Skip to main content
Top
Published in: OR Spectrum 1/2022

23-10-2021 | Original Article

Convexity, two-fund separation and asset ranking in a mean-LPM portfolio selection framework

Authors: Dipankar Mondal, N. Selvaraju

Published in: OR Spectrum | Issue 1/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper addresses two most important problems of mean-lower partial moment (MLPM) portfolio selection theory, the convexity of efficient frontier and the availability of target returns that permit two-fund separation (TFS). The convexity of the efficient frontier is a very crucial property as it guarantees the existence of various important results. However, in the MLPM framework, the convexity has not been analytically proved yet. In this paper, we provide an analytical proof for this convexity. On the other hand, in the MLPM framework, the separation is guaranteed for two specific targets—risk-free rate and mean return. The question of which other targets admit the separation has not been solved for the last three decades. As a result, non-separation occurs with the use of arbitrary targets and thereby several pitfalls arise in the MLPM portfolio optimization and asset ranking (Brogan and Stidham, Eur J Oper Res 184(2):701–710, 2008; Hoechner et al., Int Rev Finance 17(4):597–610, 2017). We solve this problem by showing the existence and uniqueness of a generalized family of target returns that guarantees the MLPM separation. The discovery of generalized target provides a sound theoretical foundation to use a modified version of Kappa ratio which, unlike the usual Kappa ratio, always satisfies the maximum principle and the invariance property (Pedersen and Satchell, Quant Finance 2(3):217–223, 2002; Zakamouline, Quant Finance 14(4):699–710, 2014). Finally, we conduct empirical experiments that illustrate our theoretical results and unfold some interesting facts.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
It is important to note that this paper emphasizes only on linear type separation.
 
Literature
go back to reference Bawa VS (1976) Safety-first, stochastic dominance, and optimal portfolio choice. J Financ Quant Anal 13(2):255–271CrossRef Bawa VS (1976) Safety-first, stochastic dominance, and optimal portfolio choice. J Financ Quant Anal 13(2):255–271CrossRef
go back to reference Bawa VS, Lindenberg EB (1977) Capital market equilibrium in a mean-lower partial moment framework. J Financ Econ 5(2):189–200CrossRef Bawa VS, Lindenberg EB (1977) Capital market equilibrium in a mean-lower partial moment framework. J Financ Econ 5(2):189–200CrossRef
go back to reference Brogan AJ, Stidham S (2008) Non-separation in the mean-lower-partial-moment portfolio optimization problem. Eur J Oper Res 184(2):701–710CrossRef Brogan AJ, Stidham S (2008) Non-separation in the mean-lower-partial-moment portfolio optimization problem. Eur J Oper Res 184(2):701–710CrossRef
go back to reference Chen L, He S, Zhang S (2011) Tight bounds for some risk measures, with applications to robust portfolio selection. Oper Res 59(4):847–865CrossRef Chen L, He S, Zhang S (2011) Tight bounds for some risk measures, with applications to robust portfolio selection. Oper Res 59(4):847–865CrossRef
go back to reference Fishburn PC (1977) Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns. Am Econ Rev 67(2):116–126 Fishburn PC (1977) Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns. Am Econ Rev 67(2):116–126
go back to reference Grootveld H, Hallerbach W (1999) Variance vs downside risk: Is there really that much difference? Eur J Oper Res 114(2):304–319CrossRef Grootveld H, Hallerbach W (1999) Variance vs downside risk: Is there really that much difference? Eur J Oper Res 114(2):304–319CrossRef
go back to reference Harlow WV (1991) Asset allocation in a downside-risk framework. Financ Anal J 47(5):28–40CrossRef Harlow WV (1991) Asset allocation in a downside-risk framework. Financ Anal J 47(5):28–40CrossRef
go back to reference Harlow WV, Rao RK (1989) Asset pricing in a generalized mean-lower partial moment framework: theory and evidence. J Financ Quant Anal 24(3):285–311CrossRef Harlow WV, Rao RK (1989) Asset pricing in a generalized mean-lower partial moment framework: theory and evidence. J Financ Quant Anal 24(3):285–311CrossRef
go back to reference Hoechner B, Reichling P, Schulze G (2017) Pitfalls of downside performance measures with arbitrary targets. Int Rev Financ 17(4):597–610CrossRef Hoechner B, Reichling P, Schulze G (2017) Pitfalls of downside performance measures with arbitrary targets. Int Rev Financ 17(4):597–610CrossRef
go back to reference Kaplan PD, Knowles JA (2004) Kappa: a generalized downside risk-adjusted performance measure. J Perform Meas 8:42–54 Kaplan PD, Knowles JA (2004) Kappa: a generalized downside risk-adjusted performance measure. J Perform Meas 8:42–54
go back to reference Klebaner F, Landsman Z, Makov U, Yao J (2017) Optimal portfolios with downside risk. Quant Financ 17(3):315–325CrossRef Klebaner F, Landsman Z, Makov U, Yao J (2017) Optimal portfolios with downside risk. Quant Financ 17(3):315–325CrossRef
go back to reference Lee WY, Rao RK (1988) Mean lower partial moment valuation and lognormally distributed returns. Manage Sci 34(4):446–453CrossRef Lee WY, Rao RK (1988) Mean lower partial moment valuation and lognormally distributed returns. Manage Sci 34(4):446–453CrossRef
go back to reference Ling A, Sun J, Wang M (2020) Robust multi-period portfolio selection based on downside risk with asymmetrically distributed uncertainty set. Eur J Oper Res 285(1):81–95CrossRef Ling A, Sun J, Wang M (2020) Robust multi-period portfolio selection based on downside risk with asymmetrically distributed uncertainty set. Eur J Oper Res 285(1):81–95CrossRef
go back to reference Ling A, Sun J, Yang X (2014) Robust tracking error portfolio selection with worst-case downside risk measures. J Econ Dyn Control 39:178–207CrossRef Ling A, Sun J, Yang X (2014) Robust tracking error portfolio selection with worst-case downside risk measures. J Econ Dyn Control 39:178–207CrossRef
go back to reference Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Financ 7(1):77–91 Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Financ 7(1):77–91
go back to reference Markowitz HM (1970) Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments, Cowles foundation monograph series. Yale University Press Markowitz HM (1970) Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments, Cowles foundation monograph series. Yale University Press
go back to reference Mondal D, Selvaraju N (2019) A note on a mean-lower partial moment CAPM without risk-free asset. Oper Res Lett 47(4):264–269CrossRef Mondal D, Selvaraju N (2019) A note on a mean-lower partial moment CAPM without risk-free asset. Oper Res Lett 47(4):264–269CrossRef
go back to reference Nawrocki DN (1999) A brief history of downside risk measures. J Invest 8(3):9–25CrossRef Nawrocki DN (1999) A brief history of downside risk measures. J Invest 8(3):9–25CrossRef
go back to reference Ogryczak W, Ruszczyński A (1999) From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: semideviations as risk measures. Eur J Oper Res 116(1):33–50CrossRef Ogryczak W, Ruszczyński A (1999) From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: semideviations as risk measures. Eur J Oper Res 116(1):33–50CrossRef
go back to reference Pedersen CS, Satchell SE (2002) On the foundation of performance measures under asymmetric returns. Quant Financ 2(3):217–223CrossRef Pedersen CS, Satchell SE (2002) On the foundation of performance measures under asymmetric returns. Quant Financ 2(3):217–223CrossRef
go back to reference Roman D, Mitra G (2009) Portfolio selection models: a review and new directions. Wilmott J: Int J Innov Quant Financ Res 1(2):69–85CrossRef Roman D, Mitra G (2009) Portfolio selection models: a review and new directions. Wilmott J: Int J Innov Quant Financ Res 1(2):69–85CrossRef
go back to reference Sharpe WF (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Financ 19(3):425–442 Sharpe WF (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Financ 19(3):425–442
go back to reference Sortino FA, Price LN (1994) Performance measurement in a downside risk framework. J Invest 3(3):59–64CrossRef Sortino FA, Price LN (1994) Performance measurement in a downside risk framework. J Invest 3(3):59–64CrossRef
go back to reference Tobin J (1958) Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. Rev Econ Stud 25(2):65–86CrossRef Tobin J (1958) Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. Rev Econ Stud 25(2):65–86CrossRef
go back to reference Zakamouline V (2014) Portfolio performance evaluation with loss aversion. Quant Financ 14(4):699–710CrossRef Zakamouline V (2014) Portfolio performance evaluation with loss aversion. Quant Financ 14(4):699–710CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Convexity, two-fund separation and asset ranking in a mean-LPM portfolio selection framework
Authors
Dipankar Mondal
N. Selvaraju
Publication date
23-10-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
OR Spectrum / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0171-6468
Electronic ISSN: 1436-6304
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-021-00657-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

OR Spectrum 1/2022 Go to the issue