Skip to main content
Top

06-01-2024

Comparative analysis of environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings: do sectors and regions differ?

Authors: Rekha Pillai, Md. Aminul Islam, S. Sreejith, Husam Aldin Al-Malkawi

Published in: Journal of Management and Governance

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Sustainable and holistic investment philosophy such as environmental, social and governance (ESG) concepts have now emerged as the subtle, comprehensive and concrete response to the unprecedented surge in environmental, social and financial market sustainable development problems. The main aim of this paper is to perform an in-depth study on ESG ratings world-wide and to granularly analyse how and why they differ within industries and regions as reported by Sustainalytics on 13,589 companies as of December 2022. Perceiving ESG ratings from dual dimensions, we introduce the ‘push–pull effect’ where we identify the rationale pushing corporates for providing their ESG engagements to ESG rating providers and the justification for stakeholders pulling information from these rating providers. Correspondence analysis, nonparametric independent sample Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney test are performed as tools of inference. Results reveal that Asia and America are regions demonstrating high ESG risks with European corporates exhibiting low ESG risks. In terms of industry, transportation infrastructure and media, both categorized under low ESG risk, portray a statistically significant difference from other industries. Finally, the sector wise reports clearly evince an overall statistically significant difference between financial and non-financial sector in all regions, the former presenting high risk ESG scores in Asia and North America. Policy implications are set as ESG is a concept which has stepped out of the “awareness creation” stage to an implementation state, imploring policy makers to embark on stringent measures of ensuring ESG compliance to reap stakeholder confidence and ensure sustainable development.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
This section is heavily based on the ratings methodology provided by Sustainalytics (2021)
 
Literature
go back to reference ADBI. (2020). Environmental, social and governance investment—opportunities for Asia. ADBI. (2020). Environmental, social and governance investment—opportunities for Asia.
go back to reference Agresti, A. (2004). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis (Third). Wiley & Sons Hoboken. Agresti, A. (2004). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis (Third). Wiley & Sons Hoboken.
go back to reference Deegan, C. M. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosure—a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(282), 311. Deegan, C. M. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosure—a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(282), 311.
go back to reference Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic managment: A stakeholder approach. Pitman. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic managment: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
go back to reference Gilula, Z., & Haberman, S.J. (1988). The analysis of multivariate contingency tables by restricted canonical and restricted association models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(403), 760–771. https://doi.org/10.2307/2289302 Gilula, Z., & Haberman, S.J. (1988). The analysis of multivariate contingency tables by restricted canonical and restricted association models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(403), 760–771. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2307/​2289302
go back to reference Greenacre, M. (1974). Correspondence analysis in the social sciences. Academic Press Inc. Greenacre, M. (1974). Correspondence analysis in the social sciences. Academic Press Inc.
go back to reference Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis, Academic Press. Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis, Academic Press.
go back to reference Greene, M. J. (2013). Correspondence Analysis. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods Statistical Analysis (pp. 142–153). Oxford University Press. Greene, M. J. (2013). Correspondence Analysis. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods Statistical Analysis (pp. 142–153). Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Harris, R., & Jarvis, C. (2011). Statistics for Geography and Environmental Science, Prentice Hall. Harris, R., & Jarvis, C. (2011). Statistics for Geography and Environmental Science, Prentice Hall.
go back to reference Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.
go back to reference International Organization of Securities Commission. (2021). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data products providers. International Organization of Securities Commission. (2021). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data products providers.
go back to reference Larcker, B. D. F., Tayan, B., & Watts, M. (2022). ESG ratings: A compass without direction. Rock center for corporate governance at Stanford University working paper. pp. 1–16. Larcker, B. D. F., Tayan, B., & Watts, M. (2022). ESG ratings: A compass without direction. Rock center for corporate governance at Stanford University working paper. pp. 1–16.
go back to reference Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Rostoum, M. (2018). The environmental, social , and governance (ESG) ratings industry: How can publicly-traded companies improve their overall ESG scores?. Rostoum, M. (2018). The environmental, social , and governance (ESG) ratings industry: How can publicly-traded companies improve their overall ESG scores?.
go back to reference Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S & P 500 companies: An analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660–1880.CrossRef Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S & P 500 companies: An analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660–1880.CrossRef
go back to reference Thomson Reuterus (2021). ESG: Fast-emerging challenges for financial institutions. Thomson Reuterus (2021). ESG: Fast-emerging challenges for financial institutions.
Metadata
Title
Comparative analysis of environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings: do sectors and regions differ?
Authors
Rekha Pillai
Md. Aminul Islam
S. Sreejith
Husam Aldin Al-Malkawi
Publication date
06-01-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Management and Governance
Print ISSN: 1385-3457
Electronic ISSN: 1572-963X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-023-09692-7