Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Introduction to Carbon Civilization Read chapter Read first chapter

2014 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

7. Carbon Capture and Storage: In the Quest for Clean Fossil Energy

Author : Nazim Muradov

Published in: Liberating Energy from Carbon: Introduction to Decarbonization

Publisher: Springer New York

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The main objective of carbon capture and storage (CCS) is to prevent CO2 from entering the atmosphere by capturing CO2 from large industrial sources and securely storing it in various carbon sinks. CCS is considered a critical component of the portfolio of carbon mitigation solutions, because global economy heavily relies and will continue to rely on fossil fuels in the foreseeable future. Currently, there are close to 300 active and planned CCS-related projects around the world—an indication of a growing commitment to this technological option. However, despite significant progress in CCS technology, the pace of CCS commercial deployment is rather slow. The major challenges facing the large-scale CCS deployment worldwide relate to a very high financial barrier and limited economic stimuli or regulatory drivers to encourage investments in the technology. This chapter highlights scientific and engineering progress in all three major stages of the CCS chain, CO2 capture, transport, and storage, and the current status of existing and planned commercial CCS projects. Technological, economic, environmental, and societal aspects of the large-scale CCS deployment and its prospects as a major carbon abatement policy are analyzed in this chapter.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Carbon-Neutral Energy Sources
next chapter Transition to Low- and Zero-Carbon Energy and Fuels
Footnotes
1
New Entrants Reserve (NER300) is one of the world’s largest funding programs for innovative low-carbon energy demonstration projects as part of the EU Emission Trading System.
 
Literature
1.
Global CCS Institute (2009) Strategic analysis of the global status of carbon capture and storage. Final report. http://​www/​globalccsinstitu​te.​com/​downloads/​reports/​2009/​worley/​foundation-report-1-rev0.​pdf.​ Accessed 3 Aug 2010
2.
Outcomes from UNFCCC conference in Doha (2013) Carbon Capture J 32
3.
Global CCS Institute (2013) Status of carbon capture and storage update. Carbon Capture J 32
4.
International Energy Agency (2012) Energy technology perspectives. Pathways to a clean energy system. IEA/OECD, Paris, France
5.
Jacobson M (2009) Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution and energy security. Energy Environ Sci 2:148–173CrossRef
6.
Quaile I, Gräßler B (2011) Deutsche Welle. http//www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,15402725,00.html. Accessed 10 Dec 2011
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Global CCS Institute (2011) The global status of CCS: 2011 update. Canberra, Australia, ISBN 978-0-9871863-0-0
13.
He H, Li W, Zhong M et al (2013) Reversible CO2 capture with porous polymers using the humidity swing. Energy Environ Sci 6:488–493
14.
US Department of Energy (2007) Carbon sequestration technology. Roadmap, Washington, DC
15.
16.
Ciferno J, Fout T, Jones A et al. (2009) Capturing carbon from existing coal-fired power plants. Chem Eng Progress:33–47
17.
US Department of Energy (2003) Carbon sequestration. Technology roadmap and program plan. US DOE Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Morgantown, West Virginia
18.
Millward A, Yaghi O (2005) Metal-organic frameworks with exceptionally high capacity for storage of carbon dioxide at room temperature. J Am Chem Soc 127:17998–17999CrossRef
19.
Carbon sponge could soak up coal emissions (2013) Carbon Capture J 32:21
20.
21.
Lin H, Merkel T, Baker R (2007) The membrane solution to global warming. 6th annual conference on carbon capture and sequestration, Pittsburgh, PA
22.
Du N, Park H, Robertson G et al (2011) Polymer nanosieve membranes for CO2-capture applications. Nat Mater 10:372–375CrossRef
23.
US Department of Energy (2006) Carbon Sequestration Technology Roadmap. Office of Fossil Energy, NETL, Morgantown, West Virginia
24.
US Department of Energy (2005) Roadmap for the hydrogen economy. Workshop on manufacturing R&D for the hydrogen economy, Washington, DC
25.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2005) IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck H et al (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
26.
International Energy Agency (1996) Decarbonization of fossil fuels, IEA Report PH2/2, March 1996, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham
27.
Muradov N (2009) Production of hydrogen from hydrocarbons. In: Gupta R (ed) Hydrogen fuel. Production, transport and storage. CRC Press, Boca Raton
28.
Wilson E, Gerard D (2007) Carbon capture and sequestration. Integrating technology, monitoring and regulation. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA
29.
Ball M, Weindorf W, Bunger U (2009) Hydrogen production. In: Ball M, Wietschel M (eds) Hydrogen economy. Opportunities and challenges. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRef
30.
Lin S (2009) Hydrogen production from coal. In: Gupta R (ed) Hydrogen fuel. Production, transport and storage. CRC Press, Boca Raton
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
Stern M, Simeon F, Herzog H et al (2013) Post-combustion carbon-dioxide capture using electrochemically mediated amine regeneration. Energy Environ Sci. doi:10.​1039/​c3ee41165f
37.
38.
Brennecke J, Gurkan B (2010) Ionic liquids for CO2 capture and emission reduction. J Phys Chem Lett 2010:3459–3464CrossRef
39.
Ritter S (2010) Carbon dioxide’s unsettled future. Chem Eng News 88:36–37
40.
Trachtenberg M, Cowan R, Smith D et al (2008). Membrane-based enzyme-facilitated efficient CO2 capture. Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Washington, DC, p 353–360
41.
Tuinier M, Hamers H, van Sing Annaland M (2011) Techno-economic evaluation of cryogenic CO2 capture—a comparison with absorption and membrane technology. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 5:1559–1565CrossRef
42.
43.
44.
Zafar Q, Mattisson T, Gevert B (2005) Integrated hydrogen and power production with CO2 capture using chemical-looping reforming-redox reactivity of particles of CuO, Mn2O3, NiO and Fe2O3 using SiO2 as a support. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:3485–3496CrossRef
45.
McGlashan N (2008) Chemical looping combustion—a thermodynamic study. J Mech Eng Sci 222:1005–1019CrossRef
46.
Brandvoll O, Bolland O (2004) Inherent CO2 capture using chemical looping combustion in a natural gas fired power cycle. ASME J Eng Gas Turb Power 126:316–321. ASME Paper GT-2002–30129
47.
Naqvi R, Bolland O (2007) Multi-stage chemical looping combustion (CLC) for combined cycles with CO2 capture. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 1:19–30CrossRef
48.
Habib M, Badr H, Ahmed S et al (2011) A review of recent developments in carbon capture utilizing oxy-fuel combustion in conventional and ion transport membrane systems. Int J Energy Res 35:741–764CrossRef
49.
Mattisson T (2007) Chemical-looping combustion using gaseous and solid fuels. 2nd Workshop on international oxy-combustion research network, 25–26 Jan 2007, Windsor, CT
50.
Tan X, Wang Z, Lin H et al (2008) Enhancement of oxygen permeation through La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ hollow fibre membranes by surface modifications. J Membr Sci 324:128–135CrossRef
51.
Park J, Do Par S (2007) Oxygen permeability and structural stability of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ membrane. Korean J Chem Eng 24:897–905CrossRef
52.
Esquiro A, Brandon N, Kilner J et al (2004) Electrochemical characterization of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ cathodes for intermediate temperature SOFC. J Electrochem Soc 151:A1847–A1855CrossRef
53.
Wang H, Cong Y, Yang W (2002) Oxygen permeation study in a tubular Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-δ oxygen permeable membrane. J Membr Sci 210:259–271CrossRef
54.
Zhu X, Cong Y, Yang W (2006) Effects of synthesis methods on oxygen permeability of BaCe0.15Fe0.85O3-δ ceramic membranes. J Membr Sci 283:158–163CrossRef
55.
Arnold M, Wang H, Feldhoff A (2007) Influence of CO2 on the oxygen permeation performance and microstructure of perovskite type (Ba0.5Sr0.5) (Co0.8Fe0.2)O3-δ membranes. J Membr Sci 293:44–52CrossRef
56.
Yan A, Liu B, Dong Y et al (2008) A temperature programmed desorption investigation on the interaction of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-δ perovskite oxides with CO2 in the absence and presence of H2O and O2. Appl Catal B 80:24–31CrossRef
57.
Benson S, Waller D, Kilner J (1999) Degradation of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3-δ in carbon dioxide and water atmospheres. J Electrochem Soc 146:1305–1309CrossRef
58.
Efimov K, Arnold M, Martynczuk J et al (2009) Crystalline intermediate phases in the sol-gel-based synthesis of La2NiO4+δ. J Am Ceram Soc 92:876–880CrossRef
59.
Kvamsdal H, Jordal K, Bolland O (2007) A quantitative comparison of gas turbine cycles with CO2 capture. Energy 32:10–24CrossRef
60.
Sandquist S, Julsrud S, Vigenand B et al (2007) Development and testing of AZEP reactor components. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2007:180–187
61.
Sundquist S, Griffin T, Thornhaug N (2011) AZEP-development of an integrated air separation membrane-gas turbine. 2nd Nordic minisymposium on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Alstom Power, Gothenburg, Sweden, October 2011
62.
63.
64.
Seiersten M (2001) Material selection for separation, transportation and disposal of CO2. Proceedings of the Corrosion National Association. Corrosion Engineers, paper 1042
65.
Guijt W (2004) Analyses of incident data show US, European pipelines becoming safer. Oil Gas J 102:68–73
66.
67.
International Energy Agency (2004) Ship transport of CO2. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme, Report PH4/30, Cheltenham
68.
Marchetti C (1977) On geoenginering and the CO2 problem. Clim Chang 1:59–68CrossRef
69.
Kaarstad O (1992) Emission-free fossil energy from Norway. Energy Convers Manag 33:781–786CrossRef
70.
Koide H, Tazaki Y, Noguchi Y et al (1992) Subterranean containment and long-term storage of carbon dioxide in unused aquifers and depleted natural gas reservoirs. Energy Convers Manag 33:619–626CrossRef
71.
Bachu S (2003) Screening and ranking of sedimentary basins for sequestration of CO2 in geological media. Environ Geol 44:277–289CrossRef
72.
Pershad H (2012) CCS for gas—results of Element Energy study. Carbon Capture J 13–15
73.
74.
75.
Bachu S, Gunter W, Perkins E (1994) Aquifer disposal of CO2: hydrodynamic and mineral trapping. Energy Convers Manag 35:269–279CrossRef
76.
Perkins E, Czernichowski-Lauriol I, Azaroual M et al (2004) Long term predictions of CO2 storage by mineral and solubility trapping in the Weybourn Midale Reservoir. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, vol II, Vancouver, Canada, p. 2093–2096
77.
Casey A (2008) Carbon cemetery. Canadian Geographic Magazine, January/February:61
78.
79.
Holt T, Jensen J, Lindeberg E (1995) Underground of storage of CO2 in aquifers and oil reservoirs. Energy Convers Manag 36:535–538CrossRef
80.
Ferguson R, Nichols C, van Leeuwen T et al (2009) Storing CO2 with enhanced oil recovery. Greenhouse Gas Technologies-9, Elsevier Science Direct, Energy Procedia 1: 1989–1996
81.
Baviere M (2007) Basic concepts in enhanced oil recovery processes. Elsevier Applied Science, London, ISBN 1-85166-617-6
82.
Stevens S, Kuuskraa J, Schraufnagel R (1996) Technology spurs growth of US coal bed methane. Oil Gas J 94:56–63
83.
Key R, Kozyr A, Sabine C et al (2004) A global ocean carbon climatology: results from GLODAP. Global Biochem Cy 18:GB4031
84.
85.
Brewer P, Peltzer E, Walz P et al (2005) Deep ocean experiments with fossil fuel carbon dioxide: creation and sensing of a controlled plume at 4 km depth. J Mar Res 63:9–33CrossRef
86.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) IPCC 4th assessment report, climate change 2007. The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
87.
O’Connor W, Dahlin D, Rush G et al (2005) Aqueous mineral carbonation, Final Report, DOE/ARC-TR-04-002, 15 March 2005
88.
US Department of Energy (1999) Carbon sequestration. State of the Science. US DOE, Office of Science, Office of Fossil Fuels, Working paper on carbon sequestration science and technology. Washington, DC
89.
Andersen R (2005) Algal culturing techniques. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 189–203
90.
Nakamura T (2004) Recovery and sequestration of CO2 from stationary combustion systems by photosynthesis of microalgae, Technical report to DOE, NETL, No. PSI-1356, December 2004
91.
National Laboratory Directors (1997) Technology opportunities to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee
92.
International Energy Agency (2004) Improvements in power generation with post- combustion capture of CO2, IEA report PH4/33. IEA Greenhouse gas R&D Programme, Cheltenham, UK
93.
Davison J (2005) CO2 capture and storage and the IEA Greenhouse Gas Programme. Workshop on CO2 issues, Miffelfart, Denmark, May 2005, IEA Greenhouse Gas Programme, Cheltenham
94.
Power from gas + CCS at 54% efficiency? (2013) Carbon Capture J 14–15
95.
Tola V, Pettinau A (2014) Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: a techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies. Appl Energy 113:1461–1474CrossRef
96.
97.
Thayer A (2009) Chemicals to help coal come clean. Chem Eng News 87:18–20CrossRef
98.
McCoy S, Rubin E (2008) An engineering economic model of pipeline transport of CO2 with application to carbon capture and storage. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2:219–229CrossRef
99.
100.
Bock B, Rhudy R, Herzog H et al. (2003) Economic evaluation of CO2 storage and sink options. DOE research report, DE-FC26–00NT40937, Washington, DC
101.
Hendriks C, Graus W, van Bergen F (2002) Global carbon dioxide storage potential and costs. Report Ecofys & The Netherlands Institute of Applied Geoscience TNO, Ecofys Report EEP, p 63
102.
103.
Akai M, Nishio N, Iijima M et al. (2004) Performance and economic evaluation of CO2 capture and sequestration technologies. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Elsevier, Oxford
104.
World Energy Investment Outlook (2003) OECD/IEA, 75775 Paris. ISBN: 92-64-01906-5
105.
Edmonds J, Feund P, Dooley J (2000) The role of carbon management technologies in addressing atmospheric stabilization of greenhouse gases. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. Sponsored by the IEA Greenhouse gas R&D Programme, Cairns
106.
107.
108.
Status of CCS project database (2012) Carbon Capture J:24–25
109.
110.
111.
112.
Michael K, Allison G, Golab A (2009) CO2 storage in saline aquifers II- experience from existing storage operations. Proceedings of the greenhouse gas technologies-9 conference. Energy procedia, vol 1, p. 1973–1980
113.
114.
Petroleum Technology Research Center (2007) Weyburn-Midale CO2 monitoring & storage project. Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on carbon capture & sequestration. Pittsburg, PA, 7 May 2007
115.
Wackowski R (2007) Rangely Weber Sand unit CO2 flooding case study, a long history of CO2 injection. Proceedings of the CO2 capture and storage conference, The Canadian Institute, Calgary, AB, 7 Feb 2007
116.
Beckwith R (2011) Carbon capture and storage: a mixed review. JPT:42–45
117.
Reeves S, Davis D, Oudinot A (2004) A technical and economic sensitivity study of enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon sequestration in coal. DOE topical report, Washington, DC
118.
Flett M, Beacher G, Brantjes J et al (2008) Gordon Project: subsurface evaluation of carbon dioxide disposal under Barrow Island. Society of Petroleum Engineering, SPE 116372
119.
Johnson J (2012) Stumbling on the path to “clean coal”. Chem Eng News 90:37–39
120.
Reisch M (2011) Air products inks carbon-capture deals. Chem Eng News 89:24
121.
122.
Worrell E, Price L, Martin N et al (2001) Carbon dioxide emissions from the global cement industry. Annu Rev Energy Environ 26:303–329CrossRef
123.
124.
125.
126.
Velzy C, Grillo L (2007) Waste-to-energy combustion. In: Kreith F, Goswami Y (eds) Handbook of energy efficiency and renewable energy. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA
127.
Johnson J (2011) EPA proposes easing CO2 controls. Chem Eng News 89:25
128.
Johnson J (2009) Water and CO2 shouldn’t mix. Chem Eng News 87:32
129.
Carapeza M, Badalamenti B, Cavarra L et al (2003) Gas hazard assessment in a densely inhabited area of Colli Albani Volcano. J Volcanol Geothermal Res 123:81–94CrossRef
130.
131.
132.
Stone E, Lowe J, Shine K (2009) The impact of carbon capture and storage on climate. Energy Environ Sci 2:81–91CrossRef
133.
Zhou W, Stenhouse M, Arthur R et al (2005) The IEA Weybourn CO2 monitoring and storage project—modeling of long-term migration of CO2 from Weybourn. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, vol 1, Vancouver, Canada, p 721–730, Elsevier, UK
134.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (1997). Washington, DC
135.
Palmgren C, Granger Morgan M, Bruine de Bruin W et al (2004) Initial public perception of deep geological and oceanic disposal of CO2. Environ Sci Technol 38:6441–6450CrossRef
136.
Itoaka K, Saito A, Akai M (2004) Public acceptance of CO2 capture and storage technology: a survey of public opinion to explore influential factors. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, 2004, Vancouver, Canada
137.
Johnson J (2010) Gasification plant funds shifted by DOE. Chem Eng News 88:34
138.
139.
140.
International Energy Agency (2011) World Energy Outlook. Are we entering a golden age of gas? IEA, Paris, France
141.
142.
Johnson J (2013) EPA tries capping power plant carbon. Chem Eng News 91:42–43
143.
144.
145.
Cook P (2012) Clean energy, climate and carbon. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, p 214
146.
Mills R (2011) Capturing carbon. The new weapon in the war against climate change. Columbia University Press, New York, p 465
147.
Jackson F (2009) Conquering carbon. Carbon emissions, carbon markets and the consumers. New Holland, London, UK, p 256
Metadata
Title
Carbon Capture and Storage: In the Quest for Clean Fossil Energy
Author
Nazim Muradov
Copyright Year
2014
Publisher
Springer New York
Book
Liberating Energy from Carbon: Introduction to Decarbonization

Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0544-7

Electronic ISBN: 978-1-4939-0545-4

Copyright Year: 2014

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0545-4_7