Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

2. Characteristics of Farms in the European Union: Relationships Between Energy Costs and Other Variables

Author : Vítor João Pereira Domingues Martinho

Published in: Energy Costs and Farm Characteristics in the European Union

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The very characteristics of agriculture call for specific attention when it comes to the evolution of this sector across the globe. In fact, this is a sector which produces essential products to meet basic human needs, but usually requires public intervention, through agricultural policies, to avoid an unbalanced evolution between demand and supply having consequences on market prices. This is because agricultural policies are so famous across the world and specifically in the European Union, in the framework of the Common Agricultural Policy. On the other hand, the great diversity of agricultural realities among regions calls for specific strategies to be adjusted to local particularities. In addition, climate change and global warming bring new challenges, namely in the use of critical resources (because of their scarcity and environmental impacts), such as energy and water. In this context, it would seem pertinent to assess the interrelationships between energy use in European Union farms and other farming variables, namely to identify how the energy consumption is affected by other dimensions in the sector. For this purpose, data from the European Union Farm Accountancy Data Network were considered for the period 2013–2018. This statistical information was first explored through descriptive analysis and then with matrices of correlation. As main insights, it is important to note that energy costs increased, on average over the period considered, by 2.7%. On the other hand, farms with a higher level of intensification and higher energy costs are those that receive more subsidies.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
“Motor fuels and lubricants, electricity, heating fuels” [26].
 
2
“Total utilised agricultural area of holding. Does not include areas used for mushrooms, land rented for less than one year on an occasional basis, woodland and other farm areas (roads, ponds, non-farmed areas, etc.). It consists of land in owner occupation, rented land and land in share-cropping (remuneration linked to output from land made available). It includes agricultural land temporarily not under cultivation for agricultural reasons or being withdrawn from production as part of agricultural policy measures. It is expressed in hectares” [26].
 
3
“Number of equines, cattle, sheep, goats, pigs and poultry present on holding (annual average), converted into livestock units. Not included are beehives and other animals. Animals which do not belong to the holder but are held under a production contract are taken into account according to their annual presence” [26].
 
4
“Total of output of crops and crop products, livestock and livestock products and of other output” [26].
 
5
“Costs linked to the agricultural activity of the holder and related to the output of the accounting year.
Included are amounts relating to inputs produced on the holding (farm use) = seeds and seedlings and feed for grazing stock and granivores, but not manure. When calculating FADN standard results, farm taxes and other dues are not included in the total for costs but are taken into account in the balance Subsidies and taxes (subsidies—taxes) on current and non-current operations. The personal taxes of the holder are not to be recorded in the FADN accounts” [26].
 
6
“Farm taxes and other dues (not including VAT and the personal taxes of the holder) and taxes and other charges on land and buildings. Subsidies on taxes are deducted” [26].
 
7
“Output—Intermediate consumption + Balance current subsidies and Taxes” [26].
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference T.N. Maraseni, S. Mushtaq, J. Maroulis, Greenhouse gas emissions from rice farming inputs a cross-country assessment. J. Agric. Sci. 147, 117 (2009)CrossRef T.N. Maraseni, S. Mushtaq, J. Maroulis, Greenhouse gas emissions from rice farming inputs a cross-country assessment. J. Agric. Sci. 147, 117 (2009)CrossRef
2.
go back to reference E. S. Azzi, E. Karltun, C. Sundberg, Small-scale biochar production on swedish farms: a model for estimating potential, variability, and environmental performance. J. Clean Prod. 280, 124873 (2021). E. S. Azzi, E. Karltun, C. Sundberg, Small-scale biochar production on swedish farms: a model for estimating potential, variability, and environmental performance. J. Clean Prod. 280, 124873 (2021).
3.
go back to reference C. Baillie, G. Chen, Opporunities for reducing on-farm energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in sugarcane. Int. Sugar J. 114, 725 (2012) C. Baillie, G. Chen, Opporunities for reducing on-farm energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in sugarcane. Int. Sugar J. 114, 725 (2012)
4.
go back to reference P. Pellegrini, R.J. Fernandez, Crop intensification, land use, and on-farm energy-use efficiency during the worldwide spread of the green revolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 2335 (2018)CrossRef P. Pellegrini, R.J. Fernandez, Crop intensification, land use, and on-farm energy-use efficiency during the worldwide spread of the green revolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 2335 (2018)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference A. D. Soteriades, A. W. Stott, S. Moreau, T. Charroin, M. Blanchard, J. Liu, P. Faverdin, The relationship of dairy farm eco-efficiency with intensification and self-sufficiency. evidence from the french dairy sector using life cycle analysis, data envelopment analysis and partial least squares structural equation modelling. PLoS One 11, e0166445 (2016) A. D. Soteriades, A. W. Stott, S. Moreau, T. Charroin, M. Blanchard, J. Liu, P. Faverdin, The relationship of dairy farm eco-efficiency with intensification and self-sufficiency. evidence from the french dairy sector using life cycle analysis, data envelopment analysis and partial least squares structural equation modelling. PLoS One 11, e0166445 (2016)
6.
go back to reference J.E. Tallaksen, C.D. Reese, M.H. Reese, Cropping system fuel use for a diversified farm in the Midwestern United States. Appl. Eng. Agric. 35, 503 (2019)CrossRef J.E. Tallaksen, C.D. Reese, M.H. Reese, Cropping system fuel use for a diversified farm in the Midwestern United States. Appl. Eng. Agric. 35, 503 (2019)CrossRef
7.
go back to reference T. Nacer, A. Hamidat, O. Nadjemi, M. Bey, Feasibility study of grid connected photovoltaic system in family farms for electricity generation in rural areas. Renew. Energy 96, 305 (2016)CrossRef T. Nacer, A. Hamidat, O. Nadjemi, M. Bey, Feasibility study of grid connected photovoltaic system in family farms for electricity generation in rural areas. Renew. Energy 96, 305 (2016)CrossRef
8.
go back to reference A. Schaffer, C. Duevelmeyer, Regional drivers of on-farm energy production in Bavaria. Energy Policy 95, 361 (2016)CrossRef A. Schaffer, C. Duevelmeyer, Regional drivers of on-farm energy production in Bavaria. Energy Policy 95, 361 (2016)CrossRef
9.
go back to reference J.A. Bailey, P. Duinker, P. Amyotte, M. Adams, F. Khan, Measuring energy conservation on nova scotia (NS) farms: a 2004 to 2011 comparison. Energy 113, 144 (2016)CrossRef J.A. Bailey, P. Duinker, P. Amyotte, M. Adams, F. Khan, Measuring energy conservation on nova scotia (NS) farms: a 2004 to 2011 comparison. Energy 113, 144 (2016)CrossRef
10.
go back to reference M.C. Balda, T. Furubayashi, T. Nakata, A novel approach for analyzing the food-energy nexus through on-farm energy generation. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 19, 1003 (2017)CrossRef M.C. Balda, T. Furubayashi, T. Nakata, A novel approach for analyzing the food-energy nexus through on-farm energy generation. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 19, 1003 (2017)CrossRef
11.
go back to reference V.J.P.D. Martinho, Output impacts of the single payment scheme in portugal: a regression with spatial effects. Outlook Agric 44, 109 (2015)CrossRef V.J.P.D. Martinho, Output impacts of the single payment scheme in portugal: a regression with spatial effects. Outlook Agric 44, 109 (2015)CrossRef
12.
go back to reference H. Ding, P. Pinson, Z. Hu, Y. Song, Optimal offering and operating strategies for wind-storage systems with linear decision rules. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31, 4755 (2016)CrossRef H. Ding, P. Pinson, Z. Hu, Y. Song, Optimal offering and operating strategies for wind-storage systems with linear decision rules. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31, 4755 (2016)CrossRef
13.
go back to reference A. Erguido, A. Crespo Marquez, E. Castellano, and J. F. Gomez Fernandez, A Dynamic Opportunistic Maintenance Model to Maximize Energy-Based Availability While Reducing the Life Cycle Cost of Wind Farms, Renew. Energy 114, 843 (2017) A. Erguido, A. Crespo Marquez, E. Castellano, and J. F. Gomez Fernandez, A Dynamic Opportunistic Maintenance Model to Maximize Energy-Based Availability While Reducing the Life Cycle Cost of Wind Farms, Renew. Energy 114, 843 (2017)
14.
go back to reference V. J. P. D. Martinho, The Reality for Agricultural Economics Within the European Union: Stressing the Efficiency Indicators Across the Representative Farms (Springer International Publishing, 2017) V. J. P. D. Martinho, The Reality for Agricultural Economics Within the European Union: Stressing the Efficiency Indicators Across the Representative Farms (Springer International Publishing, 2017)
15.
go back to reference V.J.P.D. Martinho, Insights from over 30 years of common agricultural policy in Portugal. Outlook Agric 46, 223 (2017)CrossRef V.J.P.D. Martinho, Insights from over 30 years of common agricultural policy in Portugal. Outlook Agric 46, 223 (2017)CrossRef
16.
go back to reference V. Alekneviciene, B. Stareviciute, E. Alekneviciute, Evaluation of the efficiency of european union farms: a risk-adjusted return approach. Agric. Econ. 64, 241 (2018) V. Alekneviciene, B. Stareviciute, E. Alekneviciute, Evaluation of the efficiency of european union farms: a risk-adjusted return approach. Agric. Econ. 64, 241 (2018)
17.
go back to reference I. Ferto, Z. Bakucs, S. Bojnec, L. Latruffe, East-West European farm investment behaviour—the role of financial constraints and public support. Span. J. Agric. Res. 15, e0SC01 (2017). I. Ferto, Z. Bakucs, S. Bojnec, L. Latruffe, East-West European farm investment behaviour—the role of financial constraints and public support. Span. J. Agric. Res. 15, e0SC01 (2017).
18.
go back to reference J. Marzec, A. Pisulewski, Measuring the efficiency of european union farms under heterogeneous technologies. Gospod. Narod.-Pol. J. Econ. 303, 111 (2020)CrossRef J. Marzec, A. Pisulewski, Measuring the efficiency of european union farms under heterogeneous technologies. Gospod. Narod.-Pol. J. Econ. 303, 111 (2020)CrossRef
19.
go back to reference T. N. Maraseni, S. Mushtaq, K. Reardon-Smith, Climate Change, Water Security and the Need for Integrated Policy Development: The Case of on-Farm Infrastructure Investment in the Australian Irrigation Sector, Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 034006 (2012) T. N. Maraseni, S. Mushtaq, K. Reardon-Smith, Climate Change, Water Security and the Need for Integrated Policy Development: The Case of on-Farm Infrastructure Investment in the Australian Irrigation Sector, Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 034006 (2012)
20.
go back to reference S. Mushtaq, T.N. Maraseni, K. Reardon-Smith, Climate Change and Water Security: Estimating the Greenhouse Gas Costs of Achieving Water Security through Investments in Modern Irrigation Technology. Agric. Syst. 117, 78 (2013)CrossRef S. Mushtaq, T.N. Maraseni, K. Reardon-Smith, Climate Change and Water Security: Estimating the Greenhouse Gas Costs of Achieving Water Security through Investments in Modern Irrigation Technology. Agric. Syst. 117, 78 (2013)CrossRef
21.
go back to reference I. Stavi and R. Lal, Agriculture and Greenhouse Gases, a Common Tragedy. A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 33, 275 (2013) I. Stavi and R. Lal, Agriculture and Greenhouse Gases, a Common Tragedy. A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 33, 275 (2013)
22.
go back to reference N.J. Glithero, S.J. Ramsden, P. Wilson, Farm systems assessment of bioenergy feedstock production: integrating bio-economic models and life cycle analysis approaches. Agric. Syst. 109, 53 (2012)CrossRef N.J. Glithero, S.J. Ramsden, P. Wilson, Farm systems assessment of bioenergy feedstock production: integrating bio-economic models and life cycle analysis approaches. Agric. Syst. 109, 53 (2012)CrossRef
23.
go back to reference V.J.P.D. Martinho, Socioeconomic impacts of forest fires upon Portugal: an analysis for the agricultural and forestry sectors. Sustainability 11, 2 (2019)CrossRef V.J.P.D. Martinho, Socioeconomic impacts of forest fires upon Portugal: an analysis for the agricultural and forestry sectors. Sustainability 11, 2 (2019)CrossRef
24.
go back to reference B.L. Gowreesunker, S.A. Tassou, The impact of renewable energy policies on the adoption of anaerobic digesters with farm-fed wastes in Great Britain. Energies 9, 1038 (2016)CrossRef B.L. Gowreesunker, S.A. Tassou, The impact of renewable energy policies on the adoption of anaerobic digesters with farm-fed wastes in Great Britain. Energies 9, 1038 (2016)CrossRef
28.
go back to reference StataCorp, Stata 15 Base Reference Manual (Stata Press, College Station, TX, 2017) StataCorp, Stata 15 Base Reference Manual (Stata Press, College Station, TX, 2017)
29.
go back to reference StataCorp, Stata Statistical Software: Release 15 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, 2017) StataCorp, Stata Statistical Software: Release 15 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, 2017)
Metadata
Title
Characteristics of Farms in the European Union: Relationships Between Energy Costs and Other Variables
Author
Vítor João Pereira Domingues Martinho
Copyright Year
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75839-4_2