Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
AI & SOCIETY
Published in: AI & SOCIETY 1/2016

18-06-2014 | Original Article

Brain–computer interfaces and dualism: a problem of brain, mind, and body

Author: Joseph Lee

Published in: AI & SOCIETY | Issue 1/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The brain–computer interface (BCI) has made remarkable progress in the bridging the divide between the brain and the external environment to assist persons with severe disabilities caused by brain impairments. There is also continuing philosophical interest in BCIs which emerges from thoughtful reflection on computers, machines, and artificial intelligence. This article seeks to apply BCI perspectives to examine, challenge, and work towards a possible resolution to a persistent problem in the mind–body relationship, namely dualism. The original humanitarian goals of BCIs and the technological inventiveness result in BCIs being surprisingly useful. We begin from the neurologically impaired person, the problems encountered, and some pioneering responses from computers and machines. Secondly, the interface of mind and brain is explored via two points of clarification: direct and indirect BCIs, and the nature of thoughts. Thirdly, dualism is beset by mind–body interaction difficulties and is further questioned by the phenomena of intentions, interactions, and technology. Fourthly, animal minds and robots are explored in BCI settings again with relevance for dualism. After a brief look at other BCIs, we conclude by outlining a future BCI philosophy of brain and mind, which might appear ominous and could be possible.
previous article Augmented reality and ubiquitous computing: the hidden potentialities of augmented reality
next article Enactive appropriation

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
If the neural signals proceed to a machine such as a robot and not to a computer, the term BMI was used (Donoghue 2008). The terms are nowadays interchangeable. Other terms are neural interface systems (Hatsopoulos and Donoghue 2009), and neuroprosthetics which uses neural interface systems to control robotic limbs to perform three-dimensional movements (Hochberg et al. 2012; Kwok 2013). All BCI systems require some type of training: learned voluntary control or cognitive voluntary modulation (Birbaumer and Cohen 2007). In this article, we use BCI for convenience.
 
2
The anonymous author anticipates the question: “So why am I writing this piece anonymously? Because I don't want to be known to the scientific community as 'Parkinson's guy' before I am known as a scientist” (p.30). The article notes that the author is a neuroscience professor at a major university in the USA and that he blogs at parklifensci.blogspot.com and tweets at @Parklifensci. e-mail: parklifensci@gmail.com.
 
3
These interesting comparative titles were suggested by an anonymous reviewer, who likens the situation to “being in the mind of someone” and “trying to infer what is happening in the mind”. We return to this in the conclusions.
 
4
The existence of a range of applications and indeed status between BCI being a “‘means” and a “machine subject” was highlighted by an anonymous reviewer together with a helpful suggestion.
 
Literature
Abramson D (2011) Philosophy of mind is (in part) philosophy of computer science. Minds Mach 21:203–219CrossRef
Al-Hudhud G et al (2014) Using brain signals patterns for biometric identity verification systems. Comput Hum Behav 31:224–229CrossRef
Andersen RA et al (2010) Cognitive neural prosthetics. Annu Rev Psychol 61:169–190CrossRef
Aranyosi I (2011) A new argument for mind–brain identity. Br J Philos Sci 62:489–517CrossRef
Baldwin DA, Baird JA (2001) Discerning intentions in dynamic human action. Trends Cogn Sci 5:171–178CrossRef
Barrett JA (2006) A quantum-mechanical argument for mind–body dualism. Erkenntnis 65:97–115CrossRef
Beauregard M (2007) Mind does really matter: evidence from neuroimaging studies of emotional self-regulation, psychotherapy, and placebo effect. Prog Neurobiol 81:218–236CrossRef
Bekey GA (2005) Autonomous robots, from biological inspiration to implementation and control. MIT Press, Cambridge
Bell CJ et al (2008) Control of a humanoid robot by a noninvasive brain–computer interface in humans. J Neural Eng 5:214–220CrossRef
Bickle J (2001) Understanding neural complexity: a role for reduction. Minds Mach 11:467–481CrossRef
Birbaumer N (2006) Breaking the silence: brain–computer interfaces (BCI) for communication and motor control. Psychophysiology 43:517–532CrossRef
Birbaumer N, Cohen LG (2007) Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. J Physiol 579:621–636CrossRef
BonJour L (2010) Against materialism. In: Koons RC, Bealer G (eds) The waning of materialism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–23CrossRef
Bonnet L, Lotte F, Lécuyer A (2013) Two brains, one game: design and evaluation of a multiuser BCI video game based on motor imagery. IEEE Trans Comput Intell AI Games 5:185–198CrossRef
Brack A, Troublé M (2010) Defining life: connecting robotics and chemistry. Orig Life Evol Biosph 40:131–136CrossRef
Brumberg JS, Guenther FH (2010) Development of speech prostheses: current status and recent advances. Expert Rev Med Devices 7:667–679CrossRef
Brumberg JS et al (2010) Brain–computer interfaces for speech communication. Speech Commun 52:367–379CrossRef
Campbell CM, Edwards RR (2009) Mind–body interactions in pain: the neurophysiology of anxious and catastrophic pain-related thoughts. Transl Res 153:97–101CrossRef
Campbell M, Hoane J Jr, Hsu H-f (2002) Deep blue. AI 134:57–83MATH
Chai R et al (2012) Mental non-motor imagery tasks classifications of brain computer interface for wheelchair commands using genetic algorithm-based neural network. Proc2012 Int Joint Conf Neural Netw, 10–15 June 2012, doi:10.​1109/​IJCNN.​2012.​6252499
Chapin JK et al (1999) Real-time control of a robot arm using simultaneously recorded neurons in the motor cortex. Nat Neurosci 2:664–670CrossRef
Churchland PM (1981) Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. J Philos 78:67–90
Coeckelbergh M (2011) You, robot: on the linguistic construction of artificial others. AI Soc 26:61–69CrossRef
De Massari D et al (2013) Brain communication in the locked-in state. Brain 136:1989–2000CrossRef
DiGiovanna J et al (2009) Brain–machine interface via reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56:54–64CrossRef
Donoghue JP (2008) Bridging the brain to the world: a perspective on neural interface systems. Neuron 60:511–521CrossRef
Dumit J (2004) Picturing personhood: brain scans and biomedical identity. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Durkin J (2003) Man and machine: I wonder if we can coexist. AI Soc 17:383–390CrossRef
Edelman GM (1992) Bright air, brilliant fire: on the matter of the mind. Basic Books, New York
Ekandem JI et al (2012) Evaluating the ergonomics of BCI devices for research and experimentation. Ergonomics 55:592–598CrossRef
Engel AK et al (2005) Invasive recordings from the human brain: clinical insights and beyond. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:35–47CrossRef
Evers K, Sigman M (2013) Possibilities and limits of mind-reading: a neurophilosophical perspective. Conscious Cogn 22:887–897CrossRef
Farwell LA, Donchin E (1988) Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 70:510–523CrossRef
Fingelkurts AA, Fingelkurts AA, Neves CFH (2010) Natural world physical, brain operational, and mind phenomenal space–time. Phys Life Rev 7:195–249CrossRef
Flanagan O (2005) History of the philosophy of mind. In: Honderich T (ed) The Oxford companion to philosophy, new edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 603–607
Frisoli A et al (2012) A new gaze-BCI-driven control of an upper limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation in real-world tasks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 42:1169–1179CrossRef
Gergondet P et al (2011) Using brain–computer interface to steer a humanoid robot. Proc 2011 IEEE Int Conf Robotics Biomim (ROBIO) 192–197
Gollwitzer PM (1993) Goal achievement: the role of intentions. Euro Rev Soc Psychol 4:141–185CrossRef
Green AM, Kalaska JF (2011) Learning to move machines with the mind. Trends Neurosci 34:61–75CrossRef
Grübler G (2011) Beyond the responsibility gap. Discussion note on responsibility and liability in the use of brain–computer interfaces. AI Soc 26:377–382CrossRef
Gürkök H, Nijholt A (2012) Brain–computer interfaces for multimodal interaction: a survey and principles. Int J Hum Comput Interact 28:292–307CrossRef
Gürkök H et al (2013) Evaluating a multi-player brain–computer interface game: challenge versus co-experience. Entertain Comput 4:195–203CrossRef
Haig AJ, Katz RT, Sahgal V (1987) Mortality and complications of the locked-in syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68:24–27
Hainline B (2011) Neuropathic pain: mind–body considerations. Neurol Clin 29:19–33CrossRef
Harnad S, Scherzer P (2008) First, scale up to the robotic Turing test, then worry about feeling. AI Med 44:83–89
Hasan BAS, Gan JO (2012) Hangman BCI: an unsupervised adaptive self-paced brain–computer interface for playing games. Comput Biol Med 42:598–606CrossRef
Haselager P (2013) Did I do that? Brain–computer interfacing and the sense of agency. Minds Mach 23:405–418CrossRef
Hatfield G (2000) The brain’s ‘new’ science: psychology, neurophysiology, and constraint. Philos Sci 67:S388–S403CrossRef
Hatsopoulos HG, Donoghue JP (2009) The science of neural interface systems. Annu Rev Neurosci 32:249–266CrossRef
Hirata M et al (2012) Motor restoration based on the brain–machine interface using brain surface electrodes: real-time robot control and a fully implantable wireless system. Adv Robot 26:399–408CrossRef
Hochberg LR et al (2012) Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature 485:372–375CrossRef
Hustvedt S (2013) Philosophy matters in brain matters. Seizure 22:169–173CrossRef
Iáñez E et al (2010) Mental tasks-based brain–robot interface. Robot Auton Syst 58:1238–1245CrossRef
Kaitaro T (2004) Brain–mind identities in dualism and materialism: a historical perspective. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 35:627–645CrossRef
Kelley R et al (2014) Intent recognition for human–robot interaction. In: Sukthankar G et al (eds) Plan, activity, and intent recognition: theory and practice. Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, pp 343–365CrossRef
Kendler KS, Campbell J (2009) Interventionist causal models in psychiatry: repositioning the mind–body problem. Psychol Med 39:881–887CrossRef
Kihlstrom JH (2008) Placebo: feeling better, getting better, and the problems of mind and body. McGill J Med 11:212–213
Kim J (1998) The mind–body problem after fifty years. In: O’Hear A (ed) Current issues in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–21CrossRef
Kim H-Y (2008) Locke and the mind–body problem: an interpretation of his agnosticism. Philoshy 83:439–458CrossRef
Krepki R et al (2007) The Berlin brain–computer interface (BBCI)—towards a new communication channel for online control in gaming applications. Multimed Tools Appl 33:73–90CrossRef
Kübler A et al (1999) The thought translation device: a neurophysiological approach to communication in total motor paralysis. Exp Brain Res 124:223–232CrossRef
Kwok R (2013) Neuroprosthetics: once more, with feeling. Nature 497:176–178CrossRef
Kyselo M (2013) Locked-in syndrome and BCI—towards an enactive approach to the self. Neuroethics 6:579–591CrossRef
Laureys S et al (2005) The locked-in syndrome: what is it like to be conscious but paralyzed and voiceless? Prog Brain Res 150:495–511CrossRef
Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MAL (2006) Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci 29:536–546CrossRef
Lee B, Liu CY, Apuzzo MLJ (2013) A primer on brain–machine interfaces, concepts, and technology: a key element in the future of functional neurorestoration. World Neurosurg 79:457–471CrossRef
Lin C-T et al (2010) Review of wireless and wearable electroencephalogram systems and brain–computer interfaces—a mini-review. Gerontology 56:112–119CrossRef
Lopes DM (2010) A philosophy of computer art. Routledge, Oxford
Lucivero F, Tamburrini G (2008) Ethical monitoring of brain–machine interfaces. AI Soc 22:449–460CrossRef
Lulé D et al (2009) Life can be worth living in locked-in syndrome. Prog Brain Res 177:339–351CrossRef
Lulé D et al (2013) Probing command following in patients with disorders of consciousness using a brain–computer interface. Clin Neurophysiol 124:101–106CrossRef
MacDorman KF, Ishiguro H (2006) The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interact Stud 7:297–337CrossRef
Marshall PJ (2009) Relating psychology and neuroscience: taking up the challenges. Perspect Psychol Sci 4:113–125CrossRef
Mazzone M (2011) Intentions as complex entities. Rev Philos Psychol 2:767–783CrossRef
McFarland D (2008) Guilty robots, happy dogs: the question of alien minds. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Molyneux B (2012) How the problem of consciousness could emerge in robots. Minds Mach 22:277–297CrossRef
Morris K (2004) Mind moves onscreen: brain–computer interface comes to trial. Lancet Neurol 3:329CrossRef
Murguialday R et al (2011) Transition from the locked into the completely locked-in state: a physiological analysis. Clin Neurophysiol 122:925–933CrossRef
Nagasawa Y (2012) Infinite decomposability and the mind–body problem. Am Philos Q 49:357–367
Nakahara K, Miyashita Y (2005) Understanding intentions: through the looking glass. Science 308:644–645CrossRef
Narayanan A (2013) Society under threat… but not from AI. AI Soc 28:87–94CrossRef
Niazi IK et al (2012) Peripheral electrical stimulation triggered by self-paced detection of motor intention enhances motor evoked potentials. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 20:595–604CrossRef
Nicolas-Alonso LF, Gomez-Gil J (2012) Brain computer interfaces, a review. Sensors 12:1211–1279CrossRef
Nicolelis MAL, Lebedev MA (2009) Principles of neural ensemble physiology underlying the operation of brain–machine interfaces. Nature Rev Neurosci 10:530–540CrossRef
Ortner R et al (2011) An SSVEP BCI to control a hand orthosis for persons with tetraplegia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 19:1–5CrossRef
Papies EK et al (2009) Planning is for doing: implementation intentions go beyond the mere creation of goal-directed associations. J Exp Soc Psychol 45:1148–1151CrossRef
Pearson Y, Borenstein J (2013) The intervention of robot caregivers and the cultivation of children’s capability to play. Sci Eng Ethics 19:123–137CrossRef
Pérez-Marcos D, Buitrago JA, Velásquez FDG (2011) Writing through a robot: a proof of concept for a brain–machine interface. Med Eng Phys 33:1314–1317CrossRef
Pfurtscheller G et al (2003) ‘Thought’—control of functional electrical stimulation to restore hand grasp in a patient with tetraplegia. Neurosci Lett 351:33–36CrossRef
Poel M et al (2012) Brain computer interfaces as intelligent sensors for enhancing human–computer interaction. In: Proceedings of 14th ACM international conference multimodal interact, 22–26 Oct 2012, Santa Monica, CA, 379–382
Pribram KH (1998) Thoughts on the meaning of brain electrical activity. Int J Psychol 33:213–225CrossRef
Rockwell WT (2007) Neither brain nor ghost, a nondualist alternative to the mind–brain identity theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Rocon E et al (2010) Multimodal BCI-mediated FES suppression of pathological tremor. 2010 Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (EMBC), 3337–3340
Rohm M et al (2013) Hybrid brain–computer interfaces and hybrid neuroprostheses for restoration of upper limb functions in individuals with high-level spinal cord injury. AI Med 59:133–142
Rubinstein JT (2004) How cochlear implants encode speech. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 12:444–448CrossRef
Sanchez JC et al (2009) Exploiting co-adaptation for the design of symbiotic neuroprosthetic assistants. Neural Netw 22:305–315CrossRef
Sartenaer O (2013) Neither metaphysical dichotomy nor pure identity: clarifying the emergentist creed. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 44:365–373CrossRef
Scherberger H (2009) Neural control of motor prostheses. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19:629–633CrossRef
Scherer R, Pfurtscheller G (2013) Thought-based interaction with the physical world. Trends Cogn Sci 17:490–492CrossRef
Scherer R et al (2013) Brain–computer interfacing: more than the sum of its parts. Soft Comput 17:317–331CrossRef
Schimmel P (2001) Mind over matter? I: philosophical aspects of the mind–brain problem. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 35:481–487CrossRef
Schneider S (2013) Non-reductive physicalism and the mind problem. Noûs 47:135–153CrossRef
Searle JR (1984) Minds, brains and science, the 1984 Reith Lectures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Searle JR (1992) The rediscovery of the mind. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Sellers EW, Donchin E (2006) A P300-based brain–computer interface: initial tests by ALS patients. Clin Neurophysiol 117:538–548CrossRef
Solis J et al (2010) Development of the anthropomorphic saxophonist robot WAS-1: mechanical design of the simulated organs and implementation of air pressure feedback control. Adv Robot 24:629–650CrossRef
Stoll J et al (2013) Pupil responses allow communication in locked-in syndrome patients. Curr Biol 23:R647–R648CrossRef
Tan L-F et al (2014) Effect of mindfulness meditation on brain–computer interface performance. Conscious Cogn 23:12–21CrossRef
Taylor DM, Tillery SIH, Schwartz AB (2002) Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science 296:1829–1832CrossRef
Taylor DM, Tillery SI, Schwartz AB (2003) Information conveyed through brain-control: cursor versus robot. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 11:195–199CrossRef
Tretter F (2010) Philosophical aspects of neuropsychiatry. In: Tretter F et al (eds) Systems biology in psychiatric research: from high-throughput data to mathematical modelling. Wiley-Blackwell, Weinheim, pp 3–25CrossRef
Uithol S et al (2014) Why we may not find intentions in the brain. Neuropsychologia 56:129–139CrossRef
Ungar T, Knaak S (2013) The hidden medical logic of mental health stigma. Aust NZ J Psychiatry 47:611–612CrossRef
Velliste M (2008) Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding. Nature 53:1098–1101CrossRef
Verbeek P-P (2008) Cyborg intentionality: rethinking the phenomenology of human–technology relations. Phenomenol Cognit Sci 7:387–395CrossRef
Vidal F (2009) Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. Hist Hum Sci 22:5–36CrossRef
Wasserman EA (1993) Comparative cognition: beginning the second century of the study of animal intelligence. Psychol Bull 113:211–228CrossRef
Weisberg DS et al (2008) The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. J Cogn Neurosci 20:470–477CrossRef
Wellman HM et al (2009) Early intention understandings that are common to primates predict children’s later theory of mind. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19:57–62CrossRef
Wolpaw JR et al (2000) Brain–computer interface technology: a review of the first international meeting. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 8:164–173CrossRef
Wolpaw JR et al (2002) Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol 113:767–791CrossRef
Zhang Q et al (2011) Building brain machine interfaces: from rat to monkey. In: Proceedings of 2011 8th Asian Control Conference (ASCC) Kaohsiung, Taiwan, May 15–18, 2011, pp 886–891
Zhou J et al (2009) EEG-based classification for elbow versus shoulder torque intentions involving stroke subjects. Comput Biol Med 39:443–452CrossRef
Zickler CA et al (2013) Brain painting: usability testing according to the user-centered design in end users with severe motor paralysis. AI Med 59:99–110
Metadata
Title
Brain–computer interfaces and dualism: a problem of brain, mind, and body
Author
Joseph Lee
Publication date
18-06-2014
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
AI & SOCIETY / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0951-5666
Electronic ISSN: 1435-5655
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-014-0545-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

AI & SOCIETY 1/2016 Go to the issue

Original Article

A critical interpretation of bottom-up management and leadership styles within Japanese companies: a focus on empowerment and trust

News Item

IEEE RO-MAN 2016 Call for Papers, Workshops, and Tutorials

Book Review

Histories and futures

Original Article

Effects of lying in practical Turing tests

News Item

Call for Papers: Cultural Diversity and Community Technology Design

Open Forum

The model gap: cognitive systems in security applications and their ethical implications

Premium Partner

    Image Credits