Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Introducing Corporate Water Stewardship in the Context of Global Water Governance Read chapter Read first chapter

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

5. Companies and Water Sanitation and Hygiene

Author : Thérèse Rudebeck

Published in: Corporations as Custodians of the Public Good?

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter examines CWS in the context of WASH. It puts forth the argument that companies’ engagement in WASH differs from their engagement in water resources management because it is driven by utilisation of opportunities as well as risk mitigation. More specifically, although companies’ engagement is still in its infancy, the chapter shows that there are early signs that companies will engage when they can align engagement with alleviating a risk, utilising an opportunity, or reducing inefficiency. To make this argument, the chapter first revisits the ‘business-society relationship’, and assesses how a redefined role for companies as ‘development agents’ has allowed them to take action on issues like WASH. It then analyses the rationale for integrating WASH into the CWS agenda and assesses how various companies take action. Finally, it questions the assumption that companies’ engagements in WASH lead to win-win outcomes for business and society. Critically, the findings suggest that the evidence points to a need for caution in assuming mutual public and private benefits.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Companies and Water Resources Management
next chapter Corporate Legitimacy in Collective Action
Footnotes
1
Among other things, this led to the privatisation of water services in some developing countries, which in many instances had detrimental effects on human livelihoods (see, for example, Grusky 2001; Goldman 2007).
 
2
This concept denotes the phenomenon where wealthy business people like Mark Zuckerberg (Facebook) and Bill Gates (Microsoft) set up their own philanthropic organisations in order to pursue their own causes.
 
3
The central idea here is that the poor are dependent on market systems for their livelihoods. But, due to a wide range of reasons (e.g. unstable regulatory environments, high corruption levels, or lack of infrastructure), many markets that are important to the poor do not function well, restricting choices and opportunities. Therefore, the idea is that by making those market systems work more effectively, the poor will improve their livelihoods and poverty will consequently be reduced.
 
4
A goal it claims to have achieved. RAIN has thus made an additional pledge to contribute US$35 million to support Pan-African safe water access programmes that will bring the total number of RAIN beneficiaries to six million through a total investment of US$65 million by 2020 (Mboya 2016).
 
5
In addition to working directly with local partners to implement change, WaterAid call on governments to provide solutions, as they believe that “it is only governments who can create an environment where public and private investments and civil society can all operate effectively” (WaterAid 2018).
 
6
The public authority transfers the responsibility of water services in a specific area, such as collection, treatment, or distribution, to the private sector. This can be done by granting full concession to the private company, implying the transfer of possession from the public to the private authority.
 
7
In a typical Build Operate Transfer (BOT) project, the public authority grants the right to a private company to develop and operate what would traditionally be a public-sector project. The project company obtains financing for the project, produces the design and constructions of the works, and operates the facility during the specific period in return for a revenue stream provided by sales of its services. At the end of the specified period, the facility is transferred back to the authority.
 
8
In the case of an existing utility, shares in the utility are divested to the private sector. In the case of a new build project, the project company will be established with a joint share ownership structure.
 
9
It is unclear what Unilever means by ‘reached.’ It is not explicitly stated whether this means people who have been part of the programme, the number of people who have demonstrated behaviour change, or people who have bought the product.
 
10
To attain sufficient health outcomes, it would, however, be necessary for a person to wash his/her hands more than once a day.
 
11
Based on an independent evaluation conducted in 2013, of 1485 households with children aged below 12 years.
 
Literature
Agnihotri, A. (2013). Doing good and doing business at the bottom of the pyramid. Business Horizons, 56(5), 591–599.
Arnold, D. G., & Valentin, A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility at the base of the pyramid. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1904–1914.
Banks, G., Scheyvens, R., McLennan, S., & Bebbington, A. (2016). Conceptualising corporate community development. Third World Quarterly, 37(2), 245–263.
Banks, N., & Hulme, D. (2014). New development alternatives or business as usual with a new face? The transformative potential of new actors and alliances in development. Third World Quarterly, 35(1), 181–195.
Blowfield, M. (2007). Reasons to be cheerful? What we know about CSR’s impact. Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 683–695.
Blowfield, M. (2012). Business and development: Making sense of business as a development agent. Corporate Governance, 12(4), 414–426.
Blowfield, M., & Dolan, C. S. (2014). Business as a development agent: Evidence of possibility and improbability. Third World Quarterly, 35(1), 22–42.
CEO Water Mandate. (2011). The CEO Water Mandate: An initiative by business leaders in partnership with the international community. New York: UNGC.
CEO Water Mandate. (2014a). Exploring the business case for corporate action on sanitation (White Paper). Oakland: Pacific Institute.
CEO Water Mandate. (2014b). The CEO water mandate fourteenth working conference meeting summary September 1–3, 2014 Stockholm, Sweden. Oakland: Pacific Institute.
CEO Water Mandate. (2015). Guidance for companies on respecting the human rights to water and sanitation: Bringing a human rights lens to corporate water stewardship. Oakland: Pacific Institute.
Coca-Cola Company. (2009). Live positively: 2008/2009 sustainability review. Atlanta: The Coca-Cola Company.
Coca-Cola Company. (2011). The Coca-Cola 2011 annual review: Passionately refreshing a thirsty world. Atlanta: The Coca-Cola Company.
Coca-Cola Company. (2012). The water stewardship and replenishment report. Atlanta: The Coca-Cola Company.
Coleman, D. (2003). The United Nations and transnational corporations: From an inter-nation to a “beyond-state” model of engagement. Global Society, 17(4), 339–357.
Cross, J., & Street, A. (2009). Anthropology at the bottom of the pyramid. Anthropology Today, 25(4), 4–9.
Dolan, C., & Roll, K. (2013). Capital’s new frontier: From “unusable” economies to bottom-of-the-pyramid markets in Africa. African Studies Review, 56(3), 123–146.
Gehani, R. R. (2016). Corporate brand value shifting from identity to innovation capability: From Coca-Cola to Apple. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 11(3), 11–20.
Goldman, M. (2007). How “Water for All!” policy became hegemonic: The power of the World Bank and its transnational policy networks. Geoforum, 38(5), 786–800.
Grusky, S. (2001). Privatization tidal wave: IMF/World Bank water policies and the price paid by the poor. Multinational Monitor, 22(9), 14–19.
H&M. (2015). Conscious actions, sustainability report 2015. Stockholm: H&M.
High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the post-2015 Development Agenda. (2013). A new global partnership: Eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development. New York: UN.
Hutton, G., & Haller, L. (2004). Evaluation of the costs and benefits of water and sanitation improvements at the global level. Geneva: WHO.
IFC (2014) Shared prosperity through inclusive business: How successful companies reach the base of the pyramid. Washington, DC: IFC.
Kinsley, M. (2008). Creative capitalism: A conversation with Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, and other economic leaders. New York: Simon and Schuster.
London, T., Anupindi, R., & Sheth, S. (2010). Creating mutual value: Lessons learned from ventures serving base of the pyramid producers. Journal of Business Research, 63(6), 582–594.
Mawdsley, E., Savage, L., & Kim, S. (2014). A ‘post-aid world’? Paradigm shift in foreign aid and development cooperation at the 2011 Busan High Level Forum. The Geographical Journal, 180(1), 27–38.
Nestlé. (2006). The Nestlé concept of corporate social responsibility as implemented in Latin America. Vevey: Nestlé S.A.
Nestlé. (2016). Nestlé in society: Creating Shared Value and meeting our commitments 2016. Vevey: Nestlé S.A.
Newborne, P., & Dalton, J. (2016). Water management and stewardship: Taking stock of corporate water behaviour. Gland/London: IUCN/ODI.
ODI. (2012). Private sector investment in water management (Briefing Paper 78). London: ODI.
Owen, D. P. (2006). Beyond corporate social responsibility: The scope for corporate investment in community driven development. Washington: World Bank.
PepsiCo. (2012). PepsiCo 2011/2012 GRI report. New York: PepsiCo.
PepsiCo. (2014). Delivering access to safe water through partnerships. Purchase: PepsiCo.
Pingeot, L. (2014). Corporate influence in the Post-2015 process (Working Paper). Aachen/Berlin/Bonn/New York: Misereor/GPF/Brot für die Welt.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 48–57.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy + Business, 6, 1–14.
Rangan, K. Chase, L.A., & Karim, S. (2012). Why every company needs a CSR strategy and how to build it (Working Paper 12-088). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
Rasche, A., Waddock, S., & McIntosh, M. (2012). The United Nations global compact: Retrospect and prospect. Business & Society, 52(1), 6–30.
SAB Miller. (2013). Sustainable development summary report 2013: The value of local growth. London: SABMiller plc.
Sarni, W. (2013). Getting Ahead of the “Ripple Effect”: A framework for a water stewardship strategy. Deloitte Review, 12, 84–97.
Sarni, W., & Grant, D. (2018). Water stewardship and business value: Creating abundance from scarcity. New York: Earthscan.
SDSN. (2014). An action agenda for sustainable development: Report for the UN Secretary-General. 6 June 2013. New York: UNSDSL.
UNDP. (2008). Creating value for all: Strategies for doing business with the poor. New York: UNDP.
UNGC. (2010). Coming of age: UN-private sector collaboration since 2000. New York: UNGC.
UNGC. (2015). Impact: Transforming business, changing the world. New York: DNV GLAS.
UNHRC. (2008). Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie. A/HRC/8/5, submitted 7 April 2008.
UNHRC. (2011). Human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises. A/HRC/RES/17/4.
Unilever. (2005). Unilever environmental and social report. Merseyside: Unilever PLC.
Unilever. (2008). Sustainable development 2008: An overview. Merseyside: Unilever PLC.
Unilever. (2014). Unilever sustainable living plan: Scaling for impact. Merseyside: Unilever PLC.
Unilever. (2015). Unilever sustainable living plan: Mobilising collective action. Merseyside: Unilever PLC.
UN-Water. (2016). Water and sanitation interlinkages across the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Geneva: UN-Water.
Warhurst, A. (2005). Future roles of business in society: The expanding boundaries of corporate responsibility and a compelling case for partnership. Futures, 37(2–3), 151–168.
WaterAid, The CEO Water Mandate, & WBCSD. (2016). Scaling corporate action on access to water, sanitation and hygiene in supply chains. White Paper (Draft) August, 2016.
WBCSD. (2004). Doing business with the poor, a field guide: Learning journeys of leading companies on the road to sustainable livelihoods business. Conches-Geneva: WBCSD.
Wulfson, M. (2001). The ethics of corporate social responsibility and philanthropic ventures. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(1/2), 135–145.
WWF. (2009). Investigating shared risk in water: Corporate engagement with the public policy process. Surrey: WWF-UK.
Metadata
Title
Companies and Water Sanitation and Hygiene
Author
Thérèse Rudebeck
Copyright Year
2019
Book
Corporations as Custodians of the Public Good?

Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13224-8

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-13225-5

Copyright Year: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13225-5_5