Skip to main content
Top

2012 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Corporate Governance and Firm Cash Holdings in the U.S.

Authors : Jarrad Harford, Sattar A. Mansi, William F. Maxwell

Published in: Corporate Governance

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Using governance metrics based on antitakeover provisions and inside ownership, we find that firms with weaker corporate governance structures actually have smaller cash reserves. When distributing cash to shareholders, firms with weaker governance structures choose to repurchase instead of increasing dividends, avoiding future payout commitments. The combination of excess cash and weak shareholder rights leads to increases in capital expenditures and acquisitions. Firms with low shareholder rights and excess cash have lower profitability and valuations. However, there is only limited evidence that the presence of excess cash alters the overall relation between governance and profitability. In the U.S., weakly controlled managers choose to spend cash quickly on acquisitions and capital expenditures, rather than hoard it.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Additional evidence by La Porta et al. (2000) supports the conjecture that higher shareholder rights are associated with higher dividend payouts.
 
2
In a contemporaneous paper, John and Knyazeva (2006) make a similar argument to explain why U.S. firms with low shareholder rights pay higher dividends, a result also shown here.
 
3
For a complete description on the construction of the GIndex see Gompers et al. (2003).
 
4
For robustness, we also include two additional variables, namely, the number of business segments the firm operates in and a dividend payout ratio, and find consistent results. We do not tabulate the corresponding findings.
 
5
We exclude the year 1990 from our analysis since our insider holdings data starts in the year 1992.
 
6
To minimize survivorship bias, we allow firms to exit and reenter the data set.
 
7
We use GIndex quartiles because of sample size when looking within size quintiles.
 
8
In a prior version of the paper, we estimated all of our models correcting for serial and autocorrelation using a Newey and West (1987) procedure, which Petersen (2006) finds to be upwardly biased. While correcting for clustered errors resulted in the reduced t-statistics reported in this version of the paper, the results remain significant.
 
9
Kerkorian’s 1995 tender offer for Chrysler was explicitly to be partly financed by the $8 billion in cash reserves that Chrysler had accumulated. Because U.S. law allows the debt of an acquiring shareholder to be assigned to the acquired company, this is possible.
 
Literature
go back to reference Bebchuk, L., & Cohen, A. (2005). The costs of entrenched boards. Journal of Financial Economics, 78, 409–433.CrossRef Bebchuk, L., & Cohen, A. (2005). The costs of entrenched boards. Journal of Financial Economics, 78, 409–433.CrossRef
go back to reference Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2005). What matters in corporate governance? Harvard law school John, M. Olin center discussion paper no. 491. Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2005). What matters in corporate governance? Harvard law school John, M. Olin center discussion paper no. 491.
go back to reference Bliss, R., & Rosen, R. (2001). CEO compensation and bank mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 107–138.CrossRef Bliss, R., & Rosen, R. (2001). CEO compensation and bank mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 107–138.CrossRef
go back to reference Boone, A., Field, L., Karpoff, J., & Raheja, C. (2007). The determinants of corporate board size and independence: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 85, 65–101.CrossRef Boone, A., Field, L., Karpoff, J., & Raheja, C. (2007). The determinants of corporate board size and independence: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 85, 65–101.CrossRef
go back to reference Brav, A., Graham, J., Harvey, C., & Michaely, R. (2005). Payout policy in the 21st century. Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 483–527.CrossRef Brav, A., Graham, J., Harvey, C., & Michaely, R. (2005). Payout policy in the 21st century. Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 483–527.CrossRef
go back to reference Burkart, M., Gromb, D., & Panunzi, F. (1997). Large shareholders, monitoring, and the value of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 693–728.CrossRef Burkart, M., Gromb, D., & Panunzi, F. (1997). Large shareholders, monitoring, and the value of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 693–728.CrossRef
go back to reference Comment, J., & Schwert, G. W. (1995). Poison or placebo: Evidence on the deterrence and wealth effects of modern antitakeover measures. Journal of Financial Economics, 39, 3–43.CrossRef Comment, J., & Schwert, G. W. (1995). Poison or placebo: Evidence on the deterrence and wealth effects of modern antitakeover measures. Journal of Financial Economics, 39, 3–43.CrossRef
go back to reference Core, J., Guay, W., & Rusticus, T. (2006). Does weak governance cause weak stock returns? An examination of firm operating performance and investors’ expectations. Journal of Finance, 61, 655–687.CrossRef Core, J., Guay, W., & Rusticus, T. (2006). Does weak governance cause weak stock returns? An examination of firm operating performance and investors’ expectations. Journal of Finance, 61, 655–687.CrossRef
go back to reference Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 1155–1177.CrossRef Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 1155–1177.CrossRef
go back to reference Dittmar, A., & Mahrt-Smith, J. (2007). Corporate governance and the value of cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 83, 599–634.CrossRef Dittmar, A., & Mahrt-Smith, J. (2007). Corporate governance and the value of cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 83, 599–634.CrossRef
go back to reference Dittmar, A., Mahrt-Smith, J., & Servaes, H. (2003). International corporate governance and corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 111–133.CrossRef Dittmar, A., Mahrt-Smith, J., & Servaes, H. (2003). International corporate governance and corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 111–133.CrossRef
go back to reference Dlugosz, J., Fahlenbrach, R., Gompers, P., & Metrick, A. (2006). Large blocks of stock: Prevalence, size, and measurement. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 594–618.CrossRef Dlugosz, J., Fahlenbrach, R., Gompers, P., & Metrick, A. (2006). Large blocks of stock: Prevalence, size, and measurement. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12, 594–618.CrossRef
go back to reference Easterbrook, F. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. American Economic Review, 74, 650–659. Easterbrook, F. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. American Economic Review, 74, 650–659.
go back to reference Eberhart, A., Maxwell, W., & Siddique, A. (2004). An examination of long-term abnormal stock returns and operating performance following R&D increases. Journal of Finance, 59, 623–650.CrossRef Eberhart, A., Maxwell, W., & Siddique, A. (2004). An examination of long-term abnormal stock returns and operating performance following R&D increases. Journal of Finance, 59, 623–650.CrossRef
go back to reference Faleye, O. (2004). Cash and corporate control. Journal of Finance, 59, 2041–2060.CrossRef Faleye, O. (2004). Cash and corporate control. Journal of Finance, 59, 2041–2060.CrossRef
go back to reference Fama, E., & French, K. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 153–193.CrossRef Fama, E., & French, K. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 153–193.CrossRef
go back to reference Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 107–155.CrossRef Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 107–155.CrossRef
go back to reference Harford, J. (1999). Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 54, 1969–1997.CrossRef Harford, J. (1999). Corporate cash reserves and acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 54, 1969–1997.CrossRef
go back to reference Harford, J., & Li, K. (2007). Decoupling CEO wealth and firm performance: The case of acquiring CEOs. Journal of Finance, 62, 917–949.CrossRef Harford, J., & Li, K. (2007). Decoupling CEO wealth and firm performance: The case of acquiring CEOs. Journal of Finance, 62, 917–949.CrossRef
go back to reference Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (2006). A theory of board control and size. Review of Financial Studies, forthcoming. Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (2006). A theory of board control and size. Review of Financial Studies, forthcoming.
go back to reference Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of the free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323–329. Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of the free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323–329.
go back to reference Jensen, M. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48, 831–880.CrossRef Jensen, M. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48, 831–880.CrossRef
go back to reference Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRef Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.CrossRef
go back to reference John, K., & Knyazeva, A. (2006). Payout policy, agency conflicts, and corporate governance. Working paper, New York University. John, K., & Knyazeva, A. (2006). Payout policy, agency conflicts, and corporate governance. Working paper, New York University.
go back to reference La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 3–27.CrossRef La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 3–27.CrossRef
go back to reference Lins, K., & Kalcheva, I. (2004). International evidence on cash holdings and expected managerial agency problems. Working paper, University of Utah. Lins, K., & Kalcheva, I. (2004). International evidence on cash holdings and expected managerial agency problems. Working paper, University of Utah.
go back to reference Litov, L. (2005). Corporate governance and financing policy: New evidence. Working paper, New York University. Litov, L. (2005). Corporate governance and financing policy: New evidence. Working paper, New York University.
go back to reference Masulis, R., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2007). Corporate governance and acquirer returns. Journal of Finance, 62, 1851–1889.CrossRef Masulis, R., Wang, C., & Xie, F. (2007). Corporate governance and acquirer returns. Journal of Finance, 62, 1851–1889.CrossRef
go back to reference Mikkelson, W., & Partch, M. (2003). Do persistent large cash reserves hinder performance? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 275–294.CrossRef Mikkelson, W., & Partch, M. (2003). Do persistent large cash reserves hinder performance? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 275–294.CrossRef
go back to reference Myers, S., & Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate financing decisions when firms have investment information that investors do not. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187–221.CrossRef Myers, S., & Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate financing decisions when firms have investment information that investors do not. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187–221.CrossRef
go back to reference Newey, W., & West, K. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55, 703–708.CrossRef Newey, W., & West, K. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55, 703–708.CrossRef
go back to reference Officer, M. (2006). Dividend policy, dividend initiations, and governance. Working paper, University of Southern California. Officer, M. (2006). Dividend policy, dividend initiations, and governance. Working paper, University of Southern California.
go back to reference Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52, 3–46.CrossRef Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52, 3–46.CrossRef
go back to reference Petersen, M. (2006). Estimating standard errors in finance panel datasets: Comparing approaches. Working paper, Northwestern University and NBER. Petersen, M. (2006). Estimating standard errors in finance panel datasets: Comparing approaches. Working paper, Northwestern University and NBER.
go back to reference Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (2004). Do firms with poor protection of investor rights hold more cash? Working paper, Georgetown University. Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (2004). Do firms with poor protection of investor rights hold more cash? Working paper, Georgetown University.
go back to reference Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461–488.CrossRef Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461–488.CrossRef
go back to reference Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737–783.CrossRef Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737–783.CrossRef
go back to reference Stulz, R. (1990). Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 3–27.CrossRef Stulz, R. (1990). Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 3–27.CrossRef
go back to reference Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185–212.CrossRef Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40, 185–212.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Corporate Governance and Firm Cash Holdings in the U.S.
Authors
Jarrad Harford
Sattar A. Mansi
William F. Maxwell
Copyright Year
2012
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31579-4_5