Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Production Engineering
Published in: Production Engineering 2/2023

30-08-2022 | Production Process

Data quality evaluation for smart multi-sensor process monitoring using data fusion and machine learning algorithms

Authors: Tiziana Segreto, Roberto Teti

Published in: Production Engineering | Issue 2/2023

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Condition monitoring and control of manufacturing processes are among the key issues for the development of smart factories. The employment of multiple sensor systems for manufacturing process monitoring typically involves the detection and collection of a huge volume of heterogeneous data acquired by sensors of different nature. Smart monitoring implementation requires valuable sensorial data from multiple sensors to achieve high prediction performance in the decision making phase. Data fusion techniques can be employed to combine multiple data sources in order to generate more accurate and reliable information for decision making aimed at achieving the automatic identification of machine, tool, and part failures. This paper focuses on sensorial data quality evaluation using data fusion techniques and machine learning algorithms for intelligent multiple sensor monitoring of manufacturing processes. For this purpose, a sensorial data set derived from an experimental campaign of Inconel 718 machining was subjected to different fusion techniques in order to find the best data combination for accurate classification and recognition purposes.
previous article Tool management optimisation through traceability and tool wear prediction in the aviation industry
next article Graph-based prediction of missing KPIs through optimization and random forests for KPI systems

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
1.
Qina J, Liua Y, Grosvenora R (2016) A categorical framework of manufacturing for Industry 4.0 and beyond. Procedia CIRP 52:173–178CrossRef
2.
Caiado RGG, Quelhas OLG (2020) Factories for the future: toward sustainable smart manufacturing. In: Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham.
3.
Zhong RY, Xu X, Klotz E, Newman ST (2017) Intelligent manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0: a review. Engineering 2017 3/5:616–630
4.
Kamble SS, Gunasekaran A, Gawankar SA (2018) Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: a systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Saf Environ Prot 117:408–425CrossRef
5.
Teti R, Micheletti GF (1989) Tool wear monitoring through acoustic emission. CIRP Ann 38(1):99–102CrossRef
6.
Teti R, Jemielniak K, O’Donnell G, Dornfeld D (2010) Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann 59(2):717–739CrossRef
7.
Park EL, Park J, Yang J, Cho S, Lee YH, Park HS (2014) Data based segmentation and summarization for sensor data in semiconductor manufacturing. Expert Syst Appl 41(6):2619–2629CrossRef
8.
Banks SP (1990) Signal processing, image processing and pattern recognition. Prentice Hall
9.
Szalai J, Mózes FE (2016) Intelligent digital signal processing and feature extraction methods. In: Kountchev R, Nakamatsu K (eds) New approaches in intelligent image analysis. Intelligent systems reference library, vol 108. Springer, Cham.
10.
Ren J, Shen W, Man Y, Dong L (eds) (2021) Applications of artificial intelligence in process systems engineering. Elsevier
11.
Alpaydin E (2014) Introduction to machine learning. MIT PressMATH
12.
Gao RX, Wang L, Helu M, Teti R (2020) Big data analytics for smart factories of the future. CIRP Ann 69(2):668–692CrossRef
13.
Meng T, Jing X, Yan Z, Pedrycz W (2020) A survey on machine learning for data fusion. Inform Fus 57:115–129CrossRef
14.
Dong J, Zhuang D, Huang Y, Fu J (2009) Advances in multi-sensor data fusion: algorithms and applications. Sensors 9(10):7771–7784CrossRef
15.
Tsinganos P, Skodras A (2018) On the comparison of wearable sensor data fusion to a single sensor machine learning technique in fall detection. Sensors 18(2):592CrossRef
16.
Castanedo F (2013) A review of data fusion techniques Sci World J 19
17.
Mangai UG, Samanta S, Das S, Chowdhury P (2010) A survey of decision fusion and feature fusion strategies for pattern classification. IETE Tech Rev 27(4):293–307CrossRef
18.
Duncan S, Singh S (2006) Approaches to mulitsensor data fusion in target tracking: a survey. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 18:1696–1710CrossRef
19.
Ghassemian H (2016) A review of remote sensing image fusion methods. Inf Fus 32:75–89CrossRef
20.
Ahmed M, Abdel-Aty M (2013) A data fusion framework for real-time risk assessment on freeways. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 26:203–213CrossRef
21.
Neumann T, Ebendt R, Kuhns G (2016) From finance to ITS: traffic data fusion based on Markowitz’portfolio theory. J Adv Transp 50(2):145–164CrossRef
22.
Ding Y, Wang Y, Zhou D (2018) Mortality prediction for ICU patients combining just-in-time learning and extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing 281:12–19CrossRef
23.
Liu J, Chen XX, Fang L, Li JX, Yang T, Zhan Q et al (2018) Mortality prediction based on imbalanced high-dimensional ICU big data. Comput Ind 98:218–225CrossRef
24.
Haddi Z, Mabrouk S, Bougrini M, Tahri K, Sghaier K, Barhoumi H, Bari NE, Maaref A, Jaffrezic-Renault N, Bouchikhi B (2014) E-nose and E-tongue combination for improved recognition of fruit juice samples. Food Chem 150:246–253CrossRef
25.
Li C, Heinemann P, Sherry R (2007) Neural network and Bayesian network fusion models to fuse electronic nose and surface acoustic wave sensor data for apple defect detection. Sens Actu B 125(1):301–310CrossRef
26.
Segreto T (2016) Knowledge-based system. CIRP Encyclopedia of production engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 1–5
27.
JDL (1991) Data fusion lexicon. Technical Panel For C3, F.E. White, San Diego, Calif, USA
28.
Hall DL, Llinas J (1997) An introduction to multisensor data fusion. Proc IEEE 85(1):6–23CrossRef
29.
Khaleghi B, Khamis A, Karray FO, Razavi SN (2013) Multisensor data fusion : a review of the state-of-the-art. Inform Fus 14:28–44CrossRef
30.
Blackman SS (1988) Theoretical approaches to data association and fusion, Proceedings of the SPIE, 931, Sensor Fusion, Orlando, FL, 50–5
31.
Schoes J, Castore G (1988) A distributed sensor architecture for advanced aerospace systems. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, 931, Sensor Fusion, Orlando, 74–85
32.
Luo RC, Kay MG (1988) Multisensor integration and fusion: issues and approaches. In: Proceedings of SPIE, 931, Sensor Fusion, Orlando, 42–9
33.
Hackett JK, Shah M (1990) Multisensor fusion: a perspective. IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom 2:1324–1330CrossRef
34.
Rothman PL, Denton RV (1991) Fusion or confusion: knowledge or nonsense? Proceedings of the SPIE, 1470, Data Structures and Target Classification, Orlando, 2–12
35.
Liggins ME, Hall DL, Llinas J (2017) Handbook of multisensor data fusion. 2nd ed. CRC Press
36.
Aguileta AA, Brena RF, Mayora O, Molino-Minero-Re E, Trejo LA (2019) Virtual sensors for optimal integration of human activity data. Sens (Basel) 19(9):2017CrossRef
37.
Segreto T, Teti R (2019) Machine learning for in-process end-point detection in robot-assisted polishing using multiple sensor monitoring. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103(9–12):4173–4187CrossRef
38.
Segreto T, D’Addona D, Teti R (2020) Tool wear estimation in turning of Inconel 718 based on wavelet sensor signal analysis and machine learning paradigms. Prod Eng Res Devel 14(5–6):693–705CrossRef
39.
Segreto T, Karam S, Simeone A, Teti R (2013) Residual stress assessment in Inconel 718 machining through wavelet sensor signal analysis and sensor fusion pattern recognition. Procedia CIRP 9:103–108CrossRef
40.
Prevéy P (1986) X-ray diffraction residual stress techniques. Metals Handb 10:380
41.
Gau RX, Yan R (2011) Wavelets, theory and applications for manufacturing. Springer, New York
42.
Segreto T, Caggiano A, Karam S, Teti R (2017) Vibration sensor monitoring of nickel-titanium alloy turning for machinability evaluation. Sens (Switzerl) 17(12):2885CrossRef
43.
Karam S, Teti R (2013) Wavelet transform feature extraction for pattern recognition of chip form in C steel turning. Proc CIRP 12:97–102CrossRef
44.
45.
46.
Kuncheva LI, Bezdek JC, Duin RPW (2001) Decision templates for multiple classifier fusion: an experimental comparison. Pattern Recogn 34:299–314CrossRefMATH
47.
Chistianini N, Shawe-Taylor J (2000) An introduction to support vector machines, and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge University PressCrossRef
48.
Muller KR, Mika S, Ratsch G, Tsuda K, Scholkopf B (2001) An Introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 12(2):199–222CrossRef
49.
Xu L, Krzyzak A, Suen CY (1992) Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 22:418–435CrossRef
50.
Kuncheva LI (2004) Combining pattern classifiers: methods and algorithms. Wiley.
Metadata
Title
Data quality evaluation for smart multi-sensor process monitoring using data fusion and machine learning algorithms
Authors
Tiziana Segreto
Roberto Teti
Publication date
30-08-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Production Engineering / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 0944-6524
Electronic ISSN: 1863-7353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-022-01155-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Production Engineering 2/2023 Go to the issue

Production Management

Digital-based production: introduction and fields of application

Quality

In-situ characterization of tool temperatures using in-tool integrated thermoresistive thin-film sensors

Computer Aided Engineering

Investigation of industrial die-cast Al-alloys using X-ray micro-computed tomography and machine learning approach for CT segmentation

Production Management

Tool management optimisation through traceability and tool wear prediction in the aviation industry

Processes

Study on learning efficient stroke representations in clocked sheet metal processing: theoretical and practical evaluation

Computer Assisted Approaches in Production Engineering

Creation and validation of systems for product and process configuration based on data analysis

Premium Partners

    Image Credits