Skip to main content
Top
Published in:
Cover of the book

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

1. Criteria for Evaluating the Organizational Legitimacy: A Typology for Legitimacy Jungle

Authors : Emilio Díez-de-Castro, Marta Peris-Ortiz, Francisco Díez-Martín

Published in: Organizational Legitimacy

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The legitimacy of organizations is a conceptual and scientific approach developed theoretically from different disciplines. For the measurement and analysis of legitimacy, researchers have developed typologies, coinciding in many aspects, but with significant differences in others. The diversity of typologies has its origin in the scientific theories not only on which framework the researchers who create them move but also in the object and method of analysis. This has led to the emergence of a profusion of terms used to evaluate the legitimacy of organizations. This gives rise to a jungle of terminology that makes it difficult for researchers to work, especially when empirical research is done. The present work establishes a typology of legitimacy, by taking into account the contributions of different authors, who contribute to define different aspects of the legitimacy of organizations. At the same time, we divide some concepts to achieve a greater clarity and definition of them, a relevant issue when trying to measure and evaluate. In this way, we create a somewhat broader typology than we usually find, defining eight types of legitimacy rather than the three or four types that we generally find in the literature.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2001). Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 72–83. Ahlstrom, D., & Bruton, G. D. (2001). Learning from successful local private firms in China: Establishing legitimacy. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 72–83.
go back to reference Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. (2002). The structuration of legitimate performance measures and management: Day-to-day contests of accountability in a U.K. restaurant chain. Management Accounting Research, 13(2), 151–171.CrossRef Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. (2002). The structuration of legitimate performance measures and management: Day-to-day contests of accountability in a U.K. restaurant chain. Management Accounting Research, 13(2), 151–171.CrossRef
go back to reference Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.CrossRef Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645–670.CrossRef
go back to reference Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.CrossRef Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194.CrossRef
go back to reference Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., Clark, M. A., & Fugate, M. (2007). Normalizing dirty work: Managerial tactics for countering occupational taint. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 149–174.CrossRef Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., Clark, M. A., & Fugate, M. (2007). Normalizing dirty work: Managerial tactics for countering occupational taint. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 149–174.CrossRef
go back to reference Auld, G., & Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2010). Transparency in nonstate certification: Consequences for accountability and legitimacy. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 97–119.CrossRef Auld, G., & Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2010). Transparency in nonstate certification: Consequences for accountability and legitimacy. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 97–119.CrossRef
go back to reference Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.
go back to reference Bartlett, A., & Preston, D. (2000). Can ethical behaviour really exist in business? Techniques, 23(2), 199–209. Bartlett, A., & Preston, D. (2000). Can ethical behaviour really exist in business? Techniques, 23(2), 199–209.
go back to reference Baum, J. A. C., & Oliver, C. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 187–218.CrossRef Baum, J. A. C., & Oliver, C. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 187–218.CrossRef
go back to reference Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The identity crisis within the is discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 183–194.CrossRef Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The identity crisis within the is discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 183–194.CrossRef
go back to reference Berger, P. L., Berger, B., & Kellner, H. (1973). The homeless mind: Modernization and consciousness. New York: Random House. Berger, P. L., Berger, B., & Kellner, H. (1973). The homeless mind: Modernization and consciousness. New York: Random House.
go back to reference Bitektine, A. (2008). Legitimacy-based entry deterrence in inter-population competition. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(1), 73–93.CrossRef Bitektine, A. (2008). Legitimacy-based entry deterrence in inter-population competition. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(1), 73–93.CrossRef
go back to reference Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.CrossRef Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.CrossRef
go back to reference Blanco-González, A., Prado-Román, C., & Díez-Martín, F. (2017). Building a European legitimacy index. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(5), 509–525.CrossRef Blanco-González, A., Prado-Román, C., & Díez-Martín, F. (2017). Building a European legitimacy index. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(5), 509–525.CrossRef
go back to reference Blanco-González, A., Cruz-Suárez, A., & Díez-Martín, F. (2015). The EFQM model as an instrument to legitimise organisations. In M. Peris-Ortiz, J. Álvarez-García, & C. Rueda-Armengot (Eds.), Achieving competitive advantage through quality management (pp. 155–169). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRef Blanco-González, A., Cruz-Suárez, A., & Díez-Martín, F. (2015). The EFQM model as an instrument to legitimise organisations. In M. Peris-Ortiz, J. Álvarez-García, & C. Rueda-Armengot (Eds.), Achieving competitive advantage through quality management (pp. 155–169). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRef
go back to reference Bruton, G. D., & Alhstrom, D. (2003). An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 233–259.CrossRef Bruton, G. D., & Alhstrom, D. (2003). An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry: Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 233–259.CrossRef
go back to reference Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.CrossRef Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.CrossRef
go back to reference Cashore, B. (2002). Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 15(4), 503–529.CrossRef Cashore, B. (2002). Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 15(4), 503–529.CrossRef
go back to reference Certo, S. T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 432–446.CrossRef Certo, S. T. (2003). Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 432–446.CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, J. C., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2008). Corporate charitable contributions: A corporate social performance or legitimacy strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 131–144.CrossRef Chen, J. C., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2008). Corporate charitable contributions: A corporate social performance or legitimacy strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 131–144.CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, S., & Bouvain, P. (2008). Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(S1), 299–317.CrossRef Chen, S., & Bouvain, P. (2008). Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(S1), 299–317.CrossRef
go back to reference Clarke, J., & Gibson-Sweet, M. (1999). The use of corporate social disclosures in the management of reputation and legitimacy: A cross sectoral analysis of UK top 100 companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(1), 5–13.CrossRef Clarke, J., & Gibson-Sweet, M. (1999). The use of corporate social disclosures in the management of reputation and legitimacy: A cross sectoral analysis of UK top 100 companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(1), 5–13.CrossRef
go back to reference Clegg, S. (2010). The state, power, and agency: Missing in action in institutional theory? Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 4–13.CrossRef Clegg, S. (2010). The state, power, and agency: Missing in action in institutional theory? Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 4–13.CrossRef
go back to reference Cruz-Suárez, A., Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2014). Análisis de las relaciones entre la legitimidad organizativa, sus fuentes y dimensiones. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 19(65), 9–22. Cruz-Suárez, A., Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2014). Análisis de las relaciones entre la legitimidad organizativa, sus fuentes y dimensiones. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 19(65), 9–22.
go back to reference Cruz-Suárez, A., Prado-Román, C., & Díez-Martín, F. (2014). Por qué se institucionalizan las organizaciones. Revista Europea de Dirección Y Economía de La Empresa, 23(1), 22–30.CrossRef Cruz-Suárez, A., Prado-Román, C., & Díez-Martín, F. (2014). Por qué se institucionalizan las organizaciones. Revista Europea de Dirección Y Economía de La Empresa, 23(1), 22–30.CrossRef
go back to reference Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. The behavioral theory of the firm (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. The behavioral theory of the firm (Vol. 1). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
go back to reference Czarniawska, B. (2008). How to misuse institutions and get away with it: Some reflections on institutional theory(ies). In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 769–782). London: SAGE Publications.CrossRef Czarniawska, B. (2008). How to misuse institutions and get away with it: Some reflections on institutional theory(ies). In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 769–782). London: SAGE Publications.CrossRef
go back to reference Davis, H. J., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Davis, Schoorman, and Donaldson reply: The distinctiveness of agency theory and stewardship theory. Academy of Management Review, 22(3), 611. Davis, H. J., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Davis, Schoorman, and Donaldson reply: The distinctiveness of agency theory and stewardship theory. Academy of Management Review, 22(3), 611.
go back to reference Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039.CrossRef Deephouse, D. L. (1996). Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 1024–1039.CrossRef
go back to reference Deephouse, D. L., Bundy, J., Tost, L. P., Suchman, M. C. (2017). Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, & R. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism(pp. 28–54). London: SAGE Publications Deephouse, D. L., Bundy, J., Tost, L. P., Suchman, M. C. (2017). Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, & R. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism(pp. 28–54). London: SAGE Publications
go back to reference Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329–360.CrossRef Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329–360.CrossRef
go back to reference Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). London: Sage Publications.CrossRef Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). London: Sage Publications.CrossRef
go back to reference Díez-de-Castro, E. P., Díez-Martín, F., & Vázquez-Sánchez, A. (2015). Antecedentes de la institucionalización de las organizaciones. Cuadernos de gestión, 15(1), 15–38.CrossRef Díez-de-Castro, E. P., Díez-Martín, F., & Vázquez-Sánchez, A. (2015). Antecedentes de la institucionalización de las organizaciones. Cuadernos de gestión, 15(1), 15–38.CrossRef
go back to reference Díez-Martín, F., Blanco González, A., & Prado Román, C. (2010). Legitimidad como factor clave del éxito organizativo. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección Y Economía de La Empresa, 16(3), 127–143.CrossRef Díez-Martín, F., Blanco González, A., & Prado Román, C. (2010). Legitimidad como factor clave del éxito organizativo. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección Y Economía de La Empresa, 16(3), 127–143.CrossRef
go back to reference Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2016). Explaining nation-wide differences in entrepreneurial activity: A legitimacy perspective. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(4), 1079–1102.CrossRef Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2016). Explaining nation-wide differences in entrepreneurial activity: A legitimacy perspective. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(4), 1079–1102.CrossRef
go back to reference Díez-Martín, F., Prado-Roman, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2013). Beyond legitimacy: Legitimacy types and organizational success. Management Decision, 51(10), 1954–1969.CrossRef Díez-Martín, F., Prado-Roman, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2013). Beyond legitimacy: Legitimacy types and organizational success. Management Decision, 51(10), 1954–1969.CrossRef
go back to reference DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRef DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRef
go back to reference Dover, G., & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). A gap year for institutional theory: Integrating the study of institutional work and participatory action research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(4), 305–316.CrossRef Dover, G., & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). A gap year for institutional theory: Integrating the study of institutional work and participatory action research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(4), 305–316.CrossRef
go back to reference Foreman, P., & Whetten, D. A. (2002). Members’ identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 618–635.CrossRef Foreman, P., & Whetten, D. A. (2002). Members’ identification with multiple-identity organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 618–635.CrossRef
go back to reference Galbraith, J. K. (1984). La anatomía del poder. Barcelona, Spain: Plaza & Janés. Galbraith, J. K. (1984). La anatomía del poder. Barcelona, Spain: Plaza & Janés.
go back to reference Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.CrossRef Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929–964.CrossRef
go back to reference Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1993). Organizational ecology. London: Harvard University Press. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1993). Organizational ecology. London: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Homburg, C., Hahn, A., Bornemann, T., & Sandner, P. (2014). The role of chief marketing officers for venture capital funding: Endowing new ventures with marketing legitimacy. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(5), 625–644.CrossRef Homburg, C., Hahn, A., Bornemann, T., & Sandner, P. (2014). The role of chief marketing officers for venture capital funding: Endowing new ventures with marketing legitimacy. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(5), 625–644.CrossRef
go back to reference Huy, Q. N. (1999). Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 325–345.CrossRef Huy, Q. N. (1999). Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 325–345.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnson, C., Ford, R., & Kaufman, J. (2000). Emotional reactions to conflict: Do dependence and legitimacy matter? Social Forces, 79(1), 107–137.CrossRef Johnson, C., Ford, R., & Kaufman, J. (2000). Emotional reactions to conflict: Do dependence and legitimacy matter? Social Forces, 79(1), 107–137.CrossRef
go back to reference Kanungo, R. N. (2009). Ethical values of transactional and transformational leaders. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration, 18(4), 257–265.CrossRef Kanungo, R. N. (2009). Ethical values of transactional and transformational leaders. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de l’Administration, 18(4), 257–265.CrossRef
go back to reference Katsikas, E., Manes Rossi, F., & Orelli, R. L. (2016). Accounting change: Integrated reporting through the lenses of institutional theory (pp. 25–63). Basel: Springer International Publishing. Katsikas, E., Manes Rossi, F., & Orelli, R. L. (2016). Accounting change: Integrated reporting through the lenses of institutional theory (pp. 25–63). Basel: Springer International Publishing.
go back to reference Koontz, H. (1961). The management theory jungle. The Journal of the Academy of Management, 4(3), 174–188. Koontz, H. (1961). The management theory jungle. The Journal of the Academy of Management, 4(3), 174–188.
go back to reference Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215–233.
go back to reference Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.CrossRef Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.CrossRef
go back to reference Kuilman, J. G., & Li, J. (2009). Grades of membership and legitimacy spillovers: Foreign banks in Shanghai, 1847–1935. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 229–245.CrossRef Kuilman, J. G., & Li, J. (2009). Grades of membership and legitimacy spillovers: Foreign banks in Shanghai, 1847–1935. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 229–245.CrossRef
go back to reference Kumar, R., & Das, T. K. (2007). Interpartner legitimacy in the alliance development process. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1425–1453. Kumar, R., & Das, T. K. (2007). Interpartner legitimacy in the alliance development process. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1425–1453.
go back to reference Long, B. S., & Driscoll, C. (2007). Codes of ethics and the pursuit of organizational legitimacy: Theoretical and empirical contributions. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 173–189.CrossRef Long, B. S., & Driscoll, C. (2007). Codes of ethics and the pursuit of organizational legitimacy: Theoretical and empirical contributions. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 173–189.CrossRef
go back to reference Mathews, M. R. (1995). Social and environmental accounting: A practical demonstration of ethical concern? Journal of Business Ethics, 14(8), 663–671.CrossRef Mathews, M. R. (1995). Social and environmental accounting: A practical demonstration of ethical concern? Journal of Business Ethics, 14(8), 663–671.CrossRef
go back to reference Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.CrossRef
go back to reference Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1983). The structure of educational organizations. In J.W. Meyer & R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 71–97). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1983). The structure of educational organizations. In J.W. Meyer & R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality (pp. 71–97). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
go back to reference O’Dwyer, B., Owen, D., & Unerman, J. (2011). Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: The case of assurance on sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(1), 31–52.CrossRef O’Dwyer, B., Owen, D., & Unerman, J. (2011). Seeking legitimacy for new assurance forms: The case of assurance on sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(1), 31–52.CrossRef
go back to reference Ortiz, M., & BehmMorawitz, E. (2015). Latinos’ perceptions of intergroup relations in the United States: The cultivation of GroupBased attitudes and beliefs from English and Spanish language television. Journal of Social Issues, 71(1), 90–105.CrossRef Ortiz, M., & BehmMorawitz, E. (2015). Latinos’ perceptions of intergroup relations in the United States: The cultivation of GroupBased attitudes and beliefs from English and Spanish language television. Journal of Social Issues, 71(1), 90–105.CrossRef
go back to reference Ossewaarde, R., Nijhof, A., & Heyse, L. (2008). Dynamics of NGO legitimacy: How organising betrays core missions of INGOs. Public Administration and Development, 28, 42–53.CrossRef Ossewaarde, R., Nijhof, A., & Heyse, L. (2008). Dynamics of NGO legitimacy: How organising betrays core missions of INGOs. Public Administration and Development, 28, 42–53.CrossRef
go back to reference Pandya, A., & Dholakia, N. (1992). An institutional theory of exchange in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 26(12), 19–41.CrossRef Pandya, A., & Dholakia, N. (1992). An institutional theory of exchange in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 26(12), 19–41.CrossRef
go back to reference Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
go back to reference Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 471–475.CrossRef Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 471–475.CrossRef
go back to reference Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
go back to reference Pollock, T., & Rindova, V. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631–642. Pollock, T., & Rindova, V. (2003). Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 631–642.
go back to reference Rao, H. (2004). Institutional activism in the early American automobile industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 359–384.CrossRef Rao, H. (2004). Institutional activism in the early American automobile industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 359–384.CrossRef
go back to reference Rao, H., Greve, H. R., & Davis, G. F. (2001). Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by wall street analysts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 502–526.CrossRef Rao, H., Greve, H. R., & Davis, G. F. (2001). Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by wall street analysts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 502–526.CrossRef
go back to reference Rao, R. S., Chandy, R. K., & Prabhu, J. C. (2008). The fruits of legitimacy: Why some new ventures gain more from innovation than others. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 58–75.CrossRef Rao, R. S., Chandy, R. K., & Prabhu, J. C. (2008). The fruits of legitimacy: Why some new ventures gain more from innovation than others. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 58–75.CrossRef
go back to reference Ruef, M., & Scott, W. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877–904.CrossRef Ruef, M., & Scott, W. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 877–904.CrossRef
go back to reference Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
go back to reference Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations. Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations. Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Simcic Brønn, P., & Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2009). Corporate motives for social initiative: Legitimacy, sustainability, or the bottom line? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(S1), 91–109.CrossRef Simcic Brønn, P., & Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2009). Corporate motives for social initiative: Legitimacy, sustainability, or the bottom line? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(S1), 91–109.CrossRef
go back to reference Singh, J. V. J., Tucker, D. J. D., & House, R. R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171–193.CrossRef Singh, J. V. J., Tucker, D. J. D., & House, R. R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171–193.CrossRef
go back to reference Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Lytle, B. L. (2009). Limits on legitimacy: Moral and religious convictions as constraints on deference to authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 567–578.CrossRef Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Lytle, B. L. (2009). Limits on legitimacy: Moral and religious convictions as constraints on deference to authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 567–578.CrossRef
go back to reference Spalding, A. D., & Lawrie, G. R. (2017). A critical examination of the AICPA’s new “Conceptual Framework” ethics protocol. Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, 1–18. Spalding, A. D., & Lawrie, G. R. (2017). A critical examination of the AICPA’s new “Conceptual Framework” ethics protocol. Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, 1–18.
go back to reference Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A., & Martinuzzi, A. (2005). Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: A theoretical exploration of business–society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(3), 263–281.CrossRef Steurer, R., Langer, M. E., Konrad, A., & Martinuzzi, A. (2005). Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: A theoretical exploration of business–society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(3), 263–281.CrossRef
go back to reference Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571.CrossRef Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571.CrossRef
go back to reference Suddaby, R. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 14–20.CrossRef Suddaby, R. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 14–20.CrossRef
go back to reference Thomas, T. E. (2005). Are business students buying it? A theoretical framework for measuring attitudes toward the legitimacy of environmental sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(3), 186–197.CrossRef Thomas, T. E. (2005). Are business students buying it? A theoretical framework for measuring attitudes toward the legitimacy of environmental sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(3), 186–197.CrossRef
go back to reference Tost, L. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710. Tost, L. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710.
go back to reference Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., Kreiner, G. E., & Bishop, D. G. (2014). Legitimating the legitimate: A grounded theory study of legitimacy work among ethics and compliance officers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 186–205.CrossRef Treviño, L. K., den Nieuwenboer, N. A., Kreiner, G. E., & Bishop, D. G. (2014). Legitimating the legitimate: A grounded theory study of legitimacy work among ethics and compliance officers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 123(2), 186–205.CrossRef
go back to reference Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(4), 323–345.CrossRef Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(4), 323–345.CrossRef
go back to reference Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 375–400.CrossRef Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 375–400.CrossRef
go back to reference Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191.CrossRef Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Vergne, J.-P. (2011). Toward a new measure of organizational legitimacy: Method, validation, and illustration. Organizational Research Methods, 14(3), 484–502.CrossRef Vergne, J.-P. (2011). Toward a new measure of organizational legitimacy: Method, validation, and illustration. Organizational Research Methods, 14(3), 484–502.CrossRef
go back to reference Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414.CrossRef Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Criteria for Evaluating the Organizational Legitimacy: A Typology for Legitimacy Jungle
Authors
Emilio Díez-de-Castro
Marta Peris-Ortiz
Francisco Díez-Martín
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75990-6_1