Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Actuarial Journal 1/2023

26-04-2022 | Original Research Paper

Cross-subsidizing effects between existing and new policyholders in traditional life insurance

Authors: Jonas Eckert, Stefan Graf, Alexander Kling, Jochen Ruß

Published in: European Actuarial Journal | Issue 1/2023

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

For many life insurance companies, traditional life insurance with surplus participation is still a major portion of their business. As a consequence of the low interest rate environment, financial guarantees of new contracts have been decreased. Hence, new business reduces the average guaranteed rate of interest for the whole block of business. At the same time, however, new policyholders benefit from higher yields of assets in the existing asset portfolio built up with previous policyholders’ contributions. Therefore, it is not obvious whether new policyholders benefit from or subsidize the existing portfolio. In this paper, we use the collective bonus introduced in Eckert et al. (Eur Actuar J, 2020) to measure the interaction between new policyholders and the existing insurance portfolio. Considering the situation in Germany as an example, we measure and explain cross-subsidizing effects resulting from different cohorts of policyholders being linked to the same asset portfolio. In particular, we show under which circumstances there is a benefit for or subsidization from new business.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Simplified, this is an account that is collectively owned by the policyholders but not yet allocated to individual policyholders (cf. Section 3 in Alexandrova et al. [2]).
 
2
For technical reasons, we assume that \(\left({P}_{t}-{X}_{t}\right)\), i.e. the difference between premium payments and cash flows to the shareholders, is first invested in a one-year zero coupon bond before it becomes part of the “regular” asset allocation after one year.
 
3
We call the ratio between the market value and the book value of the assets “asset valuation reserve” (AVR).
 
4
Following Burkhart et al. [9] we assume that the guaranteed interest rate also applies to the bonus reserve in subsequent years.
 
6
The application of a “reserve corridor” is in the spirit of the much more stylized model in Kling et al. [21]. The reserve ratio is determined by the \(fRfB\) and the sum of actuarial and bonus reserve.
 
7
European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority: https://​www.​eiopa.​europa.​eu/​tools-and-data/​risk-free-interest-rate-term-structures_​en: EIOPA_RFR_20190131_Term_Structures.xlsx, accessed on August 2019.
 
8
This deterministic scenario reflects the expected development of the capital market under the risk-neutral measure. The calculation is based on the assumption that all assets earn the forward rate implied by the initial yield curve (cf. Oechslin et al. [24] and Reuß et al. [26]).
 
9
This effect would be spread over several years in the more realistic case of an insurer that has contracts maturing every year.
 
10
Note that in the situation “only cohort 2”, the ex ante collective bonus of cohort 2 (and hence also the shareholders) is zero as a consequence of the fair pricing of cohort 2.
 
11
We also varied the guaranteed rate for cohort 1. Here, as expected, the collective bonus of cohort 1 increases in the guaranteed rate whereas the collective bonuses of both, the shareholder and cohort 2 decrease.
 
12
We have also varied the value of the \(fRfB\) at time 0 and found structurally similar results.
 
13
Cf. e.g. Albrecht and Weinmann [1] for an analysis of the effect of return smoothing mechanisms in German life insurance contracts, or Ruß and Schelling [28] for subjective (behavioral) aspects of the attractiveness of collective investments.
 
14
The net investment return for the deterministic scenario corresponds to the investment return rate defined in Sect. 2.3.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Albrecht P, Weinmann H (2015) 35 Jahre Kapitalanlagenperformance der deutschen Lebensversicherung. Zeitschrift für Versicherungswesen 17(2015):544–548 Albrecht P, Weinmann H (2015) 35 Jahre Kapitalanlagenperformance der deutschen Lebensversicherung. Zeitschrift für Versicherungswesen 17(2015):544–548
2.
go back to reference Alexandrova M, Bohnert A, Gatzert N, Ruß J (2017) Equity-linked life insurance based on traditional products: the case of select products. Eur Actuar J 7:379–404MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Alexandrova M, Bohnert A, Gatzert N, Ruß J (2017) Equity-linked life insurance based on traditional products: the case of select products. Eur Actuar J 7:379–404MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
3.
go back to reference Allianz Lebensversicherungs AG (2018) Annual report Allianz Lebensversicherungs AG (2018) Annual report
4.
go back to reference Bacinello A (2003) Fair pricing of a guarantee life insurance participating contract embedding surrender option. J Risk Insur 70(3):461–487MathSciNetCrossRef Bacinello A (2003) Fair pricing of a guarantee life insurance participating contract embedding surrender option. J Risk Insur 70(3):461–487MathSciNetCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bauer D, Kiesel R, Kling A, Ruß J (2005) Risk neutral valuation of participating life insurance contracts. Insur Math Econ 39(2):171–183MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Bauer D, Kiesel R, Kling A, Ruß J (2005) Risk neutral valuation of participating life insurance contracts. Insur Math Econ 39(2):171–183MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
7.
go back to reference Bergmann D (2011) Nested simulations in life insurance. PhD thesis, University of Ulm Bergmann D (2011) Nested simulations in life insurance. PhD thesis, University of Ulm
8.
go back to reference Brigo D, Mercurio F (2006) Interest rate models—theory and practice. Springer Finance, Berlin, pp 71–74MATH Brigo D, Mercurio F (2006) Interest rate models—theory and practice. Springer Finance, Berlin, pp 71–74MATH
9.
go back to reference Burkhart T, Reuß A, Zwiesler H-J (2017) Allowance for surplus funds under Solvency II: adequate reflection of risk sharing between policyholders and shareholders in a risk-based solvency framework? Eur Actuar J 7(1):51–88MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Burkhart T, Reuß A, Zwiesler H-J (2017) Allowance for surplus funds under Solvency II: adequate reflection of risk sharing between policyholders and shareholders in a risk-based solvency framework? Eur Actuar J 7(1):51–88MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
10.
go back to reference DAV (2019) Beispielhafte Kalibrierung und Validierung des ESG im BSM zum 31.03.2019 DAV (2019) Beispielhafte Kalibrierung und Validierung des ESG im BSM zum 31.03.2019
11.
go back to reference Døskeland TM, Nordahl HA (2008) Intergenerational effects of guaranteed pension contracts. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 33:19–46CrossRef Døskeland TM, Nordahl HA (2008) Intergenerational effects of guaranteed pension contracts. Geneva Risk Insur Rev 33:19–46CrossRef
14.
go back to reference GDV (2016) Fachkonzepte Branchensimulationsmodell, Berlin GDV (2016) Fachkonzepte Branchensimulationsmodell, Berlin
15.
go back to reference Graf S, Kling A, Ruß J (2011) Risk analysis and valuation of life insurance contracts: combining actuarial and financial approaches. Insur Mathe Econ 49(1):115–125MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Graf S, Kling A, Ruß J (2011) Risk analysis and valuation of life insurance contracts: combining actuarial and financial approaches. Insur Mathe Econ 49(1):115–125MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
16.
go back to reference Grosen J, Jørgensen PL (2000) Fair valuation of life insurance liabilities: the impact of interest rate guarantees, surrender options and bonus policies. Insur Math Econ 26(1):37–57CrossRefMATH Grosen J, Jørgensen PL (2000) Fair valuation of life insurance liabilities: the impact of interest rate guarantees, surrender options and bonus policies. Insur Math Econ 26(1):37–57CrossRefMATH
18.
go back to reference Hieber P, Korn R, Scherer M (2015) Analyzing the effect of low interest rates on the surplus participation of life insurance policies with different annual interest rate guarantees. Eur Actuar J 5(1):11–28MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Hieber P, Korn R, Scherer M (2015) Analyzing the effect of low interest rates on the surplus participation of life insurance policies with different annual interest rate guarantees. Eur Actuar J 5(1):11–28MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
19.
go back to reference Hieber P, Natolski J, Werner R (2019) Fair valuation of cliquet-style return guarantees in a heterogeneous life insurance portfolio. Scand Actuar J 6:478–507MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Hieber P, Natolski J, Werner R (2019) Fair valuation of cliquet-style return guarantees in a heterogeneous life insurance portfolio. Scand Actuar J 6:478–507MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
20.
go back to reference Hull J, White A (1990) Pricing interest-rate-derivative securities. Rev Financ Stud 3(4):573–592CrossRefMATH Hull J, White A (1990) Pricing interest-rate-derivative securities. Rev Financ Stud 3(4):573–592CrossRefMATH
21.
go back to reference Kling A, Richter A, Ruß J (2007) The interaction of guarantees, surplus distribution, and asset allocation in with profit life insurance policies. Insur Math Econ 40(1):164–178MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Kling A, Richter A, Ruß J (2007) The interaction of guarantees, surplus distribution, and asset allocation in with profit life insurance policies. Insur Math Econ 40(1):164–178MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
22.
23.
go back to reference Korn R, Wagner A (2018) Chance-risk classification of pension products: scientific concepts and challenges. Innov Insur Risk Asset Manag Chapter 15:381–398CrossRef Korn R, Wagner A (2018) Chance-risk classification of pension products: scientific concepts and challenges. Innov Insur Risk Asset Manag Chapter 15:381–398CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Oechslin J, Aubry O, Aellig M, Käppeli A, Brönnimann D, Tandonnet A, Valois G (2007) Replicating embedded options. Life Pensions 47–52 Oechslin J, Aubry O, Aellig M, Käppeli A, Brönnimann D, Tandonnet A, Valois G (2007) Replicating embedded options. Life Pensions 47–52
25.
go back to reference Orozco-Garcia C, Schmeiser H (2019) Is fair pricing possible? An analysis of participating life insurance portfolios. J Risk Insur 86(2):521–560CrossRef Orozco-Garcia C, Schmeiser H (2019) Is fair pricing possible? An analysis of participating life insurance portfolios. J Risk Insur 86(2):521–560CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Reuß A, Ruß J, Wieland J (2015) Participating life insurance contracts under risk based solvency frameworks: How to increase capital efficiency by product design. Innov Quant Risk Manag 99:185–208 Reuß A, Ruß J, Wieland J (2015) Participating life insurance contracts under risk based solvency frameworks: How to increase capital efficiency by product design. Innov Quant Risk Manag 99:185–208
27.
go back to reference Reuß A, Ruß J, Wieland J (2016) Participating life insurance products with alternative guarantees: reconciling policyholders’ and insurers’ interests. Risks 4(2):11CrossRef Reuß A, Ruß J, Wieland J (2016) Participating life insurance products with alternative guarantees: reconciling policyholders’ and insurers’ interests. Risks 4(2):11CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ruß J, Schelling S (2020) Return smoothing in life insurance from a client perspective. Working paper Ruß J, Schelling S (2020) Return smoothing in life insurance from a client perspective. Working paper
30.
go back to reference Wieland J (2017) Runoff or redesign? Alternative guarantees and new business strategies for participating life insurance. Eur Actuar J 7(1):29–50MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Wieland J (2017) Runoff or redesign? Alternative guarantees and new business strategies for participating life insurance. Eur Actuar J 7(1):29–50MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
31.
go back to reference Yi L, Sanders B, Bégin J-F (2019) Redistribution in collective pension arrangements without a sponsor guarantee: hidden versus explicit risk transactions. Working paper Yi L, Sanders B, Bégin J-F (2019) Redistribution in collective pension arrangements without a sponsor guarantee: hidden versus explicit risk transactions. Working paper
32.
go back to reference Zaglauer K, Bauer D (2008) Risk-neutral valuation of participating life insurance contracts in a stochastic interest rate environment. Insur Math Econ 43(1):29–40MathSciNetCrossRefMATH Zaglauer K, Bauer D (2008) Risk-neutral valuation of participating life insurance contracts in a stochastic interest rate environment. Insur Math Econ 43(1):29–40MathSciNetCrossRefMATH
Metadata
Title
Cross-subsidizing effects between existing and new policyholders in traditional life insurance
Authors
Jonas Eckert
Stefan Graf
Alexander Kling
Jochen Ruß
Publication date
26-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Actuarial Journal / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 2190-9733
Electronic ISSN: 2190-9741
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-022-00305-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

European Actuarial Journal 1/2023 Go to the issue