Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 5/2022

04-04-2022 | Original Article

Can uncertainty estimation predict segmentation performance in ultrasound bone imaging?

Authors: Prashant U. Pandey, Pierre Guy, Antony J. Hodgson

Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Issue 5/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Segmenting bone surfaces in ultrasound (US) is a fundamental step in US-based computer-assisted orthopaedic surgeries. Neural network-based segmentation techniques are a natural choice for this, given promising results in related tasks. However, to gain widespread use, we must be able to know how much to trust segmentation networks during clinical deployment when ground-truth data is unavailable.

Methods

We investigated alternative ways to measure the uncertainty of trained networks by implementing a baseline U-Net trained on a large dataset, together with three uncertainty estimation modifications: Monte Carlo dropout, test time augmentation, and ensemble learning. We measured the segmentation performance, calibration quality, and the ability to predict segmentation performance on test data. We further investigated the effect of data quality on these measures.

Results

Overall, we found that ensemble learning with binary cross-entropy (BCE) loss achieved the best segmentation performance (mean Dice: 0.75–0.78 and RMS distance: 0.62–0.86mm) and the lowest calibration errors (mean: 0.22–0.28%). In contrast to previous studies of area or volumetric segmentation, we found that the resulting uncertainty measures are not reliable proxies for surface segmentation performance.

Conclusion

Our experiments indicate that a significant performance and confidence calibration boost can be achieved with ensemble learning and BCE loss, as tested on 13,687 US images containing various anatomies and imaging parameters. However, these techniques do not allow us to reliably predict future segmentation performance. The results of this study can be used to improve the calibration and performance of US segmentation networks.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Ungi T, Fichtinger G, Greer H, Sunderland K, Wu V, Baum ZMC, Schlenger C, Oetgen M, Cleary K, Aylward S (2020) Automatic spine ultrasound segmentation for scoliosis visualization and measurement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 67(11):3234–3241 Ungi T, Fichtinger G, Greer H, Sunderland K, Wu V, Baum ZMC, Schlenger C, Oetgen M, Cleary K, Aylward S (2020) Automatic spine ultrasound segmentation for scoliosis visualization and measurement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 67(11):3234–3241
2.
go back to reference Pandey PU, Quader N, Guy P, Garbi R, Hodgson AJ (2020) Ultrasound bone segmentation: a scoping review of techniques and validation practices. Ultrasound Med Biol 46(4):921–935CrossRef Pandey PU, Quader N, Guy P, Garbi R, Hodgson AJ (2020) Ultrasound bone segmentation: a scoping review of techniques and validation practices. Ultrasound Med Biol 46(4):921–935CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mehrtash A, Wells WM, Tempany CM, Abolmaesumi P, Kapur T (2020) Confidence calibration and predictive uncertainty estimation for deep medical image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imag 39(12):3868–3878CrossRef Mehrtash A, Wells WM, Tempany CM, Abolmaesumi P, Kapur T (2020) Confidence calibration and predictive uncertainty estimation for deep medical image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imag 39(12):3868–3878CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hüllermeier E, Waegeman W (2021) Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: an introduction to concepts and methods. Mach Learn 110(3):457–506CrossRef Hüllermeier E, Waegeman W (2021) Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: an introduction to concepts and methods. Mach Learn 110(3):457–506CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gal Y, Ghahramani Z (2016) Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on machine learning ICML 2016 Gal Y, Ghahramani Z (2016) Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In: Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on machine learning ICML 2016
6.
go back to reference Wang G, Li W, Aertsen M, Deprest J, Ourselin S, Vercauteren T (2019) Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networks. Neurocomputing 338:34–45CrossRef Wang G, Li W, Aertsen M, Deprest J, Ourselin S, Vercauteren T (2019) Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networks. Neurocomputing 338:34–45CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lakshminarayanan B, Pritzel A, Blundell C (2017) Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst Lakshminarayanan B, Pritzel A, Blundell C (2017) Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst
8.
go back to reference Kannan A, Hodgson A, Mulpuri K, Garbi R (2021) Leveraging voxel-wise segmentation uncertainty to improve reliability in assessment of paediatric dysplasia of the hip. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 16(7):1121–1129CrossRef Kannan A, Hodgson A, Mulpuri K, Garbi R (2021) Leveraging voxel-wise segmentation uncertainty to improve reliability in assessment of paediatric dysplasia of the hip. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 16(7):1121–1129CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J-CC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti, J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R (2012) 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imag 30(9), 1323–1341 Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J-CC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti, J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R (2012) 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imag 30(9), 1323–1341
10.
go back to reference Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2015, pp 234–241. Springer, Cham Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2015, pp 234–241. Springer, Cham
11.
go back to reference Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SAA, Petersen J, Maier-Hein KH (2021) nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods 18(2):203–211CrossRef Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SAA, Petersen J, Maier-Hein KH (2021) nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods 18(2):203–211CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Liu L, Jiang H, He P, Chen W, Liu X, Gao J, Han J (2019) On the variance of the adaptive learning rate and beyond Liu L, Jiang H, He P, Chen W, Liu X, Gao J, Han J (2019) On the variance of the adaptive learning rate and beyond
13.
go back to reference Osband I, Blundell C, Pritzel A, Roy BV Deep exploration via bootstrapped DQN Osband I, Blundell C, Pritzel A, Roy BV Deep exploration via bootstrapped DQN
14.
go back to reference Guo C, Pleiss G, Sun Y, Weinberger KQ (2017) On calibration of modern neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 34th international conference on machine learning ICML 2017 Guo C, Pleiss G, Sun Y, Weinberger KQ (2017) On calibration of modern neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 34th international conference on machine learning ICML 2017
15.
go back to reference Roy AG, Conjeti S, Navab N, Wachinger C (2019) Bayesian QuickNAT: model uncertainty in deep whole-brain segmentation for structure-wise quality control. Neuroimage 195:11–22CrossRef Roy AG, Conjeti S, Navab N, Wachinger C (2019) Bayesian QuickNAT: model uncertainty in deep whole-brain segmentation for structure-wise quality control. Neuroimage 195:11–22CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Haas J, Rabus B (2021) Uncertainty estimation for deep learning-based segmentation of roads in synthetic aperture radar imagery. Remote Sens. 13(8):1472CrossRef Haas J, Rabus B (2021) Uncertainty estimation for deep learning-based segmentation of roads in synthetic aperture radar imagery. Remote Sens. 13(8):1472CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sander J, de Vos BD, Wolterink JM, Išgum I (2019) Towards increased trustworthiness of deep learning segmentation methods on cardiac MRI. In: Medical imaging 2019 Image Processing, vol. 10949, p. 44. SPIE Sander J, de Vos BD, Wolterink JM, Išgum I (2019) Towards increased trustworthiness of deep learning segmentation methods on cardiac MRI. In: Medical imaging 2019 Image Processing, vol. 10949, p. 44. SPIE
18.
go back to reference Kervadec H, Bouchtiba J, Desrosiers C, Granger E, Dolz J, Ben Ayed I (2021) Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentation. Med Image Anal 67:285–296CrossRef Kervadec H, Bouchtiba J, Desrosiers C, Granger E, Dolz J, Ben Ayed I (2021) Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentation. Med Image Anal 67:285–296CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Can uncertainty estimation predict segmentation performance in ultrasound bone imaging?
Authors
Prashant U. Pandey
Pierre Guy
Antony J. Hodgson
Publication date
04-04-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Issue 5/2022
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Electronic ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02597-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2022

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 5/2022 Go to the issue

Premium Partner