Top

Social Indicators Research

Published in:

05-11-2016

“Beyond GDP” Effects on National Subjective Well-Being of OECD Countries

Authors: Barbara Cavalletti, Matteo Corsi

Published in: Social Indicators Research | Issue 3/2018

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Some authors claim that maximizing subjective well-being is a more meaningful social objective than maximizing GDP and that other factors beyond income play a major role in defining well-being. In this work, we study two issues connected with this claim, looking at the context of OECD member countries. We look at the crowded category of proposed, “beyond GDP” policy-controlled factors, searching for evidence that some might be major determinants of national average subjective well-being. We also seek to compare any such effect with that of GDP, in order to evaluate if these factors have a better chance of leading to a maximization of well-being than GDP itself. In our analyses, we make use of partial order methods that have been rarely applied to this field of study. They seem particularly appropriate to the case, as well-being and its components are generally theorized as strongly multidimensional while standard modeling strategies require a great deal of compromise when working with many potential regressors and non-trivial levels of multicollinearity.

previous article What Matters Most to People? Evidence from the OECD Better Life Index Users’ Responses

next article Measuring Well-Being Over Time: The Adjusted Mazziotta–Pareto Index Versus Other Non-compensatory Indices

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

See Stevenson and Wolfers (2008), the subsequent comments by Becker et al. (2008) and, with different arguments, Oswald (2008).

“Unlike economic indicators, which locate a person’s well-being primarily in the material realm of marketplace production and consumption, well- being indicators assess the full range of inputs to the quality of life, from social relationships to spirituality and meaning, from material consumption to feelings of relaxation and security” (Diener and Tov 2012, p. 3).

Attempts of putting subjective well-being at the center of policy decision making have well documented foundations in Bentham’s quantitative hedonism (Kahneman and Riis 2005). For a distinction between hedonic and eudaimonic research on well-being see, for instance, Deci and Ryan (2008).

See for example Beckerman (1994) and Daly (1995) on manmade and natural capital.

For the source of data and the metric of SWB used here, see Sect. 2.1.

In other words, it has already been used as a major component of the “quantitative evidence on the social situation” (OECD 2014, p. 78) used by very relevant institutions.

http://www.oecd.org/social/statistics.htm. See the publication for definitions and methodology.

http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/data/oecd-environment-statistics_env-data-en.

http://www.oecd.org/gender/data/.

See Edwards et al. (2000) for a definition of formative and generative models in the development of constructs (indicators).

A detailed formalization of the mathematical background and the algorithm of POSAC can be found in Shye and Amar (1985) and Shye (1985) and the algorithm it is currently supported in the statistical package Systat.

At this stage, indicators can be ranked so that the direction of their relation with the underlying construct is uniform.

Clearly, by determining the coordinates (x, y) of each profile, POSAC attributes that profile a score on the J axis and a score on the L axis.

In a Hasse diagram, the four incomparable profiles can be put side to side in any configuration and the method itself does not provide the information required to distinguish between the incomparability of \(a^{\left( k \right)}\) and \(a^{\left( r \right)}\) and that of \(a^{\left( k \right)}\) and \(a^{\left( l \right)}\).

For an extensive list with detailed comparison see Brüggemann and Patil (2011) and Brüggemann et al. (2005).

See Figure 1 of supplementary material.

See Figure 3 of supplementary material.

See Figure 4 of supplementary material.

See Figure 2 of supplementary material.

The reader should keep in mind that the social cohesion indicators provided by OECD originate from surveys and report a subjective feeling of the respondent, so it could be appropriate to define this as “perception of social cohesion”.

See Figure 6 of supplementary material.

See Figure 5 of supplementary material.

See Figure 9 of supplementary material.

See Figure 7 of supplementary material.

See Table 1 of supplementary material.

See Figure 10 of supplementary material.

See Figure 8 of supplementary material.

See Figures 11 and 13 of supplementary material.

See Figure 14 of supplementary material.

See Figure 12 of supplementary material.

See Greene (2011, p. 160); BIC is a criterion for model selection that balances the likelihood of the model with the number of parameters in it. A model with a lower BIC should be preferred over a similar model with a higher BIC as the introduction of additional parameters in the second model did not provide sufficient improvements in likelihood.

As defined in the data section of this work.

Becchetti, L., Pelloni, A., & Rossetti, F. (2008). Relational goods, sociability, and happiness. Kyklos, 61(3), 343–363.CrossRef

Becchetti, L., Trovato, G., & Londono Bedoya, D. A. (2011). Income, relational goods and happiness. Applied Economics, 43(3), 273–290.CrossRef

Becker, G., Rayo, L., & Krueger, A. B. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Comments and discussion. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring, 88–102.

Beckerman, W. (1994). “Sustainable Development”: Is it a useful concept? Environmental Values, 3(3), 191–209.CrossRef

Bond, T. N., & Lang, K. (2014). The sad truth about happiness scales. NBER working papers 19950.

Brant, R. (1990). Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics, 46(4), 1171–1178.CrossRef

Brüggemann, R., & Annoni, P. (2014). Average heights in partially ordered sets. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry, 71, 117–142.

Brüggemann, R., & Carlsen, L. (2011). An improved estimation of averaged ranks of partial orders. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry, 65, 383–414.

Brüggemann, R., & Patil, G. (2011). Ranking and prioritization for multi-indicator systems. New York: Springer.CrossRef

Brüggemann, R., Simon, U., & Mey, S. (2005). Estimation of averaged ranks by a local partial order model. MATCH Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry, 54, 498–518.

Brüggemann, R., Sørensen, P. B., Lerche, D., & Carlsen, L. (2004). Estimation of averaged ranks by a local partial order model. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 44(2), 618–625.CrossRef

Bruni, L., & Stanca, L. (2008). Watching alone: Relational goods, television and happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65(3–4), 506–528.CrossRef

Costanza, R., Hart, M., Talberth, J., & Posner, S. (2009). Beyond GDP: The need for new measures of progress beyond GDP: The need for new measures of progress. The Pardee Papers, 4, 1–47.

Costanza, R., Kubiszewski, I., Giovannini, E., Lovins, H., McGlade, J., Pickett, K., et al. (2014). Time to leave GDP behind. Nature, 505, 283–285.CrossRef

Daly, H. E. (1995). On Wilfred Beckerman’s critique of sustainable development. Environmental Values, 4(1), 49–55.CrossRef

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1–11.CrossRef

Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.CrossRef

Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527.CrossRef

Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. 185–218). Cambridge, Massachussets: The MIT Press.

Diener, E., & Tov, W. (2012). National Accounts of Well-being. In K. C. Land, M. Sirgy, & A. C. Michalos (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 137–157). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef

Easterlin, R. (2015). Happiness and economic growth: The evidence. Netherlands: Springer.

Edwards, J. R., Bagozzi, R. P., Blackburn, R. S., Bollen, K. A., Cattani, D., Dean, J. W., Jr., et al. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5(2), 155–174.CrossRef

Fattore, M. (2016). Partially ordered sets and the measurement of multidimensional ordinal deprivation. Social Indicators Research, 128(2), 835–858.CrossRef

Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimate of the determinants of hapiness? The Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659.CrossRef

Fleurbaey, M. (2009). Beyond GDP: The quest for a measure of social welfare. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4), 1029–1075.

Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2005). Happiness research: State and prospects. Review of Social Economy, 62(190), 207–228.CrossRef

Gallup. (2010). Global wellbeing. The behavioral economics of GDP Growth. Washington DC: Gallup Inc.

Greene, W. H. (2011). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Gui, B., & Stanca, L. (2010). Happiness and relational goods: Well-being and interpersonal relations in the economic sphere. International Review of Economics, 57(2), 105–118.CrossRef

Guttman, L. (1950). The basis for scalogram analysis. In S. A. Stouffer, L. Guttman, E. A. Suchman, P. F. Lazarsfeld, S. A. Star, & J. A. Clausen (Eds.), Measurement and prediction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 903–918.CrossRef

Jorm, A. F., & Ryan, S. M. (2014). Cross-national and historical differences in subjective well-being. International Journal of Epidemiology, 43(2), 330–340.CrossRef

Jurado, A., & Perez-Mayo, J. (2012). Construction and evolution of a multidimensional well-being index for the Spanish Regions. Social Indicators Research, 107(2), 259–279.CrossRef

Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review, 94, 429–434.CrossRef

Kahneman, D., & Riis, J. (2005). Living, and thinking about it: Two perspectives on life. In F. Huppert, N. Baylis, & B. Kaverne (Eds.), The science of well-being: Integrating neurobiology, psychology and social science (pp. 285–304). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Krueger, A. B., & Schkade, D. A. (2008). The reliability of subjective well-being measures. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1833–1845.CrossRef

Kubiszewski, I., Costanza, R., Franco, C., Lawn, P., Talberth, J., Jackson, T., et al. (2013). Beyond GDP: Measuring and achieving global genuine progress. Ecological Economics, 93, 57–68.CrossRef

Kuznets, S. (1934). National income, 1929-32. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Lerche, D., Sørensen, P. B., & Brüggemann, R. (2003). Improved estimation of the ranking probabilities in partial orders using random linear extensions by approximation of the mutual ranking probability. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 43(5), 1471–1480.CrossRef

McCullagh, P. (1988). Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 42, 109–142.

Miranda, V. (2011). Cooking, caring and volunteering: Unpaid work around the world. OECD social, employment, and migration working papers (116), 0–1, 3–4, 6–39.

Nordhaus, W. D., & Tobin, J. (Eds.). (1972). Is growth obsolete? In Economic Research: Retrospect and Prospect Vol 5: Economic Growth. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

O’Connell, A. (2006). Logistic regression models for ordinal response variables. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications.CrossRef

OECD (2013). Guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD (2014). Society at a Glance 2014: OECD social indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/data/oecd-environment-statistics_env-data-en. Accessed June 2015.

OECD. http://www.oecd.org/gender/data/. Accessed June 2015.

Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2014). Can and should happiness be a policy goal? Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 195–203.CrossRef

Oswald, A. J. (2008). On the curvature of the reporting function from objective reality to subjective feelings. Economics Letters, 100(3), 369–372.CrossRef

Raveh, A., & Landau, S. (1993). Partial order scalogram analysis with base coordinates (POSAC): Its application to crime patterns in all the states in the United States. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9(1), 83–99.

Shye, S. (1985). Multiple scaling. The theory and application of partial order scalogram analysis. Jerusalem: Israel Inst of Applied Social Research.

Shye, S., & Amar, R. (1985). Partial order scalogram analysis by base coordinates and lattice mapping of items by their scalogram roles. In D. Canter (Ed.), Facet theory: Approaches to social research (pp. 277–298). Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRef

Stanca, L. (2009). With or without you? Measuring the quality of relational life throughout the world. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(5), 834–842.CrossRef

Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2008, 1–87.CrossRef

Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2013). Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation? American Economic Review, 103(May 2013), 598–604.CrossRef

Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2010). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress.

Welsch, H. (2007). Environmental welfare analysis: A life satisfaction approach. Ecological Economics, 62, 544–551.CrossRef

Welsch, H. (2009). Implications of happiness research for environmental economics. Ecological Economics, 68(11), 2735–2742.CrossRef

Wolfe, R., & Gould, W. (1998). An approximate likelihood-ratio test for ordinal response models. Stata Technical Bulletin, 42, 24–27.

Title: “Beyond GDP” Effects on National Subjective Well-Being of OECD Countries
Authors: Barbara Cavalletti
Matteo Corsi
Publication date: 05-11-2016
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Social Indicators Research / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1477-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

A Measure of Well-Being Across the Italian Urban Areas: An Integrated DEA-Entropy Approach

How ‘Critically Open-Minded’ Are We? An Australian Perspective Through the World Values Survey

The Meaning of Democracy to Citizens Across European Countries and the Factors Involved

How Can the Empowerment of Employees with Intellectual Disabilities Be Supported?

Multidimensional Child Poverty: From Complex Weighting to Simple Representation

Time Intervals Versus Composite Index Scores: An Alternative Approach for the Measurement of the Socio-Economic Development of Countries