Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8/2022

Open Access 08-08-2022 | Correction

Correction to: Environmental life cycle implications of upscaling lithium‐ion battery production

Authors: Mudit Chordia, Anders Nordelöf, Linda Ager‐Wick Ellingsen

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 8/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
download
DOWNLOAD
print
PRINT
insite
SEARCH
loading …
Notes
The original article can be found online at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11367-021-01976-0.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

1 Correction: Int J Life Cycle Assess (2021) 26:2024–2039 https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11367-021-01976-0

An error was found in the Giga-3.7 model underlying the published research article. The error pertains to the units specifying the amount of Heating and Cooling required in the “Factory construction and operation unit process” presented in the Table S2-10 of the supporting information (SI) document linked to the research article, presented as Table A below. In this table, and in the original Giga-3.7 model, the units for Heating and Cooling values were defined as GJ, while they should have been reported and modeled as TJ. This has now been corrected, and as a result of this change, the overall contribution to potential global warming impacts from the giga-factory model increase from 104 to 109 kg CO2-eq./kWh in the reference scenario. Specifically, for this scenario and these heating and cooling inputs, their contributions to global warming impacts increase from 12 to 17 kg CO2-eq./kWh. The increase in the low-carbon scenario is very small and hence at giga-scale production remain as reported for the given number of value figures, i.e., 50 kg CO2-eq./kWh.
Updated results for all impact categories, originally reported in Table S6-2 of the SI, are also reported in Table B presented below. This table represents the underlying data for the Fig. 3 (Global warming impacts), Fig. 4 (Terrestrial acidification impacts), and Fig. 5 (Human carcinogenic toxicity impacts) in the main article. In none of the figures the change in the results has a perceivable change in the graphs; hence, they are not reproduced here.
Lastly, Table C below points to the changes in the “Factory construction & operation and WWT” row in Tables S6-3 to S6-20 presented in the SI. Most importantly, these corrections do not affect any of the conclusions drawn from the study or the main outcome of the research.
Following specific changes in the main article text are applicable.
  • Section 3.3.2 (Global warming impacts): the text in the first paragraph should now state: “The Small-3.7 model coupled to the reference scenario and exclusively primary metals results in 188 kg CO2-eq./kWh of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, which reduce to 109 kg CO2-eq./kWh for the Giga-3.7 model.”
  • Section 3.3.2 (Global warming impacts): the text in the second paragraph should now state: “The giga-factory also requires heat and cooling, which adds about 17 kg CO2-eq./kWh emissions for the reference scenario. The total impact from electricity, heat and cooling usage in Giga-3.7 model, assuming the low-carbon scenario, is about 5 kg CO2-eq./kWh.”
Table A: Changes in Table S2-10 of the SI. Note the change in units for heating and cooling compared to the original reported table.
Process input
Normalized to unit process
Unit
Precious metal refinery
7.50E-02
Metal refinery
Electronic factory
7.01E-03
Electronics factory
Energy input
Normalized to unit process
Unit
Electricity
2.41E+01
GWh
Heating
4.83E+01
TJ
Cooling
5.97E+01
TJ
Product
Normalized to unit process
Unit
Operating battery factory
1
1-year of factory operation
Table B: Changes in Table S6-2 of the SI: Note that the changes from the original table occur only in the columns referring to burdens from heating and cooling, i.e., “Sweden, district heating and cooling” and “Additional burden from South Korea, district heating and cooling”.
Impact indicator
Recycled content
Sweden, electricity
Sweden, district heating and cooling
Additional burden from South Korea, electricity
Additional burden from South Korea, district heating and cooling
Additional burden from primary materials
Fine particulate matter formation, kg PM2.5 eq.
1.61E-01
2.91E-03
4.40E-03
5.62E-02
4.35E-03
7.50E-03
Fossil resource scarcity, kg oil eq.
1.42E+01
3.85E-01
3.28E-01
1.16E+01
5.58E+00
4.92E-01
Freshwater ecotoxicity, kg 1,4-DCB eq.
2.14E+01
4.43E-01
4.88E-01
9.86E-01
2.60E-02
3.13E+00
Freshwater eutrophication, kg P eq.
3.72E-02
9.01E-04
8.03E-04
3.41E-02
9.62E-04
4.52E-03
Global warming, kg CO2 eq.
4.29E+01
2.60E+00
2.63E+00
4.43E+01
1.46E+01
2.25E+00
Human carcinogenic toxicity, kg 1,4-DCB eq.
1.16E+01
5.12E-01
4.28E-01
2.24E+00
2.27E-01
-2.88E+00
Human non-carcinogenic toxicity, kg 1,4-DCB eq.
3.46E+02
5.58E+00
7.04E+00
4.32E+01
-1.19E-01
3.93E+01
Ionizing radiation, kBq Co-60 eq.
8.10E+00
1.99E+01
1.29E+00
-6.50E+00
-1.01E+00
3.26E-02
Land use, m2a crop eq.
4.43E-01
8.16E-01
2.12E+00
-3.79E-01
-2.09E+00
-5.61E-02
Marine ecotoxicity, kg 1,4-DCB eq.
2.73E+01
5.49E-01
6.16E-01
1.37E+00
4.90E-02
3.88E+00
Marine eutrophication, kg N eq.
7.49E-03
4.04E-04
1.08E-04
2.04E-03
4.10E-05
3.87E-05
Mineral resource scarcity, kg Cu eq.
9.76E+00
3.06E-02
2.81E-02
5.40E-03
2.60E-03
2.28E-01
Ozone formation, Human health, kg NOx eq.
1.37E-01
6.50E-03
1.11E-02
1.07E-01
4.03E-03
1.02E-02
Ozone formation, Terrestrial ecosystems, kg NOx eq.
1.42E-01
6.62E-03
1.14E-02
1.08E-01
4.37E-03
1.05E-02
Stratospheric ozone depletion, kg CFC11 eq.
3.33E-05
5.68E-06
3.58E-06
8.35E-06
1.56E-06
1.05E-06
Terrestrial acidification, kg SO2 eq.
4.29E-01
6.69E-03
9.88E-03
9.12E-02
7.98E-03
1.55E-02
Terrestrial ecotoxicity, kg 1,4-DCB eq.
1.20E+03
1.10E+01
1.48E+01
1.65E+01
-7.60E+00
1.29E+01
Water consumption, m3
5.16E+00
3.94E-01
1.15E-01
-1.49E-01
-2.50E-02
1.76E-02
Table C: Changes in the Factory construction & operation and waste water treatment unit process. The only unit process affected by the corrections reported is the “Factory construction & operation and waste water treatment” unit process. The following table points to the changes in the “Factory construction & operation and WWT” row in Tables S6-3 to S6-20 presented in the SI.
 
Corrected data
Reported data
 
South Korean mix
Swedish mix
South Korean mix
Swedish mix
Global warming, kg CO2 eq.
1.51E+01
2.70E+00
9.68E+00
1.80E+00
Human carcinogenic toxicity, kg 1,4-DCB eq.
1.43E+00
9.70E-01
1.24E+00
8.43E-01
Terrestrial acidification, kg SO2 eq.
2.90E-02
1.05E-02
2.34E-02
7.17E-03
Fine particulate matter formation, kg PM2.5 eq.
1.59E-02
4.79E-03
1.33E-02
3.31E-03
Fossil resource scarcity, kg oil eq.
4.30E+00
4.63E-01
2.42E+00
3.55E-01
Freshwater ecotoxicity, kg 1,4-DCB eq.
1.14E+00
9.65E-01
9.98E-01
8.23E-01
Freshwater eutrophication, kg P eq.
7.86E-03
1.54E-03
7.37E-03
1.30E-03
Human non-carcinogenic toxicity, kg 1,4-DCB eq.
2.02E+01
1.27E+01
1.82E+01
1.05E+01
Ionizing radiation, kBq Co-60 eq.
2.51E+00
3.99E+00
2.43E+00
3.59E+00
Land use, m2a crop eq.
2.16E-01
1.03E+00
2.08E-01
2.78E-01
Marine ecotoxicity, kg 1,4-DCB eq.
1.46E+00
1.21E+00
1.28E+00
1.03E+00
Marine eutrophication, kg N eq.
5.39E-04
1.66E-04
4.96E-04
1.33E-04
Mineral resource scarcity, kg Cu eq.
7.09E-02
6.93E-02
6.22E-02
6.12E-02
Ozone formation, Human health, kg NOx eq.
2.98E-02
9.71E-03
2.49E-02
5.85E-03
Ozone formation, Terrestrial ecosystems, kg NOx eq.
3.03E-02
9.93E-03
2.52E-02
6.00E-03
Stratospheric ozone depletion, kg CFC11 eq.
4.61E-06
2.72E-06
2.96E-06
1.47E-06
Terrestrial ecotoxicity, kg 1,4-DCB eq.
1.85E+01
1.84E+01
1.65E+01
1.36E+01
Water consumption, m3
8.35E-02
1.19E-01
5.78E-02
8.43E-02
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Metadata
Title
Correction to: Environmental life cycle implications of upscaling lithium‐ion battery production
Authors
Mudit Chordia
Anders Nordelöf
Linda Ager‐Wick Ellingsen
Publication date
08-08-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 8/2022
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02076-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2022

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8/2022 Go to the issue