Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Small Business Economics 1/2019

02-04-2018

Contracts for venture capital financing with double-sided moral hazard

Authors: Hui Fu, Jun Yang, Yunbi An

Published in: Small Business Economics | Issue 1/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Using a Nash bargaining approach, we analyze the financing contract between the entrepreneur and the venture capitalist with double-sided moral hazard in a start-up enterprise. Our results show that there exists an optimal contract set between the entrepreneur and the venture capitalist, in which all contracts achieve an identical second-best social state. Within the optimal contract set, there exists continuum of joint debt-equity financing. The pure equity financing contract exists in the optimal contract set when the ratio of total social surplus to the amount of investment is greater than a threshold.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Throughout the paper, we use the phrases “optimal effort” and “equilibrium effort” interchangeably.
 
2
With complete information when efforts are observable and verifiable, the entrepreneur and the VC would be compensated by their respective actual effort. In this case, their optimal effort levels are determined by the following condition:
\( \underset{L,K}{\max}\kern0.5em \gamma S\left(L,K\right)=\gamma \left({R}_{\varepsilon }+c\sqrt{LK}-F-\frac{L^2}{2\eta }-\frac{K^2}{2\theta}\right), \)
where γ = αα(1 − α)(1 − α) is a constant and S(L, K) is the gross social surplus that deducts from the project output the initial investment and effort costs of both parties. To find the optimal effort levels, we take the first-order condition, which gives \( \Big\{{\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}{L}^{\ast }=\frac{c}{2}{\theta}^{\frac{1}{4}}{\eta}^{\frac{3}{4}}\\ {}{K}^{\ast }=\frac{c}{2}{\theta}^{\frac{3}{4}}{\eta}^{\frac{1}{4}}\end{array}}\operatorname{} \).
 
3
Throughout the paper we use the terms “agreed effort” and “expected effort” interchangeably.
 
4
Lemma 1 describes the ideal yet inexecutable entrepreneurial contract form, and Proposition 1 presents the executable contract set (which nests the ideal contract) by introducing conditional social surplus. Only if conditional and actual social surplus are equal, the project output is shared in the same fashion between the ideal contract and the executable contract. The contract is fair in the sense that both parties are compensated by the actual cost of effort. The fairness of contracts in this context is more specific than that discussed in literature such as Fairchild (2011b) who relates it more generally to reciprocity, empathy, and trust.
 
5
In Figure 4 the following assumptions are made regarding the transfer payment: \( T\left(\widehat{L},\widehat{K}\right)=1.5\times \alpha F=0.15 \) in \( M\left({H}_1^{\ast}\right) \), \( T\left(\widehat{L},\widehat{K}\right)=\alpha F=0.1 \) in \( M\left({H}_2^{\ast}\right) \), \( T\left(\widehat{L},\widehat{K}\right)=0.5\times \alpha F=0.05 \) in \( M\left({H}_3^{\ast}\right) \), and\( T\left(\widehat{L},\widehat{K}\right)=0\times \alpha F=0 \) in \( M\left({H}_4^{\ast}\right) \).
 
6
The subset \( M\left({H}_4^{\ast}\right) \) excludes the scenarios when α is between 0.83 and 0.99 because of the negative social surplus (the transfer payment is out of its boundary). Such scenarios are not in the optimal contract set by definition.
 
7
The subset \( M\left({H}_3^{\ast}\right) \) excludes the scenarios when α is between 0.91 and 0.99 because of the negative social surplus.
 
8
Generally, in subsets M(H1*) and M(H3*), the relationships shown in Fig. 4 are not necessarily linear, and the share of social surplus received by the entrepreneur is usually (but not always) greater than the share of project output.
 
Literature
go back to reference Binmore, K., Rubinstein, A., & Wolinsky, A. (1986). The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling. RAND Journal of Economics, 17(2), 176–188.CrossRef Binmore, K., Rubinstein, A., & Wolinsky, A. (1986). The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling. RAND Journal of Economics, 17(2), 176–188.CrossRef
go back to reference Bengtsson, O. (2012). Financial contracting in US venture capital: overview and empirical evidence. In D. Cumming (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of venture capital (pp. 478–508). New York: Oxford University Press. Bengtsson, O. (2012). Financial contracting in US venture capital: overview and empirical evidence. In D. Cumming (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of venture capital (pp. 478–508). New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Bengtsson, O., & Sensoy, B. A. (2015). Changing the nexus: the evolution and renegotiation of venture capital contracts. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(03), 349–375.CrossRef Bengtsson, O., & Sensoy, B. A. (2015). Changing the nexus: the evolution and renegotiation of venture capital contracts. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(03), 349–375.CrossRef
go back to reference Casamatta, C. (2003). Financing and advising: optimal financial contracts with venture capitalists. Journal of Finance, 58(5), 2059–2086.CrossRef Casamatta, C. (2003). Financing and advising: optimal financial contracts with venture capitalists. Journal of Finance, 58(5), 2059–2086.CrossRef
go back to reference Chemla, G., Habib, M. A., & Ljungqvist, A. (2007). An analysis of shareholder agreements. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(1), 93–121.CrossRef Chemla, G., Habib, M. A., & Ljungqvist, A. (2007). An analysis of shareholder agreements. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(1), 93–121.CrossRef
go back to reference Cheung, S. N. S. (1969). The theory of share tenancy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press reprinted in June 2000 by Arcadia Press. Cheung, S. N. S. (1969). The theory of share tenancy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press reprinted in June 2000 by Arcadia Press.
go back to reference Cumming, D. J. (2005). Capital structure in venture finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(3), 550–585.CrossRef Cumming, D. J. (2005). Capital structure in venture finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(3), 550–585.CrossRef
go back to reference Cumming, D. J. (2007). United States venture capital financial contracting: foreign securities, in Hirschey, John, and Makhija (ed.) Issues in corporate governance and finance (Advances in financial economics, Volume 12), Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 405–444. Cumming, D. J. (2007). United States venture capital financial contracting: foreign securities, in Hirschey, John, and Makhija (ed.) Issues in corporate governance and finance (Advances in financial economics, Volume 12), Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 405–444.
go back to reference Cumming, D. (2008). Contracts and exits in venture capital finance. Review of Financial Studies, 21(5), 1947–1982.CrossRef Cumming, D. (2008). Contracts and exits in venture capital finance. Review of Financial Studies, 21(5), 1947–1982.CrossRef
go back to reference Cumming, D., & binti Johan, S. A. (2008). Preplanned exit strategies in venture capital. European Economic Review, 52(7), 1209–1241.CrossRef Cumming, D., & binti Johan, S. A. (2008). Preplanned exit strategies in venture capital. European Economic Review, 52(7), 1209–1241.CrossRef
go back to reference Cumming, D., Schmidt, D., & Walz, U. (2010). Legality and venture capital governance around the world. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 54–72.CrossRef Cumming, D., Schmidt, D., & Walz, U. (2010). Legality and venture capital governance around the world. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 54–72.CrossRef
go back to reference De Bettignies, J. E. (2008). Financing the entrepreneurial venture. Management Science, 54(1), 151–166.CrossRef De Bettignies, J. E. (2008). Financing the entrepreneurial venture. Management Science, 54(1), 151–166.CrossRef
go back to reference De Bettignies, J. E., & Brander, J. A. (2007). Financing entrepreneurship: bank finance versus venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(6), 808–832.CrossRef De Bettignies, J. E., & Brander, J. A. (2007). Financing entrepreneurship: bank finance versus venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(6), 808–832.CrossRef
go back to reference Fairchild, R. (2011a). An entrepreneur’s choice of venture capitalist or angel-financing: a behavioral game-theoretic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 359–374.CrossRef Fairchild, R. (2011a). An entrepreneur’s choice of venture capitalist or angel-financing: a behavioral game-theoretic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 359–374.CrossRef
go back to reference Fairchild, R. (2011b). Fairness norms and self-interest in venture capital/entrepreneur contracting and performance. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 2(1), 4–20.CrossRef Fairchild, R. (2011b). Fairness norms and self-interest in venture capital/entrepreneur contracting and performance. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 2(1), 4–20.CrossRef
go back to reference Fenn, G., N. Liang, S. Prowse (1998). The role of angel investors in financing high-tech start-ups, Unpublished Manuscript, Federal Reserve Board. Fenn, G., N. Liang, S. Prowse (1998). The role of angel investors in financing high-tech start-ups, Unpublished Manuscript, Federal Reserve Board.
go back to reference Gilson, R. J., & Schizer, D. M. (2003). Understanding venture capital structure: a tax explanation for convertible preferred stock. Harvard Law Review, 116(3), 874–916.CrossRef Gilson, R. J., & Schizer, D. M. (2003). Understanding venture capital structure: a tax explanation for convertible preferred stock. Harvard Law Review, 116(3), 874–916.CrossRef
go back to reference Hartmann-Wendels, T., Keienburg, G., & Sievers, S. (2011). Adverse selection, investor experience and security choice in venture capital finance: evidence from Germany. European Financial Management, 17(3), 464–499.CrossRef Hartmann-Wendels, T., Keienburg, G., & Sievers, S. (2011). Adverse selection, investor experience and security choice in venture capital finance: evidence from Germany. European Financial Management, 17(3), 464–499.CrossRef
go back to reference Hellmann, T. (1998). The allocation of control rights in venture capital contracts. RAND Journal of Economics, 29(1), 57–76.CrossRef Hellmann, T. (1998). The allocation of control rights in venture capital contracts. RAND Journal of Economics, 29(1), 57–76.CrossRef
go back to reference Hellmann, T. (2002). A theory of strategic venture investing. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(2), 285–314.CrossRef Hellmann, T. (2002). A theory of strategic venture investing. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(2), 285–314.CrossRef
go back to reference Hellmann, T. (2006). IPOs, acquisitions, and the use of convertible securities in venture capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(3), 649–679.CrossRef Hellmann, T. (2006). IPOs, acquisitions, and the use of convertible securities in venture capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(3), 649–679.CrossRef
go back to reference Hirsch, J., & Walz, U. (2013). Why do contracts differ between venture capital types? Small Business Economics, 40(3), 511–525.CrossRef Hirsch, J., & Walz, U. (2013). Why do contracts differ between venture capital types? Small Business Economics, 40(3), 511–525.CrossRef
go back to reference Inderst, R., & Muller, H. M. (2004). The effect of capital market characteristics on the value of start-up firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 72(2), 319–356.CrossRef Inderst, R., & Muller, H. M. (2004). The effect of capital market characteristics on the value of start-up firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 72(2), 319–356.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaplan, S. N., Martel, F., & Strömberg, P. (2007). How do legal differences and experience affect financial contracts? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16(3), 273–311.CrossRef Kaplan, S. N., Martel, F., & Strömberg, P. (2007). How do legal differences and experience affect financial contracts? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16(3), 273–311.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaplan, S. N., & Strömberg, P. (2003). Financial contracting theory meets the real world: an empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 281–315.CrossRef Kaplan, S. N., & Strömberg, P. (2003). Financial contracting theory meets the real world: an empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 281–315.CrossRef
go back to reference Landier, A. (2002). Start-up financing: From banks to venture capitalists, Working Paper, University of Chicago. Landier, A. (2002). Start-up financing: From banks to venture capitalists, Working Paper, University of Chicago.
go back to reference Lerner, J., & Schoar, A. (2005). Does legal enforcement affect financial transactions? The contractual channel in private equity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(1), 223–246. Lerner, J., & Schoar, A. (2005). Does legal enforcement affect financial transactions? The contractual channel in private equity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(1), 223–246.
go back to reference Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.
go back to reference Nahata, R., Hazarika, S., & Tandon, K. (2014). Success in global venture capital investing: do institutional and cultural differences matter? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(04), 1039–1070.CrossRef Nahata, R., Hazarika, S., & Tandon, K. (2014). Success in global venture capital investing: do institutional and cultural differences matter? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49(04), 1039–1070.CrossRef
go back to reference Nash, J. (1953). Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica, 21(1), 128–140.CrossRef Nash, J. (1953). Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica, 21(1), 128–140.CrossRef
go back to reference Osintsev, Y. (2010). Venture financing of start-ups: a model of contract between VC fund and entrepreneur. Economic Annals, 55(187), 61–86.CrossRef Osintsev, Y. (2010). Venture financing of start-ups: a model of contract between VC fund and entrepreneur. Economic Annals, 55(187), 61–86.CrossRef
go back to reference Reid, G. C. (1996). Fast growing small entrepreneurial firms and their venture capital backers: an applied principal-agent analysis. Small Business Economics, 8(3), 235–248.CrossRef Reid, G. C. (1996). Fast growing small entrepreneurial firms and their venture capital backers: an applied principal-agent analysis. Small Business Economics, 8(3), 235–248.CrossRef
go back to reference Repullo, R., & Suarez, J. (2004). Venture capital finance: a security design approach. Review of Finance, 8(1), 75–108.CrossRef Repullo, R., & Suarez, J. (2004). Venture capital finance: a security design approach. Review of Finance, 8(1), 75–108.CrossRef
go back to reference Roth, A. E. (1979). Axiomatic models of bargaining. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef Roth, A. E. (1979). Axiomatic models of bargaining. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRef
go back to reference Schmidt, K. M. (2003). Convertible securities and venture capital finance. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1139–1166.CrossRef Schmidt, K. M. (2003). Convertible securities and venture capital finance. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1139–1166.CrossRef
go back to reference Tirole, J. (2006). The theory of corporate finance. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Tirole, J. (2006). The theory of corporate finance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Utset, M. A. (2002). Reciprocal fairness, strategic behavior and venture survival: a theory of venture capital-financed firms. Wisconsin Law Review, 2002(1), 45–168. Utset, M. A. (2002). Reciprocal fairness, strategic behavior and venture survival: a theory of venture capital-financed firms. Wisconsin Law Review, 2002(1), 45–168.
go back to reference Yousfi, O. (2013). Does PLS solve moral hazard problems? Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 9(3), 11–26.CrossRef Yousfi, O. (2013). Does PLS solve moral hazard problems? Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 9(3), 11–26.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Contracts for venture capital financing with double-sided moral hazard
Authors
Hui Fu
Jun Yang
Yunbi An
Publication date
02-04-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Small Business Economics / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0028-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Small Business Economics 1/2019 Go to the issue

Premium Partner