Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Energy Efficiency 4/2016

01-08-2016 | Original Article

Behavioral energy feedback program evaluations: a survey of current knowledge and a call to action

Authors: Anne Dougherty, Sara Conzemius Van de Grift

Published in: Energy Efficiency | Issue 4/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Behavioral-based energy efficiency programs are those that utilize strategies intended to influence consumer energy use behaviors to achieve energy and/or peak demand savings. These programs typically include outreach, education, competition, rewards, benchmarking, and/or feedback elements (Todd et al 2012). In North America, over 110 investor-owned utilities included behavior programs in 2012 as part of their energy efficiency portfolios, allocating 0.3 to 10 % of their efficiency portfolio spending to these programs. Emerging plans in Massachusetts allocated as much as 50 % of first year kilowatt hour goals to behavior programs in 2014. Despite the overwhelming growth in spending on these programs, there are many unanswered and important policy questions that must be addressed. This paper argues that the energy industry needs to go further than just assessing energy impacts to address existing gaps in knowledge and find ways to most effectively incorporate these programs into efficiency portfolios. First, the paper presents an overview of behavioral feedback program lessons learned from third party evaluations across North America. Next, a brief analysis of gaps in industry knowledge of how behavioral programs generate savings is provided. In the last section, policy- and planning-focused research questions that need to be answered as behavioral feedback programs mature are discussed. To date, there has been an overwhelming focus on impact evaluations, and there are many key questions that need to be addressed. Future evaluations must focus on both impact and policy questions by addressing existing gaps in knowledge about how behavioral programs generate energy savings and exploring the most effective ways to integrate these programs into program portfolios.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Note, we do not discuss the details of the evaluation approaches used to estimate savings in this paper. Instead, we direct the reader to a recently published review of behavioral programs by the author, entitled: Energy Efficiency Behavioral Programs: Literature Review, Benchmarking Analysis, and Evaluation Guideline (Illume Advising et al. 2015).
 
2
It is important to note here that the savings estimates used to obtain these overall numbers were not derived using a consistent or universal method. Rather, this number represents the sum of individual program impact evaluations that include experimental and quasi-experimental impact evaluation methodologies.
 
3
The CSE is a simple metric to compare programs based on the overall cost of the program and its achieved or planned savings. CSE is expressed as the dollars spent to acquire a kilowatt hour or therm.
 
Literature
go back to reference Billingsley, M. A., Hoffman, I. M., Stuart, E., Schiller, S. R., Goldman, C. A., & LaCommare, K. H. (2014). The program administrator cost of saved energy for utility customer-funded energy efficiency programs. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.CrossRef Billingsley, M. A., Hoffman, I. M., Stuart, E., Schiller, S. R., Goldman, C. A., & LaCommare, K. H. (2014). The program administrator cost of saved energy for utility customer-funded energy efficiency programs. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.CrossRef
go back to reference Mazur-Stommen, S., & K. Farley. (2013). ACEEE field guide to utility-run behavior programs. Report B132. Washington, DC. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. Mazur-Stommen, S., & K. Farley. (2013). ACEEE field guide to utility-run behavior programs. Report B132. Washington, DC. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
go back to reference Minnesota Department of Commerce, (2012). Docket No. E,G999/CI-08-133, on February 1, 2012, the division of energy resources staff (Staff) filed analysis, recommendations, and proposed decision (Proposed Decision) regarding the inclusion of behavioral project savings in energy conservation improvement programs (CIP) and Shared Savings Demand-Side Management (DSM) Financial Incentive calculations in order to better balance the allocation of utility program resources between asset-based and CIP programs. Minnesota Department of Commerce, (2012). Docket No. E,G999/CI-08-133, on February 1, 2012, the division of energy resources staff (Staff) filed analysis, recommendations, and proposed decision (Proposed Decision) regarding the inclusion of behavioral project savings in energy conservation improvement programs (CIP) and Shared Savings Demand-Side Management (DSM) Financial Incentive calculations in order to better balance the allocation of utility program resources between asset-based and CIP programs.
go back to reference Todd, A., Stuart, E., Schiller, S., & Goldman, C. (2012). State and local energy efficiency action network. 2012. Evaluation, measurement, and verification (EM&V) of residential behavior-based energy efficiency programs: issues and recommendations. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Todd, A., Stuart, E., Schiller, S., & Goldman, C. (2012). State and local energy efficiency action network. 2012. Evaluation, measurement, and verification (EM&V) of residential behavior-based energy efficiency programs: issues and recommendations. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Metadata
Title
Behavioral energy feedback program evaluations: a survey of current knowledge and a call to action
Authors
Anne Dougherty
Sara Conzemius Van de Grift
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Energy Efficiency / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1570-646X
Electronic ISSN: 1570-6478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-016-9445-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Energy Efficiency 4/2016 Go to the issue