Advertisement
Published in:
12-09-2022 | Correction
Correction: Mechanical properties of sugar palm lignocellulosic fibre reinforced polymer composites: a review
Published in: Cellulose | Issue 17/2022
Log inActivate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by
Excerpt
In the original publication, the discussion and labels (in Table 6) of sugar palm fibre (SPF)-reinforced unsaturated polyester (UPE) composites were published incorrectly under the section of "SPF-reinforced thermoplastic polymer composites".
Table 6
Reports on mechanical properties of sugar palm biocomposites
|
Fibre
|
Fibre condition
|
Matrix
|
Matrix type
|
Treatments/Conditioning
|
Flexural
|
Tensile
|
Impact
|
References
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Strength (MPa)
|
Modulus (GPa)
|
Strength (MPa)
|
Modulus (GPa)
|
Strength (kJ/m2)
|
||||||
|
Sugar palm
|
10 wt% (long fibre)
|
Vinyl ester
|
Thermo-set
|
–
|
93.08
|
3328
|
15.41
|
2501
|
–
|
Ammar et al. (2019)
|
|
Epoxy
|
0.5 M of NaOH at 8 h
|
90.68
|
4672
|
41.88
|
3780
|
6.0
|
||||
|
Vinyl ester
|
–
|
48.5
|
2294.2
|
25.1
|
2588
|
4.5
|
Huzaifah et al. (2019a)
|
|||
|
200 h of soil burial
|
18.01
|
–
|
14.22
|
–
|
8.87
|
Huzaifah et al. (2019b)
|
||||
|
30 wt% (powder fibre)
|
Phenolic
|
0.5% of NaOH at 4 h
|
92.59
|
5.17
|
–
|
–
|
7.28
|
Rashid et al. (2017b)
|
||
|
30 wt% (long fibre)
|
Epoxy
|
Seawater 30 days
|
54.22
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
18.46
|
Ishak et al. (2009)
|
||
|
–
|
Unsaturated polyester
|
4% of nano-clay
|
68.12
|
3.788
|
21.91
|
3.683
|
6.919
|
Shahroze et al. (2018)
|
||
|
30 wt% (mat fibre)
|
Unsaturated polyester
|
3% of silica aerogel
|
56.6
|
3.00
|
19.7
|
3.5
|
68.3
|
Shahroze et al. (2019)
|
||
|
30 wt% (long fibre with 15 cm fibre length)
|
Unsaturated polyester
|
Seawater for 30 days
|
80.80
|
–
|
18.33
|
4.252
|
–
|
Maisara et al. (2019)
|
||
|
–
|
97.5
|
6.9
|
42.00
|
4.43
|
–
|
Nurazzi et al. (2020)
|
||||
|
30wt% (mat fibre)
|
Poly-propylene
|
Thermo-plastics
|
10wt% of sodium bicarbonate solution for 5 days
|
60
|
2.47
|
58.76
|
2.06
|
17.61
|
Mukhtar et al. (2019)
|
|
|
30wt% (powder fibre)
|
Poly-propylene
|
2 wt% of silane for 3 h
|
–
|
–
|
23.00
|
1.096
|
–
|
Zahari et al. (2015)
|
||
|
30 wt% (Short fibre)
|
PVDF
|
–
|
52.49
|
2.151
|
23.06
|
2.243
|
–
|
Alaaeddin et al. (2019)
|
||
|
30 wt% (Long fibre)
|
HIPS
|
4% of NaOH
|
–
|
–
|
32.94
|
1.354
|
–
|
|||
|
–
|
–
|
28.91
|
0.760
|
–
|
||||||
|
30 wt% (Short fibre)
|
Polyurethane
|
4% of NaOH and 70 °C microwave treatment
|
–
|
–
|
18.42
|
1.307
|
–
|
Mohammed et al. (2018)
|
||
|
30 wt% (Short fibre)
|
PVB
|
30% of seaweed
|
–
|
–
|
1.59
|
0.73
|
–
|
Syaqira et al. (2020)
|
||
|
–
(long fibre)
|
Polyurethane
|
2 wt% of silane for 3 h
|
–
|
–
|
173.44
|
10.07
|
–
|
Atiqah et al. (2018a)
|
||
|
–
(long fibre)
|
Polyurethane
|
6 wt% NaOH and 2 wt% of silane for 3 h each
|
–
|
–
|
142.09
|
7.75
|
–
|
Atiqah et al. (2018a)
|
||
|
10 wt% (Short fibre)
|
PLA
|
Bio-polymer
|
0.25% of NaOH
|
–
|
–
|
32.5
|
0.263
|
–
|
Chalid and Prabowo (2015)
|
|
|
–
|
SP starch/agar
|
30% of seaweed
|
32.5
|
3.00
|
22.0
|
3.250
|
5.5
|
Jumaidin et al. (2017a)
|
||
|
30 wt% (Short fibre)
|
Sugar palm starch
|
72 h immersed in water
|
–
|
–
|
1.75
|
–
|
9.0
|
Sahari et al. (2013)
|
||
|
0.5 wt% (Nano crystalline fibre)
|
Sugar palm starch/PLA
|
20% of SP starch loading
|
35.38
|
2.38
|
19.45
|
1.19
|
–
|
Nazrin et al. (2020)
|
||