Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Service Oriented Computing and Applications 1/2023

23-01-2023 | Original Research Paper

Core manufacturing ontology to model manufacturing operations and sequencing knowledge

Authors: S. Saha, W. D. Li, Z. Usman, N. Shah

Published in: Service Oriented Computing and Applications | Issue 1/2023

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

It is critical to capture and share product manufacturability knowledge along with manufacturing operations and their sequences to enhance the competitiveness of manufacturing enterprises. The developed approaches have proven to be expensive and time-consuming. In this paper, a new core manufacturing ontology is developed to model manufacturing operations, sequence knowledge and make it easily shareable. The ontological approach involves identification and definition of a core set of concepts with relations to develop the hierarchical structures of manufacturing models. The ontological model is then formalised through the Web Ontology Language, while formal axioms and rules are written in the Semantic Web Rule Language. The model was validated in an industrial environment via collaboration with one of the largest aero engine manufacturing companies. The generic nature of the proposed model renders that it is capable of capturing manufacturing operations and their sequences into proper categorisation. The multifaceted capability of the ontological model can greatly facilitate manufacturing engineers in decision-making for new product manufacturing planning.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Schlenoff C, Gruninger M, Tissot F, Valois J, Lubell J, Lee J (2000) ISO-18629 The Process Specification Language (PSL): Overview and Version 1.0 Specification. NISTIR 6459, National Institute of Standards and Technology, GaithersburgCrossRef Schlenoff C, Gruninger M, Tissot F, Valois J, Lubell J, Lee J (2000) ISO-18629 The Process Specification Language (PSL): Overview and Version 1.0 Specification. NISTIR 6459, National Institute of Standards and Technology, GaithersburgCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Feng SC, Song EY (2003) A manufacturing process information model for design and process planning integration. J Manuf Syst 22(1):1–15MathSciNetCrossRef Feng SC, Song EY (2003) A manufacturing process information model for design and process planning integration. J Manuf Syst 22(1):1–15MathSciNetCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Leimagnan S, Siadat A, Dantan J-Y, Semenenko A (2006) MASON: A proposal for an ontology for manufacturing domain. In: Proceedings of the IEEE workshop on distributed intelligent systems: collective intelligence and its applications (DIS‘06), IEEEXplore Leimagnan S, Siadat A, Dantan J-Y, Semenenko A (2006) MASON: A proposal for an ontology for manufacturing domain. In: Proceedings of the IEEE workshop on distributed intelligent systems: collective intelligence and its applications (DIS‘06), IEEEXplore
4.
go back to reference Semere TD, Dislshad S, Lindberg B (2007) Machining ontology and knowledge modelling. In: Swedish production symposium, Sweden Semere TD, Dislshad S, Lindberg B (2007) Machining ontology and knowledge modelling. In: Swedish production symposium, Sweden
5.
go back to reference Borgo S, Leitão P (2007) Foundations for a Core Ontology of Manufacturing. Bragança, PortugalCrossRef Borgo S, Leitão P (2007) Foundations for a Core Ontology of Manufacturing. Bragança, PortugalCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Imran M, Young B (2013) The application of common logic based formal ontologies to assembly knowledge sharing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 26:139CrossRef Imran M, Young B (2013) The application of common logic based formal ontologies to assembly knowledge sharing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 26:139CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Usman Z, Young RIM (2016) A MetaMeta Level Formal Manufacturing Ontology for Meta Level Production Methods. In Mertins K, Jardim-Gonçalves R, Popplewell K, Mendonça J (eds) Enterprise Interoperability VII. Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences. Springer Usman Z, Young RIM (2016) A MetaMeta Level Formal Manufacturing Ontology for Meta Level Production Methods. In Mertins K, Jardim-Gonçalves R, Popplewell K, Mendonça J (eds) Enterprise Interoperability VII. Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences. Springer
9.
go back to reference Usman Z (2012) A manufacturing core concepts ontology to support knowledge sharing. PhD Thesis. Loughborough University, Loughborough Usman Z (2012) A manufacturing core concepts ontology to support knowledge sharing. PhD Thesis. Loughborough University, Loughborough
11.
go back to reference Herlem G, Adragna PA, Ducellier G et al (2014) An extension of the core product model for the maturity management of the Digital Mockup: use of graph and knowledge to describe mechanical parts. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management 7(1):94–110CrossRef Herlem G, Adragna PA, Ducellier G et al (2014) An extension of the core product model for the maturity management of the Digital Mockup: use of graph and knowledge to describe mechanical parts. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management 7(1):94–110CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Benkamoun N, Elmaraghy W, Huyet AL et al (2014) Architecture Framework for Manufacturing System Design. Procedia CIRP 17:88–93CrossRef Benkamoun N, Elmaraghy W, Huyet AL et al (2014) Architecture Framework for Manufacturing System Design. Procedia CIRP 17:88–93CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yang B, Qiao L, Zhu Z, Wulan M (2016) A Metamodel for the Manufacturing Process Information Modeling. Procedia CIRP 56:332–337CrossRef Yang B, Qiao L, Zhu Z, Wulan M (2016) A Metamodel for the Manufacturing Process Information Modeling. Procedia CIRP 56:332–337CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Manupati VK, Putnik GD, Tiwari MK, Ávila P, Cruz-Cunha MM (2016) Integration of process planning and scheduling using mobile-agent based approach in a networked manufacturing environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering 94:63–73CrossRef Manupati VK, Putnik GD, Tiwari MK, Ávila P, Cruz-Cunha MM (2016) Integration of process planning and scheduling using mobile-agent based approach in a networked manufacturing environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering 94:63–73CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Palmer C, Usman Z, Junior CO, Malucelli A, Young RIM (2018) Interoperable Manufacturing Knowledge Systems. International Journal of Production Research 56(8):2733–2752CrossRef Palmer C, Usman Z, Junior CO, Malucelli A, Young RIM (2018) Interoperable Manufacturing Knowledge Systems. International Journal of Production Research 56(8):2733–2752CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Liang JS (2018) An ontology-oriented knowledge methodology for process planning in additive layer manufacturing. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 53:28–44CrossRef Liang JS (2018) An ontology-oriented knowledge methodology for process planning in additive layer manufacturing. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 53:28–44CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Saha S, Usman Z, Li WD, Jones S, Shah N (2019) Core Domain Ontology for Joining Processes to Consolidate Welding Standards. Robotics & Computer Integrated Manufacturing 59:417–430CrossRef Saha S, Usman Z, Li WD, Jones S, Shah N (2019) Core Domain Ontology for Joining Processes to Consolidate Welding Standards. Robotics & Computer Integrated Manufacturing 59:417–430CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zhu Z, Zhou X, Shao K (2019) A novel approach based on Neo4j for multi-constrained flexible job shopscheduling problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering 130(2019):671–686CrossRef Zhu Z, Zhou X, Shao K (2019) A novel approach based on Neo4j for multi-constrained flexible job shopscheduling problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering 130(2019):671–686CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Šormaz D, Sarkar A (2019) SIMPM – Upper-level ontology for manufacturing process plan network. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 55:183–198CrossRef Šormaz D, Sarkar A (2019) SIMPM – Upper-level ontology for manufacturing process plan network. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 55:183–198CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sarkar A, Šormaz D (2019) Ontology Model for Process Level Capabilities of Manufacturing Resources. Procedia Manufacturing 39:1889–1898CrossRef Sarkar A, Šormaz D (2019) Ontology Model for Process Level Capabilities of Manufacturing Resources. Procedia Manufacturing 39:1889–1898CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zhuoyu H, Jowers C, Dehghan-Manshadi A, Dargusch M (2020) Smart manufacturing and DVSM based on an Ontological approach. Computers in Industry 117:103189CrossRef Zhuoyu H, Jowers C, Dehghan-Manshadi A, Dargusch M (2020) Smart manufacturing and DVSM based on an Ontological approach. Computers in Industry 117:103189CrossRef
22.
go back to reference He Y, Hao C, Wang YB, Li Y, Wang Y, Huang L (2020) An ontology-based method of knowledge modelling for remanufacturing process planning. Journal of Cleaner Production 258:120952CrossRef He Y, Hao C, Wang YB, Li Y, Wang Y, Huang L (2020) An ontology-based method of knowledge modelling for remanufacturing process planning. Journal of Cleaner Production 258:120952CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cao J, Vakaj E, Soman R, Halla DM (2022) Ontology-based manufacturability analysis automation for industrialized construction. Automation in Construction 139:104277CrossRef Cao J, Vakaj E, Soman R, Halla DM (2022) Ontology-based manufacturability analysis automation for industrialized construction. Automation in Construction 139:104277CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Chandra C, Kamrani AK (2003) Knowledge management for consumer-focussed product design. J Intell Manuf 14(6):557–580CrossRef Chandra C, Kamrani AK (2003) Knowledge management for consumer-focussed product design. J Intell Manuf 14(6):557–580CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Saha S, Usman Z, Jones S, Li WD, Kshirsagar R (2017) Towards a formal Ontology to support interoperability across multiple product lifecyle domains. In: San Diego: the proceedings of IEEE 11th international conference on semantic compuiting Saha S, Usman Z, Jones S, Li WD, Kshirsagar R (2017) Towards a formal Ontology to support interoperability across multiple product lifecyle domains. In: San Diego: the proceedings of IEEE 11th international conference on semantic compuiting
26.
go back to reference Saha S (2020) Towards A Formal Ontology To Support Knowledge Sharing Across Product Design And Manufacturing. Coventry University Saha S (2020) Towards A Formal Ontology To Support Knowledge Sharing Across Product Design And Manufacturing. Coventry University
27.
go back to reference Elkin C, Greiner R (1993) Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project: D. B. Lenat and R. V. Guha. Artificial Intelligence 61:41–52CrossRef Elkin C, Greiner R (1993) Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project: D. B. Lenat and R. V. Guha. Artificial Intelligence 61:41–52CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Laboratory A (1994) Information Integration for Concurrent Engineering (IICE) IDEF5 Method Report. Knowledge Based Systems Inc, Ohio Laboratory A (1994) Information Integration for Concurrent Engineering (IICE) IDEF5 Method Report. Knowledge Based Systems Inc, Ohio
29.
go back to reference Uschold M, King M (1995) Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In: IJCAI95 workshop on basic ontological issues in knowledge sharing edited by Chris S. Mellish, Montreal Uschold M, King M (1995) Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In: IJCAI95 workshop on basic ontological issues in knowledge sharing edited by Chris S. Mellish, Montreal
30.
go back to reference Gruninger, M., and M. Fox. “Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies.” Montreal, Canada: IJCAI'95, Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, 1995. Gruninger, M., and M. Fox. “Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Ontologies.” Montreal, Canada: IJCAI'95, Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, 1995.
31.
go back to reference Fernández-López, M. Overview of Methodologies for Building Ontologies.” Stockholm.: IJCAI99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends, 1999. Fernández-López, M. Overview of Methodologies for Building Ontologies.” Stockholm.: IJCAI99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends, 1999.
32.
go back to reference Staab S, Studer R (2001) Knowledge Processes and Ontologies”. Intelligent Systems, IEEE 16(1):26–34CrossRef Staab S, Studer R (2001) Knowledge Processes and Ontologies”. Intelligent Systems, IEEE 16(1):26–34CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Corcho O, Fernandez-Lopez M, Gomez-Perez A (2003) Methodologies, Tools and Languages for Building Ontologies: Where is their Meeting Point. Data & Knowledge Engineering 46:41–64CrossRef Corcho O, Fernandez-Lopez M, Gomez-Perez A (2003) Methodologies, Tools and Languages for Building Ontologies: Where is their Meeting Point. Data & Knowledge Engineering 46:41–64CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Roche C (2000) Corporate ontologies and concurrent engineering. J Mater Process Technol 107:187–193CrossRef Roche C (2000) Corporate ontologies and concurrent engineering. J Mater Process Technol 107:187–193CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Blomqvist E, Öhgren A (2008) Constructing an Enterprise Ontology for an Automotive Supplier. Eng Appl Artif Intell 21(3):386–397CrossRef Blomqvist E, Öhgren A (2008) Constructing an Enterprise Ontology for an Automotive Supplier. Eng Appl Artif Intell 21(3):386–397CrossRef
36.
go back to reference McGuinness N, Noy F, Deborah L (2002) Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford University, Stanford McGuinness N, Noy F, Deborah L (2002) Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford University, Stanford
37.
go back to reference Usman Z et al (2013) Towards a formal manufacturing reference ontology. Int J Prod Res 51(22):6553–6572CrossRef Usman Z et al (2013) Towards a formal manufacturing reference ontology. Int J Prod Res 51(22):6553–6572CrossRef
39.
Metadata
Title
Core manufacturing ontology to model manufacturing operations and sequencing knowledge
Authors
S. Saha
W. D. Li
Z. Usman
N. Shah
Publication date
23-01-2023
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Service Oriented Computing and Applications / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 1863-2386
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2394
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-022-00355-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Service Oriented Computing and Applications 1/2023 Go to the issue

Premium Partner