Skip to main content
Top

2016 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Corporate Social Responsibility/Sustainability Reporting Among the Fortune Global 250: Greenwashing or Green Supply Chain?

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The sustainability reporting efforts of MNCs who are members of the Fortune Global 250 (FG250) was investigated. The focus was on sustainability reporting by MNCs of supply chain impacts. The reporting of FG250 MNCs was examined to determine if greenwashing was occurring or whether MNCs had committed to operating a green supply chain. A mixed methodology was used consisting of quantitative analysis of 25 MNC CSR/sustainability reports which were randomly selected from the FG250 listing. Qualitative analysis using content analysis was also conducted on the reports. Both methodologies concentrated on the sustainability reporting of the selected MNCs in regard to their supply chain. Findings were mixed as there were great variations among the MNCs in their level of sustainability reporting about their supply chains. Some MNCs did not report on the activities of their supply chain at all (20 %), the majority of the MNCs reported on their supply chain impacts at the value and goal level (48 %), while the rest reported at the management approach level (32 %). A majority of the sampled MNCs could be accused of greenwashing due to the lack of detailed quantitative information provided by the MNCs on the environmental impacts of their supply chain.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Beamon, B. M. (2005). Environmental and sustainability ethics in supply chain management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(2), 221–234.CrossRef Beamon, B. M. (2005). Environmental and sustainability ethics in supply chain management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(2), 221–234.CrossRef
go back to reference Bernon, M., Baker, P., Mena, C., Palmer, A., Skipworth, H., & Smart, A. (2012). Towards more sustainable supply-chain management. In D. Grayson (Ed.), Cranfield on corporate sustainability (pp. 149–166). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.CrossRef Bernon, M., Baker, P., Mena, C., Palmer, A., Skipworth, H., & Smart, A. (2012). Towards more sustainable supply-chain management. In D. Grayson (Ed.), Cranfield on corporate sustainability (pp. 149–166). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.CrossRef
go back to reference Bhatia, A. (2012). The corporate social responsibility report: The hybridization of a confused genre. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(3), 221–238.CrossRef Bhatia, A. (2012). The corporate social responsibility report: The hybridization of a confused genre. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 55(3), 221–238.CrossRef
go back to reference Blanchard, D. (2009). Green supply chain movement hits a speed bump. Industry Week/IW, 258(4), 42. Blanchard, D. (2009). Green supply chain movement hits a speed bump. Industry Week/IW, 258(4), 42.
go back to reference Blanchard, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain. Industry Week/IW, 261(5), 22–26. Blanchard, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain. Industry Week/IW, 261(5), 22–26.
go back to reference Bouten, L., Everaert, P., Van Liedekerke, L., De Moor, L., & Christiaens, J. (2011). Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture? Accounting Forum, 35(3), 187–204.CrossRef Bouten, L., Everaert, P., Van Liedekerke, L., De Moor, L., & Christiaens, J. (2011). Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture? Accounting Forum, 35(3), 187–204.CrossRef
go back to reference Breitbarth, T., Harris, P., & Insch, A. (2010). Pictures at an exhibition revisited: Reflections on a typology of images used in the construction of corporate social responsibility and sustainability in non-financial corporate reporting. Journal of Public Affairs, 10(4), 238–257.CrossRef Breitbarth, T., Harris, P., & Insch, A. (2010). Pictures at an exhibition revisited: Reflections on a typology of images used in the construction of corporate social responsibility and sustainability in non-financial corporate reporting. Journal of Public Affairs, 10(4), 238–257.CrossRef
go back to reference Chandler, D., & Werther, W. B. (2014). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders, globalization, and sustainable value creation (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Chandler, D., & Werther, W. B. (2014). Strategic corporate social responsibility: Stakeholders, globalization, and sustainable value creation (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Cho, S., Lee, C., & Park, C. K. (2012). Measuring corporate social responsibility. CPA Journal, 82(6), 54–60. Cho, S., Lee, C., & Park, C. K. (2012). Measuring corporate social responsibility. CPA Journal, 82(6), 54–60.
go back to reference Darnall, N., Jolley, G., & Handfield, R. (2008). Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: Complements for sustainability? Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 30–45.CrossRef Darnall, N., Jolley, G., & Handfield, R. (2008). Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: Complements for sustainability? Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 30–45.CrossRef
go back to reference Dragu, I., & Tudor-Tiron, A. (2013). New corporate reporting trends. Analysis on the evolution of integrated reporting. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 22(1), 1221–1228. Dragu, I., & Tudor-Tiron, A. (2013). New corporate reporting trends. Analysis on the evolution of integrated reporting. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 22(1), 1221–1228.
go back to reference Fortanier, F., & Kolk, A. (2007). On the economic dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Exploring fortune global 250 reports. Business Society, 46(4), 457–478.CrossRef Fortanier, F., & Kolk, A. (2007). On the economic dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Exploring fortune global 250 reports. Business Society, 46(4), 457–478.CrossRef
go back to reference Freundlieb, M., & Teuteberg, F. (2013). Corporate social responsibility reporting—a transnational analysis of online corporate social responsibility reports by market-listed companies: Contents and their evolution. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 1–26.CrossRef Freundlieb, M., & Teuteberg, F. (2013). Corporate social responsibility reporting—a transnational analysis of online corporate social responsibility reports by market-listed companies: Contents and their evolution. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 1–26.CrossRef
go back to reference Jones, A., & Jonas, G. A. (2011). Corporate social responsibility reporting: The growing need for input from the accounting profession. CPA Journal, 81(2), 65–71. Jones, A., & Jonas, G. A. (2011). Corporate social responsibility reporting: The growing need for input from the accounting profession. CPA Journal, 81(2), 65–71.
go back to reference Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1–15.CrossRef Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1–15.CrossRef
go back to reference Ladd, S. (2010). Corporate greening: Good for the soul, but is it good for the bottom line? Financial Executive, 26(2), 36–41. Ladd, S. (2010). Corporate greening: Good for the soul, but is it good for the bottom line? Financial Executive, 26(2), 36–41.
go back to reference Locke, R. M. (2013). Can global brands create just supply chains? Boston Review, 38(3), 12–29. Locke, R. M. (2013). Can global brands create just supply chains? Boston Review, 38(3), 12–29.
go back to reference Loughran, T., McDonald, B., & Yun, H. (2009). A wolf in sheep’s clothing: The use of ethics-related terms in 10-K reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 39–49.CrossRef Loughran, T., McDonald, B., & Yun, H. (2009). A wolf in sheep’s clothing: The use of ethics-related terms in 10-K reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 39–49.CrossRef
go back to reference Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
go back to reference Morhardt, J. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the Internet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(7), 436–452. Morhardt, J. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the Internet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(7), 436–452.
go back to reference Nemetz, P. N. (2013). Business and the sustainability challenge: An integrated perspective. New York: Routledge. Nemetz, P. N. (2013). Business and the sustainability challenge: An integrated perspective. New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Nikolaeva, R., & Bicho, M. (2011). The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 136–157.CrossRef Nikolaeva, R., & Bicho, M. (2011). The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 136–157.CrossRef
go back to reference Paul, K. (2008). Corporate sustainability, citizenship and social responsibility reporting. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 32, 63–78.CrossRef Paul, K. (2008). Corporate sustainability, citizenship and social responsibility reporting. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 32, 63–78.CrossRef
go back to reference Pedersen, E., Neergaard, P., Pedersen, J., & Gwozdz, W. (2013). Conformance and deviance: Company responses to institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(6), 357–373.CrossRef Pedersen, E., Neergaard, P., Pedersen, J., & Gwozdz, W. (2013). Conformance and deviance: Company responses to institutional pressures for corporate social responsibility reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(6), 357–373.CrossRef
go back to reference Preuss, L. (2005). Rhetoric and reality of corporate greening: A view from the supply chain management function. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(2), 123–139.CrossRef Preuss, L. (2005). Rhetoric and reality of corporate greening: A view from the supply chain management function. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(2), 123–139.CrossRef
go back to reference Rasche, A. (2010). The limits of corporate responsibility standards. Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(3), 280–291.CrossRef Rasche, A. (2010). The limits of corporate responsibility standards. Business Ethics: A European Review, 19(3), 280–291.CrossRef
go back to reference Reider-Gordon, M. (2013). Understanding foreign states’ mandatory corporate social responsibility reporting. Litigation, 39(1), 61–63. Reider-Gordon, M. (2013). Understanding foreign states’ mandatory corporate social responsibility reporting. Litigation, 39(1), 61–63.
go back to reference Samy, M., Odemilin, G., & Bampton, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: A strategy for sustainable business success: An analysis of 20 selected British companies. Corporate Governance, 10(2), 203–217.CrossRef Samy, M., Odemilin, G., & Bampton, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: A strategy for sustainable business success: An analysis of 20 selected British companies. Corporate Governance, 10(2), 203–217.CrossRef
go back to reference Sarfaty, G. (2013). Regulating through numbers: A case study of corporate sustainability reporting. Virginia Journal of International Law, 53(3), 574–621. Sarfaty, G. (2013). Regulating through numbers: A case study of corporate sustainability reporting. Virginia Journal of International Law, 53(3), 574–621.
go back to reference Scott, A. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: Greening the supply chain. Chemical Week, 173(8), 21–24. Scott, A. (2011). Corporate social responsibility: Greening the supply chain. Chemical Week, 173(8), 21–24.
go back to reference Shacklett, M. (2011). Sustainability, greenwashing, and the road ahead for the supply chain. World Trade, 24(12), 32–35. Shacklett, M. (2011). Sustainability, greenwashing, and the road ahead for the supply chain. World Trade, 24(12), 32–35.
go back to reference Sweeney, L., & Coughlan, J. (2008). Do different industries report corporate social responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 113–124.CrossRef Sweeney, L., & Coughlan, J. (2008). Do different industries report corporate social responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 113–124.CrossRef
go back to reference Tschopp, D., Barney, D., & Murphy, P. (2012). The institutional promotion of corporate social responsibility reporting: Second tier institutions. Journal of Academic & Business Ethics, 6, 1–17.CrossRef Tschopp, D., Barney, D., & Murphy, P. (2012). The institutional promotion of corporate social responsibility reporting: Second tier institutions. Journal of Academic & Business Ethics, 6, 1–17.CrossRef
go back to reference Tschopp, D., Wells, S., & Barney, D. (2011). The institutional promotion of corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Academic & Business Ethics, 5, 1–18. Tschopp, D., Wells, S., & Barney, D. (2011). The institutional promotion of corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Academic & Business Ethics, 5, 1–18.
go back to reference Valentine, S. V., & Savage, V. R. (2010). A strategic environmental management framework: Evaluating the profitability of being green. In L. Lin-Heng, G. Ofori, M. L. Lai Choo, V. R. Savage, & T. Yen-Ping (Eds.), Sustainability matters: Environmental management in Asia (pp. 1–32). River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.CrossRef Valentine, S. V., & Savage, V. R. (2010). A strategic environmental management framework: Evaluating the profitability of being green. In L. Lin-Heng, G. Ofori, M. L. Lai Choo, V. R. Savage, & T. Yen-Ping (Eds.), Sustainability matters: Environmental management in Asia (pp. 1–32). River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.CrossRef
go back to reference Wagner, T., Lutz, R., & Weitz, B. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77–91.CrossRef Wagner, T., Lutz, R., & Weitz, B. (2009). Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 77–91.CrossRef
go back to reference Webb, A. (2009). How green is my supply chain? Logistics & Transport Focus, 11(10), 34–37. Webb, A. (2009). How green is my supply chain? Logistics & Transport Focus, 11(10), 34–37.
Metadata
Title
Corporate Social Responsibility/Sustainability Reporting Among the Fortune Global 250: Greenwashing or Green Supply Chain?
Author
John Kennedy Lewis
Copyright Year
2016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27570-3_27