Skip to main content
Top
Published in: NanoEthics 3/2016

25-10-2016 | Original Paper

Contrasting Medical Technology with Deprivation and Social Vulnerability. Lessons for the Ethical Debate on Cloning and Organ Transplantation Through the Film Never Let Me Go (2010)

Authors: Solveig Lena Hansen, Sabine Wöhlke

Published in: NanoEthics | Issue 3/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the film Never Let Me Go (UK/USA 2010), clones are forced to donate their organs anonymously. As a work of fiction, this film can be regarded as a negotiation of limited agency, since the clones are depicted as vulnerable individuals. Thereby, it evokes a confrontation with underprivileged positions in technocratic societies, encouraging the audience to take the perspective of the marginalised. The clones are situated in ‘privileged deprivation’; from the audience’s point of view, they are unable to evolve into autonomous agents—but from their own perspective within the dystopian system, they are still ‘privileged’. In this paper, we analyse the depiction of the clones’ personal development. Further, we examine references to bioethical aspects as well as technologies that affect the human body both on a micro and macro level—cloning and its impact on the human embryo and organ donation practised on the full-grown human body. We argue that this film as a reference for the discussion in popular culture focuses on individuals who do not profit from modern technical progress or do not have enough agency to refuse it. To make this point, we analyse the film’s fictional story, set in a form of alternate history, as a negotiation of a historical context which brings out the idea of neglected voices.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
In 2010, Romanek’s film “Never let me go” was released by Fox Searchlight Pictures in the UK/US.
 
2
A differentiation can be made between directed and non-directed donation. In directed donation, the recipient is known; in non-directed (anonymous), the recipient remains unknown [1].
 
3
As Villiers & Slabbert have noted, Never Let Me Go represents an overdrawn depiction of such opt-out solutions in organ transplantation. Opt-out systems entail state regulations which readily assume its citizens’ willingness to donate organs as long as they do not explicitly refuse [13].
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bauman Z (2011) Wasted lives: modernity and its outcasts. Polity Press, Cambridge Bauman Z (2011) Wasted lives: modernity and its outcasts. Polity Press, Cambridge
4.
go back to reference Black S (2009) Ishiguro’s inhuman aesthetics. Mod Fict Stud 55(4):785–807CrossRef Black S (2009) Ishiguro’s inhuman aesthetics. Mod Fict Stud 55(4):785–807CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Corbin JM, Strauss A (1988) Unending work and care: managing chronic illness at home. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Corbin JM, Strauss A (1988) Unending work and care: managing chronic illness at home. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
11.
go back to reference Currie M (2009) Controlling time: Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go. In: Matthews S, Groes S (eds) Kazuo Ishiguro: Contemporary critical perspectives. Continuum, London, pp 91–103 Currie M (2009) Controlling time: Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go. In: Matthews S, Groes S (eds) Kazuo Ishiguro: Contemporary critical perspectives. Continuum, London, pp 91–103
12.
go back to reference Dans PE (2011) A personal journey using film to teach medical ethics. In: Colt H, Quadrelli S, Lester F (eds) The picture of health. Medical ethics and the movies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 11–19CrossRef Dans PE (2011) A personal journey using film to teach medical ethics. In: Colt H, Quadrelli S, Lester F (eds) The picture of health. Medical ethics and the movies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 11–19CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Feinberg J (1989) Autonomy. In: Christman J (ed) The inner citadel: Essays on individual autonomy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 27–53 Feinberg J (1989) Autonomy. In: Christman J (ed) The inner citadel: Essays on individual autonomy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 27–53
16.
go back to reference Franklin PM, Crombie AK (2003) Live related renal transplantation: psychological, social, and cultural issues. Transplantation 76(8):1247–1252CrossRef Franklin PM, Crombie AK (2003) Live related renal transplantation: psychological, social, and cultural issues. Transplantation 76(8):1247–1252CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Friese C (2013) Cloning wild life: zoos, captivity, and the future of endangered animals. New York University Press, New YorkCrossRef Friese C (2013) Cloning wild life: zoos, captivity, and the future of endangered animals. New York University Press, New YorkCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gottweis H (2012) Political rhetoric and stem cell policy in the United States. In: Fischer F, Gottweis H (eds) The argumentative turn revisited. Public policy as communicative practice. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 211–235CrossRef Gottweis H (2012) Political rhetoric and stem cell policy in the United States. In: Fischer F, Gottweis H (eds) The argumentative turn revisited. Public policy as communicative practice. Duke University Press, Durham, pp 211–235CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hakim NS (2012) Introduction to organ transplantation, 2nd edn. Imperial College Press, LondonCrossRef Hakim NS (2012) Introduction to organ transplantation, 2nd edn. Imperial College Press, LondonCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hansen SL (2016) Alterität als kulturelle Herausforderung des Klonens. Eine Rekonstruktion bioethischer und literarischer Verhandlungen. Mentis, Münster Hansen SL (2016) Alterität als kulturelle Herausforderung des Klonens. Eine Rekonstruktion bioethischer und literarischer Verhandlungen. Mentis, Münster
22.
go back to reference Holm S (2001) A life in the shadow. One reason why we should not clone humans. In: Ruse M, Sheppard A (eds) Cloning. Responsible science or technomadness. Prometheus Books, Amherst, pp 189–193 Holm S (2001) A life in the shadow. One reason why we should not clone humans. In: Ruse M, Sheppard A (eds) Cloning. Responsible science or technomadness. Prometheus Books, Amherst, pp 189–193
24.
go back to reference Hwang WS, Roh S, Lee BC, Kang SK, Kwon DK, Kim S (2005) Patient-specific embryonic patient-specific embryonic stem cells derived from human SCNT Blastocysts. Science 308(5729):1777–1783. doi:10.1126/science.1112286 CrossRef Hwang WS, Roh S, Lee BC, Kang SK, Kwon DK, Kim S (2005) Patient-specific embryonic patient-specific embryonic stem cells derived from human SCNT Blastocysts. Science 308(5729):1777–1783. doi:10.​1126/​science.​1112286 CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hwang WS, Ryu YJ, Park JH, Park ES, Lee EG, Koo JM (2004) Evidence of a pluripotent human embryonic stem cell line derived from a cloned blastocyst. Science 303(5664):1669–1674. doi:10.1126/science.1094515 CrossRef Hwang WS, Ryu YJ, Park JH, Park ES, Lee EG, Koo JM (2004) Evidence of a pluripotent human embryonic stem cell line derived from a cloned blastocyst. Science 303(5664):1669–1674. doi:10.​1126/​science.​1094515 CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Ishiguro K (2005) Never let me go. Faber, London Ishiguro K (2005) Never let me go. Faber, London
27.
go back to reference Jakober M (2008) The continuum of meaning: a reflection on speculative fiction and society. In: Easton L, Schroeder R (eds) The influence of imagination: Essays on science fiction and fantasy as agents of social change. McFarland & Company, Jefferson, pp 27–31 Jakober M (2008) The continuum of meaning: a reflection on speculative fiction and society. In: Easton L, Schroeder R (eds) The influence of imagination: Essays on science fiction and fantasy as agents of social change. McFarland & Company, Jefferson, pp 27–31
28.
go back to reference Jerng, M (2008) Giving form to life: cloning and narrative expectations of the human. Partial answers 6(2):369–393 Jerng, M (2008) Giving form to life: cloning and narrative expectations of the human. Partial answers 6(2):369–393
34.
go back to reference Macintosh KL (2013) Human cloning. Four fallacies and their legal consequences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Macintosh KL (2013) Human cloning. Four fallacies and their legal consequences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
36.
go back to reference Matthews S (2009) ‘I’m sorry I can’t say more’: An interview with Kazuo Ishiguro. In: Matthews S, Groes S (eds) Kazuo Ishiguro. Contemporary critical perspectives. Continuum, London, pp 114–125 Matthews S (2009) ‘I’m sorry I can’t say more’: An interview with Kazuo Ishiguro. In: Matthews S, Groes S (eds) Kazuo Ishiguro. Contemporary critical perspectives. Continuum, London, pp 114–125
37.
go back to reference Mihaela F, Demeny E, Sandor J, Ioan B (2013) To share or not to share your donor status on Facebook: public benefits, private risks. In: Randhawa G, Schicktanz S (eds) Public engagement in organ donation and transplantation. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich, pp 18–27 Mihaela F, Demeny E, Sandor J, Ioan B (2013) To share or not to share your donor status on Facebook: public benefits, private risks. In: Randhawa G, Schicktanz S (eds) Public engagement in organ donation and transplantation. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich, pp 18–27
38.
39.
go back to reference Motakef M (2011) Körper Gabe: Ambivalente Ökonomien der Organspende. Transcript, BielefeldCrossRef Motakef M (2011) Körper Gabe: Ambivalente Ökonomien der Organspende. Transcript, BielefeldCrossRef
40.
go back to reference National commission for the protection of human subjects of biomedical and behavioral research, United States (1978), The Belmont report National commission for the protection of human subjects of biomedical and behavioral research, United States (1978), The Belmont report
41.
go back to reference Randhawa G, Schicktanz S (2013) Public engagement in organ donation and transplantation. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich Randhawa G, Schicktanz S (2013) Public engagement in organ donation and transplantation. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich
42.
go back to reference Rieder J (2008) Colonialism and the emergence of science fiction. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown Rieder J (2008) Colonialism and the emergence of science fiction. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown
43.
go back to reference Roberts AC (2006) Science fiction, 2nd edn. Routledge, London Roberts AC (2006) Science fiction, 2nd edn. Routledge, London
45.
go back to reference Scheper-Hughes N (2005) The last commodity: post-human ethics and the global traffic in “fresh” organs. In: Ong A, Collier AJ, Assemblages G (eds) Technology, politics and ethics as anthropological problems. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, pp 145–168 Scheper-Hughes N (2005) The last commodity: post-human ethics and the global traffic in “fresh” organs. In: Ong A, Collier AJ, Assemblages G (eds) Technology, politics and ethics as anthropological problems. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, pp 145–168
46.
go back to reference Schweda M, Wöhlke S (2013) Lasting bonds and new connections: public views on the donor-recipient-relation and their implications for the ethics of organ transplantation. In: Lauri MA, Zahra A (eds) Organ donation and transplantation – an interdisciplinary approach. Nova Publishers, Malta, pp 177–181 Schweda M, Wöhlke S (2013) Lasting bonds and new connections: public views on the donor-recipient-relation and their implications for the ethics of organ transplantation. In: Lauri MA, Zahra A (eds) Organ donation and transplantation – an interdisciplinary approach. Nova Publishers, Malta, pp 177–181
47.
go back to reference Seed D (2011) Science fiction. A very short introduction. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef Seed D (2011) Science fiction. A very short introduction. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Sinason V (2012) Trauma, dissociation and multiplicity: working on identity and selves. Routledge, Hove Sinason V (2012) Trauma, dissociation and multiplicity: working on identity and selves. Routledge, Hove
49.
go back to reference Squier SM (2004) Liminal lives: imagining the human at the frontiers of biomedicine. Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRef Squier SM (2004) Liminal lives: imagining the human at the frontiers of biomedicine. Duke University Press, DurhamCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Storrow RF (2009) Therapeutic reproduction and human dignity. Law Lit 21(2):257–274CrossRef Storrow RF (2009) Therapeutic reproduction and human dignity. Law Lit 21(2):257–274CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Tachibana M, Amato P, Sparman M, Gutierrez NM, Tippner-Hedges R, Ma H, Kang E, Fulati A, Lee H, Sritanau-Domchai H, Masterson K, Larson J, Eaton D, Sadler-Fredd K, Battaglia D, Lee D, Wu D, Jensen J, Patton P, Gokhale S, Stouffer RL, Wolf D, Mitalipov S (2013) Human embryonic stem cells derived by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell 153(6):1–11. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.006 CrossRef Tachibana M, Amato P, Sparman M, Gutierrez NM, Tippner-Hedges R, Ma H, Kang E, Fulati A, Lee H, Sritanau-Domchai H, Masterson K, Larson J, Eaton D, Sadler-Fredd K, Battaglia D, Lee D, Wu D, Jensen J, Patton P, Gokhale S, Stouffer RL, Wolf D, Mitalipov S (2013) Human embryonic stem cells derived by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell 153(6):1–11. doi:10.​1016/​j.​cell.​2013.​05.​006 CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Tilney NL (2003) Transplant: from myth to reality. Yale University Press, New Haven Tilney NL (2003) Transplant: from myth to reality. Yale University Press, New Haven
54.
go back to reference Turner BS (2006) Vulnerability and human rights. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park Turner BS (2006) Vulnerability and human rights. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park
55.
go back to reference Whitehead A (2011) Writing with care: Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go. Contemp Lit 52(1):54–83CrossRef Whitehead A (2011) Writing with care: Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go. Contemp Lit 52(1):54–83CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Wilkinson TM (2011) Ethics and the acquisition of organs. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef Wilkinson TM (2011) Ethics and the acquisition of organs. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Wöhlke S (2013) The morality of giving and receiving living kidneys: Empirical findings on opinions of affected patients. In: Randhawa G, Schicktanz S (eds) Public engagement in organ donation and transplantation. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich, pp 144–153 Wöhlke S (2013) The morality of giving and receiving living kidneys: Empirical findings on opinions of affected patients. In: Randhawa G, Schicktanz S (eds) Public engagement in organ donation and transplantation. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich, pp 144–153
59.
go back to reference Wöhlke S (2015) Geschenkte Organe? Ethische und kulturelle Herausforderungen bei der familiären Lebendnierenspende. Campus, Frankfurt Wöhlke S (2015) Geschenkte Organe? Ethische und kulturelle Herausforderungen bei der familiären Lebendnierenspende. Campus, Frankfurt
60.
go back to reference Wöhlke S (2017) Living organ donation between self-determination and family obligation, DILEMATA, special issue about consent for donation (1/2017) (in preparation) Wöhlke S (2017) Living organ donation between self-determination and family obligation, DILEMATA, special issue about consent for donation (1/2017) (in preparation)
61.
go back to reference Yamada M, Johannesson B, Sagi I, Cole Burnett L, Kort DH, Prosser RW, Paull D, Nestor MW, Freeby M, Greenberg E, Goland RS, Leibel RL, Solomon SL, Benvenisty N, Sauer MV, Egli D (2014) Human oocytes reprogram adult somatic nuclei of a type 1 diabetic to diploid pluripotent stem cells. Nature 510(7506):533–536. doi:10.1038/nature13287 CrossRef Yamada M, Johannesson B, Sagi I, Cole Burnett L, Kort DH, Prosser RW, Paull D, Nestor MW, Freeby M, Greenberg E, Goland RS, Leibel RL, Solomon SL, Benvenisty N, Sauer MV, Egli D (2014) Human oocytes reprogram adult somatic nuclei of a type 1 diabetic to diploid pluripotent stem cells. Nature 510(7506):533–536. doi:10.​1038/​nature13287 CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Young IM (1996) Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy. In: Benhabib S (ed) Democracy and difference. Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 120–135 Young IM (1996) Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy. In: Benhabib S (ed) Democracy and difference. Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 120–135
63.
go back to reference Zeiler K (2013) Why the altruism/self-interest dichotomy does not hold and should be avoided also in public perception studies related to ‘donation’. In: Randhawa G, Schicktanz S (eds) Public engagement in organ donation and transplantation. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich, pp 18–27 Zeiler K (2013) Why the altruism/self-interest dichotomy does not hold and should be avoided also in public perception studies related to ‘donation’. In: Randhawa G, Schicktanz S (eds) Public engagement in organ donation and transplantation. Pabst Science Publishers, Lengerich, pp 18–27
Metadata
Title
Contrasting Medical Technology with Deprivation and Social Vulnerability. Lessons for the Ethical Debate on Cloning and Organ Transplantation Through the Film Never Let Me Go (2010)
Authors
Solveig Lena Hansen
Sabine Wöhlke
Publication date
25-10-2016
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
NanoEthics / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1871-4757
Electronic ISSN: 1871-4765
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-016-0275-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

NanoEthics 3/2016 Go to the issue

Premium Partner