L., & Eagleburger, L. S. (2006). The Iraq Study Group Report: The Way Forward—A New Approach. New York: Vintage Books.
go back to reference Italy. (2015). White Paper for International Security and Defence. Press Office of the Cabinet of the Minister. Italy. (2015). White Paper for International Security and Defence. Press Office of the Cabinet of the Minister.
go back to reference Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, signed in Vienna on 14 July 2015. (2015). Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, signed in Vienna on 14 July 2015. (2015).
go back to reference Jenkins, W. B. (2016). Bonyads as Agents and Vehicles of the Islamic Republic’s Soft Power. In S. Akbarzadeh & D. Conduit (Eds.), Iran in the World: President Rouhani’s Foreign Policy (pp. 155–175). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Jenkins, W. B. (2016). Bonyads as Agents and Vehicles of the Islamic Republic’s Soft Power. In S. Akbarzadeh & D. Conduit (Eds.), Iran in the World: President Rouhani’s Foreign Policy (pp. 155–175). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Karsh, E. (2002). The Iran-Iraq War, 1980–1988. Oxford: Osprey Pub. Karsh, E. (2002). The Iran-Iraq War, 1980–1988. Oxford: Osprey Pub.
go back to reference Lake, A. (1994). Confronting Backlash States. Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 45–55.CrossRef Lake, A. (1994). Confronting Backlash States. Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 45–55.CrossRef
go back to reference Le Monde. (2017). 2017: Iran un noveau visage. Paris: Le Monde. Le Monde. (2017). 2017: Iran un noveau visage. Paris: Le Monde.
go back to reference Litwak, R. (2000). Rogue States and U.S. Foreign Policy: Containment After the Cold War. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press. Litwak, R. (2000). Rogue States and U.S. Foreign Policy: Containment After the Cold War. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
go back to reference Malouf, A. (2019). Le naufrage des civilisations. Paris: Grasset Malouf, A. (2019). Le naufrage des civilisations. Paris: Grasset
go back to reference NATO. (2020). NATO 2030: United for a New Era—Analysis and Recommendations of the Reflection Group Appointed by the NATO Scretary General. NATO. (2020). NATO 2030: United for a New Era—Analysis and Recommendations of the Reflection Group Appointed by the NATO Scretary General.
go back to reference Nephew, R. (2018). The Art of Sanctions: A View from the Field. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Nephew, R. (2018). The Art of Sanctions: A View from the Field. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
go back to reference Ostovar, A. (2016). Vanguard of the Imam: Religion, Politics, and Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Ostovar, A. (2016). Vanguard of the Imam: Religion, Politics, and Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Poland. (2017). Defence Concept of the Republic of Poland. Poland. (2017). Defence Concept of the Republic of Poland.
go back to reference Razoux, P., & Elliott, N. (2015). The Iran-Iraq war. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRef Razoux, P., & Elliott, N. (2015). The Iran-Iraq war. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Reisman, M. W. (2003). Assessing Claims to Revise the Laws of War. American Journal of International Law, 97, 82–90.CrossRef Reisman, M. W. (2003). Assessing Claims to Revise the Laws of War. American Journal of International Law, 97, 82–90.CrossRef
go back to reference Seliktar, O., & Rezaei, F. (2020). Iran, Revolution, and Proxy Wars. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Seliktar, O., & Rezaei, F. (2020). Iran, Revolution, and Proxy Wars. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Simpson, G. (2004). Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Simpson, G. (2004). Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Spain. (2017). Estrategia de Seguriad Nacional. Spain. (2017). Estrategia de Seguriad Nacional.
go back to reference Stenner, K. (2005). The Authoritarian Dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Stenner, K. (2005). The Authoritarian Dynamic. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Takeyh, R. (2021). The Last Shah: America, Iran, and the Fall of the Pahlavi Dynasty. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRef Takeyh, R. (2021). The Last Shah: America, Iran, and the Fall of the Pahlavi Dynasty. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder (1st ed.). New York: Random House. Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder (1st ed.). New York: Random House.
go back to reference The International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2010). The Military Balance 2010. Routledge. The International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2010). The Military Balance 2010. Routledge.
go back to reference The International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2012). The Military Balance 2012. Routledge. The International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2012). The Military Balance 2012. Routledge.
go back to reference The International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2014). The Military Balance 2014. Routledge. The International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2014). The Military Balance 2014. Routledge.
go back to reference The International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2017). The Military Balance 2017. Routledge. The International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2017). The Military Balance 2017. Routledge.
go back to reference The International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2018). The Military Balance 2018. Routledge. The International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2018). The Military Balance 2018. Routledge.
go back to reference The International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2019). The Military Balance 2019. Routledge. The International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2019). The Military Balance 2019. Routledge.
go back to reference The International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2020). The Military Balance 2020. Routledge. The International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2020). The Military Balance 2020. Routledge.
go back to reference United Kingdom. (2015). National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review: A Secure and Prosperous United Kingdom. United Kingdom. (2015). National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review: A Secure and Prosperous United Kingdom.
go back to reference United States of America. (2002a). The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2002). Washington: The White House. United States of America. (2002a). The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2002). Washington: The White House.
go back to reference United States of America. (2002b). State of the Union Address of 29 January 2002. Washington: The White House. United States of America. (2002b). State of the Union Address of 29 January 2002. Washington: The White House.
go back to reference United States of America. (2006). The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2006). Washington: The White House. United States of America. (2006). The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2006). Washington: The White House.
go back to reference United States of America, House of Representatives, House Resolution 1585 (2007). United States of America, House of Representatives, House Resolution 1585 (2007).
go back to reference United States of America. (2015). The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2015). Washington: The White House. United States of America. (2015). The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2015). Washington: The White House.
go back to reference United States of America. (2017). The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2017). Washington: The White House. United States of America. (2017). The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2017). Washington: The White House.
go back to reference United States of America. (2018b). The United States Nuclear Posture Review (2018). Washington: US Department of Defense. United States of America. (2018b). The United States Nuclear Posture Review (2018). Washington: US Department of Defense.
go back to reference Wedgwood, R. (2000). Unilateral Action in the UN System. European Journal of International Law, 11(2), 349–359.CrossRef Wedgwood, R. (2000). Unilateral Action in the UN System. European Journal of International Law, 11(2), 349–359.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Beating the (White) House: How a “Rogue” Iran Broke Free from the “Axis of Evil” and Became an Antifragile State
Author
Bruno Reynaud de Sousa
Copyright Year
2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3564-9_5